The Major Depression Inventory versus Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry in a population sample
This study examined the association between the Major Depression Inventory (MDI) and the Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN).
A questionnaire including the MDI was sent out to an adult population and was completed by a total of 10448 persons. Psychiatrists used SCAN and interviewed a subsample (n=1093).
The specificity of the MDI was 0.22, the sensitivity 0.67 and Kappa 0.25 when Major Depression according to SCAN was considered as the index of validity, and with all depressive disorders the specificity was 0.44, the sensitivity 0.51 and Kappa 0.33. Higher educated persons and those with reported disability were less likely to be false negatives. The sensitivity and specificity for different cut-off scores when using the MDI total score were calculated.
The result from this study suggests that, when MDI is used in population-based samples, cut-off scores rather than the algorithm for depression should be used. The optimal cut-off score must be chosen according to the aims of the study.
Key wordsdepression population rating scales sensitivity specificity
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and Statistical manual of Mental Disorders. American Psychiatric Association (4th ed, rev). Washington, DC, APAGoogle Scholar
- 2.Anthony JC, Folstein MF, Romanovski AJ, Von Korff MR, Nestadt GR, Chahal R, Merchant A, Brown CH, Sapiro S, Kramer M, Gruenberg EM (1985) Comparison of the lay Diagnostic Interview Schedule and a standardized psychiatric diagnosis: experience in eastern Baltimore. Arch Gen Psychiatry 42:667–675PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 3.Bech P, Stage K, Nair NPV, Larsen JK, Kragh-Sorensen P, Gjeriss P (1997) The Major Depression Rating Scale (MDS). Inter-rater reliability and validity across different settings in randomised moclobemide trials. J Affect Disord 42:39–48Google Scholar
- 4.Bech P, Wermuth, L (1998) Applicability and validity of the Major Depression Inventory in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Nord J Psychiatry 52:305–309Google Scholar
- 5.Bech P, Rasmussen NA, Raabaer K, Olsen L, Noerholm V, Abilgard W (2001) The sensitivity and specificity of the Major Depression Inventory using the Present State Examination as the index of diagnostic validity. J Aff Disord 66:159–164Google Scholar
- 7.Beck AT, Steer RA, Ball R, Ranieri W (1996) Comparison of the Beck Depression inventories IA and II in psychiatric outpatients. J Pers Assess 132:381–385Google Scholar
- 8.Eaton WW, Neufeld K, Chen L-S, Cai G (2000) A comparison of self-reports and clinical diagnostic interviews for depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 57:217–222Google Scholar
- 10.Helzer JE, Robins LN, McEvoy LT, Spitznagel EL, Stoltzman RK, Farmer A, Brockington IF (1985) A comparison of clinical and Diagnostic Interview Schedule diagnoses: re-examination of lay-interviewed cases in the general population. Arch Gen Psychiatry 42:657–666Google Scholar
- 11.Hsiao JK, Bartko JJ, Potter WZ (1989) Diagnosing diagnoses. Arch Gen Psychiatry 46:664–668Google Scholar
- 12.Janca A, Kastrup M, Katschnig H, Lopez-Ibor JJ Jr, MezzIich JE, Sartorius N (1996) The World Health Organisation Short Disability Assessment Schedule (WHO DAS-S): a tool for the assessment of difficulties in selected areas of functioning of patients with mental disorders. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 31(6):349–354Google Scholar
- 13.Leentjens AFG, Verhey FRJ, Lousberg R, Spitsbergen H, Wilmink FW (2000) The validity of the Hamilton and Montgomery-Åsberg depression rating scales as screening for depression and diagnostic tools for depression in Parkinson’s disease. Int J Ger Psychiatry 15:644–649Google Scholar
- 14.Regier DA, Kaelber CT, Rae DS, Farmer ME, Kanauper B, Kessler RC, Norquist GS (1998a) Limitations of diagnostic criteria and assessment instruments for mental disorders. Arch Gen Psychiatry 55:109–115Google Scholar
- 15.Regier DA (1998b) In reply, Letters to the editor. Arch Gen Psychiatry 55:1146–1147Google Scholar
- 17.Tomov T, Nikolov V (1990) Reliability of SCAN categories and scores: results of the field trials. In: Stefanis CN, Rabavilas AD, Soldatos CR (eds) Vol 1: Classification and Psychopathology, Child Psychiatry, Substance Use: Proceedings of the VIII World Congress of Psychiatry, Athens,12–19 October 1989. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Excerpta MedicaGoogle Scholar
- 19.Zung WWK (1965) A self-rating depression scale. Arch Gen Psychiatry 12:63–70Google Scholar