Advertisement

Diabetologia

, Volume 62, Issue 12, pp 2179–2187 | Cite as

Extracellular vesicles in metabolic disease

  • Naveed AkbarEmail author
  • Valerio Azzimato
  • Robin P. Choudhury
  • Myriam AouadiEmail author
Open Access
Review

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are submicron-sized lipid envelopes that are produced and released from a parent cell and can be taken up by a recipient cell. EVs are capable of mediating cellular signalling by carrying nucleic acids, proteins, lipids and cellular metabolites between cells and organs. Metabolic dysfunction is associated with changes in plasma concentrations of EVs as well as alterations in their EV cargo. Since EVs can act as messengers between parent and recipient cells, they could be involved in cell-to-cell and organ-to-organ communication in metabolic diseases. Recent literature has shown that EVs are produced by cells within metabolic tissues, such as adipose tissue, pancreas, muscle and liver. These vesicles have therefore been proposed as a novel intercellular communication mode in systemic metabolic regulation. In this review, we will describe and discuss the current literature that investigates the role of adipose-derived EVs in the regulation of obesity-associated metabolic disease. We will particularly focus on the EV-dependent communication between adipocytes, the vasculature and immune cells in type 2 diabetes.

Keywords

Adipocytes Diabetes Diagnostic Endothelial cells Exosomes Extracellular vesicle Immune cells Macrophages Metabolic dysfunction Platelets Review Therapeutic 

Abbreviations

ATM

Adipose tissue macrophages

EV

Extracellular vesicle

ICAM-1

Intracellular adhesion molecule-1

MVB

Multivesicular body

SEC

Size exclusion chromatography

VCAM-1

Vascular cell adhesion molecule-1

Introduction

Metabolic disease

Metabolic dysfunction is a collective term for the clustering of disease risk factors, including hyperglycaemia, dyslipidaemia, hypertension, obesity and insulin resistance. Metabolic dysfunction significantly increases disease risk for cardiovascular diseases such as acute myocardial infarction and stroke. The combined pathogenesis of metabolic dysfunction implicates numerous cell types, tissues, organs, inflammatory signalling cascades and humoral factors. Blood-based biomarkers, such as glucose, insulin and HbA1c are used in the diagnosis and management of type 2 diabetes and plasma lipoproteins in cardiovascular diseases. Other blood-borne factors, such as inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, TNF-α, IL-10), oxidised low-density lipoproteins, triacylglycerols, leptin, gherlin and adiponectin are imperfect markers of metabolic disease [1] but are related to measures of insulin resistance, visceral adiposity and atherosclerotic disease. The identification of plasma molecules that serve as prognostic and diagnostic biomarkers for metabolic disease and its pathological complications remains challenging because the factors listed above provide little insight into the tissue types and organs afflicted by metabolic dysfunction.

Extracellular vesicles

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are membrane-enclosed envelopes that carry lipids, proteins, nucleic acids (DNA, mRNA, microRNA and long non-coding RNAs) and metabolites. EVs can bear features (RNAs, DNA and lipids) of their parent cell of origin and may provide diagnostic and prognostic value in metabolic dysfunction [2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12]. They can mediate communication locally within tissues between cells of the same origin, i.e. endothelial cells, hepatocytes, immune or pancreatic cells, and cross organ systems through liberation into peripheral blood [13, 14]. EVs thus have potential as biomarkers in the prognosis and diagnosis of metabolic disease [4, 6, 15, 16].

The term EVs denotes numerous subpopulations of biological vesicles, enclosed with a lipid bilayer. The inward budding of endosomal membranes generates intraluminal vesicles in cytosolic multivesicular bodies (MVBs) and the fusion of these MVBs with the plasma membrane releases so-called small exosomes (40–150 nm). The direct blebbing of EVs from the plasma membrane produces microvesicles (150–1000 nm) and larger apoptotic bodies (>1000 nm) are released by cellular death (Fig. 1). Exosomes, microvesicles and apoptotic bodies are characterised primarily by their size, isolation method and protein cargo, such as the presence of tetraspanins (CD63, CD81, CD9), ALG-2-interacting protein X (ALIX), tumour susceptibility gene 101 (TSG101), heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) and annexin V, although discrepancies exist and there is significant overlap between these individual subpopulations [17] (Fig. 1). EVs can be isolated from plasma, urine, cerebral spinal fluid, lymph and conditioned media from cell culture by differential ultracentrifugation. EV preparations can be positive for the EV-associated tetraspanins, TSG101, ALIX and display circular morphology, as determined by transmission electron microscopy. EV preparations may be contaminated by soluble factors, such as proteins and apolipoproteins (Apo-1/2, Apo-B, Apo-B100), cellular components such as nuclear fragments, which can be detected by the presence of histones (H3) and mitochondria, by ATP synthase F1 subunit α (ATP5A)/translocase of outer mitochondrial membrane 20 (TOMM20). EV surface proteins, such as intracellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), allow EVs to target and bind to recipient cells through receptor interactions with leucocyte function-associated antigen-1 (LFA-1) and very late antigen-4 (VLA-4), respectively [13, 18]. EV uptake by cells can be mediated by endocytosis (clathrin-, caveolin- and/or lipid-mediated), phagocytosis and micropinocytosis. EVs can also undergo degradation by matrix metalloproteinase at the cell surface and the constituent parts of EVs, such as proteins, RNA and/or lipids, may mediate cellular signalling by receptor binding. Precisely how EV biogenesis and the mechanism of EV uptake are altered in metabolic dysfunction remains unknown. A better understanding of how EVs promote signalling and uptake by cells in metabolic disease may allow the development of novel strategies for EV-targeting, to perturb pathogenic signalling. EVs transport many constituent parts of their parent cells, and methods for EV cargo detection require robust optimisation because there are often limited amounts of starting material available in clinical and rodent studies.
Fig. 1

The EV landscape at a glance from biogenesis to isolation and characterisation. (a) A schematic representation of the cellular origins of EV sub-populations, their respective classifications based on EV size, and associated markers. Apoptotic bodies are generated by apoptotic blebbing and microvesicles by budding of the plasma membrane. Exosomes are generated from late endosomal MVBs, which fuse with the plasma membrane and release small exosomes. ALIX, ALG-2-interacting protein X; HSP70, heat shock protein 70; TSG101, tumour susceptibility gene 101. (b) The stages of exosome biogenesis. Late endosomes mature into MVBs, which are targeted for degradation or fuse with the plasma membrane to release exosomes. ER, endoplasmic reticulum. (c) The most commonly used techniques for EV isolation from biological fluids: ultracentrifugation, immunoaffinity capture and size-exclusion chromatography. This figure is available as a downloadable slide

The International Society for Extracellular Vesicles (ISEV) publishes guidelines for the isolation, characterisation and experimental use of EVs [19]. The most popular method for EV isolation remains ultracentrifugation, as it is easily accessible, cheap and requires little prior specialist knowledge or equipment. Ultracentrifugation can co-isolate soluble proteins (cytokines, chemokines and growth factors) and lipoproteins, which carry EV-associated cargo such as miRNAs. Washing of isolated EVs can reduce the level of contamination by soluble proteins and lipoproteins, but ultracentrifugation speeds can alter the morphology of EVs, possibly affecting their biological activity. Immunoaffinity capture using EV-associated antibodies (CD63, CD81 and CD9) conjugated to magnetic beads allows high-throughput processing of clinical samples but is biased towards the isolation of tetraspanin-expressing EVs [20]. Immunoaffinity capture has the added difficulty of binding EV to beads and limits the utilisation of isolated EV for downstream functional characterisation such as in vivo studies. Size exclusion chromatography (SEC) of EVs from biological fluids allows soluble proteins to be separated from the EV pool but does not eliminate contamination with lipoproteins, and SEC EV samples often need to be further concentrated for additional EV analysis, such as proteomics [21] (see Text box: Methods of EV isolation and characterisation: principles, advantages and limitations). EV phenotyping in metabolic disease has revealed a number of dysregulated EV proteins and EV miRNAs from numerous tissue types and plasma from individuals with different types of metabolic dysfunction. This review focuses on the discoveries and descriptions of EV in metabolic disease and the challenges faced to produce an effective EV diagnostic platform for metabolic disease phenotyping. Here we discuss type 2 diabetes and insulin resistance but systematic studies investigating individual cell populations to determine their EV characteristics will enhance the utility of EVs as disease biomarkers and facilitate the creation of EV-based therapeutics.

EVs as biomarkers of metabolic disease

Patient plasma and urine are rich sources of EVs and studies have demonstrated EV miRNAs as diagnostic tools in individuals suffering from metabolic [2, 3, 4, 9] and cardiovascular disease [22, 23]. A recent meta-analysis by Li et al. [24] reported that levels of EVs of platelet, endothelial cell and monocyte origin were significantly raised in individuals with type 2 diabetes from 48 independent studies [24, 25].

EV number correlates positively with systolic and diastolic blood pressure, BMI, HOMA-IR, and HOMA-B (a measure of beta cell function) [6], which are altered in metabolic disease. Circulating levels of plasma EVs are higher in men than in women with and without metabolic disease and are elevated in individuals with impaired glucose tolerance. Obese patients have significantly greater levels of circulating plasma EVs than normal healthy controls and reductions in plasma EVs can be achieved by a low-energy diet, diet plus exercise and weight loss following gastrectomy [26]. Below we summarise key findings in endothelial cell-, platelet-, adipocyte- and monocyte-derived EVs, which are among the most-widely studied EV populations in metabolic disease.

Platelet-derived EVs

Platelet-derived EVs are primarily characterised by the presence of CD41, CD42b and phosphatidylserine and have been demonstrated to play roles in exercise [27, 28], acute injury [29] and diabetes [30]. Platelet-derived EVs are regarded as the most abundant source of plasma EVs; however, it is unclear as to what proportion of the EV pool they represent, with approximations varying from 50 to 90% [29]. Platelet EV release is calcium dependent and relies on actin cytoskeleton destabilisation [31]. The number of platelet-derived EVs is increased in obese individuals but is not further influenced by the presence of metabolic disease [32]. A better understanding is needed of which metabolic disease factors, i.e. endothelial dysfunction, hypertension and/or dyslipidaemia, alter the properties of platelet-derived EVs in metabolic dysfunction. This will allow the development of diagnostic tests and therapies that target platelet EVs. Individuals with metabolic disease are often prescribed a variety of therapeutic agents, which may influence the number and composition of platelet-derived EVs in patients [33]. Importantly, those that target calcium signalling would alter the biogenesis of platelet-derived EVs.

Adipocyte-derived EVs

Adipose tissue has been described as a major source of circulating exosomal miRNA by studies using an adipose-tissue-specific knockout of the miRNA-processing enzyme Dicer (AdicerKO) and other studies of samples obtained from humans with lipodystrophy [34, 35]. Adipocyte hypertrophy increases the risk for developing type 2 diabetes [36]. It has also been associated with the elevated production and release of EVs, characterised by the expression of perilipin A [11, 37]. Consistent with these studies, circulating levels of adipocyte-derived EVs have been shown to be increased in obese mice and humans and decreased following energy restriction or bariatric surgery [11, 38]. Interestingly, Hubal et al. have identified 55 adipocyte-derived exosomal miRNAs that are differentially expressed between obese and lean individuals, suggesting that in addition to their higher circulating levels, the exosomal cargo of EVs is regulated in obese individuals [38]. Although the precise mechanism whereby adipose tissue-derived EV production is regulated in obesity is not clear, the adiponectin/T-cadherin system has been implicated in exosome biogenesis and secretion [39].

Recent studies investigating the role of EVs in the regulation of systemic metabolism have identified adipocyte-derived EVs as mediators linking adiposity and insulin resistance in peripheral tissues, such as the liver [40, 41]. EVs can act as messengers between adipocytes and other cells in the adipose tissue. For example, adipocyte-derived EVs can chemoattract monocytes and could therefore contribute to the adipose tissue inflammation observed in obese insulin-resistant animals and humans [37, 42]. EVs could also be transferred from adipose tissue endothelial cells to adipocytes and vice versa in vivo [43]. This transfer event is affected by nutritional and obesity status. While the effect of adipose-derived EVs on metabolism seems to be dependent on the physiological context, EVs from adipose-derived stem cells might have a beneficial effect on insulin sensitivity through their ability to reduce inflammation and induce beigeing in the adipose tissue [44].

Taken together, these studies offer new insights into the complex signalling mechanisms that exist between adipocytes, stromal vascular cells and distal organs in health and metabolic diseases. Further studies are needed to elucidate the precise content of adipose-derived EVs and their impact on surrounding cells and the function of metabolic organs, including different fat depots.

Adipose tissue macrophage-derived EVs

Obesity and insulin resistance are associated with the accumulation of macrophages in the adipose tissue [45]. Extensive literature has described a detrimental role of adipose tissue macrophages (ATMs) in the regulation of whole body metabolism [46] through excessive production of inflammatory cytokines able to block insulin signalling. Recently exosomes derived from ATMs have been shown to be important mediators in the regulation of adipose tissue function and insulin sensitivity [47]. In obese mice, ATMs secrete miRNA-containing exosomes, which cause glucose intolerance and insulin resistance when administered to lean mice. Conversely, ATM exosomes obtained from lean mice improve glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity when administered to obese recipients. miRNA-155, one of the miRNAs overexpressed in exosomes derived from obese ATMs, was shown to regulate adipose tissue homeostasis through direct suppression of its targets, the adipogenic transcription factors peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) and CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein β (CEBPβ) [48]. It has also been demonstrated that proinflammatory macrophages preferentially produce miR-155 [49]. These studies highlight not only the importance of macrophages as a source of adipose-exosomes, but also suggest that ATMs could produce EVs containing different types of cargo depending on their phenotype. Since multiple populations of macrophages co-exist within the adipose tissue [36, 50], it would be important to characterise the types of EVs produced by these different populations in health and metabolic diseases.

Endothelial cell-derived EVs

Endothelial dysfunction is an early vascular abnormality during insulin resistance and is present in metabolic disease. Endothelial cells interface with multiple tissue microenvironments release signals to attract immune cells and capture them from the circulation. Endothelial cell-derived EVs from individuals with metabolic disease have been characterised by the presence of markers CD62E, CD144, CD31, VCAM-1, ICAM-1 and miRNAs-126-3/5p [51]. People with diabetes have lower levels of miRNA-126 and miRNA-26a; hyperglycaemia lowers levels of these two miRNAs in endothelial cells [52, 53]. Hyperglycaemia and endothelial cell activation alter endothelial cell-derived EV mRNAs for inflammatory IL-1β, chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2), VCAM-1 and EV proteins by increasing levels of EV ICAM-1, TNF and TNFα-induced protein 3 (TNFAIP3) [54]. Endothelial cells can transfer EV proteins, such as caveolin-1, and sphingolipids to neighbouring adipocytes during nutrient deficiency [43]. Insulin can influence the proteomic profile of EVs [55] but whether RNA, lipoproteins and proteins from EVs change synergistically during hyperglycaemia or in response to insulin or obesity remains unknown. The number of circulating plasma EVs decreases with advancing age, and EVs from older individuals are more readily internalised by immune cells than EVs from younger individuals [10]. However, which ageing-associated changes influence the pathological features of EVs in the presence of metabolic disease remains ambiguous.

Metabolic disease: influence of EVs on metabolic tissues and immune cells

Liberated EVs in plasma can be captured by tissue resident populations of macrophages in the liver, marginal zone CD169+ macrophages in the spleen and endothelial cells in the lung [56, 57]. EVs from individuals with metabolic disease can mediate differential effects on immune cells and show alterations in their protein cargo [5]. Inflammation [13, 14, 21, 55, 58] and insulin resistance increases EV secretion [9] and EV uptake by leucocytes [9, 13, 14, 21] (see Text box: Impact of EVs on immune cells and metabolic function). In type 2 diabetes, EVs containing sonic hedgehog protein can mediate macrophage activation and insulin resistance [59], although the role of other immune cell-derived EVs, such as those from neutrophils in response to hyperglycaemia, insulin, oxidised LDL, and their role in metabolic homeostasis requires further attention. However, whether these dysregulated EV miRNAs remain altered in macrophage EVs following diet or exercise interventions remains unknown.

Macrophages can be broadly split into proinflammatory M1 or anti-inflammatory M2 phenotypes, according to their activating stimulus, gene expression, metabolic profiles and cellular functions. EVs from inflammatory M1 but not anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages influence adipocyte differentiation and insulin signalling via NF-kB activation and M2 macrophage-derived EVs enhance glucose uptake by adipocytes [60]. Macrophages are highly sensitive to the microenvironment, and how altered tissue homeostasis impacts individual niches of tissue-resident macrophages mediate EV uptake and EV release may provide insight into why some tissues are more prone to metabolic stress and dysfunction.

Gut microbiota-derived EVs

The gut microbiota can generate EVs [61] to alter insulin sensitivity by impairing glucose metabolism in skeletal muscle [62] and disrupt circadian biology to mediate metabolic dysfunction and inflammatory cell recruitment [7]. The gut microbiome is altered in individuals with metabolic disease but the extent to which the gut microbiota contribute to the pathogenesis of metabolic disease via the action of EVs remains uncertain. Dietary EVs can alter the gut microbiome, for example, bovine milk exosomes significantly alter populations of Lachnospiraceae, Ruminococcaceae and the Verrucomicrobiaceae families in non-bovine species [63, 64], and bovine milk EVs alter amino acid metabolism in the liver [65]. Dietary and gut microbe EVs may work synergistically to promote the pathogenesis of metabolic disease, and stool-derived EVs may be a useful biomarker for alterations in metabolic homeostasis. Exactly which individual populations of gut microbes produce and release EVs that can influence metabolic homeostasis by altering digestion and/or nutrient absorption requires further investigation and may provide insight into how dietary interventions mediate beneficial effects for individuals with metabolic disease.

Influence of drugs for metabolic disease on EVs

A significant proportion of patients with conditions that fall under the umbrella of metabolic disease are prescribed a range of therapeutic interventions, including statins, anti-hypertensive medications, metformin, sulfonylureas and sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors. There is limited information available on the effect of metabolic drugs on the generation, release and cargo of EVs on mammalian biology and on host gut microbiomes. Determination of whether EV biogenesis and cargo are altered by widely prescribed medicine would allow delineation of EVs as a consequence of therapeutic intervention and a possible platform for disease monitoring.

Discussion and conclusions

Metabolic investigations have used a range of mammalian cells to study EVs subpopulations but there is a lack of systematic in-depth characterisation of all the EV populations in single cell types from multiple sources, i.e. endothelial cells or tissue resident macrophages from different organs. Identification of differences between EVs from the same cell type in different microenvironments may allow better differentiation of pathological EV-signals for disease phenotyping in peripheral blood. Furthermore, there is limited information on how EV biogenesis pathways are implicated in metabolic disease and how these are altered to influence the release of EV and their cargo in individuals with metabolic disease. A better understanding of how EV biogenesis pathways are dysregulated in metabolic disease may allow the generation of targeted therapies to perturb EV signalling and the development of new EV diagnostic tests.

EVs protect miRNA from nucleases in the peripheral blood. Other non-coding RNAs, such as lncRNAs are enriched in EVs but knowledge of their roles in cellular response and metabolic disease homeostasis is limited. It is currently difficult to ascertain whether EVs, especially those from clinical cohorts are solely biomarkers of existing metabolic disease or triggered by disturbances in homeostasis, such as insulin insensitivity and hyperglycaemia. By utilising primary human cell cultures in addition to clinical cohorts, researchers can begin to understand whether metabolic stimuli such as hyperglycaemia are inducing transient changes in EVs or alter cellular function that can be detected in EV cargo.

Metabolic EV studies to date have largely focused on either EV miRNA or EV proteome but few efforts have been made to explore synergistic/co-ordinated disease signatures in the combined EV RNA–proteome. This combined approach would support the notion that EVs are generated under specific disease conditions and promote pathology by direct cellular targeting. The pool of EVs in plasma and urine offers opportunities for disease phenotyping. However, research efforts are hindered by an inability to definitely ascertain the tissues and parent cells producing and releasing EV. Combined ‘-omics’ approaches for EV phenotyping would provide vital insight into the characteristics of EVs in metabolic disease and potentially identify new strategies for disease treatment.

Notes

Contribution statement

All authors were responsible for drafting the article and revising it critically for important intellectual content. All authors approved the version to be published.

Funding

Work in the authors’ laboratories is supported by research grants from AstraZeneca through the ICMC (MA), the Swedish Research council (MA; 2015-0358), the Strategic Research Program in Diabetes at Karolinska Institutet (MA), the British Heart Foundation (NA and RC), the Centre of Research Excellence, Oxford (NA and RC; RE/13/1/30181) and BHF Project Grant (NA and RC; PG/18/53/33895). All authors acknowledge support from the Tripartite Immunometabolism Consortium, Novo Nordisk Foundation (NNF15CC0018486) and the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.

Duality of interest

The authors declare that there is no duality of interest associated with this manuscript.

Supplementary material

125_2019_5014_MOESM1_ESM.pptx (164 kb)
ESM 1 (PPTX 164 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Srikanthan K, Feyh A, Visweshwar H, Shapiro JI, Sodhi K (2016) Systematic review of metabolic syndrome biomarkers: a panel for early detection, management, and risk stratification in the West Virginian population. Int J Med Sci 13(1):25–38.  https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.13800 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pomatto MAC, Gai C, Deregibus MC, Tetta C, Camussi G (2018) Noncoding RNAs carried by extracellular vesicles in endocrine diseases. Int J Endocrinol 2018:4302096.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4302096 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    O’Neill S, Bohl M, Gregersen S, Hermansen K, O’Driscoll L (2016) Blood-based biomarkers for metabolic syndrome. Trends Endocrinol Metab 27(6):363–374.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2016.03.012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Martínez MC, Andriantsitohaina R (2017) Extracellular vesicles in metabolic syndrome. Circ Res 120(10):1674–1686.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.309419 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lakhter AJ, Sims EK (2015) Minireview: emerging roles for extracellular vesicles in diabetes and related metabolic disorders. Mol Endocrinol 29(11):1535–1548.  https://doi.org/10.1210/me.2015-1206 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kobayashi Y, Eguchi A, Tempaku M et al (2018) Circulating extracellular vesicles are associated with lipid and insulin metabolism. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 315(4):E574–E582.  https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00160.2018 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Khalyfa A, Poroyko VA, Qiao Z et al (2017) Exosomes and metabolic function in mice exposed to alternating dark-light cycles mimicking night shift work schedules. Front Physiol 8:882.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00882 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hulsmans M, Holvoet P (2013) MicroRNA-containing microvesicles regulating inflammation in association with atherosclerotic disease. Cardiovasc Res.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvt161 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Freeman DW, Noren Hooten N, Eitan E et al (2018) Altered extracellular vesicle concentration, cargo and function in diabetes mellitus. Diabetes.  https://doi.org/10.2337/db17-1308 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eitan E, Green J, Bodogai M et al (2017) Age-related changes in plasma extracellular vesicle characteristics and internalization by leukocytes. Sci Rep 7(1):1342.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01386-z CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Eguchi A, Lazic M, Armando AM et al (2016) Circulating adipocyte-derived extracellular vesicles are novel markers of metabolic stress. J Mol Med (Berl) 94(11):1241–1253.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00109-016-1446-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Agouni A, Lagrue-Lak-Hal AH, Ducluzeau PH et al (2008) Endothelial dysfunction caused by circulating microparticles from patients with metabolic syndrome. Am J Pathol 173(4):1210–1219.  https://doi.org/10.2353/ajpath.2008.080228 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Akbar N, Digby JE, Cahill TJ et al (2017) Endothelium-derived extracellular vesicles promote splenic monocyte mobilization in myocardial infarction. JCI Insight 2(17).  https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.93344
  14. 14.
    Couch Y, Akbar N, Roodselaar J et al (2017) Circulating endothelial cell-derived extracellular vesicles mediate the acute phase response and sickness behaviour associated with CNS inflammation. Sci Rep 7(1):9574–9512.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09710-3 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Javeed N (2019) Shedding perspective on extracellular vesicle biology in diabetes and associated metabolic syndromes. Endocrinology 160(2):399–408.  https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2018-01010 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Charlotte L, Jose MV, Derek MY, Sean MD (2016) Microvesicles and exosomes: new players in metabolic and cardiovascular disease. J Endocrinol 228(2):R57–R71.  https://doi.org/10.1530/JOE-15-0201 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ramirez MI, Amorim MG, Gadelha C et al (2018) Technical challenges of working with extracellular vesicles. Nanoscale 10(3):881–906.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C7NR08360B CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lee HM, Choi EJ, Kim JH et al (2010) A membranous form of ICAM-1 on exosomes efficiently blocks leukocyte adhesion to activated endothelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 397(2):251–256.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.05.094 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Théry C, Witwer KW, Aikawa E et al (2018) Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018): a position statement of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and update of the MISEV2014 guidelines. J Extracell Vesicles 7(1):1535750.  https://doi.org/10.1080/20013078.2018.1535750 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kowal J, Arras G, Colombo M et al (2016) Proteomic comparison defines novel markers to characterize heterogeneous populations of extracellular vesicle subtypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113(8):E968.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1521230113 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Couch Y, Akbar N, Davis S et al (2017) Inflammatory stroke extracellular vesicles induce macrophage activation. Stroke 48(8):2292–2296.  https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017236 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Delić D, Eisele C, Schmid R et al (2016) Urinary exosomal miRNA signature in type ii diabetic nephropathy patients. PLoS One 11(3):e0150154.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150154 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    La Marca V, Fierabracci A (2017) Insights into the diagnostic potential of extracellular vesicles and their miRNA signature from liquid biopsy as early biomarkers of diabetic micro/macrovascular complications. Int J Mol Sci 18(9):1974.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18091974 CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Li S, Wei J, Zhang C et al (2016) Cell-derived microparticles in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cell Physiol Biochem 39(6):2439–2450.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000452512 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Berezin AE, Kremzer AA, Berezina TA, Martovitskaya YV (2016) The pattern of circulating microparticles in patients with diabetes mellitus with asymptomatic atherosclerosis. Acta Clin Belg 71(1):38–45.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17843286.2015.1110894 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pardo F, Villalobos-Labra R, Sobrevia B, Toledo F, Sobrevia L (2018) Extracellular vesicles in obesity and diabetes mellitus. Mol Asp Med 60:81–91.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mam.2017.11.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Eichner NZM, Erdbr FC, Gger U, Malin SK (2018) Extracellular vesicles: a novel target for exercise-mediated reductions in type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease risk. J Diabetes Res 2018:14.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7807245 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Eichner NZM, Gilbertson NM, Gaitan JM et al (2018) Low cardiorespiratory fitness is associated with higher extracellular vesicle counts in obese adults. Physiol Rep 6(10):e13701.  https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.13701 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Balaphas A, Meyer J, Sadoul K et al (2019) Platelets and platelet-derived extracellular vesicles in liver physiology and disease. Hepatol Commun 3(7):855–866.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hep4.1358 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Randriamboavonjy V, Fleming I (2012) Platelet function and signaling in diabetes mellitus. Curr Vasc Pharmacol 10(5):532–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cauwenberghs S, Feijge MAH, Harper AGS, Sage SO, Curvers J, Heemskerk JWM (2006) Shedding of procoagulant microparticles from unstimulated platelets by integrin-mediated destabilization of actin cytoskeleton. FEBS Lett 580(22):5313–5320.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2006.08.082 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Stepanian A, Bourguignat L, Hennou S et al (2013) Microparticle increase in severe obesity: not related to metabolic syndrome and unchanged after massive weight loss. Obesity 21(11):2236–2243.  https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.20365 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rosińska J, Łukasik M, Kozubski W (2017) The impact of vascular disease treatment on platelet-derived microvesicles. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 31(5–6):627–644.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-017-6757-7 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mori Marcelo A, Raghavan P, Thomou T et al (2012) Role of MicroRNA processing in adipose tissue in stress defense and longevity. Cell Metab 16(3):336–347.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2012.07.017 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Asztalos BF, Batista M, Horvath KV et al (2003) Change in α1 HDL concentration predicts progression in coronary artery stenosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 23(5):847–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Acosta JR, Douagi I, Andersson DP et al (2016) Increased fat cell size: a major phenotype of subcutaneous white adipose tissue in non-obese individuals with type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 59(3):560–570.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-015-3810-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Eguchi A, Mulya A, Lazic M et al (2015) Microparticles release by adipocytes act as “Find-Me” signals to promote macrophage migration. PLoS One 10(4):e0123110.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123110 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hubal MJ, Nadler EP, Ferrante SC et al (2017) Circulating adipocyte-derived exosomal microRNAs associated with decreased insulin resistance after gastric bypass. Obesity 25(1):102–110.  https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.21709 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Obata Y, Kita S, Koyama Y et al (2018) Adiponectin/T-cadherin system enhances exosome biogenesis and decreases cellular ceramides by exosomal release. JCI Insight 3(8):e99680.  https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.99680 CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Thomou T, Mori MA, Dreyfuss JM et al (2017) Adipose-derived circulating miRNAs regulate gene expression in other tissues. Nature 542(7642):450–455.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21365 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Koeck ES, Iordanskaia T, Sevilla S et al (2014) Adipocyte exosomes induce transforming growth factor beta pathway dysregulation in hepatocytes: a novel paradigm for obesity-related liver disease. J Surg Res 192(2):268–275.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2014.06.050 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wadey RM, Connolly KD, Mathew D, Walters G, Rees DA, James PE (2019) Inflammatory adipocyte-derived extracellular vesicles promote leukocyte attachment to vascular endothelial cells. Atherosclerosis 283:19–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2019.01.013 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Crewe C, Joffin N, Rutkowski JM et al (2018) An endothelial-to-adipocyte extracellular vesicle axis governed by metabolic state. Cell 175(3):695–708.e613.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.09.005 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Zhao H, Shang Q, Pan Z et al (2018) Exosomes from adipose-derived stem cells attenuate adipose inflammation and obesity through polarizing M2 macrophages and beiging in white adipose tissue. Diabetes 67(2):235–247.  https://doi.org/10.2337/db17-0356 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Amano SU, Cohen JL, Vangala P et al (2014) Local proliferation of macrophages contributes to obesity-associated adipose tissue inflammation. Cell Metab 19(1):162–171.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2013.11.017 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Russo L, Lumeng CN (2018) Properties and functions of adipose tissue macrophages in obesity. Immunology 155(4):407–417.  https://doi.org/10.1111/imm.13002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ying W, Riopel M, Bandyopadhyay G et al (2017) Adipose tissue macrophage-derived exosomal miRNAs can modulate in vivo and in vitro insulin sensitivity. Cell 171(2):372–384.e312.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.08.035 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Chen Y, Siegel F, Kipschull S et al (2013) miR-155 regulates differentiation of brown and beige adipocytes via a bistable circuit. Nat Commun 4:1769.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2742 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Ortega FJ, Moreno M, Mercader JM et al (2015) Inflammation triggers specific microRNA profiles in human adipocytes and macrophages and in their supernatants. Clin Epigenetics 7(1):49–10.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-015-0083-3 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Acosta JR, Joost S, Karlsson K et al (2017) Single cell transcriptomics suggest that human adipocyte progenitor cells constitute a homogeneous cell population. Stem Cell Res Ther 8(1):250–256.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-017-0701-4 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Giannella A, Radu CM, Franco L et al (2017) Circulating levels and characterization of microparticles in patients with different degrees of glucose tolerance. Cardiovasc Diabetol 16(1):118–110.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-017-0600-0 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Jansen F, Yang X, Hoelscher M et al (2013) Endothelial microparticle-mediated transfer of microRNA-126 promotes vascular endothelial cell repair via SPRED1 and is abrogated in glucose-damaged endothelial microparticles. Circulation.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001720 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Jansen F, Wang H, Przybilla D et al (2016) Vascular endothelial microparticles-incorporated microRNAs are altered in patients with diabetes mellitus. Cardiovasc Diabetol 15:49.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-016-0367-8 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    de Jong OG, Verhaar MC, Chen Y et al (2012) Cellular stress conditions are reflected in the protein and RNA content of endothelial cell-derived exosomes. J Extracell Vesicles 1(1):18396.  https://doi.org/10.3402/jev.v1i0.18396 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Liem M, Ang C-S, Mathivanan S (2017) Insulin mediated activation of PI3K/Akt Signalling pathway modifies the proteomic cargo of extracellular vesicles. Proteomics 17(23–24):1600371.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201600371 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Imai T, Takahashi Y, Nishikawa M et al (2015) Macrophage-dependent clearance of systemically administered B16BL6-derived exosomes from the blood circulation in mice. J Extracell Vesicles 4:26238.  https://doi.org/10.3402/jev.v4.26238 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Saunderson SC, Dunn AC, Crocker PR, McLellan AD (2014) CD169 mediates the capture of exosomes in spleen and lymph node. Blood 123(2):208–216.  https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2013-03-489732 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Isla H, Abi Y, Ashley D et al (2018) Exacerbation of acute traumatic brain injury by circulating extracellular vesicles. J Neurotrauma 35(4):639–651.  https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2017.5049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Song M, Han L, Chen F et al (2018) Adipocyte-derived exosomes carrying sonic hedgehog mediate M1 macrophage polarization-induced insulin resistance via Ptch and PI3K pathways. Cell Physiol Biochem 48(4):1416–1432.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000492252 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Zhang Y, Shi L, Mei H et al (2015) Inflamed macrophage microvesicles induce insulin resistance in human adipocytes. Nutr Metab 12(1):21–14.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12986-015-0016-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Ahmadi Badi S, Moshiri A, Fateh A et al (2017) Microbiota-derived extracellular vesicles as new systemic regulators. Front Microbiol 8:1610.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01610 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Choi Y, Kwon Y, Kim D-K et al (2015) Gut microbe-derived extracellular vesicles induce insulin resistance, thereby impairing glucose metabolism in skeletal muscle. Sci Rep 5:15878.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep15878 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Zhou F, Paz HA, Shu J et al (2018) Dietary bovine milk exosomes elicit changes in microbial communities in C57BL/6 mice. bioRxiv:356048.  https://doi.org/10.1101/356048
  64. 64.
    Teng Y, Ren Y, Sayed M et al (2018) Plant-derived exosomal microRNAs shape the gut microbiota. Cell Host Microbe 24(5):637–652.e638.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2018.10.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Leiferman A, Shu J, Grove R, Cui J, Adamec J, Zempleni J (2018) A diet defined by its content of bovine milk exosomes and their RNA cargos has moderate effects on gene expression, amino acid profiles and grip strength in skeletal muscle in C57BL/6 mice. J Nutr Biochem 59:123–128.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnutbio.2018.06.007 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of MedicineUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
  2. 2.Integrated Cardio Metabolic Centre, Department of MedicineKarolinska Institutet, NOVUMHuddingeSweden

Personalised recommendations