An application of item response mixture modelling to psychosis indicators in two large community samples
- 95 Downloads
Previous research has suggested that psychosis is better described as a continuum rather than a dichotomous entity. This study aimed to describe the distribution of positive psychosis-like symptoms in two large community samples using an item response mixture model.
An item response mixture model was used to explain the pattern of psychosis-like symptom endorsement. This model incorporated two elements. First, a continuous non-normal latent variable to explain the observed pattern of data. Second, a categorical latent variable to explain the variation in the continuous non-normal latent variable.
For both samples, representing broadly and narrowly defined psychosis, the best fitting model was a four-class solution. In both cases, the classes differed quantitatively rather than qualitatively.
The analysis showed that psychosis-like symptoms at the population level could be best explained by four classes that appeared to represent an underlying continuum.
Key wordspsychosis IRT latent class analysis hybrid model
- 3.Andreasen NC (1984) The Scale for Assessment of Positive Symptoms. Iowa City: University of IowaGoogle Scholar
- 11.Kessler RC (1994) The National Comorbidity Survey of the United States. Int Rev Psychiat 6:365–376Google Scholar
- 12.Krabbendam L, Myin-Germeys I, van Os J (2004) The expanding psychosis phenotype. Int J Psych Psychol Ther 4:411–420Google Scholar
- 17.Muthén L, Muthén B (1998–2006) Mplus user guide. Version 4. Los Angeles: StatmodelGoogle Scholar
- 18.Nylund KL, Asparouhov T, Muthen B (2006) Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis, growth mixture modeling. A Monte Carlo simulation study. Downloaded from http://www.statmodel.com/download/LCA_tech11_nylund_v83.pdf on 30th September 2006
- 21.Schwartz G (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat 6:461–464Google Scholar
- 27.Wittchen H-U, Kessler RC (2005) Modifications of the CIDI in the National Comorbidity Survey: the development of the UM-CIDI: NCS Working Paper #2 (1994). Available at: http://www.hcp.med.harvard.edu/ncs/ftpdir/um-cidi.pdf/, accessed July 2005