Labour market conditions, labour force activity and prevalence of psychiatric disorders
- 137 Downloads
At a population level, the extent that labour market conditions influence labour force activity among people with psychiatric disorders, remains equivocal. Similarly equivocal is the hypothesised relationship between economic conditions and the reported prevalence of specific psychiatric disorders. We investigated these issues by examining the extent that labour market conditions were associated with change in labour force activity among people with anxiety disorders, affective disorders, and schizophrenia, in comparison to healthy working age adults.
Data files were provided by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) from a population survey conducted in 1998 and replicated in 2003. Multi-stage probability samples were obtained in 1998 (N 1 = 37,580) and 2003 (N 2 = 36,088). Adults with schizophrenia, depression, and anxiety disorders were compared to healthy working age adults.
Greater labour demand in 2003 was positively associated with increased labour force participation among healthy adults. The proportions actively looking for work declined among healthy adults and among those with anxiety disorders. Full-time employment significantly increased among healthy working age residents. The proportions employed part-time significantly increased in all groups except among people with schizophrenia.
These results support policies which remove disincentives and increase access to the more intensive evidence-based employment programs even when labour market conditions are improving.
Keywordspsychiatric disorders labour force employment
This study was funded by the Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, and the Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research.
- 1.Australian Bureau of Statistics (1998) Mental health and wellbeing: profile of adults, Australia 1997. Catalogue no. 4326.0. Australian GovernmentGoogle Scholar
- 2.Australian Bureau of Statistics (1998) Survey of disability, ageing and carers, Australia. Summary of findings. Catalogue no. 4430.0. Australian GovernmentGoogle Scholar
- 3.Australian Bureau of Statistics (1999) Standards for social, labour and demographic variables. Labour force variables. Catalogue no. 1200.0. Australian GovernmentGoogle Scholar
- 4.Australian Bureau of Statistics (1999) Survey of disability, ageing and carers, Australia. Technical paper. Confidentialised unit record file 1998. Australian GovernmentGoogle Scholar
- 5.Australian Bureau of Statistics (2002) National health survey: summary of results. Catalogue no. 4364.0. Australian GovernmentGoogle Scholar
- 6.Australian Bureau of Statistics (2005) Survey of disability, ageing and carers, Australia. Technical paper revised. Confidentialised unit record file 2003. Australian GovernmentGoogle Scholar
- 7.Australian Bureau of Statistics (2006) National health survey: summary of results. Catalogue no. 4364.0. Australian Government http://www.health.gov.au/internet/wcms/publishing.nsf/Content/mental-boimhc Google Scholar
- 8.Beyondblue: the national depression initiative (2007) Our history. http://www.beyondblue.org.au. Beyondblue
- 14.Department of Health and Ageing (2007) Better outcomes in mental health care. Australian GovernmentGoogle Scholar
- 27.National Centre for Classification in Health (2002) ICD-10-AM mental health manual. An integrated classification tool for community-based mental health services. Department of Health and Ageing, Australian Government, CanberraGoogle Scholar
- 28.Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2007) Country GDP Statistics. http://stats.oecd.org
- 30.SAS Institute (2003) SAS 8.02 users guide [computer software]. SAS Institute, Cary, North CarolinaGoogle Scholar
- 35.World Health Organization (1980) International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- 36.World Health Organization (1993) International classification of diseases, 10th edn. (ICD-10). World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar