Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Translating TCF7L2: from gene to function

We are living through a revolution in genetics research. At present, barely a week goes by without a flurry of reports revealing robustly replicated loci associating with a common complex disease. Diabetes was one of the first disease areas to yield results from these genome-wide association studies. Prior to 2006, only two genes were established type 2 diabetes loci (PPARG [1] and KCNJ11 [2]). With the latest round of meta-analyses there are 18 such loci [3, 4], probably more by the time this article goes to print. The majority of these new loci are in gene regions that were not previously candidates for diabetes. Thus, unravelling these new pathways could potentially reveal new disease mechanisms and new therapies. However, herein lies the difficulty. In this commentary the genetic discovery of TCF7L2 is used as a case study to highlight the challenges that lie ahead in terms of defining the functional and therapeutic impact of diabetes susceptibility genes.

Polymorphisms in TCF7L2 that are strongly associated with diabetes risk were identified under an area of linkage on chromosome 10 by the deCODE investigators, who are based in Iceland [5]. This association has since been replicated across multiple ethnic groups, and with a per-allele relative risk of 1.4, is the strongest association among the common type 2 diabetes genes [3]. The protein product of TCF7L2 (transcription factor 7-like 2, also referred to as transcription factor 4 or TCF4) is a transcription factor that is involved in the WNT signalling pathway. Importantly, at the time of the deCODE discovery, the role of TCF7L2 in the regulation of the glucagon gene (GCG), which encodes glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP1) in the gut L cells, had just been described [6]. This immediately implicated TCF7L2 in incretin release or incretin signalling pathways, and an impaired incretin system as the mechanism whereby TCF7L2 polymorphisms increase diabetes risk. However, whilst to some extent supporting this initial hypothesis, studies to determine the mechanism whereby TCF7L2 is implicated in diabetes remains far from clear, as is highlighted in the text box.

TCF7L2, incretins and the beta cell

Initial studies revealed impaired insulin secretion in response to oral glucose ingestion in carriers of the diabetes risk allele (T) at the TCF7L2 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs7903146 [7, 8]. In this issue of Diabetologia, Pilgaard et al. [9] show that T allele carriers have impaired post-meal beta cell responsiveness, i.e. the amount of insulin secreted at a particular glucose concentration is reduced; this is a measure of the beta cell response not just to glucose but also to amino acids and incretins. Lyssenko et al. [10] showed that the insulin secretory response to oral glucose ingestion was greater than that to intravenous glucose in carriers of the T allele at rs7903126. Although, to date, no results have been published on the gold standard assessment of the incretin effect (the isoglycaemic infusion, which involves the intravenous infusion of glucose to achieve plasma glucose levels that match those reached following oral glucose ingestion), this study established that TCF7L2 variants somehow impair this effect.

What is the mechanism for this reduction? Surprisingly, despite the role of TCF7L2 in the transcriptional regulation of GCG, neither glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) [10] nor GLP1 secretion is reduced after oral glucose ingestion in carriers of the risk allele. So rather than directly reducing incretin secretion, TCF7L2 must play a role in the pancreatic insulin secretory response to incretins. Pilgaard et al. [9] add to the report by Schafer et al. [11] that the insulin secretory response to GLP1, in this study at high physiological concentrations and at mild hyperglycaemia (7 mmol/l), is reduced in normoglycaemic carriers of the T allele at rs7903146. The marked effect of the TCF7L2 variant on the response to incretins contrasts with the minimal effect on the direct response to glucose and suggests a functional beta cell defect rather than, or in addition to, a loss of beta cell mass.

Two recent in vitro studies on human and mouse islets show strong parallels with the human in vivo work. Reducing TCF7L2 protein production using siRNA led to a small reduction in glucose-induced insulin secretion and a much greater reduction in GLP1-induced secretion [12, 13]. In the first study [12], knockdown of TCF7L2 in human islets decreased beta cell proliferation, and overexpression of TCF7L2 had a protective effect against glucose- and cytokine-induced apoptosis, suggesting a role in regulation of beta cell mass. However, the second study points to a functional defect [11]. Knockdown of Tcf7l2 in mouse islets primarily affected the expression of genes involved in the late stages of insulin secretion. Notably, there was a reduction in the expression of Slc30a8, an established diabetes gene [14], which encodes a zinc transporter that is located in the secretory vesicles. In addition, Tcf7l2 knockdown reduced the expression of Munc18-1 (also known as Stxbp1) and increased the expression of Stx1a (which encodes syntaxin 1a), both of which encode key players in the control of insulin exocytosis. Interestingly both Munc18-1 and Stx1a contain a putative TCF7L2 binding site in their 5' untranslated regions, suggesting a direct regulatory role of TCF7L2 [13]. It should be noted, however, that levels of TCF7L2 mRNA [10] and TCF7L2 protein [15] are increased, not decreased, in human islets from type 2 diabetic donors. In addition, T allele carriers had increased islet levels of TCF7L2 mRNA compared with individuals with the CC genotype [10]. The role of the intronic variant rs7903146 in TCF7L2, or the variant it is tagging, and how it relates to these in vitro studies has yet to be determined.

The in vivo and in vitro data support a role for TCF7L2 in the distal regulation of insulin secretion. What remains uncertain is whether the striking incretin effect reflects a GLP1/GIP-specific effect, or whether this is a generalised defect in insulin processing and secretion. In favour of the latter, TCF7L2 expression affects the direct effect of glucose both in vitro [12, 13] and in vivo [16]; there is an increase in the proinsulin:insulin ratio in carriers of the risk allele [17], suggesting a defect in insulin processing; and the ‘maximum’ insulin secretory capacity, as assessed by the response to arginine at a constant plasma glucose concentration of 28 mmol/l, is reduced in risk allele carriers with impaired glucose tolerance or type 2 diabetes [10]. It would be interesting to see how the insulin secretory response to tolbutamide is affected in islets with reduced TCF7L2 expression, or, indeed, in humans carrying the TCF7L2 risk allele, as this may help further address this question.

Glucagon concentrations are elevated in patients with type 2 diabetes. In contrast, Pilgaard et al. report that 24 h glucagon concentration profiles are reduced in carriers of the diabetes rs7903146 risk allele [9]. They also report unpublished data for 580 individuals showing decreased plasma glucagon expression with other TCF7L2 SNPs, but not the established diabetes SNP rs7903146. However, these data contrast with previous reports of normal fasting glucagon in T allele carriers [10] and the finding from in vitro studies that TCF7L2 does not play a role in GCG gene expression in alpha cell lines [6]. TCF7L2 expression in human islet alpha cells has not been described, and further in vivo replication is required, yet reduced paracrine glucagon stimulation of beta cell insulin secretion would certainly provide another mechanism for decreased insulin secretion in TCF7L2 risk allele carriers.

TCF7L2 and insulin action

Finally, the paper by Pilgaard et al. [9] introduces a new twist to the story. Euglycaemic–hyperinsulinaemic clamp studies have shown normal whole body insulin sensitivity [10, 11]. An increase in basal endogenous glucose output has been previously described [10] and attributed to reduced pancreatic insulin secretion. Pilgaard et al. show that carriers of the risk allele of rs7903146 show a reduced suppression of endogenous glucose output in response to both low-dose insulin (10 mU m−2 min−1, not statistically significant) and high-dose insulin (40 mU m−2 min−1), despite reduced glucagon concentrations, suggesting that these individuals have insulin resistance in the liver [9]. It is important to interpret the results of Pilgaard et al. with caution. Only 34 participants were studied, and these were selected from a study that was designed to investigate the effect of birthweight on the development of type 2 diabetes, although all analyses were adjusted for birthweight difference. If real, the result is intriguing and offers up a number of possible explanations. First, GLP1 acts on the liver to decrease endogenous glucose output [18]. As GLP1 is secreted by the L cells of the gut, the postprandial portal vein concentrations of GLP1 are twice that of the systemic circulation [19]. Thus, GLP1 secretion may indeed be reduced in carriers of the T allele at rs7903146, but this is not detectable at the levels measurable in the systemic circulation. Although not significant, GLP1 secretion in response to oral glucose ingestion was reduced in the T allele carriers in this group [9]. Another possibility is that TCF7L2 is expressed in the liver [20], and thus may play a direct role in mediating insulin action. Third, this isolated hepatic insulin resistance bears a striking similarity to that described for patients with MODY resulting from TCF2 (also known as HNF1B) mutations [21] via a mechanism that has yet to be determined. Clearly, before postulating further mechanisms, replication of this novel finding by Pilgaard et al. is key.

In summary, it is 3 years since the identification of TCF7L2 as a key player in diabetes aetiology, yet we still do not know how TCF7L2 variation causes diabetes. Definite progress has been made as a result of human and in vitro studies, but we are still some way from being able to translate the genetic discovery through to clinical benefit. However, there is no doubt that each step along this path is providing considerable insight into the physiology and pathophysiology of glucose regulation and other pathways. And this is just for one risk variant. With at least 17 other risk variants, there are many more discoveries to be made.



Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide


Glucagon-like peptide 1


Single nucleotide polymorphism


  1. 1.

    Altshuler D, Hirschhorn JN, Klannemark M et al (2000) The common PPARγ Pro12Ala polymorphism is associated with decreased risk of type 2 diabetes. Nat Genet 26:76–80

  2. 2.

    Gloyn AL, Weedon MN, Owen KR et al (2003) Large-scale association studies of variants in genes encoding the pancreatic β-cell KATP channel subunits Kir6.2 (KCNJ11) and SUR1 (ABCC8) confirm that the KCNJ11 E23K variant is associated with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 52:568–572

  3. 3.

    Frayling TM (2007) Genome-wide association studies provide new insights into type 2 diabetes aetiology. Nat Rev 8:657–662

  4. 4.

    Zeggini E, Scott LJ, Saxena R et al (2008) Meta-analysis of genome-wide association data and large-scale replication identifies additional susceptibility loci for type 2 diabetes. Nat Genet 40:638–645

  5. 5.

    Grant SF, Thorleifsson G, Reynisdottir I et al (2006) Variant of transcription factor 7-like 2 (TCF7L2) gene confers risk of type 2 diabetes. Nat Genet 38:320–323

  6. 6.

    Yi F, Brubaker PL, Jin T (2005) TCF-4 mediates cell type-specific regulation of proglucagon gene expression by β-catenin and glycogen synthase kinase-3β. J Biol Chem 280:1457–1464

  7. 7.

    Florez JC, Jablonski KA, Bayley N et al (2006) TCF7L2 polymorphisms and progression to diabetes in the Diabetes Prevention Program. N Engl J Med 355:241–250

  8. 8.

    Saxena R, Gianniny L, Burtt NP et al (2006) Common single nucleotide polymorphisms in TCF7L2 are reproducibly associated with type 2 diabetes and reduce the insulin response to glucose in nondiabetic individuals. Diabetes 55:2890–2895

  9. 9.

    Pilgaard K, Jensen CB, Schou JH et al (2009) The T allele of rs7903146 TCF7L2 is associated with impaired insulinotropic action of incretin hormones, reduced 24 h profiles of plasma insulin and glucagon, and increased hepatic glucose production in young healthy men. Diabetologia doi:10.1007/s00125-009-1307-x

  10. 10.

    Lyssenko V, Lupi R, Marchetti P et al (2007) Mechanisms by which common variants in the TCF7L2 gene increase risk of type 2 diabetes. J Clin Invest 117:2155–2163

  11. 11.

    Schäfer SA, Tschritter O, Machicao F et al (2007) Impaired glucagon-like peptide-1-induced insulin secretion in carriers of transcription factor 7-like 2 (TCF7L2) gene polymorphisms. Diabetologia 50:2443–2450

  12. 12.

    Shu L, Sauter NS, Schulthess FT, Matveyenko AV, Oberholzer J, Maedler K (2008) Transcription factor 7-like 2 regulates β-cell survival and function in human pancreatic islets. Diabetes 57:645–653

  13. 13.

    da Silva Xavier G, Loder MK, McDonald A et al (2009) TCF7L2 regulates late events in insulin secretion from pancreatic islet β-cells. Diabetes doi:10.2337/db08-1187

  14. 14.

    Sladek R, Rocheleau G, Rung J et al (2007) A genome-wide association study identifies novel risk loci for type 2 diabetes. Nature 445:881–885

  15. 15.

    Lee SH, Demeterco C, Geron I, Abrahamsson A, Levine F, Itkin-Ansari P (2008) Islet specific Wnt activation in human type II diabetes. Exp Diabetes Res 2008:728763

  16. 16.

    Palmer ND, Lehtinen AB, Langefeld CD et al (2008) Association of TCF7L2 gene polymorphisms with reduced acute insulin response in Hispanic Americans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93:304–309

  17. 17.

    Loos RJ, Franks PW, Francis RW et al (2007) TCF7L2 polymorphisms modulate proinsulin levels and β-cell function in a British Europid population. Diabetes 56:1943–1947

  18. 18.

    Prigeon RL, Quddusi S, Paty B, D’Alessio DA (2003) Suppression of glucose production by GLP-1 independent of islet hormones: a novel extrapancreatic effect. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 285:E701–E707

  19. 19.

    Dardevet D, Moore MC, DiCostanzo CA et al (2005) Insulin secretion-independent effects of GLP-1 on canine liver glucose metabolism do not involve portal vein GLP-1 receptors. Am J Physiol 289:G806–G814

  20. 20.

    Cauchi S, Meyre D, Dina C et al (2006) Transcription factor TCF7L2 genetic study in the French population: expression in human beta-cells and adipose tissue and strong association with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 55:2903–2908

  21. 21.

    Brackenridge A, Pearson ER, Shojaee-Moradie F, Hattersley AT, Russell-Jones D, Umpleby AM (2006) Contrasting insulin sensitivity of endogenous glucose production rate in subjects with hepatocyte nuclear factor-1β and -1α mutations. Diabetes 55:405–411

Download references


Thanks to H. Colhoun and A. Morris for their comments on the manuscript. E. R. Pearson holds a Clinician Scientist Fellowship from the Chief Scientists Office, Scotland.

Duality of interest

The author declares that there is no duality of interest associated with this manuscript.

Author information

Correspondence to E. R. Pearson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pearson, E.R. Translating TCF7L2: from gene to function. Diabetologia 52, 1227–1230 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-009-1356-1

Download citation


  • Genetics
  • Glucagon
  • Hepatic glucose production
  • Incretin hormones
  • Insulin secretion
  • TCF7L2
  • Type 2 diabetes