What’s in a name? Is accurate recognition and labelling of mental disorders by young people associated with better help-seeking and treatment preferences?
- 1.7k Downloads
The possible benefits or harms of using psychiatric labels in the community have been a focus of debate for many decades. The aim of this study was to examine associations between the accuracy of labelling of depression or psychosis by young people aged 12–25 and their help-seeking, treatment and self-help preferences, whilst controlling for a range of potential confounding factors.
A randomly selected population sample of 1,207 young people aged 12–25 years from several regions of Victoria, Australia, was interviewed via a telephone survey. The structured interviews used vignettes of a young person with either depression or psychosis followed by a series of questions related to recognition of disorder and recommended forms of help and treatment. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to measure the association between a range of help-seeking, treatment and self-help preferences and the predictor variables of accuracy of recognition, socio-demographic background and exposure to mental health problems.
Correct labelling of the disorder was the predictor variable most frequently associated with choice of appropriate help and treatment for both the depression and psychosis vignettes. In regard to self-help preferences, correct labelling of the depression vignette was only associated with being less likely to recommend smoking marijuana to relax. Correct labelling of the psychosis vignette, or labelling it as depression, was associated with being less likely to recommend dealing with the problem alone.
These findings support the view that improving the use of psychiatric labels by young people is beneficial, because it facilitates appropriate help-seeking and treatment choice. The label may be the cue to activating a schema about appropriate action to take.
Key wordshelp-seeking mental health literacy labelling depression psychosis
The study was supported by grants from ANZ Trustees and beyondblue: the national depression initiative. Support for data analysis and writing was provided by the Colonial Foundation and an NHMRC Fellowship. Ruth Parslow assisted with the statistical analysis and Amy Morgan with refinement of the text.
- 2.American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: fourth edition (DSM-IV). American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 4.Anderson RC (1984) Some reflections on the acquisition of knowledge. Educ Res 13:5–10Google Scholar
- 6.Australian Bureau of Statistics (1997) Australian Standard Classification of Occupations, 2nd edn. Australian Government Publishing Service, CanberraGoogle Scholar
- 8.Fischer W, Goerg D, Zbinden E, Guimon J (1999) Determining factors and the effects of attitudes towards psychotropic medication. In: Guimon J, Fischer W, Sartorius N (eds). The image of madness: the public facing mental illness and psychiatric treatment. Karger, Basel, pp 162–186Google Scholar
- 9.Fishbein M, Ajzen I (1975) Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MAGoogle Scholar
- 11.Goldberg D, Huxley P (1980) Mental illness in the community: the pathway to psychiatric care. Tavistock Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 24.Rickwood D, Cavanagh S, Curtis L, Sakrouge R (2004) Educating young people about mental health and mental illness: evaluating a school-based programme. Int J Ment Health Promot 6:23–32Google Scholar
- 25.Rickwood D, Deane FP, Wilson CJ, Ciarrochi J (2005) Young people’s help-seeking for mental health problems. Australian e-Journal for the Advancement of Mental Health 4: Supplement. http://www.auseinet.com/journal/vol4iss3suppl/rickwood.pdf
- 28.Sawyer MG, Arney FM, Baghurst PA, Clark JJ, Graetz BW, Kosky RJ, Nurcombe B, Patton GC, Prior MR, Raphael B, Rey J, Whaites LC, Zubrick SR (2000) The mental health of young people in Australia. Mental Health and Special Programs Branch, Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care, CanberraGoogle Scholar
- 32.World Health Organization (1993) The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: diagnostic criteria for research. WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar