Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology

, Volume 42, Issue 10, pp 780–786 | Cite as

The association of schizophrenia with split personality is not an ubiquitous phenomenon

Results from population studies in Russia and Germany
  • Georg SchomerusEmail author
  • Denis Kenzin
  • Julia Borsche
  • Herbert Matschinger
  • Matthias C. Angermeyer


A widely prevalent stereotype connected with schizophrenia is its misperception as split personality. We examine whether the popular meaning of the term schizophrenia differs in countries of different cultural imprint by conducting an international cross-cultural comparison of public associations with the word schizophrenia in a Western and a Non-Western industrialized country. We analyze data from two representative population surveys in Novosibirsk, Russia (n = 745), and large German cities (n = 952) that used identical questions and sampling procedures. Unprompted associations with schizophrenia are compared by assigning them to a differentiated categorical system. 31.6% of respondents in Germany associated split personality with schizophrenia, compared to 2.0% in Novosibirsk. Logistic regression analysis controlling for age, gender and educational achievement demonstrated that country differences were independent of socio-demographic variables. Mention of split personality increased significantly with higher education. In Novosibirsk, associations with abnormality and unpredictability prevailed. We hypothesize on those cultural particularities in both countries that have shaped the different public understanding of the term and discuss implications for anti-stigma interventions.

Key words

schizophrenia stigma stereotype cross-cultural comparison split personality 



The project was supported by the German Research Association (Grant # AN 101/5-1).


  1. 1.
    Angermeyer MC, Matschinger H (1999) Social representations of mental illnes among the public. In: Guimón J, Fischer W, Sartorius N (eds) The image of madness. The public facing mental illness and psychiatric treatment. Karger, Basel, pp 20–28Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Angermeyer MC, Matschinger H (2003) Public beliefs about schizophrenia and depression: similarities and differences. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 38:526–534PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Balachova TN, Levy S, Isurina GL, Wasserman LI (2001) Medical psychology in Russia. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 8:61–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Becker T, Vazquez-Barquero JL (2001) The European perspective of psychiatric reform. Acta Psychiatr Scand 104:8–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften (2006) Das digitale Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache des 20. Jahrhunderts [Digital dictionary of the German language of the 20th century]. (accessed 13/01/2006)
  6. 6.
    Chung KF, Chan JH (2004) Can a less pejorative Chinese translation for schizophrenia reduce stigma? A study of adolescents’ attitudes toward people with schizophrenia. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 58:507–515PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Duckworth K, Halpern JH, Schutt RK, Gillespie C (2003) Use of schizophrenia as a metaphor in US newspapers. Psychiatr Serv 54:1402–1404PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Feuchtwanger L (1930) Erfolg [Success]. Kiepenheuer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Finzen A, Benz D, Hoffmann-Richter U (2001) Schizophrenie im “Spiegel” – oder ist der Krankheitsbegriff der Schizophrenie noch zu halten? [Schizophrenia as portrayed by the German weekly “Spiegel” – or can we still uphold the medical concept of schizophrenia as a disease?]. Psychiatr Prax 28:365–367PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gabler S, Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik JHP (1997) Stichproben in der Umfragepraxis. [Samples in survey practice]. Westdeutscher Verlag, OpladenGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grausgruber A, Katschnig H, Meise U, Schony W (2002) Einstellung der österreichischen Bevölkerung zu Schizophrenie [Attitudes of the general population towards schizophrenia in Austria]. Neuropsychiatrie 16:54–67Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hesse H (1927) Der Steppenwolf. G. Fischer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hoenig J. Schizophrenia. In: Berrios GE, Porter R (eds) A history of clinical psychiatry. New York University Press, New York, pp 336–359Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hoffmann-Richter U, Forrer F, Finzen A (2003) Schizophrenie in der Frankfurter Allgemeinen Zeitung – ein Lehrstück [Schizophrenia in the German national paper Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung – a didactic play]. Psychiatr Prax 30:4–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Holzinger A, Angermeyer MC, Matschinger H (1998) Was fällt Ihnen zum Wort Schizophrenie ein? Eine Untersuchung zur sozialen Repräsentation der Schizophrenie [What are your associations with the term schizophrenia? An inquiry concerning the social representation of schizophrenia]. Psychiatr Prax 25:9–13PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kim Y, Berrios GE (2001) Impact of the term schizophrenia on the culture of ideograph: the Japanese experience. Schizophr Bull 27:181–185PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lauber C, Ajdacic-Gross V, Fritschi N, Stulz N, Rossler W (2005) Mental health literacy in an educational elite – an online survey among university students. BMC Public Health 5:44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Link BG, Phelan JC (2001) Conceptualizing stigma. Annu Rev Sociol 27:363–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Luty J, Fekadu D, Dhandayudham A (2006) Understanding of the term “schizophrenia” by the British public. World Psychiatry 5:177–178PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    MORI (1997) Attitudes towards Schizophrenia. A survey of public opinion. Unpublished research reportGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mayring P (2003) Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken. [Qualitative content analysis. Foundations and techniques]. Weinheim, BeltzGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    McDaid D, Thornicroft G (2005) Policy brief mental health II. Balancing institutional and community based care. European observatory on health system and policies. WHO Regional Office for Europe, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Meyers Lexikon (1927) Bibliographisches Institut, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ozhegov SI, Shvedova NJU (1995) Tolkovyj slovar’ russkogo jazyka [Explanatory dictionary of Russian language]. “AEB” Ltd., MoscowGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pfeiffer W (1993) Etymologisches Wörterbuch. Akademie Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Piatnitski N, Dech H, Mundt C (1998) Schizophreniekonzepte in der sowjetischen und russischen Psychiatrie [Concepts of schizophrenia in Soviet and Russian psychiatry]. Nervenarzt 69:196–203PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Poloshij B, Saposhnikova I (2001) Psychiatric reform in Russia. Acta Psychiatr Scand 104:56–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sartorius N, Kuyken W (1994) Translation of health status instruments. In: Orley J, Kuyken W (eds) Quality of life assessment: international perspectives. Springer, Berlin, pp 2–8Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Spencer I (2000) Lessons from history: the politics of psychiatry in the USSR. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 7:355–361PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Stuart H, Arboleda-Florez J (2001) Community attitudes toward people with schizophrenia. Can J Psychiatry 46:245–252PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tucholsky K (1927) Start. Die Weltbühne 23:964Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zweig S (1943) Schachnovelle [Chess story]. Bermann-Fischer, StockholmGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Georg Schomerus
    • 1
    Email author
  • Denis Kenzin
    • 1
  • Julia Borsche
    • 1
  • Herbert Matschinger
    • 1
  • Matthias C. Angermeyer
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of PsychiatryLeipzig UniversityLeipzigGermany

Personalised recommendations