Residential area and social contacts in schizophrenia
Social isolation is associated with poor prognosis in schizophrenia. We aim to determine the effect of rural or urban residence on frequency of social and family contacts.
We analysed data from the European Schizophrenia Cohort, a two-year follow-up study of 1,208 patients in Britain, France and Germany. Frequency of contact was elicited with Lehman’s Quality of Life Inventory. Between-effect error component regression models adjusted the effects of living environment for country, age, gender, education, schizophrenia symptoms and global functioning.
Across all living conditions, contact with family occurred more frequently than contact with others. Family visits, social visits and planned social activities were less common in urban compared to rural settings, whereas no significant differences were found for social and family telephone calls and time spent with a spouse. Patients living with a partner had more family, but fewer social contacts, while women had more contact by phone. Family and social contacts across all categories decreased with age. Employment increased social contacts, but did not affect visits or phone calls within the family. Schizophrenia symptoms, particularly negative symptoms, and impaired global functioning decreased all aspects of social and family contacts.
Contrasting with results of previous studies, we found rural living was associated with greater frequency of social contacts in patients suffering from schizophrenia. Beyond living environment, our findings stress the importance both of an adequate control of negative symptoms and of employment opportunities for schizophrenia patients in order to enhance their social networks.
Key wordssocial network schizophrenia urban–rural differences employment negative symptoms
- 1.Angermeyer MC (1989) Soziales Netzwerk und Schizophrenie: Eine Übersicht [Social network and schizophrenia: an overview]. In: Angermeyer MC, Klusmann D (eds) Soziales Netzwer. Ein neues Konzept für die Psychiatrie [Social network. A new concept for psychiatry]. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 188–206Google Scholar
- 2.Angermeyer MC, Roick C, Becker T, Kilian R (2004) Cost-effectiveness of Mental health service systems in the European comparison. In: Kirch W ed Public health in Europe. Springer, Berlin, 189–201Google Scholar
- 5.Berkman LF (1995) Role of Social-Relations in Health Promotion Psychosom Med 57:245–254Google Scholar
- 6.Brummett BH, Barefoot JC, Siegler IC, Clapp-Channing NE, Lytle BL, Bosworth HB, et al. (2001) Characteristics of socially isolated patients with coronary artery disease who are at elevated risk for mortality Psychosom Med 63:267–272Google Scholar
- 8.Cohen CI, Sokolovsky J (1978) Schizophrenia and social networks—ex-patients in inner-city Schizophr Bull 4:546–560Google Scholar
- 9.Erickson DH, Beiser M, Iacono WG, Fleming JAE, Lin TY (1989) The Role of Social Relationships in the Course of 1St-Episode Schizophrenia and Affective Psychosis. Am J Psychiatry 146:1456–1461Google Scholar
- 11.Hamilton NG, Ponzoha CA, Cutler DL, Weigel RM (1989) Social networks and negative versus positive symptoms of Schizophrenia Schizophr Bull 15:625–633Google Scholar
- 12.Kay SR, Fiszbein A, Opler LA (1987) The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (Panss) for Schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 13:261–276Google Scholar
- 13.Lehman AF (1983) The well-being of chronic mental-patients—assessing their quality of life. Arch Gen Psychiatry 40:369–373Google Scholar
- 14.Lehman AF, Kernan E, Postrado L (1996) Toolkit for evaluating quality of life for persons with severe mental illness. Human Services Research Institute, Cambridge, MassGoogle Scholar
- 17.Salokangas RKR (1997) Living situation, social network and outcome in schizophrenia: a five-year prospective follow-up study Acta Psychiatr Scand 96:459–468Google Scholar
- 20.Wing JK, Babor T, Brugha T, Burke J, Cooper JE, Giel R, et al. (1990) Scan—schedules for clinical-assessment in neuropsychiatry. Arch Gen Psychiatry 47:589–593Google Scholar