, Volume 50, Issue 1, pp 63–67 | Cite as

Common variants in the TCF7L2 gene are strongly associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Indian population

  • G. R. Chandak
  • C. S. Janipalli
  • S. Bhaskar
  • S. R. Kulkarni
  • P. Mohankrishna
  • A. T. Hattersley
  • T. M. Frayling
  • C. S. Yajnik
Short Communication


Aims and hypothesis

India has the greatest number of diabetic subjects in any one country, but the genetic basis of type 2 diabetes mellitus in India is poorly understood. Common non-coding variants in the transcription factor 7-like 2 gene (TCF7L2) have recently been strongly associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes in European populations. We investigated whether TCF7L2 variants are also associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Indian population.

Materials and methods

We genotyped type 2 diabetes patients (n = 955) and ethnically matched control subjects (n = 399) by sequencing three single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (rs7903146, rs12255372 and rs4506565) in TCF7L2.


We observed a strong association with all the polymorphisms, including rs12255372 (odds ratio [OR] 1.50 [95% CI = 1.24–1.82], p = 4.0 × 10−5), rs4506565 (OR 1.48 [95% CI = 1.24–1.77], p = 2.0 × 10−5) and rs7903146 (OR 1.46 [95% CI = 1.22–1.75], p = 3.0 × 10−5). All three variants showed increased relative risk when homozygous rather than heterozygous, with the strongest risk for rs12255372 (OR 2.28 [95% CI = 1.40–3.72] vs OR 1.43 [95% CI = 1.11–1.83]). We found no association of the TCF7L2 genotypes with age at diagnosis, BMI or WHR, but the risk genotype at rs12255372 was associated with higher fasting plasma glucose (p = 0.001), higher 2-h plasma glucose (p = 0.0002) and higher homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-R; p = 0.012) in non-diabetic subjects.


Our study in Indian subjects replicates the strong association of TCF7L2 variants with type 2 diabetes in other populations. It also provides evidence that variations in TCF7L2 may play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes by influencing both insulin secretion and insulin resistance. TCF7L2 is an important gene for determining susceptibility to type 2 diabetes mellitus and it transgresses the boundaries of ethnicity.


Body mass index Ethnicity Polymorphisms TCF7L2 Type 2 diabetes mellitus 



homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance


potassium inwardly rectifying channel, subfamily J, member 11


odds ratio


Pune Maternal Nutrition Study


peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma


relative risk


single nucleotide polymorphism


transcription factor 7-like 2


The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus in adult Indians living in cities is estimated to be between 12 and 16%, and India has the greatest number of diabetic subjects in any single country [1]. It is well established that Asian Indians are thin (low BMI) but have higher adiposity (percentage body fat), are more centrally obese [2] and more insulin-resistant than Europeans [3]. These factors are thought to increase their susceptibility to diabetes mellitus [4]. It has been reported that the genetic basis of some diseases in Indians may be different from that reported in Europeans [5], but only a few such studies have been performed.

There has been some progress in defining the genetic susceptibility to type 2 diabetes mellitus in European populations. The Pro12Ala polymorphism in PPARG (also known as PPARγ) and the E23K variant in KCNJ11 predispose to type 2 diabetes with allelic odds ratios (OR) in the range of 1.15–1.3 [6, 7]. There are a limited number of studies on the genetic basis of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Indian population, mostly on Southern Indians [8, 9]. Recently, variants in TCF7L2 gene have been strongly associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Icelandic individuals and replicated in Europid subjects from USA and Denmark, with a combined OR of 1.56 (p = 4.7 × 10−18) [10]. Similar observations have been made in large case–control and familial-association studies from the UK [11]. However, all these studies are from European populations. We report for the first time the association of the variants in the TCF7L2 gene with type 2 diabetes mellitus in a South Asian Indian population.

Subjects and methods

We studied 955 type 2 diabetes mellitus patients and 399 ethnically matched control subjects (Indo-Europeans) from Pune, Maharashtra, Western India. The patients were from the Diabetology Research Centre, King Edward Memorial Hospital and the Research Centre, Pune, and were part of the Wellcome Genetic collection (WellGen) of young type 2 diabetes mellitus patients (diagnosed before age 45 years). The centre receives patients from Pune and adjoining areas for routine treatment, while some are referred for specific problems (secondary and tertiary referrals). We recruited consecutive young type 2 diabetic patients attending the outpatient department in the study. Diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus was based on clinical criteria. Those clinically judged to be insulin-dependent (history of ketoacidosis, to be unresponsive to oral hypoglycaemic agents, to be on continuous insulin treatment since diagnosis) or to have exocrine pancreatic disease (fibrocalculous pancreatic diabetes) or to fulfil clinical criteria for monogenic forms of diabetes were excluded. We studied only one member from a family where more than one attended the clinic. Sixty-five per cent of the patients had osmotic symptoms or weight changes at diagnosis. Subsequent clinical course and response to treatment with oral hypoglycaemic agents supports the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes. The control subjects were parents of children studied in the Pune Maternal Nutrition Study (PMNS) in six villages near Pune [12], who were normal glucose tolerant on a 75 g OGTT. The clinical characteristics of the case and the control subjects are presented in Table 1. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee following the Indian Council of Medical Research guidelines for research on human subjects. All subjects gave written informed consent.
Table 1

Clinical characteristics of the study population



Control subjects




Sex (men/women)



Age at study (years)

47.2 (9.3)

30.9 (5.1)

Age at diagnosis (years)

37.1 (6.2)


BMI (kg/m2)


25.4 (3.6)

20.5 (3.1)


27.1 (3.9)

19.1 (2.5)



0.98 (0.06)

0.90 (0.06)


0.89 (0.06)

0.76 (0.05)

FPG (mmol/l)


5.1 (4.7–5.5)

2-h PG (mmol/l)


4.9 (4.3–5.8)

Fasting plasma insulin (pmol/l)


28.13 (19.58–42.64)

2-h plasma insulin (pmol/l)


136.68 (86.53–236.62)



1.15 (0.9)

Treatment (OHA/ins/OHA + ins/diet)



FPG fasting plasma glucose; 2-h PG 2-h plasma glucose; ins insulin; OHA oral hypoglycemic agents; NA not applicable

All values are mean ± SD, except FPG, 2-h PG and insulin values, which are medians (interquartile ranges)

We genotyped the SNPs rs7903146 and rs12255372, which showed the strongest association in the study by Grant et al. [10], and rs4506565, as it was the best correlated proxy of these SNPs in HapMapII. SNP genotyping was carried out by direct sequencing (using ABI3730 Genetic Analyzer; Applied BioSystems, Foster City, CA, USA) of the purified PCR products, amplified using primers flanking the three variants (available on request). Fifteen per cent of the randomly selected samples were re-genotyped and the discrepancy rate on duplicate genotyping was 1 / 752 (0.13%).

Allele and genotype frequencies were calculated and consistency of genotype frequencies at each SNP with Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium was tested on a contingency table of observed and expected genotype frequencies using the Markov simulation-based goodness of fit test [13]. The allele and genotype frequencies between the diabetic and the control subjects were compared using standard contingency table analysis. Continuous trait data are shown as mean ± SD unless otherwise specified. Variables with skewed distributions were log transformed to satisfy assumptions of normality and back-transformed values are shown. We used regression analysis to examine the effects of TCF7L2 genotypes on quantitative traits. Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-R) was calculated using the equation (fasting plasma insulin × fasting plasma glucose) / 22.5, and all analyses were carried out with Stata (version 7; Stata, College Station, TX, USA).

Results and discussion

The allele and genotype frequencies for all the variants in the patients and the control subjects are shown in Table 2. The risk allele frequency at rs12255372 in control subjects was lower in Indian subjects than Icelandic subjects (22 vs 29%, p = 0.001), but that at rs7903146 was very similar to the cohorts reported by Grant et al. [10]. The genotype distribution at all the SNPs did not show any deviation from the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (p > 0.05 in controls). All three SNPs showed strong linkage disequilibrium with D′ = 0.86–0.93 and r2 = 0.71–0.88 (Electronic supplementary material [ESM] Table 1).
Table 2

Allelic and genotypic frequencies and estimates of relative risks for the TCF7L2 variants in type 2 diabetes patients and control subjects


Position (NCBI 35.1)a


Patients (n = 955)

Control subjects (n = 399)


Patients (n = 955)

Control subjects (n = 399)

Allele OR (95% CI)

p value

Het OR (95% CI)

p value

Hom OR (95% CI)

p value






391 (40.9)

205 (51.4)

1.46 (1.22–1.75)

3.0 × 10−5

1.39 (1.08–1.78)

9.8 × 10−3

2.17 (1.44–3.28)

1.7 × 10−4





423 (44.3)

160 (40.1)






141 (14.8)

34 (8.5)






376 (39.4)

204 (51.1)

1.48 (1.24–1.77)

2.0 × 10−5

1.50 (1.17–1.92)

1.4 × 10−3

2.12 (1.41–3.20)

2.5 × 10−4





442 (46.3)

160 (40.1)






137 (14.3)

35 (8.8)






479 (50.1)

243 (60.9)

1.50 (1.24–1.82)

4.0 × 10−5

1.43 (1.11–1.83)

5.3 × 10−3

2.28 (1.40–3.72)

6.9 × 10−4





377 (39.5)

134 (33.6)






99 (10.4)

22 (5.5)


For the number of individuals n, values in parentheses indicate percentage

Genotype relative risk (GRR) was calculated compared with the baseline genotype (homozygote for the common allele)

Allele OR allelic odds ratio; Het OR GRR for heterozygotes; Hom OR GRR for minor allele homozygotes

aNational Centre for Biotechnology Information, Build 35.1

We found a strong association of TCF7L2 variants with type 2 diabetes mellitus in this Indian population, replicating observations in European populations [10, 11]. All the SNPs showed similar association with the rare allele (rs12255372 [OR = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.24–1.82, p = 4.0 × 10−5], rs7903146 [OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.22–1.75, p = 3.0 × 10−5] and rs4506565 [OR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.24–1.77, p = 2.0 × 10−5]). For all variants, the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in homozygotes was higher than for the heterozygous carriers (Table 2). This was most marked for rs12255372, with heterozygotes OR = 1.43 (95% CI = 1.11–1.83, p = 5.3 × 10−3) and homozygotes OR = 2.28 (95% CI = 1.40–3.72, p = 6.9 × 10−4). These results support the multiplicative mode of inheritance proposed by Grant et al. [10].

As recent studies have suggested that the higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the South Asian Indians could be partially due to central obesity and altered distribution of fat and muscle mass [2], we investigated whether TCF7L2 genotypes were associated with altered BMI and WHR. However, no significant association with BMI or WHR was observed in the patients or control subjects. Similarly, the TCF7L2 genotypes were not associated with age at diagnosis, sex or family history of diabetes mellitus (p > 0.05) (data not shown). However, in the non-diabetic subjects, we found that possessing the at-risk allele at rs12255372 predicted higher fasting and 2-h plasma glucose concentrations and higher HOMA-R, suggesting both a defect in insulin secretion from the beta cells and an increase in insulin resistance (Table 3).
Table 3

Correlation of TCF7L2 rs12255372 genotype with measures of quantitative traits in non-diabetic control subjects





p value

p value corrected for BMI






BMI (kg/m2)

19.57 (19.19–19.96)

20.01 (19.52–20.51)

20.47 (19.67–21.26)


WHR (men)

0.90 (0.89–0.91)

0.90 (0.89–0.92)

0.90 (0.87–0.93)



WHR (women)

0.75 (0.74–0.76)

0.77 (0.75–0.78)

0.75 (0.72–0.78)



FPG (mmol/l)

4.95 (4.88–5.02)

5.14 (5.02–5.25)

5.24 (5.01–5.47)



2-h PG (mmol/l)

4.71 (4.57–4.85)

5.10 (4.91–5.30)

5.42 (4.74–6.19)



Fasting plasma insulin (pmol/l)

27.15 (25.21–29.24)

31.60 (28.27–35.42)

30.21 (24.93–36.60)



2-h plasma insulin (pmol/l)

129.80 (117.65–143.21)

144.32 (126.75–164.32)

154.46 (108.83–219.18)




0.86 (0.80–0.93)

1.04 (0.92–1.17)

1.02 (0.83–1.25)



FPG fasting plasma glucose; 2-h PG 2-h plasma glucose

Our results confirm that genetic variation in TCF7L2 is as strongly associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus in India, as previously described in European populations [10, 11]. Variation in TCF7L2 is the most significant genetic factor for diabetes mellitus described in the Indian population to date [8, 9]. The similar strength of association for TCF7L2 in this Indian study contrasts with the results observed for the PPARG Pro12Ala SNP. The 12Ala allele is consistently associated with protection of type 2 diabetes in European populations, but not in South Asian Indians (n = 697) in India and in Dallas, TX, USA [9]. However, in view of the genetic diversity of Indians, both these results need to be replicated in other groups of patients. Our results show that the strongest risk variant found for type 2 diabetes mellitus to date in European populations is a risk allele of similar effect size in Indians. This is consistent with genetic factors playing an important role in risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus, even in populations where environmental factors may have resulted in a dramatic recent increase in prevalence.

A potential limitation of our study is the relatively small number of patients and control subjects; thus, estimates of the association have relatively large confidence risks, especially for homozygous subjects. However, they are larger than the replication cohorts used in the initial study by Grant et al. [10]. Despite testing our control subjects with OGTT, there may be some potential diabetic patients in the control group, since they were younger and thinner than the patients and might develop diabetes in later life. However, the fact that some control subjects are at risk of diabetes would result in a slight reduction in the ORs, so our results may represent an underestimate of the strength of the association. Since we do not have data on the 30-min insulin levels in the control subjects, the dynamic measurements of insulin secretion, such as the insulinogenic and insulin disposition indices, are not available.

It is not yet clear how TCF7L2 contributes to the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus [10]. Association of the at-risk alleles in non-diabetic control subjects with higher glycaemia and higher HOMA-R suggests defects in both insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity mechanisms for its possible effects. A causal variant or functional defect in this gene is yet to be identified, so further study of the gene is required.

To conclude, we have replicated the strong association of variants in TCF7L2 gene and shown it to be a susceptibility gene for type 2 diabetes mellitus in the South Asian Indians. In view of a similar strength of association in Indians as in European populations, TCF7L2 is an important susceptibility marker for risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in different ethnic groups.



We thank all the patients and control subjects for agreeing to join the WellGen Study. J. Deshpande, S. Kale, K. Meenakumari, C. Rao, P. Yajnik, R. Pasarkar, A. Shete, D. Raut, P. Hardikar, P. Yajnik and N. Chandak helped in data collection and management. We are grateful to M. N. Weedon (Peninsula Medical School, Exeter, UK) and S. Mahurkar (Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Hyderabad, India) for their help with statistical analysis. Both the present study and Pune Maternal Nutrition Study (PMNS) are funded by the Wellcome Trust, London, UK.

Duality of interest

None of the authors had any conflicting interests in connection with this study.

Supplementary material

125_2006_502_MOESM1_ESM.doc (80 kb)
Table 1Pairwise linkage disequilibrium statistics between TCF7L2 variants (r2 and D′) in the control subjects (DOC 82 KB)


  1. 1.
    Ramachandran A, Snehalatha C, Kapur A et al (2001) High prevalence of diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance in India: National Urban Diabetes Survey. Diabetologia 44:1094–1101PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shelgikar KM, Hockaday TDR, Yajnik CS (1991) Central rather than generalized obesity is associated with hyperglycemia in Asian subjects. Diabet Med 8:712–717PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ramachandran A, Snehalatha C, Viswanathan V, Viswanathan M, Haffner SM (1997) Risk of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus conferred by obesity and central obesity in different ethnic groups. A comparative analysis between Asian Indians, Mexican Americans and Whites. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 36:121–125PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    McKeigue PM, Pierpoint T, Ferrie JE, Marmot MG (1992) Relationship of glucose intolerance and hyperinsulinaemia to body fat pattern in south Asians and Europeans. Diabetologia 35:785–791PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chandak GR, Idris MM, Reddy DN et al (2002) Mutations in pancreatic secretory trypsin inhibitor gene (PSTI/SPINK1) rather than cationic trypsinogen gene (PRSS1) are significantly associated with tropical calcific pancreatitis. J Med Genet 39:347–351PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Altshuler D, Hirschhorn JN, Klannemark M et al (2000) The common PPARgamma Pro12Ala polymorphism is associated with decreased risk of type 2 diabetes. Nat Genet 26:76–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gloyn AL, Weedon MN, Owen KR et al (2003) Large-scale association studies of variants in genes encoding the pancreatic beta-cell K-ATP channel subunits Kir6.2 (KCNJ11) and SUR1 (ABCC8) confirm that the KCNJ11 E23K variant is associated with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 52:568–572PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vimaleswaran KS, Radha V, Ghosh S et al (2005) Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ co-activator-1α (PGC-1α) gene polymorphisms and their relationship to type 2 diabetes in Asian Indians. Diabet Med 22:1516–1521PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Radha V, Vimaleswaran KS, Babu HN et al (2006) Role of genetic polymorphism peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma2 Pro12Ala on ethnic susceptibility to diabetes in South-Asian and Caucasian subjects. Diabetes Care 29:1046–1051PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grant SF, Thorleifsson G, Reynisdottir I et al (2006) Variant of transcription factor 7-like 2 (TCF7L2) gene confers risk of type 2 diabetes. Nat Genet 38:320–323PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Groves CJ, Zeggini E, Minton J et al (2006) Association analysis of 6,736 U.K. subjects provides replication and confirms TCF7L2 as a type 2 diabetes susceptibility gene with a substantial effect on individual risk. Diabetes 55:2640–2644PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kinare AS, Natekar AS, Chinchwadkar MC et al (2000) Low mid pregnancy placental volume in rural Indian women: a cause for low birth weight? Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:443–448PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schaid DJ, Rowland CM, Tines DE, Jacobson RM, Poland GA (2002) Score tests for association between traits and haplotypes when linkage phase is ambiguous. Am J Hum Genet 70:425–434PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. R. Chandak
    • 1
  • C. S. Janipalli
    • 1
  • S. Bhaskar
    • 1
  • S. R. Kulkarni
    • 2
  • P. Mohankrishna
    • 1
  • A. T. Hattersley
    • 3
  • T. M. Frayling
    • 3
  • C. S. Yajnik
    • 2
  1. 1.Genome Research GroupCentre for Cellular and Molecular BiologyHyderabadIndia
  2. 2.Kamalnayan Bajaj Diabetology Research CentreKing Edward Memorial Hospital and Research Centre, Rasta PethMaharashtraIndia
  3. 3.Institute of Biomedical and Clinical SciencePeninsula Medical SchoolExeter, DevonUK

Personalised recommendations