Advertisement

Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology

, Volume 41, Issue 2, pp 156–163 | Cite as

Mental health problems in early adolescents in the Netherlands

Differences between school and household surveys
  • Wilma A. M. VolleberghEmail author
  • Saskia van Dorsselaer
  • Karin Monshouwer
  • Jaqueline Verdurmen
  • Jan van der Ende
  • Tom ter Bogt
Original Paper

Abstract

Objective

A large representative sample of early adolescents in the Netherlands was investigated to assess mental health problems in a school survey. These results were compared to results from former household surveys. In addition, several socio-demographic determinants were analysed.

Method

A random sample of schools in the Netherlands was approached for participation in the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children Survey study (response rate at school level, 60% in primary education and 45% in secondary education). Within schools, a random selection of classes from the schools participated in the study (response rate within schools >95%). We analysed the percentage of children scoring in the problem range on each of the syndromes of the Youth Self Report and compared these to the percentages found in a former population study. The impact of several socio-demographic background variables was assessed.

Results

Approximately 20% of the boys and 23% of the girls have total problem scores in the problem range. These percentages are much higher than those found in population studies in the Netherlands so far, particularly in girls. In multivariate analyses, gender, socio-economic status and family composition were found to be of influence. Migrant status does not appear to be of importance once other background variables are taken into account.

Conclusions

In school surveys on mental health problems, higher problem rates may be found than in population surveys conducted in household settings. This effect has seldom been discussed. It is suggested that this survey context has to be taken into account more explicitly when comparing results of surveys.

Key words

adolescence psychopathology internalising and externalising problem behaviours 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The HBSC study in the Netherlands was supported by the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport (VWS) and by the Stichting Jeugd Informatie Nederland (Youth information in the Netherlands, at present part of the Centre of Youth of the National Institute of Care and Wellbeing, NIZW).

References

  1. 1.
    Achenbach TM (1991) Integrative guide to the 1991 CBCL 4–18, YSR and TRF profiles. Department of Psychiatry, Burlington. University of Vermont, VTGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Achenbach TM, Dumenci L, Rescorla LA (2003) Are American children’s problems still getting worse? A 23-year comparison. J Abnorm Child Psychol 31:1–11CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Black MM, Krishnakumar A (1998) Children in low-income, urban settings. Interventions to promote mental health and well-being. Am Psychol 53:635–646CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Collishaw S, Maughan B, Goodman R, Pickles A (2004) Time trends in adolescent mental health. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 45:1350–1362PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Costello EJ, Angold A, Burns BJ, Erkanli A, Stangl DK, Tweed DL (1996) The Great Smoky Mountains study of youth. Functional impairment and serious emotional disturbance. Arch Gen Psychiatry 53:1137–1143PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Crijnen AAM, Achenbach TM, Verhulst FC (1997) Comparisons of problems reported by parents of children in 12 cultures: total problems, externalizing and internalizing. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 36:1269–1277PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Currie CE, Elton RA, Todd J, Platt S (1997) Indicators of socio-economic status for adolescents: the WHO Health Behaviour in School-aged Children Survey. Health Educ Res 12:385–397PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Currie CW, Samdal O, Boyce W, Smith R (eds) (2002) Health behaviour in school-aged children: a World Health Organization Cross-National Study. Research protocol for the 2001/02 Survey. HBSC, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ferdinand RF, Verhulst FC, Wiznitzer M (1995) Continuity and change of self-reported problem behaviors from adolescence into young adulthood. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 34:680–690PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hofstra MB, Van der Ende J, Verhulst FC (2002) Child and adolescent problems predict DSM-IV disorders in adulthood: a 14-year follow-up of a Dutch epidemiological sample. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 41:182–189PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McLoyd VC (1998) Socioeconomic disadvantage and child development. Am Psychol 53:185–204CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    McDermott PA, Spencer MB (1997) Racial and social class prevalence of psychopathology among school-age youth in the United States. Youth Soc 28:387–414Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Smit F, De Zwart W, Spruit I, Monshouwer K, Van Ameijden E (2002) Monitoring substance use in adolescents: school survey or household survey? Drugs Educ Prev Policy 9:267–274Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sourander, A, Santalahti P, Haavisto A, Piha J, Ikaheimo K, Helenius H (2004) Have there been changes in children’s psychiatric symptoms and mental health service use? A 10-year comparison from Finland. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 43:1134–1145PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stansfeld SA, Haines MM, Head JA, Bhui K, Viner R, Taylor SJC, Hillier S, Klineberg E, Booy R (2004) Ethnicity, social deprivation and psychological distress in adolescents. Br J Psychiatry 185:233–238CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stevens GWJM, Pels T, Bengi-Arslan L, Verhulst FC, Vollebergh WAM, Crijnen AAM (2003) Parent, teacher and self-reported problem behaviour in The Netherlands: comparing Moroccan immigrant with Dutch and with Turkish immigrant children and adolescents. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 38:576–585CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Townsend P (1987) Deprivation. J Soc Policy 16:125–146Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Van der Valk I, Spruijt E, De Goede M, Meeus W, Maas C (2004) Marital status, marital process, and parental resources in predicting adolescents’ emotional adjustment: a multilevel analysis. J Fam Issues 25:291–317Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Verhulst FC, Van der Ende J, Koot HM (1997) Handleiding voor de youth self-report (YSR). [Manual for the Youth Self Report (YSR)]. Sophia Children’s Hospital, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Verhulst FC, Van der Ende J, Ferdinand RF, Kasius MC (1997) The prevalence of DSM-II-R-diagnoses in a national sample of Dutch adolescents. Arch Gen Psychiatry 54:329–336PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Verhulst FC, Van der Ende J, Rietbergen A (1997) Ten-year time trends in child and adolescent psychopathology: no evidence for strong trends. Acta Psychiatr Scand 96:7–13PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Verhulst FC, Achenbach TM, Van der Ende J, Erol N, Lambert MC, Leung, PWL, Silva MA, Zilber N, Zubrick SR (2003) Comparisons of problems reported by youths from seven countries. Am J Psychiatry 160:1479–1485CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wardle K, Robb K, Johnson F (2002) Assessing socio-economic status in adolescents: the validity of a home affluence scale. J Epidemiol Community Health 56:595–599PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wilma A. M. Vollebergh
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Saskia van Dorsselaer
    • 2
  • Karin Monshouwer
    • 2
  • Jaqueline Verdurmen
    • 2
  • Jan van der Ende
    • 3
  • Tom ter Bogt
    • 2
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Social SciencesUniversity of UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Trimbos InstituteNational Institute of Mental Health and AddictionUtrechtThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Erasmus MC/SophiaRotterdamThe Netherlands
  4. 4.University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations