Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The relationship between early personality and midlife psychological well-being: evidence from a UK birth cohort study

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Individual differences in personality influence the occurrence, reporting and outcome of mental health problems across the life course, but little is known about the effects on adult psychological well-being. The aim of this study was to examine long range associations between Eysenck’s personality dimensions and psychological well-being in midlife.

Methods

The study sample comprised 1,134 women from the 1946 British birth cohort. Extraversion and neuroticism were assessed using the Maudsley Personality Inventory in adolescence (age 16 years) and early adulthood (age 26). Psychological well-being was assessed at age 52 with a 42-item version of Ryff’s Psychological Well-being Scale. Analyses were undertaken within a structural equation modelling framework that allowed for an ordinal treatment of well-being and personality items, and latent variable modelling of longitudinal data on emotional adjustment. The contribution of mental health problems in linking personality variations to later well-being was assessed using a summary measure of mental health (emotional adjustment) created from multiple time-point assessments.

Results

Women who were more socially outgoing (extravert) reported higher well-being on all dimensions. Neuroticism was associated with lower well-being on all dimensions. The effect of early neuroticism on midlife well-being was almost entirely mediated through emotional adjustment defined in terms of continuities in psychological/ psychiatric distress. The effect of extraversion was not mediated by emotional adjustment, nor attenuated after adjustment for neuroticism.

Conclusions

Individual differences in extraversion and neuroticism in early adult life influence levels of well-being reported in midlife.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abbott RA, Huppert FA, Kuh D (2006) Psychological well-being in mid adult life: findings from a UK birth cohort. Paper presented at the 3rd European Conference on positive psychology. University of Minho, Braga, Portugal, 3rd July, 2006

  2. Abbott RA, Ploubidis GB, Huppert FA, Kuh DJ, Wadsworth ME, Croudace TJ (2006) Psychometric evaluation and predictive validity of Ryff’s psychological well-being items in a UK birth cohort sample of women. Health Qual Life Outcomes 4:76

    Google Scholar 

  3. Argyle M (1999) Causes and correlates of happiness. In: Kahneman D, Diener E, Schwarz N (eds) Well-being: the foundations of hedonic psychology. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp 365–367

    Google Scholar 

  4. Argyle M, Lu L (1990) The happiness of extraverts. Pers Individ Dif 11:1011–1017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Caspi A, Moffitt TE, Newman DL, Silva PA (1996) Behavioral observations at age 3 predict adult psychiatric disorders: longitudinal evidence from a birth cohort. Arch Gen Psychiatry 53:1033–1039

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Clarke LA, Watson D, Mineka S (1994) Temperament, personality and the mood and anxiety disorders. J Abnorm Psychol 1:103–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Costa PT, McCrae RR (1980) Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being: happy and unhappy people. J Pers Soc Psychol 38:668–678

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Costa PT, McCrae RR (1992) Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI). Professional Manual Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa

    Google Scholar 

  9. DeNeve KM, Cooper H (1998) The happy personality: a meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychol Bull 124:197–230

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Diener E (1984) Subjective well-being. Psychol Bull 95:542–575

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Diener E, Larsen RJ (1993) The experience of emotional well-being. In: Lewis M, Haviland JM (eds) Handbook of emotions. Guildford, New York, pp 405–415

    Google Scholar 

  12. Diener E, Lucas RE (1999) Personality and subjective well-being. In: Kahneman D, Diener E, Schwarz N (eds) Well-being: the foundations of hedonic psychology. Sage Found, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Diener E, Suh EM, Lucas RE, Smith H (1999) Three decades of progress. Psychol Bull 125:276–302

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dolan P, Peasgood T, White M (2008) Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. J Econ Psychol 29:94–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Eysenck H (1958) A short questionnaire for the measurement of two dimensions of personality. J Appl Psychol 42:14–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fergusson DM, Horwood LJ, Lawton JM (1989) The relationships between neuroticism and depressive symptoms. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 24:275–281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gutierrez JLG, Jimenez BM, Hernandez EG, Puente CP (2005) Personality and subjective well-being: big five correlates and demographic variables. Pers Individ Dif 38:1561–1569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hayes N, Joseph S (2003) Big 5 correlates of three measures of subjective well-being. Pers Individ Dif 34:1561–1569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Helliwell J, Putnam RD (2005) The social context of well-being. In: Huppert FA, Keverne B, Bayliss N (eds) The science of well-being. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  20. Huppert FA, Keverne B, Bayliss N (eds) (2005) The science of well-being. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  21. Kendler KS, Gatz M, Gardner CO, Pedersen NL (2006) Personality and major depression: a Swedish longitudinal, population-based twin study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 63:1113–1120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kuh D, Hardy R, Rodgers B, Wadsworth MEJ (2002) Lifetime risk factors for women’s psychological distress in midlife. Soc Sci Med 55:1957–1973

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lindelow M, Hardy R, Rodgers B (1997) Development of a scale to measure symptoms of anxiety and depression in the general UK population: the psychiatric symptom frequency scale. J Epidemiol Community Health 51:549–557

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. McCrae RR, Costa PT (1991) Adding liebe und arbeit: the full five factor model of well-being. Pers Psychol Bull 17:227–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. McCrae RR, Costa PT (2003) Personality in adulthood: a five-factor theory perspective. The Guildford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  26. McDonald RP (1999) Test theory: a unified treatment. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Manwah

    Google Scholar 

  27. Muthén B (1984) A general structural equation model with dichotomized variables. Psychometrika 49:115–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Muthén L, Muthén B (1998–2004) Mplus user guide. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles

  29. Myers DG (2000) The funds, friends, and faith of happy people. Am Psychol 55(1):63–65

    Google Scholar 

  30. Neeleman J, Ormel J, Bijl RV (2001) The distribution of psychiatric and somatic ill health: associations with personality and socioeconomic status. Psychosom Med 63:239–247

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ormel J, Rosmalen J, Farmer A (2004) Neuroticism: a non-informative marker of vulnerability to psychopathology. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 39

  32. Rodgers B (1990) Behaviour and personality in childhood as predictors of adult psychiatric disorder. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 31:393–414

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Ruini C, Ottolini F, Rafanelli C, Tossani E, Ryff CD, Fava GA (2003) The relationship of psychological well-being to distress and personality. Psychother Psychosom 72:268–275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ryff CD (1989) Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol 57:1069–1081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ryff CD, Keyes CL (1995) The structure of psychological well-being revisited. J Pers Soc Psychol 69:719–727

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Ryff CD, Singer B (1998) The contours of positive human health. Psychol Inq 9:1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Schmutte PS, Ryff CD (1997) Personality and well-being: reexamining methods and meanings. J Pers Soc Psychol 73:549–559

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Skrondal A, Rabe-Hesketh S (2004) Generalized latent variable modeling: multilevel, longitudinal and structural equation models. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  39. Springer KW, Hauser RM (2006) An assessment of the construct validity of Ryff’s scales of psychological well-being: method, mode and measurement effects. Soc Sci Res 35:1079–1101

    Google Scholar 

  40. van Os J, Park SBG, Jones PB (2001) Neuroticism, life events and mental health: evidence for person-environment correlation. Br J Psychiatry 178:s72–s77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Vitterso J (2001) Personality traits and subjective well-being: emotional stability, not extraversion, is probably the important predictor. Pers Individ Dif 31(6):903–914

    Google Scholar 

  42. Vitterso J, Nilsen F (2002) The conceptual and relational structure of subjective well-being, neuroticism and extroversion: once again, neuroticism is the important predictor of happiness. Soc Indic Res 57:89–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Wadsworth ME (1991) The imprint of time: childhood, history, and adult life. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  44. Wadsworth ME, Butterworth SL, Hardy RJ, Kuh DJ, Richards M, Langenberg C, Hilder WS, Connor M (2003) The life course prospective design: an example of the benefits and problems associated with study longevity. Soc Sci Med 57:2193–2205

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Wadsworth ME, Kuh DJ, Richards M, Hardy RJ (2006) Cohort profile: the 1946 national birth cohort (MRC national survey of health and development) Int J Epidemiol 31:49–54

    Google Scholar 

  46. WHO (2001) World Health Organisation: mental health: strengthening mental health promotion. In: WHO Fact Sheet 220

  47. Wing JK, Cooper JE, Sartorius N (1974) The measurement and classification of psychiatric symptoms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Box 189, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 2QQ, UK

    Rosemary A. Abbott, Tim J. Croudace, George B. Ploubidis & Felicia A. Huppert

  2. MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing, Dept. of Epidemiology and Public Health, Royal Free & University College Medical School, London, UK

    Diana Kuh & Marcus Richards

Authors
  1. Rosemary A. Abbott
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tim J. Croudace
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. George B. Ploubidis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Diana Kuh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Marcus Richards
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Felicia A. Huppert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rosemary A. Abbott.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abbott, R.A., Croudace, T.J., Ploubidis, G.B. et al. The relationship between early personality and midlife psychological well-being: evidence from a UK birth cohort study. Soc Psychiat Epidemiol 43, 679–687 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-008-0355-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-008-0355-8

Key words

Search

Navigation