The impact of mental illness on patient satisfaction with the therapeutic relationship
- 643 Downloads
The relationship between patients and their clinicians is an essential factor in psychiatric treatment. The purpose of this study was to analyze the influence of psychopathology on patient satisfaction with the therapeutic relationship.
Data from 969 patients from 40 different treatment teams collected from eight Norwegian community mental health centres were analyzed. Patient satisfaction with the therapeutic relationship was assessed with a six-item scale: sufficient time for contact/dialogue, clinicians’ ability to listen and understand, follow-up of planned interventions, respect for patients’ views/opinions, cooperation among clinicians, and patients’ influence on treatment. Mental illness was assessed using the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS) and Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scale. Diagnoses were established using the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems—10th revision (ICD-10). Treatment outcomes were clinically assessed retrospectively by rating changes from start of treatment on seven items. Multilevel regression analysis was used for a simultaneous analysis of the contribution of patient and team variables.
Satisfaction was associated with treatment outcome, better health as assessed using HoNOS, being female, of older age and having less psychiatric team severity indicated by the teams’ mean GAF score. Patients with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder were more satisfied when treated as in- and day patients, compared with outpatient treatment. Patients in other diagnostic categories were less satisfied with day treatment.
Patients’ perceptions of the therapeutic relationship may be influenced by psychopathology. Teams comprising many patients with severe mental illness may constrain the therapeutic relationship. Hence, resources and organizational measures should be carefully considered in such care units.
Keywordstherapeutic alliance user satisfaction psychopathology community mental health services multilevel analysis
The collection of data was funded by the Research Council of Norway. The writing of the paper was funded by the Norwegian Council for Mental Health. The views expressed are those of the authors.
- 1.American Psychological Association (1994) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th edn. American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 2.Bjørngaard JH, Ruud T, Garratt A, Hatling T (2007) Patients’ experiences and clinicians’ ratings of the quality of outpatient teams in psychiatric care units in Norway (in press). Psychiatr Serv 58Google Scholar
- 14.Leyland A, Goldstein H (2001) Multilevel modelling of health statistics. John Wiley & Sons, LtdGoogle Scholar
- 18.Mueser KT, Noordsy DL, Drake RE, Fox L (2003) Integrated treatment for dual disorders—A guide to effective practice. The Guildford PressGoogle Scholar
- 28.Ruggeri M (1996) Satisfaction with psychiatric services. In: Thornicroft G, Tansella M eds Mental health outcome measures. Springer, Berlin, pp 27–51Google Scholar
- 29.Ruud T, Reas D (2003) Community mental health centres, services and patient satisfaction—state and variation 2002 (In Norwegian). SINTEF Unimed, Trondheim, NorwayGoogle Scholar
- 33.Wampold BE (2001) The great psychotherapy debate. Models, methods and findings. Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
- 35.Wing JK, Beevor AS, Curtis RH, Park SB, Hadden S, Burns A (1998) Health of the nation outcome scales (HoNOS). Research and development. Br J Psychiatr 172:11–18Google Scholar
- 36.World Health Organization (1992) International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems—10th revisionGoogle Scholar