No evidence for restrictive care practices in Māori admitted to a New Zealand psychiatric inpatient unit: do specialist cultural teams have a role?
- First Online:
- 146 Downloads
To ascertain the presence, and describe the pattern and extent, of restrictive care practices in the treatment of mental health inpatients in a rural New Zealand unit.
Retrospective data was anonymously extracted from patient records at Rotorua Hospital (Rotorua, New Zealand). Data sets were compiled from 300 consecutive patient admissions between January 2000 and December 2001. The demographic and diagnostic characteristics extracted were gender, age, ethnicity (Māori or non-Māori classification only), primary diagnosis, length of hospital stay, seclusion, medication on discharge, dosage of antipsychotic medication if given, referral to psychotherapy, voluntary/involuntary status on admission, and readmission rates.
After controlling for other clinical variables, ethnicity was not associated with specific diagnoses, increased use of seclusion, and involuntary status on admission or higher readmission rates. Māori patients were more likely to receive antipsychotic medication and at higher doses than non-Māori. Māori were less likely to be referred to psychotherapy services and had shorter lengths of stay.
There was no evidence of widespread restrictive care practices against Māori, although the disparities in antipsychotic prescription and psychotherapy referral suggest some restrictive care practices do exist. The use of specialist cultural teams in general mental health services may prevent restrictive care practices.
Key wordsethnic minority groups restrictive care practice transcultural psychiatry Māori
- 1.American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th edn. American Psychiatric Association, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- 3.Bodley JH (1990) Victims of progress, 3rd edn. Māyfield, Mountain ViewGoogle Scholar
- 6.Chong S, Sachdev P, Māhendran R, Chua H (2000) Neuroleptic and anticholinergic drug use in Chinese patients with schizophrenia resident in a state psychiatric hospital in Singapore. Aust NZ J Psych 34:988–991Google Scholar
- 7.Dein S, Lipsedge M (1998) Negotiating across class, culture, and religion: psychiatry in the English inner city. In: Okpaku SO (ed) Clinical methods in transcultural psychiatry. American Psychiatric Publishing, Arlington, pp 137–154Google Scholar
- 9.Durie MH (1994) Māori Psychiatric Admission: patterns and policy implications. In: Spicer J, Trlin A, Watson J (eds) Social dimensions of health and illness; New Zealand perspectives. Dunmore Press, Palmerston NorthGoogle Scholar
- 10.Gaines P, Bower A, Buckingham B, Eagar K, Burgess P, Green J (2003) Mental health classification and outcomes study: final report. Health Research Council, AucklandGoogle Scholar
- 12.Jacobson N, Greenley D (2001) What is recovery? A conceptual model and explication. Psychiatric Services 52:481–485Google Scholar
- 16.Kumar S, Oakley-Browne M. Usefulness of the construct of Social Network to explain higher mental health service utilisation by Māori population in New Zealand. Transcultural Psychiatry (in press)Google Scholar
- 23.Spector R (2001) Is there a racial bias in clinicians’ perceptions of the dangerousness of psychiatric patients? A review of the literature. J Ment Health 10:5–15Google Scholar
- 24.Statistics New Zealand (2002) A changing New Zealand. Statistics New Zealand, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
- 26.Te Puni Kokiri (1994) Nga Ia o te Oranga Hinengaro Māori. Trends in Māori Mental Health: a discussion document. Te Puni Kokiri and Mental Health Foundation, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
- 27.Te Puni Kokiri (1998) Progress towards closing the social and economic gaps between Māori and Non-Māori. A report to the minister of Māori affairs. Te Puni Kokiri, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
- 28.Tseng W (2003) Clinician’s guide to cultural psychiatry. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar