The prevalence of postpartum depression
- 2.9k Downloads
Little is known about the prevalence of clinically significant postpartum depression in women of varying social status. The purpose of the present study was to examine the prevalence of postpartum depression as a function of three indices of social status: income, education and occupational prestige.
A sample of 4,332 postpartum women completed a demographic interview and the Inventory to Diagnose Depression, a self-report scale developed to identify a major depressive episode in accordance with DSM diagnostic criteria. Logistic regression was used to assess the relative significance of the three social status variables as risk factors for postpartum depression controlling for the effects of correlated demographic variables.
In the logistic regression, income, occupational prestige, marital status, and number of children were significant predictors of postpartum depression controlling for the effects of other related demographic characteristics. The Wald Chi Square value for each of these significant predictors indicates that income was the strongest predictor.
The prevalence of postpartum depression was significantly higher in financially poor relative to financially affluent women. Maternal depression screening programs targeting women who are financially poor are well placed. Future research is needed to replicate the present findings in a more ethnically diverse sample that includes the full age range of teenage mothers.
Key wordspostpartum depression prevalence social status income
This work was supported by grants MH50524 and a supplement to MH59668 from the National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD. (Drs. O’Hara and Stuart, respectively). The authors would like to thank Laura Gorman, Ph.D. for her assistance with this research.
- 1.American Psychiatric Association Committee on Nomenclature and Statistics (1980) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 3rd edn. Author, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 8.Dohrenwend BP, Dohrenwend BS (1969) Social status and psychological disorder: A causal inquiry. John Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 15.Hollingshead AB (1975) Four factor index of social status. New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
- 18.WHO International Consortium in Psychiatric Epidemiology (2000) Cross-national comparisons of the prevalences and correlates of mental disorders. Bull World Health Organ 78:413–426Google Scholar
- 22.O’Hara MW, Swain A (1996) Rates and risk of postpartum depression – a meta-analysis. Int Rev Psychiatry 8:37–54Google Scholar
- 24.Pires SA, Lazear KJ (2004) Maternal depression workshop. Annie E. Casey Foundation Community Health Summit, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 26.Segre LS, O’Hara MW (2005) Screening in the U.S. healthcare system. In: Henshaw C, Elliott S (eds) Screening for perinatal depression. Jessica Kinglsey Publishers, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 27.Surgeon General (1999) Mental health: Culture, race, ethnicity – Supplement. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 28.The Postpartum Depression Law (2006) NJSA 42:2–176Google Scholar
- 33.Wisner KL, Wheeler SB (1994) Prevention of recurrent postpartum major depression. Hosp Community Psych 45:1191–1196Google Scholar