Insulin resistance, lipotoxicity, type 2 diabetes and atherosclerosis: the missing links. The Claude Bernard Lecture 2009
- 9.8k Downloads
Insulin resistance is a hallmark of type 2 diabetes mellitus and is associated with a metabolic and cardiovascular cluster of disorders (dyslipidaemia, hypertension, obesity [especially visceral], glucose intolerance, endothelial dysfunction), each of which is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Multiple prospective studies have documented an association between insulin resistance and accelerated CVD in patients with type 2 diabetes, as well as in non-diabetic individuals. The molecular causes of insulin resistance, i.e. impaired insulin signalling through the phosphoinositol-3 kinase pathway with intact signalling through the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway, are responsible for the impairment in insulin-stimulated glucose metabolism and contribute to the accelerated rate of CVD in type 2 diabetes patients. The current epidemic of diabetes is being driven by the obesity epidemic, which represents a state of tissue fat overload. Accumulation of toxic lipid metabolites (fatty acyl CoA, diacylglycerol, ceramide) in muscle, liver, adipocytes, beta cells and arterial tissues contributes to insulin resistance, beta cell dysfunction and accelerated atherosclerosis, respectively, in type 2 diabetes. Treatment with thiazolidinediones mobilises fat out of tissues, leading to enhanced insulin sensitivity, improved beta cell function and decreased atherogenesis. Insulin resistance and lipotoxicity represent the missing links (beyond the classical cardiovascular risk factors) that help explain the accelerated rate of CVD in type 2 diabetic patients.
KeywordsCardiovascular disease Endothelial dysfunction Insulin resistance Insulin signalling Lipotoxicity Obesity Review Type 2 diabetes
Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes
Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron MR Controlled Evaluation
Extracellular regulated kinase
HOMA of insulin resistance
Nuclear factor kβ
Platelet-derived growth factor
Protein kinase C
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
Veterans Administration Diabetes Trial
Vascular smooth muscle cells
Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a complex metabolic disorder complicated by microvascular and macrovascular disease . Hyperglycaemia is the major risk factor for microvascular complications [2, 3] and reduction in HbA1c decreases the incidence of retinopathy, nephropathy and neuropathy [2, 3]. For every 1% decrement in HbA1c, the incidence of microvascular complications is reduced by ∼25% to 35%. Although microvascular complications are a major cause of morbidity, macrovascular complications represent the primary cause of mortality with heart attacks and stroke accounting for around 80% of all deaths . In type 2 diabetic patients without prior history of myocardial infarction, the 7-year incidence of myocardial infarction is equal to or greater than the 7-year incidence of heart attack in non-diabetic individuals with prior myocardial infarction . In diabetic patients with a previous heart attack, the 7-year incidence of subsequent myocardial infarction is more than double (45%) that of non-diabetic individuals . Similarly, the recurrence rate of major atherosclerotic complications in type 2 diabetic patients with a prior cardiovascular event is very high, around 6% per year . These results document that diabetes is a cardiovascular equivalent.
Hyperglycaemia and cardiovascular disease
Given the above observations and the negative results of the ACCORD , ADVANCE  and VADT  studies, in which intensified glycaemic control failed to reduce macrovascular complications, it is reasonable to ask what role hyperglycaemia plays in the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Epidemiological analysis of the UKPDS  demonstrated that rising HbA1c was associated with increased risk of myocardial infarction and stroke. However, the increased hazard ratio was modest and reduction in HbA1c following insulin or sulfonylurea therapy did not significantly decrease myocardial infarctions or strokes , although long-term follow up did demonstrate a significant reduction in atherosclerotic cardiovascular events . These results suggest a ‘memory’ effect of improved glycaemic control, reminiscent of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial in type 1 diabetic patients .
First, the underlying hypothesis is not based on sound pathophysiological evidence. Hyperglycaemia is a weak risk factor for CVD compared with other well established risk factors, e.g. dyslipidaemia and hypertension; moreover, most patients in the above studies were being treated with lipid-lowering medications, antihypertensive drugs and anti-inflammatory agents [7, 8, 9]. Second, participants had long-standing diabetes with a prior cardiovascular event or multiple risk factors for CVD. Third, insulin may be the wrong drug for prevention of CVD. Insulin is associated with weight gain [13, 14] and weight gain (obesity) is a major risk factor for CVD [15, 16]. Moreover, even small increments in plasma insulin cause severe insulin resistance [17, 18], which is also a risk factor for CVD. Fourth, the study population, although large in the ACCORD and ADVANCE studies, was inadequate, given the low annual incidence of cardiovascular complications (∼2% per year), to demonstrate a beneficial effect of improved glycaemic control.
Insulin and atherosclerosis
Many in vivo and in vitro studies have demonstrated that insulin, especially at high doses, can promote atherogenesis [19, 20, 21] (see textbox: Insulin and atherosclerosis). Insulin promotes de novo lipogenesis and augments hepatic VLDL synthesis [22, 23] via its stimulation of sterol regulatory-element-binding protein-1c and its inhibition of acetyl-CoA carboxylase . In cultured arterial smooth muscle cells, insulin augmented LDL-cholesterol transport . Insulin is a potent growth factor, augments collagen synthesis [26, 27], stimulates arterial smooth muscle cell proliferation [28, 29] and turns on multiple genes involved in inflammation .
In vivo studies in dogs , rabbits  and chickens  provide further evidence that insulin promotes atherogenesis. Non-diabetic chickens fed a high-cholesterol diet develop severe atherosclerosis, which regresses when switched to low-cholesterol diet . Insulin administration when the low-cholesterol diet was instituted prevented regression of coronary atherosclerosis. Alloxan-induced diabetic rabbits fed a high-cholesterol diet developed marked hypercholesterolaemia, but their aorta remained free of atherosclerotic plaque . If rabbits are treated with insulin, severe atherosclerosis develops. Dogs receiving a low-dose insulin infusion into a hindlimb artery (to cause local, physiological hyperinsulinaemia) developed severe femoral atherosclerosis, whereas all other arteries remained free of atherosclerotic plaque . Rats chronically (7–10 days) infused with insulin while maintaining euglycaemia became markedly resistant to the stimulation of glucose uptake and suppression of plasma NEFA by insulin , and became hypertensive .
Two other points about hyperinsulinaemia are noteworthy. In humans with normal glucose tolerance, insulin infusion to raise fasting plasma insulin from 57 to 104 pmol/l for 3 days produced severe insulin resistance [17, 18], a risk factor for CVD (see subsequent discussion). Finally, insulin therapy is invariably associated with weight gain [13, 14]. Most studies designed to reduce HbA1c <7.0% have required large insulin doses, failed to achieve the targeted HbA1c goal and resulted in weight gain [13, 14]. The study of Henry et al.  is especially noteworthy. HbA1c was reduced from 7.7% to 5.1%, but this was associated with weight gain of 8.6 kg. This is of major concern since the current diabetes epidemic is being driven by obesity, a major risk factor for CVD [15, 16]. Weight gain promotes atherogenesis via multiple mechanisms including dyslipidaemia and hypertension. Fat deposition in the arterial wall promotes inflammation, which directly accelerates atherogenesis [34, 35, 36, 37]. Interestingly, 27.8% of individuals in the intensive treatment arm of the ACCORD study gained >10 kg .
Insulin resistance (metabolic) syndrome
Hypertension is a central feature of the insulin resistance syndrome. Many studies have demonstrated that hypertensive individuals are resistant to insulin, primarily involving the glycogen synthetic pathway (Fig. 1) [47, 48, 49, 50, 51], and hypertension is a well established risk factor for CVD.
Type 2 diabetic and obese individuals develop dyslipidaemia characterised by hypertriacylglycerolaemia, reduced HDL-cholesterol, and small dense atherogenic LDL particles [39, 40, 52, 53], each of which is a major CVD risk factor. We and others [51, 54, 55, 56, 57] have shown that hypertriacylglycerolaemia, but not hypercholesterolaemia is associated with insulin resistance primarily involving the glycogen synthetic pathway (Fig. 1). The frequency of hypercholesterolaemia is not increased in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus . However, if elevated, LDL-cholesterol acts synergistically with other risk factors to accelerate atherogenesis .
To examine the relationship between insulin resistance and CVD, we compared normal glucose-tolerant individuals with diffuse coronary artery disease with normal glucose-tolerant participants with clean coronary arteries . Individuals with coronary artery disease manifested marked insulin resistance, primarily affecting the glycogen synthetic pathway in skeletal muscle  (Fig. 1). Studies by Reaven  and Paternostro et al.  have demonstrated that non-diabetic individuals with established coronary artery disease are resistant to insulin. Using positron emission tomography, the myocardium of non-diabetic individuals with coronary artery disease  and type 2 diabetic patients without coronary artery disease  has been shown to be resistant to insulin.
In summary, each component of the ‘metabolic’ syndrome is characterised by insulin resistance involving the glycogen synthetic pathway (Fig. 1). Insulin resistance is present at the stage of impaired glucose tolerance [63, 64] and even before any abnormality in glucose tolerance is observed . Thus, we prefer to refer to the metabolic and cardiovascular cluster of factors that comprise the ‘metabolic’ syndrome as the ‘insulin resistance syndrome’ [20, 21, 66]. This focuses clearly on a specific pathogenic aetiology, rather than on a diffuse cluster of factors that may or may not be related to the same underlying pathophysiology.
Insulin resistance and the insulin resistance syndrome predict future cardiovascular disease
Molecular causes of insulin resistance syndrome
Normal insulin signalling
In muscle, insulin binding to its receptor [77, 79] leads to tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1, which mediates insulin’s effect on glucose metabolism. In liver, IRS-2 phosphorylation mediates the actions of insulin. IRS-1 activates phosphatidylinositol (PI)-3 kinase , which catalyses 3′ phosphorylation of PI, PI-4 phosphate and PI-4,5 diphosphate, and augments glucose transport and glycogen synthase [81, 82, 83]. Inhibitors of PI-3 kinase inhibit glucose transport , hexokinase II  and glycogen synthase .
Insulin signalling also plays a critical role in activating nitric oxide synthase, which regulates nitric oxide production [86, 87, 88]. Nitric oxide is a potent vasodilator and anti-atherogenic agent . Nitric oxide deficiency activates multiple pathways involved in atherogenesis [89, 90]. Thus, a defect in insulin signalling, not only impairs glucose utilisation, but causes hypertension and accelerated atherosclerosis.
Insulin is a potent growth factor [20, 26, 27, 91, 92], whose growth-promoting effects are mediated via the mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase pathway . After the interaction between IRS-1 and SHC, extracellular regulated kinase (ERK) is activated [77, 94], translocates into the nucleus and catalyses phosphorylation of transcription factors that promote cell growth, cell proliferation and cell differentiation . Thus, this pathway plays an important role in atherogenesis. MAP kinase blockade prevents stimulation of insulin’s growth-promoting effects, but has no effect on the metabolic actions of insulin [95, 96]. Insulin resistance in the PI-3 kinase (metabolic) pathway with intact MAP kinase signalling activates multiple inflammatory pathways, including inhibitor kβ (IkB)/nuclear factor kβ (NFkB)  and c-Jun N-terminal kinase , which also cause insulin resistance. Not surprisingly, sustained physiological hyperinsulinaemia activates multiple genes involved in inflammation .
Insulin receptor defects in type 2 diabetes
Some studies [44, 78, 99] have demonstrated decreased insulin binding to monocytes and adipocytes in type 2 diabetic patients. However, in muscle and liver, insulin binding to solubilised insulin receptors is normal in obese normal glucose-tolerant and lean type 2 diabetic participants .
Insulin receptor tyrosine kinase activity
In normal-weight and obese diabetic patients, insulin-stimulated insulin receptor tyrosine kinase activity was reduced and could not be explained by decreased insulin receptor number/binding . Normalisation of fasting plasma glucose with weight loss corrected the defect in insulin receptor tyrosine kinase , indicating that the defect is acquired.
Insulin signalling (IRS-1 and PI-3 kinase) defects
As indicated in Fig. 4b, we have shown that in skeletal muscle of lean individuals with normal glucose tolerance, physiological hyperinsulinaemia increases insulin receptor and IRS-1 tyrosine phosphorylation by 150% to 200% [94, 103]. In obese non-diabetic participants, activation of these two insulin signalling events in muscle was reduced, while in type 2 diabetic individuals insulin had no significant stimulatory effect . Association of PI-3 kinase with IRS-1/IRS-2 was greatly reduced in obese non-diabetic and type 2 diabetic participants and correlated closely with impaired muscle glycogen synthase activity and with in vivo insulin-stimulated glucose disposal .
MAP kinase signalling
Our studies in human skeletal muscle  (Fig. 4b) were the first to demonstrate that in insulin-resistant type 2 diabetic and obese non-diabetic individuals the profound insulin resistance in the PI-3 kinase pathway contrasts with the normal stimulatory effect of insulin on the MAP kinase pathway (MAP kinase kinase 1 activity and ERK1/2 phosphorylation/activity) . Maintained insulin stimulation of the MAP kinase pathway, with persistent insulin resistance in the PI-3 kinase pathway, represents an important pathogenic mechanism for development of CVD in insulin-resistant states (see subsequent discussion).
Molecular link between insulin resistance and atherosclerosis
Our studies in man demonstrated that impaired IRS-1 tyrosine phosphorylation/PI-3 kinase activation in lean type 2 diabetic and obese non-diabetic participants causes a profound defect in glucose transport/phosphorylation and glycogen synthesis (Fig. 4b) [104, 105]. Because nitric oxide synthase is activated by the same PI-3 kinase pathway, nitric oxide production is impaired [106, 107], resulting in endothelial dysfunction [108, 109, 110] and accelerated atherosclerosis [110, 111, 112, 113]. This pathogenic sequence establishes the molecular basis linking insulin resistance, inflammation and accelerated atherosclerosis in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus and may help account for the missing 30% CVD risk that cannot be explained by circulating cardiovascular risk factors [74, 76] (Fig. 4b). This pathogenic sequence also explains why insulin resistance is a strong predictor of CVD [67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73].
Once the insulin signalling defect becomes established, it initiates a reverberating negative feedback cycle. Impaired glucose utilisation causes hyperglycaemia, which stimulates insulin secretion (Fig. 4b). Because the IRS-1/PI-3 kinase pathway is defective, the MAP kinase pathway is excessively stimulated since it is normally sensitive to insulin. Increased IRS-1 serine phosphorylation, induced by metabolic/inflammatory abnormalities present in the diabetic state (reviewed by Draznin ), further impairs insulin signalling through the PI-3 kinase pathway [115, 116]. In diabetic and obese patients, continued MAP kinase pathway stimulation  causes vascular smooth muscle proliferation, increased collagen formation and excessive production of growth factors/inflammatory cytokines, contributing to accelerated atherosclerosis. The same insulin signalling defects that we have demonstrated in skeletal muscle of type 2 diabetic patients have been demonstrated in arterial vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) in animal models of diabetes and in humans [92, 117, 118].
Draznin and colleagues [93, 114] have provided additional evidence for this ‘dual insulin signalling hypothesis’. In cultured VSMCs and endothelial cells treated with PI-3 kinase inhibitors, insulin cannot activate nitric oxide synthase to generate nitric oxide and these cells are no longer protected from the detrimental effects of vascular endothelial growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) and other inflammatory peptides. Insulin continues to stimulate VSMC proliferation/migration even though the PI-3 kinase pathway has been inhibited and increases prenylated Ras (rat sarcoma) and Rho (Ras related homologue), leading to augmented VSMC response to the growth-promoting effects of IGF-1, epidermal growth factor, PDGF and angiotensin II. These effects are enhanced when PI-3 kinase is inhibited [119, 120]. The sensitising effect of VSMCs to angiotensin II is of particular importance, since hyperinsulinaemia doubles the ability of angiotensin II to transactivate NF-kB , a powerful nuclear transcription factor that activates multiple inflammatory pathways involved in atherogenesis [121, 122] and causes IRS-1 serine phosphorylation, which inhibits insulin signalling . Angiotensin II also serine phosphorylates IRS-1 in aortic smooth muscle and skeletal muscle cells . This provides a pathophysiological link between insulin resistance, atherogenesis and essential hypertension.
Genetic vs acquired defects in insulin signal transduction
To examine whether the insulin signalling defect is genetic or acquired, we studied lean normal glucose-tolerant offspring of two diabetic parents . These offspring are severely insulin-resistant [65, 103] and at high risk of developing diabetes. Insulin-stimulated glucose disposal was markedly reduced despite increased insulin receptor tyrosine phosphorylation . Basal and insulin-stimulated IRS-1 tyrosine phosphorylation/PI-3 kinase activity were markedly reduced. From these observations five points ensue: (1) early in the natural history of type 2 diabetes insulin receptor activation is normal (Fig. 4b); (2) the rate-limiting step for insulin signalling resides at IRS-1; (3) molecular abnormalities responsible for insulin resistance are present long before onset of overt diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance; (4) insulin normally augments MAP kinase, but not PI-3 kinase, demonstrating dissociation between regulation of PI-3 kinase and MAP kinase pathways; and (5) tissues of offspring with normal glucose tolerance are being ‘incubated’ in a ‘sea’ of molecular insulin resistance and atherogenicity from an early age, explaining in part why clinically evident CVD is present in 15 to 20% of individuals at initial diagnosis  and why insulin resistance and CVD are closely linked [19, 20, 44, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72]. Only thiazolidinediones simultaneously augment the PI-3 kinase (metabolic) pathway while inhibiting the MAP kinase (atherogenic) pathway [126, 127]. Thiazolidinediones also enhance nitric oxide synthase activity, increasing nitric oxide production [128, 129, 130]; they also reduce high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels and improve multiple cardiovascular risk factors in type 2 diabetic participants .
Lipotoxicity, insulin resistance and atherosclerotic CVD
In animals  and humans , plasma NEFA elevation by lipid infusion also increased intramyocellular diacylglycerol, a potent activator of protein kinase C (PKC) isoforms, which inhibit insulin signalling through serine phosphorylation of IRS-1 . Muscle  and plasma  ceramide levels are also increased in obese and type 2 diabetic individuals, correlating closely with severity of insulin resistance.
In summary, much evidence supports the notion that increased plasma NEFA/intramyocellular levels of toxic lipid metabolites (long-chain fatty acyl CoAs, diacylglycerol, ceramides) play a role in the pathogenesis of muscle/liver insulin resistance.
NEFA, inflammation and atherosclerosis: the neglected lipid
Skeletal muscle IkB content is decreased in type 2 diabetic patients , indicative of increased NFkB activity. We have confirmed this by demonstrating increased NF-kB p50–p65 DNA binding activity in type 2 diabetic and obese individuals (P Tantiwong, K Shammugasumdaran, A Monroy, S Ghosh, E Cersosimo, A Sriwijitkamol, RA DeFronzo, S Mohan, N Musi, unpublished results). Reduced IkB and increased NFkB p50–p65 binding activity were strongly correlated with reduced insulin sensitivity.
Multiple stimuli , including lipids, activate IkB kinase/NFkB, causing insulin resistance in cultured myocytes  and muscle from rodents [155, 161] and humans . In human myocytes, palmitate enhances NFkB activity and increases IL6 mRNA, a downstream gene regulated by NFkB. Transfection of myocytes with an adenovirus-IkB super repressor mutant blocked the augmentation of NFkB activity and of IL6 mRNA expression by palmitate .
NEFA also stimulate formation of collagen, an integral component of the atherosclerotic plaque [163, 164]. Physiological NEFA elevation in participants with normal glucose tolerance increases mRNA expression of collagen, fibronectin and lumican, as well as connective tissue growth factor , a member of the CCN gene family, which mediates fibrotic responses . Increased connective tissue growth factor levels are a characteristic finding in complicated atherosclerotic plaques and induce mononuclear cell chemotaxis .
Plasma NEFA exert profound effects on endothelial function. Insulin-stimulated blood flow is mediated via nitric oxide  and is impaired in obese and type 2 diabetic individuals [108, 165]. Experimental plasma NEFA elevation in participants with normal glucose tolerance reduced endothelium-dependent blood flow, without altering endothelium-independent blood flow . Endothelial dysfunction is associated with accelerated atherosclerosis and insulin resistance [110, 111], providing another mechanism via which NEFA promote CVD in type 2 diabetes mellitus.
‘Adiposopathy’ is another form of lipotoxicity . Fat cells produce adipocytokines, which travel to distant sites (muscle, liver, arterial tissue) where they exert deleterious effects on metabolism and vascular function. Adipose tissue of obese and type 2 diabetic individuals is infiltrated by mononuclear cells and is in a state of chronic inflammation . The adipocytes and infiltrated macrophages secrete proinflammatory/prothrombotic cytokines (TNFα, resistin, IL-6, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, angiotensinogen) that promote atherogenesis and cause insulin resistance (reviewed by Bays et al. ). Adipocytes also under-produce adiponectin, a potent insulin-sensitising, anti-atherogenic cytokine .
What therapeutic interventions reverse lipotoxicity?
Tissue fat overload is explained by: (1) excessive energy intake; (2) increased lipolysis in insulin-resistant adipocytes, leading to increased plasma NEFA and enhanced influx into muscle/liver; and (3) decreased fat oxidation. Weight loss (energy-intake restriction) has proven effective in reducing total body fat content . Glucagon-like peptide-1 analogues are potent appetite suppressants and effectively promote weight loss .
Thiazolidinediones exert the following unique actions that ameliorate lipotoxicity (Textbox 3): (1) decrease plasma NEFA by inhibition of lipolysis; (2) reduction of muscle long-chain fatty acyl CoA levels; (3) redistribution of fat within the body; and (4) amelioration of adiposopathy.
Thiazolidinediones, insulin sensitivity and NEFA metabolism
Thiazolidinediones are potent insulin sensitisers in muscle and liver [126, 127, 140, 141, 172, 173] and improve sensitivity to the antilipolytic effect of insulin, decreasing basal NEFA turnover/plasma NEFA . Thiazolidinediones also improve hepatic insulin sensitivity, leading to decreased basal hepatic glucose production and enhanced hepatic glucose production suppression by insulin [140, 172, 173, 174]. Reduced plasma NEFA levels correlate closely with improved insulin-stimulated muscle glucose disposal and decreased hepatic glucose production.
Mitochondrial dysfunction, lipotoxicity and thiazolidinediones
Impaired ATP synthesis and mitochondrial dysfunction have been demonstrated in insulin-resistant states including ageing, offspring of diabetic parents, obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus [175, 176, 177, 178, 179]. Using 31P nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, Petersen et al.  have shown that decreased ATP synthesis is associated with increased intramyocellular fat. In isolated mitochondria from obese and type 2 diabetic individuals, we have demonstrated that ATP synthesis is reduced [179, 180] and correlates closely with decreased insulin-stimulated glucose disposal and increased fasting plasma NEFA. To examine whether fatty acid metabolites directly inhibit mitochondrial function, we incubated mitochondria from participants with normal glucose tolerance with palmitoyl carnitine . At concentrations <2 μmol/l, palmitoyl carnitine stimulated ATP synthesis, while at concentrations >2 μmol/l it progressively decreased ATP synthesis and inner mitochondrial membrane potential, which provides the voltage gradient driving electron transport.
Thiazolidinediones and fat topography: clinical implications
Thiazolidinediones redistribute body fat by reducing visceral and increasing subcutaneous fat [189, 190] (Fig. 8). They also reduce muscle fatty acyl CoA, leading to improved insulin sensitivity and glycaemic control [126, 127, 140, 141, 172, 173, 176]. Thiazolidinediones also reduce liver fat and are effective in treating non-alcoholic steatohepatitis [139, 191]. In a randomised, placebo controlled study of 55 participants with type 2 diabetes/impaired glucose tolerance and biopsy-proven non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, pioglitazone reduced liver fat by 54% (p < 0.001), normalised alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase, and reduced hepatic inflammation, ballooning necrosis and fibrosis .
