Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology

, Volume 42, Issue 7, pp 561–572

Diagnostic concordance of neurasthenia spectrum disorders in Pune, India

  • Vasudeo Paralikar
  • Sanjeev Sarmukaddam
  • Mohan Agashe
  • Mitchell G. Weiss
ORIGINAL PAPER

Abstract

Background

Clinically significant fatigue or weakness is a common but understudied clinical problem in India. The applicability and relevance of Western clinical criteria in this setting are not studied. Alternative criteria sets used in different clinical contexts suggest a range of conditions constituting neurasthenia spectrum disorders (NSDs). We therefore aimed to determine frequency of patients with these complaints in four specialty outpatient clinics of an urban general hospital. We compared the concordance of four diagnostic criteria sets of fatigue disorders among the same patients.

Methods

Patients from the clinics of Psychiatry, Medicine, Dermatology, and Ayurved were screened for clinically significant fatigue or weakness and assessed for CFS, ICD-10 neurasthenia, DSM-IV draft criteria for neurasthenia, and CCMD-2 neurasthenia.

Results

For 352 patients, sensitivity of CDC criteria for CFS (13.4%) was poorest. CFS was most frequent in the Medicine clinic. CCMD-2 criteria were the most frequently met (77.6%) with no significant difference across clinics. Two-way concordance of neurasthenia categories was no better than fair (≤0.4) and few patients (8.0%) met criteria for all four categories.

Discussion

Four NSD criteria sets identified different clinical subgroups. CFS, considering fatigue and ignoring weakness, was least relevant for identifying NSD patients in these clinics. Poor concordance among the four diagnostic systems studied indicates the need for reviewing the nosology of these disorders. Focus on clinical significance alone is likely to avoid the discordant confusion arising from cross-cultural differences.

Keywords

neurasthenia fatigue disorders culture-bound syndromes diagnostic criteria diagnostic sensitivities 

References

  1. 1.
    Afari N, Buchwald D (2003) Chronic fatigue syndrome: a review. Am J Psychiatry 160:221–236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Agashe M, Paralikar V, Weiss MG (1999) EMIC interview for study of disorders of fatigue and weakness. Maharashtra Institute of Mental Health and Swiss Tropical InstGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th edn.) (DSM-IV). APA, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bankier B, Aigner M, Bach M (2001) Clinical validity of ICD 10 neurasthenia. Psychopathology 34(3):134–139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barsky AJ, Borus JF (1999) Functional somatic syndromes. Ann Intern Med 130:910–921PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bhatia MS, Malik SC (1991) Dhat syndrome – a useful diagnostic entity in Indian culture. Br J Psychiatry 159:691–695PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chang DF, Myers HF, Yeung A, et al. (2005) Shenjing Shuairuo and the DSM IV: diagnosis, distress and disability in a Chinese primary care setting. Transcult Psychiatry 42(2):204–218PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cheung FM (1989) The indigenization of neurasthenia in Hong Kong. Cult Med Psychiatry 13(2):227–241PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chinese Association of Neurology and Psychiatry (1989) Chinese classification of mental disorders, 2nd edn. Publishing House of Hunan University, Changsha, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chopra A, Lavin P, Patwardhan B, Chitre D (2000) Randomized double blind trial of an ayurvedic plant derived formulation for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 27:1365–1372PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Derogatis LR, Lipman RS, Covi L (1973) SCL-90: an outpatient psychiatric rating scale – preliminary report. Psychopharmacol Bull 9(1):13–28PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JBW (1998) Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV Axis I disorders – patient edition (SCID-I/P, Version 2.0, 8/98 revision). Biometrics Research Department, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fleiss JL (1971) Measurement of nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychol Bull 76(5):378–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fukuda K, Straus S, Hickie I, et al. (1994) International Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Study Group. The chronic fatigue syndrome: a comprehensive approach to its definition and study. Ann Intern Med 121(12):953–959PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Holmes GP, Kaplan JE, Gantz NM (1988) Chronic fatigue syndrome: a working case definition. Ann Intern Med 108:387–389PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kirmayer LJ, Weiss M (1997) Cultural considerations for somatoform disorders. In: Widiger TA, Francis AJ, Pincus HA, Ross R, First MB, Davis W (eds) DSM-IV Sourcebook, vol 3. American Psychiatric Association, Washington DC, pp 933–941Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kleinman A (1980) Patients and their healers in the context of culture. University of California Press, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Maire B, Lioret S, Gartner A, et al. (2002) Nutritional transition and non-communicable diet-related chronic diseases in developing countries [Article in French] Sante. 12(1):45–55Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Manton KG (1988) The global impact of non-communicable diseases: estimates and projections. World Health Stat Q 41(3–4):255–266PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Paralikar V, Agashe M, Oke M, Dabholkar H, Abouihia A, Weiss MG (in press) Prevalence of clinically significant functional fatigue or weakness in specialty outpatient clinics of Pune, India. JIMAGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Patel V, Kirkwood BR, Weiss H, Pednekar S, Fernandes J, Pereira B, Upadhye M, Mabey D (2005) Chronic fatigue in developing countries: population based survey of women in India. Br Med J 330:1190, doi:10.1136/bmj.38442.636181.E0Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Prins JB, Van der Meer JWM, Bleijenberg G (2006) Chronic fatigue syndrome. Lancet 367:346–355PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ranjith G, Mohan R (2006) Dhat syndrome as a functional somatic syndrome: developing a sociosomatic model. Psychiatry 69(2):142–150PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ritsher JB (2005) Cultural factors and the international space station. Aviat Space Environ Med 76(6-II):B135–144PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Skapinakis P, Lewis G, Mavreas V (2003) Cross-cultural differences in the epidemiology of unexplained fatigue syndromes in primary care. Br J Psychiatry 182:205–209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Smith RC, Gardiner JC, Lyles JS, et al. (2005) Exploration of DSM IV criteria in primary care patients with medically unexplained symptoms. Psychosom Med 67(1):123–129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sumathipala A, Siribaddana SH, Bhugra D (2004) Culture-bound syndromes: the story of dhat syndrome. Br J Psychiatry 184:200–209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Weiss M (2001) Cultural epidemiology: an introduction and overview. Anthropol Med 8(1):5–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wessely S, Hotopf M, Sharpe M (1998) Epidemiology of fatigue. In: Chronic fatigue and its syndromes, Chapter 2. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 19Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wessely S, White P (2004) There is only one functional somatic syndrome. Br J Psychiatry 185:95–96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Williams JBW (1988) The Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Anxiety and Depression Rating Scales (SIGH-AD). New York State Psychiatric Institute, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    World Health Organization (1992a) The Tenth Revision of the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-10). WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Young D (1989) Neurasthenia and related problems. Cult Med Psychiatry 13(2):131–138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhang MY (1989) The diagnosis and phenomenology of neurasthenia. A Shanghai study. Cult Med Psychiatry 13(2):147–161PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vasudeo Paralikar
    • 1
  • Sanjeev Sarmukaddam
    • 1
  • Mohan Agashe
    • 1
  • Mitchell G. Weiss
    • 2
  1. 1.Maharashtra Institute of Mental HealthPuneIndia
  2. 2.Swiss Tropical InstituteBaselSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations