, 51:1771 | Cite as

The WNT signalling pathway and diabetes mellitus

Open Access


The WNT signalling pathway is involved in many physiological and pathophysiological activities. WNT ligands bind to Frizzled receptors and co-receptors (LDL receptor-related protein 5/6), triggering a cascade of signalling events. The major effector of the canonical WNT signalling pathway is the bipartite transcription factor β-catenin/T cell transcription factor (β-cat/TCF), formed by free β-cat and one of the four TCFs. The WNT pathway is involved in lipid metabolism and glucose homeostasis, and mutations in LRP5 may lead to the development of diabetes and obesity. β-Cat/TCF is also involved in the production of the incretin hormone glucagon-like peptide-1 in the intestinal endocrine L cells. More recently, genome-wide association studies have identified TCF7L2 as a diabetes susceptibility gene, and individuals carrying certain TCF7L2 single nucleotide polymorphisms could be more susceptible to the development of type 2 diabetes. Furthermore, β-cat is able to interact with forkhead box transcription factor subgroup O (FOXO) proteins. Since FOXO and TCF proteins compete for a limited pool of β-cat, enhanced FOXO activity during ageing and oxidative stress may attenuate WNT-mediated activities. These observations shed new light on the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes as an age-dependent disease.


β-cat/TCF FOXO GLP-1 Stress TCF7L2 WNT 





casein kinase-1α


Dishevelled protein


forkhead box transcription factor subgroup O


glucagon-like peptide-1


glycogen synthase kinase-3


genome-wide association


lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1


LDL receptor-related protein




pancreas/duodenum homeobox protein 1


phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase


protein kinase B


reactive oxygen species


single nucleotide polymorphism


T cell factor

Introduction to the WNT signalling pathway

The WNT signalling pathway (referred to as the WNT pathway hereafter) was initially recognised in colon cancer research and in embryonic development studies of the fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster), frog (Xenopus laevis) and other organisms [1, 2]. Aberrant activation of the WNT pathway may lead to the development of colorectal and other types of tumours [3]. The major effector of the canonical WNT pathway is the bipartite transcription factor β-catenin/T cell factor (β-cat/TCF). This is formed by the heterodimerisation of free β-cat with one of the four members of the TCF family (TCF7 [also known as TCF-1], lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1 [LEF-1], TCF7L1 [also known as TCF-3] and TCF7L2 [also known as TCF-4]), TCF7L2 being the major partner of β-cat in the intestinal epithelia [3, 4]. As shown in Fig. 1a, in the absence of WNT, the cellular concentration of free β-cat is tightly controlled by a ‘destructive complex’, consisting of the tumour suppressor adenomatous polyposis coli (APC), axin, the serine threonine kinase glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK-3), casein kinase-1α (CK-1α) and phosphorylated ERK (pERK) [5, 6]. This complex interacts with β-cat and phosphorylates it. The phosphorylated β-cat is then destroyed via the proteasome-mediated degradation process. The WNT ligands exert their effect via the Frizzled receptors and the LDL receptor-related protein 5/6 (LRP5/6) co-receptors (Fig. 1b). Following receptor binding, WNT signals are transmitted by the association of WNT receptors with Dishevelled protein (Dvl). This event triggers the disruption of the destructive complex, preventing the phosphorylation-dependent degradation of β-cat [4], which then enters the nucleus and interacts with a member of the TCF family to form a complex that stimulates the β-cat/TCF (or WNT) downstream target genes (Fig. 1b).
Fig. 1

Summary of the canonical WNT pathway. a In the absence of WNT stimulation, β-cat is located within the ‘destructive complex’, phosphorylated by GSK-3, CK-1α and pERK, and subsequently destroyed by proteasome-mediated protein degradation. b Following WNT stimulation, the phosphorylation/destructive complex disassembles. This results in an accumulation of free β-cat, which enters the nucleus and forms the bipartite transcription factor β-cat/TCF, leading to enhanced expression of the WNT target genes. APC, adenomatous polyposis coli; pERK, phosphorylated ERK

Many in vitro and in vivo examinations have shown that several components of the WNT pathway are involved in pancreatic beta cell proliferation [7, 8, 9], normal cholesterol metabolism and glucose-induced insulin secretion [10] and the production of the incretin hormone glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) [4, 11, 12, 13]. More recently, extensive genome-wide association (GWA) studies have identified TCF7L2 as a type 2 diabetes susceptibility gene. Of all the polymorphisms studied to date, TCF7L2 polymorphisms have been demonstrated to have by far the biggest effect on the risk of developing type 2 diabetes [14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20]. In addition, the human LRP5 gene was mapped to within the IDDM4 region, which is linked to type 1 diabetes on chromosome 11q13 [21, 22, 23]. Polymorphisms in LRP5 have been shown to be associated with obesity phenotypes, and missense mutations in LRP6 have been shown to be associated with the risk of bone loss, early coronary disease and the metabolic syndrome [24, 25]. Moreover, polymorphisms in Wnt5B have been shown to be associated with the risk of type 2 diabetes [26].

In this review, I will first discuss the laboratory experimental studies on the role of the WNT pathway in the development/genesis of mouse pancreatic islets, pancreatic beta cell growth and the production of the incretin hormone glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1). This will be followed by a brief summary of GWA studies of TCF7L2 and the risk of type 2 diabetes. Finally, I will discuss recent findings indicating that forkhead box transcription factor subgroup O (FOXO) and TCF proteins are able to compete for the limited pool of β-cat, and ageing will lead to increased FOXO-mediated gene transcription and reduced TCF-mediated gene transcription. These findings give us new insights into type 2 diabetes as an age-dependent disease.

WNT signalling is involved in the genesis of pancreatic islets and the proliferation of pancreatic beta cells

Investigations into how β-cat, the major effector of WNT signalling, influences pancreatic islet development using transgenic and knockout mice has produced inconsistent results. Although several WNT ligands and the Frizzled receptors were shown to be produced in the embryonic and postnatal pancreas [27, 28, 29], an early study showed that the loss of β-cat did not significantly perturb pancreatic islet endocrine cell mass or function, although β-cat is essential for pancreatic exocrine acinar cell development [30]. Utilising the pancreatic and duodenal homeobox protein 1 (Pdx1)–Cre system to specifically delete the gene encoding β-cat (Ctnnb1) in the epithelium of the pancreas and duodenum revealed that Ctnnb1-deleted cells had a competitive disadvantage during pancreas development [31]. Although there was a reduction in endocrine islet numbers during early embryonic development and the mice developed pancreatitis perinatally because of the disruption of acinar epithelial structure, the mice later recovered from the pancreatitis and regenerated normal pancreas and duodenal villi from the wild-type cells that escaped the Ctnnb1 deletion [31]. However, a more recent study found that inducing the production of a stabilised form of β-cat (a mutant one that is more resistant to the proteasome-mediated degradation process) at different stages of development has different effects. During the early stage of organogenesis, robust production of stabilised β-cat drives changes in Hedgehog and fibroblast growth factor signalling and blocks the expression of the gene encoding Pdx-1, an important homeodomain protein transcription factor involved in the genesis of pancreatic beta cells. Induction of the stabilised form of β-cat at a later time point in pancreas development enhances proliferation and increases the size of this organ [32].

Rulifson et al. recently examined the effect of WNT signalling in regulating beta cell genesis and proliferation using both in vitro and in vivo approaches [7]. Purified WNT3a (which is known to activate the canonical WNT pathway) stimulated proliferation of both the mouse beta cell line MIN6 and primary mouse pancreatic beta cells, possibly through the cell cycle regulators cyclin D1, cyclin D2 and cyclin-dependent kinase 4, as well as the homeodomain transcription factor Pitx2. Immunohistological examinations of 3-month-old bi-transgenic rat insulin I promoter (RIP)-Cre and β-catactive mice revealed a threefold increase in the production of Ki67 by pancreatic beta cells, which occurred in parallel with a 2.5-fold increase in beta cell mass [7]. Furthermore, axin production led to impaired Pitx2 gene expression, along with impaired beta cell expansion [7]. Taken together, these observations suggest that WNT signalling is necessary and sufficient for pancreatic beta cell proliferation.

The incretin hormone GLP-1 has been shown to stimulate WNT activity in adult mouse pancreatic islets, and both TCF7L2 and β-cat are required for GLP-1-stimulated proliferation of the rat pancreatic beta cell line INS-1 [9]. Furthermore, adipocyte-derived WNT molecules have been reported to induce beta cell proliferation and insulin secretion in vitro [33].

The WNT co-receptor LRP5 is essential for normal lipid metabolism and glucose-induced insulin secretion

Besides the effectors of WNT signalling, the co-receptors of the WNT ligands, LRP-5/6 [34, 35], are also important for normal lipid and glucose metabolism. An early study demonstrated that loss of function mutations of LRP5 were associated with the development of the autosomal recessive disorder osteoporosis-pseudoglioma syndrome [36]. The co-receptor was shown to be important in transducing WNT signalling and to play critical roles in modulating bone accrual and eye development [37]. The human LRP5 gene maps within the IDDM4 region on chromosome 11q13, which is linked to type 1 diabetes [21, 22, 23]. A recent GWA study has also shown that polymorphisms in LRP5 are associated with obesity phenotypes [38]. Pancreatic production of LRP5 has been reported [39, 40].

It has been demonstrated that LRP5 can interact with axin, one of the inhibitors of the WNT pathway (Fig. 1). When Lrp5 was expressed in fibroblast cells, the LRP5 protein alone exerted no effect on the WNT pathway, but acted synergistically with the WNT ligands [41]. Furthermore, LRP5 molecules without the extracellular domain were constitutively active. They induced TCF/LEF-mediated transcription and stabilised β-cat [41]. The addition of WNT ligands to the medium triggered the translocation of axin to the cell membrane and enhanced the interaction between axin and LRP5. Finally, the LRP5 domain involved in the interaction with axin is also required for TCF/LEF-mediated transcriptional activation. These observations collectively suggest that binding of axin by LRP5 and its translocation to the cell membrane is an important part of WNT signal activation [41] (Fig. 1b).

After being fed a high-fat diet, Lrp5 −/− mice showed increased plasma cholesterol levels and after being fed a normal diet they showed markedly impaired glucose tolerance [10]. Furthermore, in response to the administration of high concentrations of glucose, the mice showed significant reductions in intracellular ATP and calcium levels and decreased glucose-induced insulin secretion [10]. The WNT ligands WNT3a and WNT5a stimulated insulin secretion in the wild-type mice but not in the LRP5 −/− mice [10], suggesting that WNT ligands require a functional LRP5 to regulate insulin secretion.

Both WNT and insulin pathways are involved in the production of the incretin hormone GLP-1

GLP-1 is an important incretin hormone that is encoded by the Gcg gene, which is expressed in the intestinal endocrine L cells [42, 43, 44]. In these cells, expression of Gcg mRNA and production of GLP-1 can be activated by lithium, which mimics the function of the WNT ligands [45], or the overproduction of the constitutively active S33Y β-cat mutant [12], indicating that Gcg is a downstream target of the WNT signalling pathway. Activation was subsequently attributed to a TCF binding site within the G2 enhancer element of the Gcg promoter and the production of TCF7L2 in the intestinal endocrine L cells [4]. It is well known that Gcg expression and GLP-1 production can be activated by elevations in cAMP levels [46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52]. Since the G2 enhancer element has been shown to mediate the stimulatory effect of both cAMP and calcium on Gcg promoter activity [53], it is possible that cAMP pathway cross-talks with the WNT pathway to regulate Gcg expression [12].

Insulin inhibits Gcg expression in pancreatic alpha cells [54, 55]. This inhibition is physiologically important because Gcg mRNA expression in pancreatic islets leads to the production of glucagon, the primary counter-regulatory hormone of insulin [54, 55]. A recent study showed a significant stimulatory effect of insulin on Gcg mRNA expression and GLP-1 production in intestinal L cells. Interestingly, insulin activated a Gcg–luciferase (LUC) reporter gene construct containing the wild-type TCF binding site within the G2 enhancer element of the Gcg promoter, but not the one carrying a mutation at this site. Either ‘knocking-down’ β-cat production or the function of TCF7L2 completely blocked insulin-stimulated intestinal Gcg expression. Thus, insulin, at least partially uses effectors of the WNT pathway to exert this stimulatory effect [13]. Interestingly, the stimulatory effect of insulin on Gcg promoter activity was blocked by phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibition, but not by protein kinase B (PKB) inhibition [13]. This, along with the observations of the existence of PKB-independent PI3K activity in other cell lineages [56, 57, 58], suggest that an unknown signalling component mediates PI3K-mediated cross-talk between insulin and WNT signalling pathways [13]. In hyperinsulinaemic and insulin-resistant MKR mice [59, 60], Gcg mRNA expression and GLP-1 production in the distal ileum were significantly higher than in sex- and age-matched controls [13], indicating that hyperinsulinaemia and/or insulin resistance may affect the homeostasis of GLP-1 production. Figure 2 shows that both WNT and cross-talk between insulin and WNT are involved in GLP-1 production, although detailed mechanisms and the pathophysiological significance of the cross-talk need to be further explored. Figure 2 also shows that lithium and cAMP may stimulate Gcg expression by affecting the production of free β-cat.
Fig. 2

Multiple signalling cascades utilise β-cat/TCF as the effector for the regulation of Gcg expression. Both WNT and LiCl increase levels of free β-cat through inhibition of GSK-3. Hormone and neurotransmitters (H/NT) may enhance β-cat/TCF activity by interacting with their G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Insulin may enhance the translocation of β-cat into the nucleus. The question marks indicate that detailed mechanisms for these events are still under investigation. IR, insulin receptor

TCF7L2 polymorphisms are associated with the risk of type 2 diabetes

In 2006, a study reported that inheritance of specific single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within the TCF7L2 gene was related to an increased risk of type 2 diabetes [20]. The investigators of this study have genotyped 228 microsatellite markers in Icelandic individuals with type 2 diabetes and healthy controls across a 10.5 Mb interval on chromosome 10q. A microsatellite, DG10S478, located within the intron 3 region of TCF7L2, was found to be associated with type 2 diabetes [20]. This observation was subsequently replicated in both a Danish and US cohort [20]. The investigators found that two of five SNPs investigated within introns 4 and 5 of TCF7L2, namely rs12255372 and rs7903146, were in strong linkage disequilibrium with DG10S478 and showed similarly robust associations with type 2 diabetes [20]. This discovery has drawn attention globally [15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71], and studies in many other ethnic groups have confirmed that rs12255372 and rs7903146 are the two SNPs most strongly associated with type 2 diabetes [72, 73], with the SNP rs7903146 reported to have the greatest effect in white individuals [73, 74]. The two SNPs occur at relatively low frequencies in Asian populations, although an association with type 2 diabetes was identified in two large Japanese cohorts [75, 76]. Recent studies have revealed two novel SNPs associated with the risk of type 2 diabetes. The SNP rs290487 was identified in a study of a Han Chinese population in Taiwan [77], and the SNP rs11196218 was identified in a study of Hong Kong Chinese individuals [78]. It has been reported that non-diabetic carriers of the risk-associated TCF7L2 SNPs do not have defects in GLP-1 secretion [64].

Since TCF7L2 is known as an intestinal cell specific transcription factor [79] and is an important regulator of intestinal Gcg expression and GLP-1 production [11], it was suggested that the TCF7L2 SNPs may modify disease susceptibility by affecting intestinal Gcg expression and plasma levels of GLP-1 [20]. More recently, genotyping 1,100 non-diabetic German individuals for the five known TCF7L2 SNPs indicated that TCF7L2 variants are associated with reduced insulin secretion [64]. In contrast, plasma GLP-1 levels during an OGTT were not significantly influenced by the TCF7L2 variants [64]. The CT/TT genotypes of the SNP rs7903146 were shown to strongly predict future type 2 diabetes in two independent Scandinavian cohorts [63]. The risk T allele was associated with impaired insulin secretion, incretin effects, and an enhanced rate of hepatic glucose production [63]. Furthermore, investigators found that islet TCF7L2 expression was increased fivefold in individuals with the TT genotype. Although TCF7L2 expression was positively correlated with the expression of INS, which encodes insulin, it was inversely correlated with glucose-stimulated insulin release [63]. Furthermore, an ex vivo examination demonstrated that TCF7L2 knockdown (with small interfering RNA) increased human pancreatic beta cell apoptosis and reduced beta cell proliferation and glucose-stimulated insulin secretion [8]. Overexpression of TCF7L2, on the other hand, protected islets from glucose- and cytokine-induced apoptosis and from impaired functions [8]. As discussed above, both TCF7L2 and β-cat are required as effectors for GLP-1-stimulated beta cell proliferation [9].

Although these recent studies indicate that TCF7L2 SNPs may directly affect INS expression and/or insulin secretion, we still do not have a clear picture of how these SNPs affect the function of pancreatic beta cells. As discussed by Schafer and colleagues, the involvement of changes in GLP-1 production and secretion influenced by TCF7L2 variants in the increased risk of type 2 diabetes cannot be eliminated [64]. It should also be pointed out that the participants in their study were non-diabetic individuals. It is possible that a certain compensatory response(s) attenuated the defect in GLP-1 secretion in these TCF7L2 SNP carriers in the pre-diabetic stages.

FOXOs compete with TCFs for the limited pool of β-cat

Over the last few years, investigations have led to the discovery of the insulin–FOXO protein signalling cascade [80, 81, 82, 83]. This regulatory system controls metabolic homeostasis and other important physiological and pathophysiological events. In the absence of insulin or growth factors, FOXOs are mainly located within the nuclei and upregulate the expression of a set of target genes, thereby promoting cell cycle arrest, stress resistance and apoptosis (Fig. 3a). In the presence of insulin or growth factors, FOXOs are phosphorylated by PKB and serum- and glucocorticoid-regulated protein kinase and stay in the cell cytosol (Fig. 3b) [81]. In this way, FOXOs function to control the growth, development, metabolism, and possibly, longevity of the cell and the organism in response to insulin, insulin-like growth factor-1 and many other growth factors [81]. In contrast to the effect on insulin signalling, oxidative stress induces the activation of FOXO signalling [84]. It appears that this is due to the activation of the small GTPase Ral, which leads to the c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase (JNK)-dependent phosphorylation of FOXOs, followed by their translocation to the nucleus and increased FOXO-mediated transcriptional activities [84].
Fig. 3

Schematic representation of FOXO signalling. a Without insulin or a growth factor, FOXO enters the nucleus, binds to the forkhead response element (FHRE) of its downstream target genes. The activation of these genes (such as p27 [also known as Cdkn1b], Bim [also known as Bcl2l11], Gadd45 and Fasl) will lead to cell cycle arrest, stress resistance and cell apoptosis. b Insulin (Ins), insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and other growth factors (GFs) are able to activate the PI3K–PDK-1–PKB signalling pathway. Both PKB and serum- and glucocorticoid-inducible kinase (SGK) phosphorylate FOXOs, trapping them in the cytosol. PDK-1, 3′-phosphoinositide-dependent kinase-1

An evolutionarily conserved interaction between the WNT pathway effector β-cat and FOXOs was discovered in 2005 [85]. In mammalian cells, a yeast two-hybrid screen detected an interaction between β-cat and FOXO1 and FOXO3. The gene bar-1 (also known as C54D1.6) encodes the Caenorhabditis elegans (nematode worm) homologue of β-cat [86], while the FOXO gene homologue in this organism is daf16 [87]. An interaction between BAR-1 and DAF16 was also detected [85]. In mammalian cells, binding of β-cat to FOXO enhanced the transcriptional activity of FOXO. In C. elegans, the loss of BAR-1 reduced the activity of DAF16 in dauer formation and life span [85]. More importantly, the association between β-cat and FOXO was shown to be enhanced in cells exposed to oxidative stress [85].

The interaction between FOXO and β-cat prompted scientists to explore the pathophysiological role of this interaction in age-dependent diseases, including osteoporosis. It was reported that male and female mice with sufficient sex hormones could still lose bone mass and strength progressively during the ages of 4–31 months, and that this was associated with enhanced osteoblast and osteocyte apoptosis, reduced osteoblast number and bone formation rate, and elevated levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [88]. Furthermore, in the C57BL/6 mice, ageing was shown to be associated with the reduced expression of several WNT target gene mRNAs, including Axin2 and Opg (also known as Tnfrsf11b); and increased expression of the FOXO target genes, such as Gadd45 (also known as Gadd45a) [89]. However, hydrogen peroxide treatment in an uncommitted mesenchymal cell line, C2C12, increased FOXO-mediated transcription and attenuated both basal and WNT3A-stimulated levels of Axin2 and other WNT target genes. Opposite effects of hydrogen peroxide on FOXO- and TCF-mediated transcription were confirmed by measuring the reporter gene activity of FOXO-LUC and TCF-LUC in response to different dosages of hydrogen peroxide. More recently, the concept of that the interaction of FOXO with β-cat inhibits β-cat/TCF activity was further confirmed [90]. It has been demonstrated that small interfering RNA (siRNA)-mediated knockdown of FOXO reverted the loss of β-cat binding to TCF after cellular oxidative stress [90]. The production and function of FOXO proteins in the pancreatic beta cells have been extensively investigated during the past few years [91]. It will be interesting to examine whether insulin and growth factors control the balance between FOXO-mediated and WNT-mediated gene transcription (see below).

Summary and perspective

Comprehensive in vitro and in vivo studies by multiple laboratories have shown that WNT signalling is important in normal pancreatic islet development, as well as in pancreatic beta cell function and genesis. It appears that the WNT/β-cat pathway plays direct, precise, and even opposing roles during different stages of pancreatic islet development [32]. Obviously, to exert such precise and opposing effects, WNT/β-cat signalling needs to interact with other signalling pathways and regulate the downstream gene expression profiles, both temporally and spatially.

WNT signalling is also important in activating intestinal Gcg transcription and, therefore, the production of the incretin hormone GLP-1 [11, 12, 13], which has been shown to utilise WNT signalling effectors, i.e. β-cat/TCF7L2, to exert its effect on beta cell proliferation [9]. Further examinations are required to verify whether TCF7L2, certain WNT ligands and Frizzled receptors are also involved in the genesis of pancreatic islets and intestinal endocrine L cells.

GWA have revealed relationships between SNPs in LRP5, which encodes a co-receptor of the WNT ligands, and the risk of type 1 diabetes [22, 23], as well as obesity [29]. LRP6 mutations are possibly related to the development of bone loss, coronary disease and the metabolic syndrome [24, 25]. More importantly, extensive recent studies have identified associations between SNPs in TCF7L2 and the risk of type 2 diabetes. These observations suggest that WNT signalling is not only involved in pancreatic islet development during embryogenesis, but also in the function of pancreatic and intestinal endocrine cells during adulthood. Since all the known risk-associated SNPs of TCF7L2 are located within the intronic regions, the effect of these SNPs on TCF7L2 expression should be examined. To ultimately understand why these SNPs affect the risk of type 2 diabetes, we need to explore mechanisms underlying TCF7L2 production in pancreatic and intestinal endocrine cells under both physiological and pathological conditions.

Type 2 diabetes is a chronic and age-dependent disease. As shown in Fig. 4, nuclear FOXOs increase during ageing because of the accumulation of ROS and JNK signalling pathway activation [92]. FOXOs compete with TCF proteins, including TCF7L2, for the limited pool of β-cat. This leads to reduced WNT activity, which is important for lipid and glucose metabolism, pancreatic beta cell proliferation and function, and the production of the incretin hormone GLP-1. Insulin and growth factors, on the other hand, may restore the balance between FOXO- and TCF-mediated gene transcription by trapping FOXOs within the cell cytosol. The establishment of this concept offers a new perspective on the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes and other age-dependent diseases. Further examination of the cross-talk between insulin/growth factors and WNT signalling pathways may lead to the development of novel therapeutic approaches for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and other age-dependent diseases.
Fig. 4

Insulin/growth factors control the balance between FOXO- and TCF-mediated gene expression. FOXOs and TCFs compete for the limited pool of β-cat. During ageing and oxidative stress, the production of ROS leads to increased FOXO-mediated gene transcription and reduced TCF-mediated gene transcription. This will lead to reduced WNT activity, which is important for lipid and glucose metabolism, pancreatic beta cell proliferation and function and the production of the incretin hormone GLP-1. Insulin/growth factors (GFs) help to restore the balance by two means. First, they stimulate the nuclear exclusion of FOXOs via phosphorylation mediated by PKB/serum- and glucocorticoid-inducible kinase (SGK) [81, 82, 91]. Second, they enhance the nuclear content of β-cat and the binding of β-cat/TCF to the WNT target gene promoters via a yet to be identified PKB-independent mechanism [13]



The author thanks Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR grant no. 68991) and Banting and Best Diabetes Centre (BBDC) for supporting his research team in studying the role of WNT signalling in intestinal proglucagon gene expression and GLP-1 production. The author regrets not being able to cite all excellent contributions in the field because of space limitations.

Duality of interest

The author declares that there is no duality of interest associated with this manuscript.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.


  1. 1.
    Peifer M, Polakis P (2000) Wnt signaling in oncogenesis and embryogenesis—a look outside the nucleus. Science 287:1606–1609PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moon RT, Brown JD, Torres M (1997) WNTs modulate cell fate and behavior during vertebrate development. Trends Genet 13:157–162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Morin PJ, Sparks AB, Korinek V et al (1997) Activation of beta-catenin-Tcf signaling in colon cancer by mutations in beta-catenin or APC. Science 275:1787–1790PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Doble BW, Woodgett JR (2003) GSK-3: tricks of the trade for a multi-tasking kinase. J Cell Sci 116:1175–1186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zeng X, Tamai K, Doble B et al (2005) A dual-kinase mechanism for Wnt co-receptor phosphorylation and activation. Nature 438:873–877PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Polakis P (2000) Wnt signaling and cancer. Genes Dev 14:1837–1851PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rulifson IC, Karnik SK, Heiser PW et al (2007) Wnt signaling regulates pancreatic beta cell proliferation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:6247–6252PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shu L, Sauter NS, Schulthess FT, Matveyenko AV, Oberholzer J, Maedler K (2008) TCF7L2 regulates cell survival and function in human pancreatic islets. Diabetes 57:645–653PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liu Z, Habener JF (2008) Glucagon-like peptide-1 activation of TCF7L2-dependent Wnt signaling enhances pancreatic beta-cell proliferation. J Biol Chem 283:8723–8735PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fujino T, Asaba H, Kang MJ et al (2003) Low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 (LRP5) is essential for normal cholesterol metabolism and glucose-induced insulin secretion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:229–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yi F, Brubaker PL, Jin T (2005) TCF-4 mediates cell type-specific regulation of proglucagon gene expression by beta-catenin and glycogen synthase kinase-3beta. J Biol Chem 280:1457–1464PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ni Z, Anini Y, Fang X, Mills G, Brubaker PL, Jin T (2003) Transcriptional activation of the proglucagon gene by lithium and beta-catenin in intestinal endocrine L cells. J Biol Chem 278:1380–1387PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yi F, Sun J, Lim GE, Fantus IG, Brubaker PL, Jin T (2008) Crosstalk between the insulin and Wnt signaling pathways: evidence from intestinal endocrine L cells. Endocrinology 149:2341–2351PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Weedon MN (2007) The importance of TCF7L2. Diabet Med 24:1062–1066PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Owen KR, McCarthy MI (2007) Genetics of type 2 diabetes. Curr Opin Genet Dev 17:239–244PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Elbein SC (2007) Evaluation of polymorphisms known to contribute to risk for diabetes in African and African-American populations. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 10:415–419PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Frayling TM (2007) A new era in finding type 2 diabetes genes—the unusual suspects. Diabet Med 24:696–701PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Grarup N, Andersen G (2007) Gene–environment interactions in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes and metabolism. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 10:420–426PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Florez JC (2007) The new type 2 diabetes gene TCF7L2. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 10:391–396PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Grant SF, Thorleifsson G, Reynisdottir I et al (2006) Variant of transcription factor 7-like 2 (TCF7L2) gene confers risk of type 2 diabetes. Nat Genet 38:320–323PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hey PJ, Twells RC, Phillips MS et al (1998) Cloning of a novel member of the low-density lipoprotein receptor family. Gene 216:103–111PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Twells RC, Mein CA, Payne F et al (2003) Linkage and association mapping of the LRP5 locus on chromosome 11q13 in type 1 diabetes. Hum Genet 113:99–105PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Twells RC, Mein CA, Phillips MS et al (2003) Haplotype structure, LD blocks, and uneven recombination within the LRP5 gene. Genome Res 13:845–855PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mani A, Radhakrishnan J, Wang H et al (2007) LRP6 mutation in a family with early coronary disease and metabolic risk factors. Science 315:1278–1282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kokubu C, Heinzmann U, Kokubu T et al (2004) Skeletal defects in ringelschwanz mutant mice reveal that Lrp6 is required for proper somitogenesis and osteogenesis. Development 131:5469–5480PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kanazawa A, Tsukada S, Sekine A et al (2004) Association of the gene encoding wingless-type mammary tumor virus integration-site family member 5B (WNT5B) with type 2 diabetes. Am J Hum Genet 75:832–843PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Heller RS, Dichmann DS, Jensen J et al (2002) Expression patterns of Wnts, Frizzleds, sFRPs, and misexpression in transgenic mice suggesting a role for Wnts in pancreas and foregut pattern formation. Dev Dyn 225:260–270PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Heller RS, Klein T, Ling Z et al (2003) Expression of Wnt, Frizzled, sFRP, and DKK genes in adult human pancreas. Gene Expr 11:141–147PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lim HW, Lee JE, Shin SJ et al (2002) Identification of differentially expressed mRNA during pancreas regeneration of rat by mRNA differential display. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 299:806–812PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Murtaugh LC, Law AC, Dor Y, Melton DA (2005) Beta-catenin is essential for pancreatic acinar but not islet development. Development 132:4663–4674PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Papadopoulou S, Edlund H (2005) Attenuated Wnt signaling perturbs pancreatic growth but not pancreatic function. Diabetes 54:2844–2851PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Heiser PW, Lau J, Taketo MM, Herrera PL, Hebrok M (2006) Stabilization of beta-catenin impacts pancreas growth. Development 133:2023–2032PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Schinner S, Ulgen F, Papewalis C et al (2008) Regulation of insulin secretion, glucokinase gene transcription and beta cell proliferation by adipocyte-derived Wnt signalling molecules. Diabetologia 51:147–154PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tamai K, Semenov M, Kato Y et al (2000) LDL-receptor-related proteins in Wnt signal transduction. Nature 407:530–535PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wehrli M, Dougan ST, Caldwell K et al (2000) arrow encodes an LDL-receptor-related protein essential for Wingless signalling. Nature 407:527–530PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gong Y, Slee RB, Fukai N et al (2001) LDL receptor-related protein 5 (LRP5) affects bone accrual and eye development. Cell 107:513–523PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kato M, Patel MS, Levasseur R et al (2002) Cbfa1-independent decrease in osteoblast proliferation, osteopenia, and persistent embryonic eye vascularization in mice deficient in Lrp5, a Wnt coreceptor. J Cell Biol 157:303–314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Guo YF, Xiong DH, Shen H et al (2006) Polymorphisms of the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 (LRP5) gene are associated with obesity phenotypes in a large family-based association study. J Med Genet 43:798–803PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Figueroa DJ, Hess JF, Ky B et al (2000) Expression of the type I diabetes-associated gene LRP5 in macrophages, vitamin A system cells, and the islets of Langerhans suggests multiple potential roles in diabetes. J Histochem Cytochem 48:1357–1368PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kim DH, Inagaki Y, Suzuki T et al (1998) A new low density lipoprotein receptor related protein, LRP5, is expressed in hepatocytes and adrenal cortex, and recognizes apolipoprotein E. J Biochem 124:1072–1076PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mao J, Wang J, Liu B et al (2001) Low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein-5 binds to Axin and regulates the canonical Wnt signaling pathway. Mol Cell 7:801–809PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kieffer TJ (2004) Gastro-intestinal hormones GIP and GLP-1. Ann Endocrinol (Paris) 65:13–21Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Drucker DJ (2006) The biology of incretin hormones. Cell Metab 3:153–165PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Holst JJ (2007) The physiology of glucagon-like peptide 1. Physiol Rev 87:1409–1439PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Stambolic V, Ruel L, Woodgett JR (1996) Lithium inhibits glycogen synthase kinase-3 activity and mimics Wingless signalling in intact cells. Curr Biol 6:1664–1668PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Drucker DJ, Jin T, Asa SL, Young TA, Brubaker PL (1994) Activation of proglucagon gene transcription by protein kinase-A in a novel mouse enteroendocrine cell line. Mol Endocrinol 8:1646–1655PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Lu F, Jin T, Drucker DJ (1996) Proglucagon gene expression is induced by gastrin-releasing peptide in a mouse enteroendocrine cell line. Endocrinology 137:3710–3716PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Chen L, Wang P, Andrade CF et al (2005) PKA independent and cell type specific activation of the expression of caudal homeobox gene Cdx-2 by cyclic AMP. FEBS J 272:2746–2759PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Lotfi S, Li Z, Sun J et al (2006) Role of the exchange protein directly activated by cyclic adenosine 5′-monophosphate (Epac) pathway in regulating proglucagon gene expression in intestinal endocrine L cells. Endocrinology 147:3727–3736PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Drucker DJ, Campos R, Reynolds R, Stobie K, Brubaker PL (1991) The rat glucagon gene is regulated by a protein kinase A-dependent pathway in pancreatic islet cells. Endocrinology 128:394–400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Gajic D, Drucker DJ (1993) Multiple cis-acting domains mediate basal and adenosine 3′,5′-monophosphate-dependent glucagon gene transcription in a mouse neuroendocrine cell line. Endocrinology 132:1055–1062PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Wang J, Cao Y, Steiner DF (2003) Regulation of proglucagon transcription by activated transcription factor (ATF) 3 and a novel isoform, ATF3b, through the cAMP-response element/ATF site of the proglucagon gene promoter. J Biol Chem 278:32899–32904PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Furstenau U, Schwaninger M, Blume R, Jendrusch EM, Knepel W (1999) Characterization of a novel calcium response element in the glucagon gene. J Biol Chem 274:5851–5860PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Philippe J (1989) Glucagon gene transcription is negatively regulated by insulin in a hamster islet cell line. J Clin Invest 84:672–677PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Philippe J (1991) Insulin regulation of the glucagon gene is mediated by an insulin-responsive DNA element. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:7224–7227PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Sun J, Jin T (2008) Both Wnt and mTOR signaling pathways are involved in insulin-stimulated proto-oncogene expression in intestinal cells. Cell Signal 20:219–229PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Zhang Q, Adiseshaiah P, Kalvakolanu DV, Reddy SP (2006) A phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-regulated Akt-independent signaling promotes cigarette smoke-induced FRA-1 expression. J Biol Chem 281:10174–10181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Qiao M, Shapiro P, Kumar R, Passaniti A (2004) Insulin-like growth factor-1 regulates endogenous RUNX2 activity in endothelial cells through a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/ERK-dependent and Akt-independent signaling pathway. J Biol Chem 279:42709–42718PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Fernandez AM, Kim JK, Yakar S et al (2001) Functional inactivation of the IGF-I and insulin receptors in skeletal muscle causes type 2 diabetes. Genes Dev 15:1926–1934PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Asghar Z, Yau D, Chan F, Leroith D, Chan CB, Wheeler MB (2006) Insulin resistance causes increased beta-cell mass but defective glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in a murine model of type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 49:90–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Freathy RM, Weedon MN, Bennett A et al (2007) Type 2 diabetes TCF7L2 risk genotypes alter birth weight: a study of 24,053 individuals. Am J Hum Genet 80:1150–1161PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Florez JC, Jablonski KA, Bayley N et al (2006) TCF7L2 polymorphisms and progression to diabetes in the Diabetes Prevention Program. N Engl J Med 355:241–250PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Lyssenko V, Lupi R, Marchetti P et al (2007) Mechanisms by which common variants in the TCF7L2 gene increase risk of type 2 diabetes. J Clin Invest 117:2155–2163PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Schafer SA, Tschritter O, Machicao F et al (2007) Impaired glucagon-like peptide-1-induced insulin secretion in carriers of transcription factor 7-like 2 (TCF7L2) gene polymorphisms. Diabetologia 50:2443–2450PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Cauchi S, Choquet H, Gutierrez-Aguilar R et al (2008) Effects of TCF7L2 polymorphisms on obesity in European populations. Obesity (Silver Spring) 16:476–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Cauchi S, El Achhab Y, Choquet H et al (2007) TCF7L2 is reproducibly associated with type 2 diabetes in various ethnic groups: a global meta-analysis. J Mol Med 85:777–782PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Cauchi S, Meyre D, Choquet H et al (2007) TCF7L2 rs7903146 variant does not associate with smallness for gestational age in the French population. BMC Med Genet 8:37PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Cauchi S, Meyre D, Choquet H et al (2006) TCF7L2 variation predicts hyperglycemia incidence in a French general population: the Data from an Epidemiological Study on the Insulin Resistance Syndrome (DESIR) study. Diabetes 55:3189–3192PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Cauchi S, Meyre D, Dina C et al (2006) Transcription factor TCF7L2 genetic study in the French population: expression in human beta-cells and adipose tissue and strong association with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 55:2903–2908PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Cauchi S, Proenca C, Choquet H et al (2008) Analysis of novel risk loci for type 2 diabetes in a general French population: the D.E.S.I.R. study. J Mol Med 86:341–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Duan QL, Dube MP, Frasure-Smith N et al (2007) Additive effects of obesity and TCF7L2 variants on risk for type 2 diabetes among cardiac patients. Diabetes Care 30:1621–1623PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Saxena R, Gianniny L, Burtt NP et al (2006) Common single nucleotide polymorphisms in TCF7L2 are reproducibly associated with type 2 diabetes and reduce the insulin response to glucose in nondiabetic individuals. Diabetes 55:2890–2895PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Helgason A, Palsson S, Thorleifsson G et al (2007) Refining the impact of TCF7L2 gene variants on type 2 diabetes and adaptive evolution. Nat Genet 39:218–225PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Goodarzi MO, Rotter JI (2007) Testing the gene or testing a variant? The case of TCF7L2. Diabetes 56:2417–2419PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Hayashi T, Iwamoto Y, Kaku K, Hirose H, Maeda S (2007) Replication study for the association of TCF7L2 with susceptibility to type 2 diabetes in a Japanese population. Diabetologia 50:980–984PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Horikoshi M, Hara K, Ito C, Nagai R, Froguel P, Kadowaki T (2007) A genetic variation of the transcription factor 7-like 2 gene is associated with risk of type 2 diabetes in the Japanese population. Diabetologia 50:747–751PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Chang YC, Chang TJ, Jiang YD, Kuo SS, Lee KC, Chiu KC, Chuang LM (2007) Association study of the genetic polymorphisms of the transcription factor 7-like 2 (TCF7L2) gene and type 2 diabetes in the Chinese population. Diabetes 56:2631–2637PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Ng MC, Tam CH, Lam VK, So WY, Ma RC, Chan JC (2007) Replication and identification of novel variants at TCF7L2 associated with type 2 diabetes in Hong Kong Chinese. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:3733–3737PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Korinek V, Barker N, Moerer P, van Donselaar E, Huls G, Peters PJ, Clevers H (1998) Depletion of epithelial stem-cell compartments in the small intestine of mice lacking Tcf-4. Nat Genet 19:379–383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Puig O, Tjian R (2006) Nutrient availability and growth: regulation of insulin signaling by dFOXO/FOXO1. Cell Cycle 5:503–505PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Greer EL, Brunet A (2005) FOXO transcription factors at the interface between longevity and tumor suppression. Oncogene 24:7410–7425PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Accili D, Arden KC (2004) FoxOs at the crossroads of cellular metabolism, differentiation, and transformation. Cell 117:421–426PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Barthel A, Schmoll D, Unterman TG (2005) FoxO proteins in insulin action and metabolism. Trends Endocrinol Metab 16:183–189PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Essers MA, Weijzen S, de Vries-Smits AM et al (2004) FOXO transcription factor activation by oxidative stress mediated by the small GTPase Ral and JNK. EMBO J 23:4802–4812PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Essers MA, de Vries-Smits LM, Barker N, Polderman PE, Burgering BM, Korswagen HC (2005) Functional interaction between beta-catenin and FOXO in oxidative stress signaling. Science 308:1181–1184PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Eisenmann DM, Maloof JN, Simske JS, Kenyon C, Kim SK (1998) The beta-catenin homolog BAR-1 and LET-60 Ras coordinately regulate the Hox gene lin-39 during Caenorhabditis elegans vulval development. Development 125:3667–3680PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Tissenbaum HA, Guarente L (2002) Model organisms as a guide to mammalian aging. Dev Cell 2:9–19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Almeida M, Han L, Martin-Millan M et al (2007) Skeletal involution by age-associated oxidative stress and its acceleration by loss of sex steroids. J Biol Chem 282:27285–27297PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Almeida M, Han L, Martin-Millan M, O’Brien CA, Manolagas SC (2007) Oxidative stress antagonizes Wnt signaling in osteoblast precursors by diverting beta-catenin from T cell factor- to forkhead box O-mediated transcription. J Biol Chem 282:27298–27305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Hoogeboom D, Essers MA, Polderman PE, Voets E, Smits LM, Burgering BM (2008) Interaction of FOXO with beta-catenin inhibits beta-catenin/TCF activity. J Biol Chem 283:9224–9230PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Glauser DA, Schlegel W (2007) The emerging role of FOXO transcription factors in pancreatic beta cells. J Endocrinol 193:195–207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Nishikawa T, Araki E (2007) Impact of mitochondrial ROS production in the pathogenesis of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Antioxid Redox Signal 9:343–353PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2008

Open AccessThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (, which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MedicineUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Department of PhysiologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  3. 3.Department of Laboratory Medicine and PathobiologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  4. 4.10-354, Toronto Medical Discovery Tower, the MaRS Building, Division of Cell and Molecular BiologyToronto General Research Institute, University Health NetworkTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations