Socioeconomic status as a cause and consequence of psychosomatic symptoms from adolescence to adulthood

  • Taina Huurre
  • Ossi Rahkonen
  • Erkki Komulainen
  • Hillevi Aro
Original Paper

Abstract

Background

Few follow-up studies have investigated psychosomatic health and socioeconomic status (SES) and associations between them at different life stages. The aim of this study was to investigate differences in psychosomatic symptoms by SES in adolescence, early adulthood and adulthood and to examine whether lower SES leads to higher levels of symptoms (social causation) or higher levels of symptoms to lower SES (health selection) or both.

Methods

All 16-year-old ninth-grade school pupils of one Finnish city completed questionnaires at school. Subjects were followed up using postal questionnaires when aged 22 and 32 years.

Results

Females reported significantly higher scores of psychosomatic symptoms than males at 16, 22 and 32 years of age. Higher rates of psychosomatic symptoms were found among females of manual class origin at 16 years. In addition, at 22 years, both females and males with only comprehensive school education and, at 32 years, those who worked in manual jobs had higher scores of symptoms. When low SES both as a cause and consequence of symptoms was investigated, the findings supported both these paths among females and more the health selection among males. In both genders, especially the path from psychosomatic symptoms in adolescence to lower education in early adulthood was strong.

Conclusions

The results highlight the need of greater consideration of psychosomatic symptoms, particularly in adolescence, in later socioeconomic outcomes.

Key words

Socioeconomic status Psychosomatic symptoms Longitudinal studies 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a grant from the Juho Vainio Foundation, the Yrjö Jahnsson Foundation, Signe and Ane Gyllenberg’s Foundation and the Academy of Finland (80414 and 45664).

References

  1. 1.
    Allison PD (2001) Missing data. Sage University papers series on quantitative applications in the social sciences. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arbuckle JL (2003) Amos 5 user’s guide. SPSS, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arbuckle JL, Wothke W (1999) Amos 4.0 user’s guide. SmallWaters Corporation, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aro S (1981) Stress, morbidity and health-related behaviour: a five-year follow-up study among mental industry employees. Scand J Soc Med 9(Suppl 25):1–130PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Aro H (1989) Stress, development and psychosomatic symptoms in adolescence: a comparison of the sexes. Psychiatr Fenn 20:101–109Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aro H, Paronen O, Aro S (1987) Psychosomatic symptoms among 14- to 16-year-old Finnish adolescents. Soc Psychiatry 22:171–176CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Aro S, Aro H, Keskimäki I (1995) Socioeconomic mobility among patients with schizophrenia or major affective disorders. A 17-year retrospective follow-up. Br J Psychiatry 166:759–767PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Berntsson LT, Köhler L (2001) Long-term illness and psychosomatic complaints in children aged 2–17 years in the five Nordic countries. Eur J Public Health 11:35–42CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bijleveld CC, van der Kamp LJ, Mooijaart A, van der Kloot WA, van der Leeden R, van der Burg E (1998) Longitudinal data analysis. Design, models and methods. SAGE, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Blane D, Harding S, Rosato M (1999) Does social mobility affect the size of the socioeconomic mortality differential?: evidence from the Office for National Statistics Longitudinal Study. J R Statist Soc A 162:59–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bollen KA (1989) Structural equations with latent variables. Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Byrne BM (1989) A primer of LISREL: basic applications and programming for confimatory factor analytic models. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Byrne BM (1998) Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS and SIMPLIS: basic concepts, applications, and programming. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Central Statistical Office of Finland (1975) Classification of occupations. Central Statistical Office of Finland, Helsinki, FinlandGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Central Statistical Office of Finland (1989) Classification of socioeconomic groups. Central Statistical Office of Finland, Helsinki, FinlandGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chandola T, Bartley M, Sacker A, Jenkinson C, Marmot M (2003) Health selection in the Whitehall II study, UK. Soc Sci Med 56:2059–2072CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dohrenwend BP, Levav I, Shrout PE, Schwartz S, Naveh G, Link BG, Skodol AE, Stueve A (1992) Socioeconomic status and psychiatric disorders: the causation-selection issue. Science 255:946–952PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Eaton WW, Muntaner C, Bovasso G, Smith C (2001) Socioeconomic status and depressive syndrome: the role of inter- and intragenerational mobility, government assistance, and work environment. J Health Soc Behav 42:277–294PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Eriksen HR, Svendsrod R, Ursin G, Ursin H (1998) Prevalence of subjective health complaints in the Nordic European countries in 1993. Eur J Public Health 8:294–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Eriksson M, Lahelma E, Rahkonen O (1992) Gender and social class differences in psychic symptoms among Finnish youth and young adults. Sos Laaketiet Aikak 29:89–95 (in Finnish with English summary)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gijsberg van Wijk CMT, Kolk AM (1997) Sex differences in physical symptoms: the contribution of symptom perception theory. Soc Sci Med 45:231–246CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Halldórsson M, Kunst AE, Köhler L, Mackenbach JP (2000) Socioeconomic inequalities in the health of children and adolescents. A comparative study of the five Nordic countries. Eur J Public Health 10:281–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Haugland S, Wold B (2001) Subjective health complaints in adolescence-reliability and validity of survey methods. J Adolesc 24:611–624CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Haugland S, Wold B, Stevenson J, Aaroe LE, Woynarowska B (2001) Subjective health complaints in adolescence. A cross-national comparison of prevalence and dimensionality. Eur J Public Health 11:4–10CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hayduk LA (1987) Structural equation modeling with Lisrel. Essentials and advances. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hu LT, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria vs new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling 6:1–55Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Huurre T, Aro H, Rahkonen O (2003) Well-being and health behaviour by parental socioeconomic status. A follow-up study of adolescents aged 16 until 32 years of age. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 38:249–255CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ihlebaek C, Eriksen HR, Ursin H (2002) Prevalence of subjective health complaints (SHC) in Norway. Scand J Public Health 30:20–29PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Johnson JG, Cohen P, Dohrenwend BP, Link BG, Brook JS (1999) A longitudinal investigation of social causation and social selection processes involved in the association between socioeconomic status and psychiatric disorders. J Abnorm Psychol 108:490–499CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D (1978) LISREL IV’s user’s guide. National Educational Resources, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D (1996a) LISREL 8. User’s reference guide. Scientific Software International, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D (1996b) PRELIS 2. User’s reference guide: a program for multivariate data screening and data summarization. A preprocessor for LISREL. Scientific Software International, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D (2003) LISREL 8.54. Scientific Software International, Lincolnwood, ILGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kelloway EK (1998) Using LISREL for structural equation modeling: a researcher’s guide. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Koivusilta L, Rimpelä A, Rimpelä M (1995) Health status: does it predict choice in further education? J Epidemiol Community Health 49:131–138PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ladwig K-H, Marten-Mittag B, Formanek B, Dammann G (2000) Gender differences of symptom reporting and medical health care utilization in the German population. Eur J Epidemiol 16:511–518CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lien N, Friestad C, Klepp K-I (2001) Adolescents ‘proxy reports of parents’ socioeconomic status: how valid are they? J Epidemiol Community Health 55:731–737CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Loehlin J (1998) Latent variable models. An introduction to factor, path, and structural analysis, 3rd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Macintyre S (1997) The Black Report and beyond: what are the issues? Soc Sci Med 44:723–745CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Macintyre S, Hunt K, Sweeting H (1996) Gender differences in health: are things really as simple as they seem? Soc Sci Med 42:617–624CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Manor O, Matthews S, Power C (2003) Health selection: the role of inter- and intra-generational mobility on social inequalities in health. Soc Sci Med 57:2217–2227CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Marmot M, Ryff CD, Bumpass LL, Shipley M, Marks NF (1997) Social inequalities in health: next questions and converging evidence. Soc Sci Med 44:901–910CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Maruyama GM (1998) Basics of structural equation modeling. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Miech RA, Caspi A, Moffitt TE, Wright BRE, Silva BA (1999) Low socioeconomic status and mental disorders: a longitudinal study of social selection and causation during young adulthood. Am J Sociol 104:1096–1131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Mirowsky J, Ross CE (1995) Sex differences in distress: real of artifact? Am Sociol Rev 60:449–468Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Muthén LK, Muthén BO (1998) Mplus user’s guide. Statistical analysis with latent variables. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, CA http://www.StatModel.com
  47. 47.
    Muthén LK, Muthén BO (2002) Mplus Version 2.12. Addendum to the Mplus user’s guide. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, CA http://www.StatModel.com
  48. 48.
    Muthén LK, Muthén BO (2003) Mplus Version 2.13. Addendum to the Mplus user’s guide. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, CA http://www.StatModel.com
  49. 49.
    Paronen O, Pasanen M, Rantanen P, Aro S (1982) Test-retest study of psychosomatic symptoms among 14- to 15-year-old schoolchildren. Sos Laaketiet Aikak 19:234–239 (in Finnish with English summary)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Piccinelli M, Simon G (1997) Gender and cross-cultural differences in somatic symptoms associated with emotional distress. Psychol Med 27:433–444CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Power C, Matthews S (1997) Origins of health inequalities in a national population sample. Lancet 350:1584–1589CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Power C, Stansfeld SA, Matthews S, Manor O, Hope S (2002) Childhood and adulthood risk factors for socioeconomic differentials in psychological distress: evidence from the 1958 British birth cohort. Soc Sci Med 55:1989–2004CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Prescott CA (2004) Using the Mplus computer program to estimate models for continuous and categorical data from twins. Behav Genet 34:17–20CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Rahkonen O, Arber S, Lahelma E (1995) Health inequalities in early adulthood: a comparison of young men and women in Britain and Finland. Soc Sci Med 41:163–171CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Rahmqvist M, Carstensen J (1998) Trend of psychological distress in a Swedish population from 1989 to 1995. Scand J Soc Med 26:214–222PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Rimpelä M, Rimpelä A, Pasanen M (1982) Perceived symptoms among 12- to 18-year-old Finns. Sos Laaketiet Aikak 19:219–233 (in Finnish with English summary)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Sweeting H, West P (2003) Sex differences in health at ages 11, 13 and 15. Soc Sci Med 56:31–39CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    West P (1991) Rethinking the health selection explanation for health inequalities. Soc Sci Med 32:373–384CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    West P (1997) Health inequalities in the early years: is there equalisation in youth? Soc Sci Med 44:833–858CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    West P, Sweeting H, Speed E (2001) We really do know what you do: a comparison of reports from 11-year-olds and their parents in respect of parental economic activity and occupation. Sociology 35:539–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Wool CA, Barsky AJ (1994) Do women somatize more than men? Psychosomatics 35:445–452PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Yu C-Y, Muthén B (2001) Evaluation of model fit indices for latent variable models with categorical and continuous outcomes. Technical report. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, CA http://www.StatModel.com

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Taina Huurre
    • 1
  • Ossi Rahkonen
    • 2
  • Erkki Komulainen
    • 3
  • Hillevi Aro
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mental Health and Alcohol ResearchNational Public Health InstituteHelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.Department of Social PolicyUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  3. 3.Department of EducationUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations