Attempted suicide and associated risk factors among youth in urban Japan
- 1.1k Downloads
Suicide is a major social and health issue in Japan. We assessed prevalence of attempted suicide and explored individual, interpersonal, behavioral, and psychological risk factors associated with attempted suicide in a general community sample of youth in a metropolitan Japanese city.
Survey of 2,095 participants age between 15 and 24 who were recruited using street-intercept techniques.
Overall, 6% of males and 11% of females reported a prior suicide attempt. For males, attempted suicide was independently associated with experience of school bullying, being homosexual or bisexual, history of drug use, experience of unwanted sex, history of a diagnosed sexually transmitted infection, and low self-esteem. For females, attempted suicide was independently associated with being younger (ages 15–19 compared to 20–24), experience of school bullying, history of drug use, and history of smoking.
Prevention intervention programs for youth in Japan are necessary to achieve national aims to reduce attempted suicides and suicide mortality.
KeywordsJapan suicide mental health youth
This research was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for AIDS Research from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan in 2001 and 2002.
- 5.Centers for Disease Control, Prevention (1992) Youth suicide prevention programs: a resource guide. Atlanta, CDCGoogle Scholar
- 15.Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (1989) Applied logistic regression. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 18.Matsumoto T, Yamaguchi A, Chiba Y, Asami T, Iseki E, Hirayasu Y (2004) Patterns of self-cutting: a preliminary study of differences in clinical implications between wrist and arm-cutting using a Japanese juvenile detention center sample. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 58:377–382PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Rosenberg M (1965) Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- 32.Yamamoto M, Matui Y, Yamanari Y (1982) [ninchi sareta jiko no syosokumen]. Jpn J Educ Psychol 30:64–68Google Scholar