Thiazolidinediones preserve beta cell function in type 2 diabetic patients . Eight double-blind, placebo/active comparator-controlled studies demonstrate that thiazolidinediones have a durable effect in reducing HbA1c (reviewed by DeFronzo ) because of a beta cell protective effect. Five studies in participants with impaired glucose tolerance document that thiazolidinediones markedly reduced conversion to type 2 diabetes, primarily by improving beta cell function (reviewed by DeFronzo ). Using the gold standard insulin secretion/insulin resistance (disposition) index, both pioglitazone and rosiglitazone have been shown to improve beta cell function in drug naive and sulfonylurea-treated type 2 diabetic patients . Thiazolidinediones augment beta cell function by multiple mechanisms, including direct effects (increased GLUT2, glucokinase, Pdx) exerted through PPARγ , and by reducing intracellular fatty acyl CoA levels [194, 195, 196].
Myocardial lipid content is increased in type 2 diabetic individuals [197, 198] and contributes to diastolic dysfunction [198, 199]. The myocardium in type 2 diabetes is markedly insulin-resistant [61, 198]. The insulin resistance cannot be explained by coronary artery disease  and correlates with increased myocardial fat [198, 200]. Rosiglitazone similarly improved myocardial and skeletal muscle insulin resistance . Although myocardial fat content was not measured in these studies, it is reasonable to hypothesise that thiazolidinediones exert their myocardial insulin sensitising effect, in part by reducing myocardial fat content.
Coronary and carotid arterial disease represent the major cause of mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes . Elevated plasma LDL-cholesterol and triacylglycerol, and reduced HDL-cholesterol all contribute to accelerated atherogenesis in type 2 diabetes. Quantitative lipid analysis of atherosclerotic plaques reveals large amounts of NEFA and fatty acid metabolites [35, 36, 37], which can stimulate inflammatory pathways involved in atherogenesis. Pioglitazone reduces plasma triacylglycerol, increases HDL-cholesterol, converts small dense LDL particles to larger more buoyant ones and decreases apolipoprotein B-100 without altering plasma LDL-cholesterol [201, 202]. Thiazolidinediones also markedly reduce plasma NEFA [127, 139, 172], which would be expected to reduce fatty acyl CoAs and other toxic fatty acid metabolites within arterial smooth muscle cells, thus inhibiting atherogenesis. Thiazolidinediones also inhibit release of proinflammatory, prothrombotic, atherogenic adipocytokines from fat tissue [139, 141, 172, 203] and redistribute fat from visceral (atherosclerotic equivalent) to subcutaneous depots [189, 190]. Thus, thiazolidinediones ameliorate all components of the ‘lipotoxicity syndrome’. Therefore, one could expect thiazolidinediones to reduce cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes.
The Prospective Pioglitazone Clinical Trial in Macrovascular Events  examined the effect of pioglitazone on cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes patients with a previous cardiovascular event. Although the primary composite endpoint did not reach statistical significance, a beneficial trend (10% decrease) was observed; the second principal endpoint (time to death, myocardial infarction, stroke) was significantly reduced. Analysis of all double-blind placebo-controlled pioglitazone trials in the USA demonstrated a significant reduction in cardiovascular events . Consistent with these trials, pioglitazone decreased carotid intima medial thickness  and coronary atherosclerotic plaque volume .
Weight gain and thiazolidinedione paradox
Thiazolidinedione treatment is associated with modest weight gain (1–3 kg) that occurs within the first 12 months of treatment. Paradoxically, the greater the weight gain, the greater the reduction in HbA1c and the greater the improvements in insulin sensitivity and beta cell function [173, 189, 192]. This paradox is explained as follows. Thiazolidinediones mobilise fat from muscle, liver and beta cells leading to improved insulin sensitivity and beta cell function. PPARγ receptors are abundant in hypothalamic appetite regulation centres . Thus, thiazolidinediones simultaneously evoke two effects: (1) PPARγ activation in muscle/liver/adipocytes/beta cells; and (2) stimulation of appetite. The former improves glucose homeostasis, while the latter promotes weight gain. Consequently, increased body weight is a strong predictor of improved glycaemic control (HbA1c) in type 2 diabetes mellitus .
Insulin resistance in the PI-3 kinase pathway with normal insulin sensitivity in the MAP kinase pathway plays an important role in accelerated atherogenesis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Lipotoxicity is a major cause of insulin resistance and impaired beta cell function in type 2 diabetes mellitus and plays a central role in the accelerated CVD. Interventions that mobilise fat out of tissues (restriction of energy intake, thiazolidinediones, glucagon-like peptide-1 analogues) are likely to produce a durable reduction in glycaemia and reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular events.
Duality of interest
R. A. DeFronzo is a speaker for Amylin-Lilly and Takeda, has received grants from Amylin, Lilly, Takeda and Bristol Myers Squibb, and is an Advisory Board member and/or consultant for Amylin, Takeda, Boehringer-Ingelheim, ISIS, Novartis and Roche.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
- 2.Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group (1993) The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 329:977–986Google Scholar
- 7.Gerstein HC, Miller ME, Byington RP et al (2008) Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 358:2345–2359Google Scholar
- 10.UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group (1998) Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 352:837–853Google Scholar
- 12.Nathan DM, Cleary PA, Backlund JY et al (2005) Intensive diabetes treatment and cardiovascular disease in patients with type I diabetes. N Engl J Med 22:2643–53Google Scholar
- 18.Iozzo P, Pratipanawatr T, Pijl H et al (2001) Physiological hyperinsulinemia impairs insulin-stimulated glycogen synthase activity and glycogen synthesis. Am J Physiol 280:E712–E719Google Scholar
- 20.DeFronzo RA, Ferrannini E (1991) Insulin resistance: a multifaceted syndrome responsible for NIDDM, obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and ASCVD. Diabetes Care Reviews 14:173–194Google Scholar
- 27.Coletta D, Balas B, Chavez AO et al (2008) Effect of acute physiological hyperinsulinemia on gene expression in human skeletal muscle in vivo. Am J Physiol Endo Metab 294:E910–E917Google Scholar
- 35.Felton CV, Crook D, Davies MJ et al (1997) Relation of plaque lipid composition and morphology to the stability of human aortic plaques. Arterio Throm Vasc Biol 17:1337–1345Google Scholar
- 38.Third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) (2002) Expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. Circulation 106:3143–3421Google Scholar
- 40.Reaven GM (1988) Banting lecture. Role of insulin resistance in human disease. Diabetes 37:1594–1607Google Scholar
- 47.Reaven G (2003) Insulin resistance, hypertension, and coronary heart disease. J Clin Hypertens 5:269–274Google Scholar
- 50.Solini A, DeFronzo RA (1992) Insulin resistance, hypertension, and cellular ion transport systems. Acta Diabetologica 29:196–200Google Scholar
- 52.Rana JS, Visser ME, Arsenault BJ et al. (2010) Metabolic dyslipidemia and risk of future coronary heart disease in apparently healthy men and women: The EPIC-Norfolk prospective population study. Int J Cardiol doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard2009.03.123
- 54.Jeppesen J, Hollenbeck CB, Zhou MY et al (1995) Relation between insulin resistance, hyperinsulinemia, postheparin plasma lipoprotein lipase activity, and postprandial lipemia. Arteriosclerosis Thromb Vasc Biol 15:320–324Google Scholar
- 55.Sheu WH, Shieh SM, Fuh MM et al (1993) Insulin resistance, glucose intolerance, and hyperinsulinemia. Hypertriglyceridemia vs hypercholesterolemia. Arteriosc Throb 13:367–370Google Scholar
- 66.Kashyap SR, DeFronzo RA (2007) The insulin resistance syndrome: physiological considerations. Diabetes Vasc Dis Res 4:13–19Google Scholar
- 72.Bedblad B, Nilsson P, Janzon L et al (2002) Relation between insulin resistance and carotid intima-media thickness and stenosis in non-diabetic subjects. Results from a cross-sectional study in Malmö, Sweden. Diabet Med 17:299–307Google Scholar
- 75.Wilson PWF, D’Agostino RB, Levy D et al (1998) Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factors categories. Circ 97:1837–1847Google Scholar
- 76.Goldsen SH, Folsom AR, Coresh J et al (2002) Risk factor groupings related to insulin resistance and their synergistic effects on subclinical atherosclerosis: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Diabetes 51:3069–3076Google Scholar
- 78.DeFronzo RA (1997) Pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus: metabolic and molecular implications of identifying diabetes genes. Diabetes Rev 5:177–269Google Scholar
- 79.White MF, Livingston JN, Backer JM et al (1992) Mutation of the insulin receptor at tyrosine 960 inhibits signal transmission but does not affect its tyrosine kinase activity. Cell 54:641–649Google Scholar
- 84.Osawa H, Sutherland C, Robey R et al (1996) Analysis of the signaling pathway involved in the regulation of hexokinase II gene transcription by insulin. J Biol Chem 272:16690–16694Google Scholar
- 85.Cross D, Alessi DR, Vandenhead JR et al (1994) The inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase-3 by insulin or insulin-like growth factor 1 in the rat skeletal muscle cell line L6 is blocked by wortmannin but not by rapamycin: evidence that wortmannin blocks activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway in L6 cells between Ras and Raf. Biochem 303:21–26Google Scholar
- 89.Brunner H, Cockcroft JR, Deanfield J et al (2005) Endothelial function and dysfunction. Part II: Association with cardiovascular risk factors and diseases. A statement by the Working Group on Endothelins and Endothelial Factors of the European Society of Hypertension. J Hypertens 23:233–246PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 96.Lazer DF, Wiese RJ, Brady MJ et al (1995) Mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibition does not block the stimulation of glucose utilization by insulin. J Biol Chem 270:20801–20807Google Scholar
- 99.Lonroth P, Digirolamo M, Krotkiewski M et al (1983) Insulin binding and responsiveness in fat cells from patients with reduced glucose tolerance and type II diabetes. Diabetes 32:748–754Google Scholar
- 103.Pratipanawatr W, Pratipanawatr T, Cusi K et al (2001) Skeletal muscle insulin resistance in normoglycemic subjects with a strong family history of type 2 diabetes is associated with decreased insulin-stimulated insulin receptor substrate-1 tyrosine phosphorylation. Diabetes 50:2572–2578PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 109.Cabellero AE, Arora S, Saouaf R et al (1999) Microvascular and macrovascular reactivity is reduced in subjects at risk for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 48:1856–1862Google Scholar
- 110.Cerosismo E, DeFronzo RA (2006) Insulin resistance and endothelial dysfunction: the road map to cardiovascular diseases. Diab Metab Res Rev 22:423–436Google Scholar
- 113.Behrendt D, Ganz P (2002) Endothelial function. From vascular biology to clinical applications. Am J Cardiol 21:40L–48LGoogle Scholar
- 119.Lettner JW, Kline T, Carel K et al (1997) Hyperinsulinemia potentiates activation of p21 Ras by growth factors. Endocrinol 138:2211–2214Google Scholar
- 122.de Winther MP, Kanters E, Kraal G et al (2005) Nuclear factor kappaB signaling in atherogenesis. Art Throm Vasc Biol 25:904–914Google Scholar
- 127.Bajaj M, Baig R, Suraamornkul S et al. (2010) Effects of pioglitazone on intramyocellular fat metabolism in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-0911
- 128.Vinik AI, Stansberry KB, Barlow PM (2003) Rosiglitazone treatment increased nitric oxide production in human peripheral skin: a controlled clinical trial in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Diab Comp 17:279–285Google Scholar
- 161.Bhatt BA, Dube JJ, Dedousis N et al (2006) Diet-induced obesity and acute hyperlipidemia reduce IkappaBalpha levels in rat skeletal muscle in a fiber-type dependent manner. Am J Physiol Regu Integr Comp Physiol 290:R233–R240Google Scholar
- 164.Cicha I, Yilmaz A, Klein M et al (2005) Connective tissue growth factor is overexpressed in complicated atherosclerotic plaques and induces mononuclear cell chemotaxis in vitro. Art Throm Vas Biol 25:1008–1013Google Scholar
- 169.Despre JP, Moorjani S, Lupien PJ et al (1990) Regional distribution of body fat, plasma lipoproteins, and cardiovascular disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vas Biol 10:497–511Google Scholar
- 171.Triplitt C, DeFronzo RA (2006) Exenatide: first in class incretin mimetic for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab 1:329–341Google Scholar
- 177.Petersen KF, Dufour S, Shulman GI (2005) Decreased insulin-stimulated ATP synthesis and phosphate transport in muscle of insulin-resistant offspring of type 2 diabetic parents. PLoS Medicine 2:879–884Google Scholar
- 181.Abdul-Ghani MA, Muller FL, Liu Y et al (2008) Deleterious action of FA metabolites on ATP synthesis: possible link between lipotoxicity, mitochondrial dysfunction, and insulin resistance. Am J Physiol 295:E678–E685Google Scholar
- 185.Yamauchi T, Kadowaki T (2008) Physiological and pathophysiological roles of adiponectin and adiponectin receptors in the integrated regulation of metabolic and cardiovascular diseases. Int J Obesity 32:S13–S18Google Scholar
- 188.Civitarese AE, Ukropcova B, Carling S et al (2006) Role of adiponectin in human skeletal muscle bioenergetics. Cell Metab 4:74–87Google Scholar
- 189.Miyazaki Y, Glass L, Triplitt C et al (2002) Abdominal fat distribution and peripheral and hepatic insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 46:E1135–E1143Google Scholar
- 192.Gastaldelli A, Ferrannini E, Miyazaki Y et al (2007) Thiazolidinediones improve beta-cell function in type 2 diabetic patients. Am J Phyisol Endocrinol Metab 292:E871–E883Google Scholar
- 195.Del Prato S, Marchetti P (2004) Targeting insulin resistance and beta-cell dysfunction: the role of thiazolidinediones. Diabetes Tech Thera 6:719–731Google Scholar
- 203.Miyazaki M, de Filippis E, Bajaj M et al (2005) Predictors of improved glycaemic control with rosiglitazone therapy in type 2 diabetic patients: a practical approach for the primary care physician. Br J Diabetes Vasc Dis 5:28–35Google Scholar
- 204.Dormandy JA, Charbonnel B, Eckland DJ et al (2005) Proactive investigators: secondary prevention of macrovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes in the PROactive Study (PROspective pioglitazone Clinical Trial in macroVascular Events): a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 266:1279–1289Google Scholar