Validity of the self reporting questionnaire-20 in epidemiological studies with older adults

Results from the Sao Paulo Ageing & Health Study
  • Marcia Scazufca
  • Paulo R. Menezes
  • Homero Vallada
  • Ricardo Araya
ORIGINAL PAPER

Abstract

Background

This study examined the validity of the self-reporting questionnaire (SRQ-20) in a population-based survey with older adults in Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Method

The study sample consisted of 2,008 individuals aged 65 years or more who were living in an economically disadvantaged area of the city. The geriatric mental state (GMS) was used as the gold standard for the assessment of common mental disorders (CMD).

Results

The optimal SRQ-20 threshold for case definition was 4/5 (sensitivity = 76.1%, specificity = 74.6%, area under ROC curve = 0.82). Women, older participants and those with lower income were more likely to be misclassified by the questionnaire. The inclusion of older persons with dementia or psychosis did not change the ability of the SRQ-20 to identify cases of CMD.

Discussion

The SRQ-20 may be a useful instrument to be used in large epidemiological studies in resource-poor settings for the identification of cases of depression and anxiety in later life. The performance of the SRQ-20 among older adults was similar to that observed with the adult population in Brazil.

Keywords

common mental disorders depression ageing questionnaire epidemiology 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the Wellcome Trust (grant code GR066133MA) and the CNPQ-Brazil for financial support. M. Scazufca was supported by the Wellcome Trust and CNPQ-Brazil during the development of this work. P. R. Menezes and H. P. Vallada were partly funded by CNPQ-Brazil. We thank professor Martin Prince for helping with the acquisition of funding.

References

  1. 1.
    American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and statistic manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV. Donnelley & Sons Company, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Araya R, Wynn R, Lewis G (1992) Comparison of two self administered psychiatric questionnaires (GHQ-12 and SRQ-20) in primary care in Chile. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 27:168–173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Armstrong BK, White E, Saracci R (2001) Principles of exposure measurement in epidemiology. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beekman AT, Copeland JR, Prince MJ (1999) Review of community prevalence of depression in later life. Br J Psychiatry 174:307–311PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bisoffi G, Mazzi MA, Dunn G (2000) Evaluating screening questionnaires using Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curves from two-phase (double) samples. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 9:121–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Blazer DG (2003) Depression in late life: review and commentary. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 58:249–265PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Broadhead WE, Blazer DG, George LK, Tse CK (1990) Depression, disability days, and days lost from work in a prospective epidemiologic survey. JAMA 264:2524–2528PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Blazer DG (2003) Depression in late life: review and commentary. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 58:249–265PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bruce ML (2001) Depression and disability in late life: directions for future research. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 9:102–112PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Burns A, Lawlor B, Craig S (2002) Rating scales in old age psychiatry. Br J Psychiatry 180:161–167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cohen JE (2003) Human population: the next half century. Science 302:1172–1175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Copeland JR, Dewey ME, Griffiths-Jones HM (1986) A computerized psychiatric diagnostic system and case nomenclature for elderly subjects: GMS and AGECAT. Psychol Med 16:89–99PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Goldberg D, Huxley P (1992) Common mental disorders: a biosocial model. Tavistock/Routledge, London, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Goldberg D (1972) The detection of psychiatric illness by questionnaire. Oxford University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Goldberg D (1981) Estimating the prevalence of psychiatric disorder from the results of a screening test. In: Wing JK, Bebbington P, Robins L (eds) What is a acase? The problem of definition in psychiatric community surveys. Grant McIntyre, London, pp 129–136Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hackett RJ, Sagdeo D, Creed FH (2007) The physical and social associations of common mental disorder in a tribal population in South India. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 42:712–715PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hall KS, Gao S, Emsley CL, Ogunniyi AO, Morgan O, Hendrie HC (2000) Community screening interview for dementia (CSI ‘D’); performance in five disparate study sites. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 15:521–531PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Harding TW, de Arango MV, Baltazar J, Climent CE, Ibrahim HH, Ladrido-Ignacio L, Murthy RS, Wig NN (1980) Mental disorders in primary health care: a study of their frequency and diagnosis in four developing countries. Psychol Med 10:231–241PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Husain N, Gater R, Tomenson B, Creed F (2006) Comparison of the personal health questionnaire and the self reporting questionnaire in rural Pakistan. J Pak Med Assoc 56:366–370PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jenkins R, Lewis G, Bebbington P, Brugha T, Farrell M, Gill B, Meltzer H (1997) The national psychiatric morbidity surveys of Great Britain–initial findings from the household survey. Psychol Med 27:775–789PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ludermir A (1998) Socioeconomic status, employment, migration and common mental disorders in Olinda, Northeast Brazil. University of London, pp 1–224Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ludermir AB, Lewis G (2005) Investigating the effect of demographic and socioeconomic variables on misclassification by the SRQ-20 compared with a psychiatric interview. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 40:36–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ludermir AB, Lewis G (2005) Is there a gender difference on the association between informal work and common mental disorders? Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 40:622–627PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ludermir AB, Schraiber LB, D’Oliveira AF, Franca-Junior I, Jansen HA (2008) Violence against women by their intimate partner and common mental disorders. Soc Sci Med 66:1008–1018PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Malakouti SK, Fatollahi P, Mirabzadeh A, Zandi T (2007) Reliability, validity and factor structure of the GHQ-28 used among elderly Iranians. Int Psychogeriatr 19:623–634PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mari JJ, Williams P (1986) A validity study of a psychiatric screening questionnaire (SRQ-20) in primary care in the city of Sao Paulo. Br J Psychiatry 148:23–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mari JJ, Williams P (1986) Misclassification by psychiatric screening questionnaires. J Chronic Dis 39:371–378PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Marin-Leon L, Oliveira HB, Barros MB, Dalgalarrondo P, Botega NJ (2007) Social inequality and common mental disorders. Rev Bras Psiquiatr 29:250–253PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Maziak W, Asfar T, Mzayek F, Fouad FM, Kilzieh N (2002) Socio-demographic correlates of psychiatric morbidity among low-income women in Aleppo, Syria. Soc Science Med 54:1419–1427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Montorio I, Izal M (1996) The geriatric depression scale: a review of its development and utility. Int Psychogeriatr 8:103–112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Papassotiropoulos A, Heun R (1999) Screening for depression in the elderly: a study on misclassification by screening instruments and improvement of scale performance. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 23:431–446PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Patel V, Araya R, de Lima M, Ludermir A, Todd C (1999) Women, poverty and common mental disorders in four restructuring societies. Soc Sci Med 49:1461–1471PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Perera R, Heneghan C (2006) Making sense of diagnostic tests likelihood ratios. Evid Based Med 11:130–131PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Prince M, Acosta D, Chiu H, Copeland J, Dewey M, Scazufca M, Varghese M (2004) Effects of education and culture on the validity of the geriatric mental state and its AGECAT algorithm. Br J Psychiatry 185:429–436PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Prince M, Acosta D, Chiu H, Scazufca M, Varghese M (2003) Dementia diagnosis in developing countries: a cross-cultural validation study. Lancet 361:909–917PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rothman KJ, Greenland S (1998) Modern epidemiology. Lippincott-Raven, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Scazufca M, Menezes PR, Vallada HP, Crepaldi AL, Pastor-Valero M, Coutinho LMS, Di Rienzo VD, Almeida OP (2008) High prevalence of dementia among older adults from poor socio-economic backgrounds in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Int Psychogeriatr 20:394–405PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Scazufca M, Seabra CA (2008) Sao Paulo portraits: ageing in a large metropolis. Int J Epidemiol 37:721–723PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Schaub RT, Linden M, Copeland JR (2003) A comparison of GMS-A/AGECAT, DSM-III-R for dementia and depression, including subthreshold depression (SD)—results from the Berlin Aging Study (BASE). Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 18: 109–117PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Secretaria do Governo da Prefeitura de São Paulo. Sumário de Dados do Município de São Paulo 2004. http://portal.prefeitura.sp.gov.br/secretarias/governo/sumario_dados. Accessed 10 August 2007
  41. 41.
    United Nations Department of Economic, Social Affairs (2002) World Population Ageing 1950–2050. United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ventevogel P, De Vries G, Scholte WF, Shinwari NR, Faiz H, Nassery R, van den Brink W, Olff M (2007) Properties of the Hopkins symptom checklist-25 (HSCL-25) and the self-reporting questionnaire (SRQ-20) as screening instruments used in primary care in Afghanistan. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 42:328–335PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Welsh KA, Butters N, Mohs RC, Beekly D, Edland S, Fillenbaum G, Heyman A (1994) The consortium to establish a registry for Alzheimer’s disease (CERAD). Part V. A normative study of the neuropsychological battery. Neurology 44:609–614PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    World Health Organization (1994) A user’s guide to the self-reporting questionnaire (SRQ). WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Yesavage JA, Brink TL (1993) Development and validity of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res 17:37–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Steinkopff Verlag Darmstadt 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcia Scazufca
    • 1
    • 2
  • Paulo R. Menezes
    • 2
    • 3
  • Homero Vallada
    • 1
  • Ricardo Araya
    • 2
  1. 1.Dept. of Psychiatry, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of Sao PauloSao PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Academic Unity of Psychiatry, Dept. of Community Based MedicineUniversity of BristolBristolUK
  3. 3.Dept. of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of Sao PauloSao PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations