Cross-informant agreement about bullying and victimization among eight-year-olds: whose information best predicts psychiatric caseness 10–15 years later?

  • John A. Rønning
  • Andre Sourander
  • Kirsti Kumpulainen
  • Tuula Tamminen
  • Solja Niemelä
  • Irma Moilanen
  • Hans Helenius
  • Jorma Piha
  • Fredrik Almqvist
ORIGINAL PAPER

Abstract

Objective

To examine cross-informant agreement and whose information (parents, teachers, children) about childhood bullying and victimization carry the strongest weight to late adolescent psychiatric outcome. The importance of frequency of bullying in such predictions is addressed.

Methods

Information from 2,713 boys about bullying and victimization at the age of eight was correlated with information about psychiatric disorder at 18–23.

Results

Agreement between informants was poor. Teachers reported higher levels of frequent bullying than others, whereas children reported the highest percentage of victimization. All three informant groups’ reports of “frequent bullying” predicted later psychiatric disorder. Teachers’ reports of “frequent victimization” was the strongest predictor of later psychiatric disorder. Informants’ report about “infrequent bullying” showed at most a rather low risk of adverse outcome. When the associations between bullying/victimization and psychiatric outcome were adjusted with total psychopathology score at age 8, none of the associations remained significant.

Conclusion

“Frequent bullying” behaviour of boys is a marker of present and later psychopathology. The education system and school health-care service in mid- childhood are of great importance for the early detection of bullying and prevention of later adverse outcomes. A closer integration of these systems in the context of school should be promoted.

Keywords

bullying victimization cross-informant agreement prediction psychopathology 

References

  1. 1.
    Achenbach TM, McConaughy SH, Howell CT (1987) Child/adolescent behavioural and emotional problems: implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity. Psychol Bull 101:213–232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Almqvist F, Ikäheimo K, Kumpulainen K, Tuompo-Johansson E, Linna S-L, Puura K, Moilanen I, Räsänen E, Tamminen T, Piha J (1999) Design and subjects of a Finnish epidemiological study on psychiatric disorders in childhood. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 8(Suppl IV):3–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bernstein M (1984) Dominance: the baby and the bathwater. Behav Brain Sci 4:419–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boulton MJ (1997) Teachers’ view on bullying definitions, attitudes and ability to cope. Br J Educ Psychol 67:223–233PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boulton MJ, Smith PK (1994) Bully/victim problems in middle-school children: stability, self-perceived competence, peer perceptions, and peer acceptance. Br J Dev Psychol 12:315–329Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boulton MJ, Trueman M, Flemington I (2002) Associations between secondary school pupils’ definitions of bullying, attitudes towards bullying, and tendencies to engage in bullying: age and sex differences. Educ Stud 28:353–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fox CL, Boulton MJ (2005) The social skills problems of victims of bullying: self, peer and teacher perceptions. Br J Educ Psychol 75:313–328PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Glew GM, Fan M-Y, Katon W, Rivara FP, Kernic MA (2005) Bullying, psychosocial adjustment and academic performance in elementary school. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 159:1026–1031PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goodman R (1999) The extended version of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire as a guide to child psychiatric caseness and consequent burden. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 40:791–799PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Henry DB, The Metropolitan Area Child Study Research Group (2006) Associations between peer nominations, teacher ratings, self-reports, and observations of malicious and disruptive behaviour. Assessment 13:241–252PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hodges EVE, Perry DG (1999) Personal and interpersonal antecedents and consquences of victimization by peers. J Pers Soc Psychol 76:677–685PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hofstra MB, van der Ende J, Verhulst FC (2001) Adolescents’ self-reported problems as predictors of psychopathology in adulthood: 10-year follow-up study. Br J Psychiatry 179:203–209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Houndomadi A, Pateraki L (2001) Bullying and bullies in Greek elementary schools: pupils’ attitudes and teachers’/parents’ awareness. Educ Rev 53:19–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jablonska B, Lindberg L (2007) Risk behaviours, victimization and mental distress among adolescents in different family structures. Soc Psychiatry Psychatr Epidemiol 42:656–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kim YS, Leventhal KL, Koh Y-J, Hubbard A, Boyce T (2006) School bullying and youth violence. Causes or consequences of psychpathologic behavior? Arch Gen Psychiatry 63:1035–1041PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kumpulainen K, Räsänen E (2000) Children involved in bullying at elementary school age: their psychiatric symptoms and deviance in adolescence. Child Abuse Negl 24:1567–1577PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lease AM, Musgrove KT, Axelrod JL (2002) Dimensions of social status in pre-adolescent peer groups: likeability, perceived popularity, and social dominance. Soc Dev 11:508–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Loeber R, Gree SM, Lahey BB (1990) Mental health professionals’ perception of the utility of children, mothers, and teachers as informants on childhood psychopathology. J Clin Psychol 19:136–143Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mishna F, Scarcello I, Pepler D, Wiener J (2005) Teachers’ understanding of bullying. Can J Educ 28:718–738Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Monks CP, Smith PK (2006) Definitions of bullying: age differences in understanding of the term, and the role of experience. Br J Dev Psychol 24:801–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Morita Y, Soeda H, Soeda K, Taki M (1999) Japan. In: Smith PK, Morita Y, Junger-Tas J, Olweus D, Catalano R, Slee P (eds) The nature of school bullying: a cross-national perspective. Routledge, London, pp 309–323Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Naylor P, Cowie H, Cossin F, de Bettencourt R, Lemme F (2006) Teachers’ and pupils definitions of bullying. Br J Educ Psychol 76:553–576PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Olweus D (1991) Bullying/victim problems among schoolchildren: basic facts and effects of a school-based intervention programme. In: Pepler D, Rubin K (eds) The development and treatment of childhood aggression. Erlbaumm, Hillsdale pp. 411–448Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Owens L, Shute R, Slee P (2000) Guess what I just heard!; indirect aggression among teenage girls in Australia. Agg Behav 26:67–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pellegrini AD, Bartini M, Brooks F (1999) School bullies, victims, and aggressive victims: factors relating to group affiliation and victimization in early adolescence. J Edu Psychol 91:216–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Perry DG, Williard JC, Perry LC (1990) Peers’ perceptions of the consequences that victimized children provide aggressors. Child Dev 61:1310–1325PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rodkin PC, Farmer TW, Pearl R, Van Acker R (2000) Heterogeneity of popular boys: antisocial and prosocial configurations. Dev Psychol 36:14–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rønning JA, Handgaard BH, Sourander A (2004) Self-perceived peer harassment in a community sample of Norwegian school children. Child Abuse Negl 28:1067–1079PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rutter M (1967) A children’s behaviour questionnaire for completion by teacher’s: preliminary findings. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 8:1–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rutter M, Tizard J, Whitmore K (1970) Education, health and behaviour. Longman, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Salmivalli C, Lagerspetz K, Björkqvist K, Österman K, Kaukiainen A (1995) Bullying as a group process: participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggress Behav 22:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Schwartz D, Gorman AH, Nakamoto J, Toblin RL (2005) Victimization in the peer group and children’s academic functioning. J Educ Psychol 97:425–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sentse M, Scholte R, Salmivalli C, Voeten M (2007) Person-group dissimilarity in involvement in bullying and its relation with social status. J Abnorm Child Psychol 35:1009–1019PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Smith JD, Cousins JB, Stewart R (2005) Antibullying interventions in schools: ingredients of effective programs. Can J Educ 28:739–762Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Smith PK, Cowie H, Olafsson RF, Liefooghe APD (2002) Definitions of bullying: a comparison of terms used, and age and gender differences, in a fourteen-country international comparison. Child Dev 73:1119–1133PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Smith PK, Morita Y, Junger-Tas J, Olweus D, Catalano R, Slee P (eds) (1999) The nature of school bullying: a cross-national perspective. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sourander A, Helselä L, Helenius H (1999) Parent-adolescent agreement on emotional and behavioural problems. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 34:657–663PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sourander A, Jensen P, Rønning JA, Niemela S, Helenius H, Kumpulainen K, Piha J, Tamminen T, Moilanen I, Almqvist F (2007) What is the early adult outcome of boys who bully or are bullied in childhood? The Finnish “from a boy to a man” study. Pediatrics 120:397–404PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sourander A, Jensen P, Rønning JA, Elonheimo H, Niemela S, Helenius H, Kumpulainen K, Piha J, Tamminen T, Moilanen I, Almqvist F (2007) Are childhood bullies and victims at risk of criminality in late adolescence? The Finnish “From a boy to a man” study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 161:546–552PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sourander A, Multimäki P, Nikolakaros G, Haavisto A, Ristkari T, Helenius H., Parkkola K, Piha J, Tamminen T, Moilanen I, Kumpulainen K, Almqvist F (2005) Childhood predictors of psychiatric disorders among boys: a prospective community-based follow-up study from age 8 years to early adulthood. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 44:756–767PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Unnever JD, Cornell D (2004) Middle school victims of bullying: who reports being bullied? Aggress Behav 30:373–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Van der Wal MF, de Wit CA, Hirasing RA (2003) Psychosocial health among young victims and offenders of direct and indirect bullying. Pediatrics 111:1312–1317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Verhulst FC, Dekker MC, van der Ende J (1997) Parent, teacher and self-reports as predictors of signs of disturbance in adolescents: whose information carries the most weight? Acta Psychiatr Scand 96:75–81PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    von Eye A, Spiel C (1996) Standard and nonstandard log-linear symmetry models for measuring change in categorical variables. Am Stat 50:300–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Yang S-J, Kim J-M, Kim S-W, Shin I-S, Yoon J-S (2006) Bullying and victimization in boys and girls at South Korean primary schools. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 45:69–77PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Younger AJ, Schwartzman AE, Ledingham JE (1986) Age-related differences in childrens’ perceptions of social deviance: changes in behavior or in perspective? Dev Psychol 22:531–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • John A. Rønning
    • 1
    • 2
  • Andre Sourander
    • 1
    • 3
  • Kirsti Kumpulainen
    • 4
  • Tuula Tamminen
    • 5
  • Solja Niemelä
    • 3
  • Irma Moilanen
    • 6
  • Hans Helenius
    • 7
  • Jorma Piha
    • 3
  • Fredrik Almqvist
    • 8
  1. 1.Institute of Clinical MedicineUniversity of TromsøTromsøNorway
  2. 2.University Hospital of North NorwayTromsøNorway
  3. 3.Dept. of Child PsychiatryTurku UniversityTurkuFinland
  4. 4.Dept. of Child PsychiatryKuopio UniversityKuopioFinland
  5. 5.Dept. of Child PsychiatryTampere UniversityTampereFinland
  6. 6.Dept. of Child PsychiatryOulu UniversityOuluFinland
  7. 7.Dept. of BiostatisticsTurku UniversityTurkuFinland
  8. 8.Dept. of Child PsychiatryHelsinki UniversityHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations