Socioeconomic status as a cause and consequence of psychosomatic symptoms from adolescence to adulthood
- 328 Downloads
Few follow-up studies have investigated psychosomatic health and socioeconomic status (SES) and associations between them at different life stages. The aim of this study was to investigate differences in psychosomatic symptoms by SES in adolescence, early adulthood and adulthood and to examine whether lower SES leads to higher levels of symptoms (social causation) or higher levels of symptoms to lower SES (health selection) or both.
All 16-year-old ninth-grade school pupils of one Finnish city completed questionnaires at school. Subjects were followed up using postal questionnaires when aged 22 and 32 years.
Females reported significantly higher scores of psychosomatic symptoms than males at 16, 22 and 32 years of age. Higher rates of psychosomatic symptoms were found among females of manual class origin at 16 years. In addition, at 22 years, both females and males with only comprehensive school education and, at 32 years, those who worked in manual jobs had higher scores of symptoms. When low SES both as a cause and consequence of symptoms was investigated, the findings supported both these paths among females and more the health selection among males. In both genders, especially the path from psychosomatic symptoms in adolescence to lower education in early adulthood was strong.
The results highlight the need of greater consideration of psychosomatic symptoms, particularly in adolescence, in later socioeconomic outcomes.
Key wordsSocioeconomic status Psychosomatic symptoms Longitudinal studies
This study was supported by a grant from the Juho Vainio Foundation, the Yrjö Jahnsson Foundation, Signe and Ane Gyllenberg’s Foundation and the Academy of Finland (80414 and 45664).
- 1.Allison PD (2001) Missing data. Sage University papers series on quantitative applications in the social sciences. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
- 2.Arbuckle JL (2003) Amos 5 user’s guide. SPSS, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
- 3.Arbuckle JL, Wothke W (1999) Amos 4.0 user’s guide. SmallWaters Corporation, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- 5.Aro H (1989) Stress, development and psychosomatic symptoms in adolescence: a comparison of the sexes. Psychiatr Fenn 20:101–109Google Scholar
- 9.Bijleveld CC, van der Kamp LJ, Mooijaart A, van der Kloot WA, van der Leeden R, van der Burg E (1998) Longitudinal data analysis. Design, models and methods. SAGE, London, UKGoogle Scholar
- 11.Bollen KA (1989) Structural equations with latent variables. Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 12.Byrne BM (1989) A primer of LISREL: basic applications and programming for confimatory factor analytic models. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 13.Byrne BM (1998) Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS and SIMPLIS: basic concepts, applications, and programming. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJGoogle Scholar
- 14.Central Statistical Office of Finland (1975) Classification of occupations. Central Statistical Office of Finland, Helsinki, FinlandGoogle Scholar
- 15.Central Statistical Office of Finland (1989) Classification of socioeconomic groups. Central Statistical Office of Finland, Helsinki, FinlandGoogle Scholar
- 20.Eriksson M, Lahelma E, Rahkonen O (1992) Gender and social class differences in psychic symptoms among Finnish youth and young adults. Sos Laaketiet Aikak 29:89–95 (in Finnish with English summary)Google Scholar
- 25.Hayduk LA (1987) Structural equation modeling with Lisrel. Essentials and advances. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
- 26.Hu LT, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria vs new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling 6:1–55Google Scholar
- 30.Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D (1978) LISREL IV’s user’s guide. National Educational Resources, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- 31.Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D (1996a) LISREL 8. User’s reference guide. Scientific Software International, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- 32.Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D (1996b) PRELIS 2. User’s reference guide: a program for multivariate data screening and data summarization. A preprocessor for LISREL. Scientific Software International, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- 33.Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D (2003) LISREL 8.54. Scientific Software International, Lincolnwood, ILGoogle Scholar
- 34.Kelloway EK (1998) Using LISREL for structural equation modeling: a researcher’s guide. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
- 38.Loehlin J (1998) Latent variable models. An introduction to factor, path, and structural analysis, 3rd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJGoogle Scholar
- 43.Maruyama GM (1998) Basics of structural equation modeling. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
- 45.Mirowsky J, Ross CE (1995) Sex differences in distress: real of artifact? Am Sociol Rev 60:449–468Google Scholar
- 46.Muthén LK, Muthén BO (1998) Mplus user’s guide. Statistical analysis with latent variables. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, CA http://www.StatModel.com
- 47.Muthén LK, Muthén BO (2002) Mplus Version 2.12. Addendum to the Mplus user’s guide. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, CA http://www.StatModel.com
- 48.Muthén LK, Muthén BO (2003) Mplus Version 2.13. Addendum to the Mplus user’s guide. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, CA http://www.StatModel.com
- 49.Paronen O, Pasanen M, Rantanen P, Aro S (1982) Test-retest study of psychosomatic symptoms among 14- to 15-year-old schoolchildren. Sos Laaketiet Aikak 19:234–239 (in Finnish with English summary)Google Scholar
- 56.Rimpelä M, Rimpelä A, Pasanen M (1982) Perceived symptoms among 12- to 18-year-old Finns. Sos Laaketiet Aikak 19:219–233 (in Finnish with English summary)Google Scholar
- 62.Yu C-Y, Muthén B (2001) Evaluation of model fit indices for latent variable models with categorical and continuous outcomes. Technical report. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, CA http://www.StatModel.com