Glutamate uptake in retinal glial cells during diabetes
- 544 Downloads
Glutamate recycling is a major function of retinal Müller cells. The aim of this study was to evaluate the expression and function of glutamate transporters during diabetes.
Sprague–Dawley rats were rendered diabetic by a single dose of streptozotocin (50 mg/kg). Following 12 weeks of diabetes, immunolocalisation and mRNA expression of the two glial cell transporters, GLAST and EAAT4 were evaluated using indirect immunofluorescence and real-time PCR. The function of glutamate transport was investigated at 1, 4 and 12 weeks following induction of diabetes by measuring the level of uptake of the non-metabolisable glutamate analogue, d-aspartate, into Müller cells.
There was no difference in the localisation of either GLAST or EAAT4 during diabetes. Although there was a small apparent increase in expression of both GLAST and EAAT4 in diabetic retinae compared with controls this was not statistically significant. At 1, 4 and 12 weeks following diabetes, d-aspartate immunoreactivity was significantly increased in Müller cells of diabetic rats compared to controls (p<0.001). The EC50 was found to increase by 0.304 log units in diabetic Müller cells compared with controls, suggesting that glutamate uptake is twice as efficient.
These data suggest that there are alterations in glutamate transport during diabetes. However, these changes are unlikely to play a significant role in glutamate-induced neuronal excitoxicity during diabetes. These results suggest that although Müller cells undergo gliosis at an early stage of diabetes, one of the most important functions for maintaining normal retinal function is preserved within the retina.
KeywordsDiabetes EAAT1 GLAST Glutamate Müller cell Retina STZ
excitatory amino acid carrier 1
excitatory amino acid transporter
goat serum in phosphate buffered saline
inner nuclear layer
inner plexiform layer
normal goat serum
outer nuclear layer
polymerase chain reaction
Diabetic retinopathy is the leading cause of blindness in those of working age. A major factor in the pathogenesis of this condition is alterations in retinal vasculature, and subsequent neovascularisation. In addition to the vascular changes there are also a range of abnormalities of neuronal function that occur early in diabetes (for review, see ). This neuronal dysfunction is manifest as alterations in colour vision [2, 3], dark adaptation and electrophysiology [4, 5, 6, 7]. Because such neuronal changes occur early in the disease process, it has been suggested that they may ultimately be linked with the retinal vascular pathology.
Müller cells are vital for maintaining the integrity of the retina . They are actively involved in uptake and degradation of the amino acid neurotransmitters, glutamate and GABA, are involved in shuttling energy metabolites to neurons and are also important for maintenance of the blood–retinal barrier [9, 10, 11]. Astrocytes are intricately linked with the vasculature and have processes within the nerve fibre and ganglion cell layers . The function of astrocytes within the retina is not clearly defined, although they do express glutamate transporters such as GLAST and EAAT4 [13, 14]. Highlighting the potential importance of these glutamate transporters in retinal pathology, studies have reported increased glutamate concentrations within the vitreous of patients with diabetes and in diabetic retinae [15, 16].
Glutamate is the major excitatory neurotransmitter within the retina and brain . In order to maintain normal retinal function, glutamate must be removed rapidly from the synaptic cleft. At the molecular level, five glutamate transporters have been cloned: excitatory amino acid transporters (EAAT) 1–5, all of which have been identified in the retina [13, 14, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22]. Although the function of specific transporter types is contentious, it is clear that GLAST (EAAT1) is the predominant transporter for removal of glutamate within the retina and defects in its function lead to major deleterious effects on vision [20, 23, 24].
Several studies have suggested that Müller cells are abnormal in diabetes. They express glial fibrillary acidic protein following one month of diabetes . Furthermore, the level of glutamate within the vitreous of patients with diabetes and in diabetic rat retinae is elevated [15, 16]. However, the major enzyme involved in glutamate degradation within Müller cells, glutamine synthetase, is only moderately affected [25, 26]. These studies suggest that glutamate transport within the retina during diabetes might be abnormal. Indeed, a recent study showed reduced glutamate uptake in isolated Müller cells, suggesting that GLAST function in these cells is altered in the STZ rat model of diabetes . However, it should be emphasised that Li and Puro  examined 1-trans-pyrrolidine-2,4-dicarboxylate (a glutamate analogue that is transported into Müller cells via GLAST)-induced currents in isolated Müller cells. Glutamate uptake and expression of glutamate transporters can be affected by the external milieu, in particular serum factors and plasma [28, 29]. Therefore it is important to examine glutamate uptake in an in vivo situation.
The aim of this project was to examine the changes in glutamate transporter expression and function during diabetes using an in vivo model of type 1 diabetes. We used immunocytochemistry and semi-quantitative real-time PCR to examine the expression of GLAST and EAAT4 in the control and diabetic rat retinae and also measured the function of the GLAST transporter by determining the extent of uptake of the non-metabolisable glutamate analogue, d-aspartate.
Materials and methods
Duration of diabetes (weeks)
EAAT4 and GLAST immunocytochemistry
In order to examine the protein expression of GLAST and EAAT4, control and diabetic rat eyes were enucleated, the anterior segment and vitreous removed, and the posterior eyecup placed in a chilled fixative containing 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 mol/l phosphate buffer (PB) for 30 min. Following fixation, the retinae were dissected from the eyecup, cryoprotected in graded sucrose solutions (10, 20, 30%), and either sectioned vertically at 12 μm on a cryostat, or processed free-floating as flat-mounts.
A guinea-pig polyclonal antiserum directed against the C-terminus of GLAST (AB#1782; Chemicon International, CA, USA; diluted 1:1,000) was used to evaluate changes in the localisation of GLAST during diabetes. A polyclonal affinity-purified antiserum directed against a 21 amino acid synthetic oligopeptide corresponding to the C-terminus of rat EAAT4 was used to immunolabel EAAT4 (Alpha Diagnostic Int., San Antonio, TX, USA, diluted 1:100).
Immunocytochemical labelling was carried out using indirect immunofluorescence or avidin–biotin–peroxidase complex (ABC) method. Retinal sections were blocked for 1 h in a solution containing 10% normal goat serum (NGS), 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA), 0.05% Triton-X-100 in PB. The primary antibodies were diluted in 3% NGS, 1% BSA, 0.05% Triton-X-100 in PB, and applied overnight at room temperature. After washing in PB, either goat-anti-rabbit IgG, goat-anti-guinea pig conjugated to Alexa TM 594, goat-anti-guinea pig conjugated to Alexa TM 488 or biotinylated goat-anti-rabbit secondary antibodies were applied for 1 h (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA; diluted 1:500). For the ABC method, retinal flat-mounts were subsequently incubated in solutions from the Vectastain Elite ABC Kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) in PB for 1 h. Retinae were rinsed in two changes of PB and two changes of 0.05 mol/l Tris–HCl buffer for 5 min, then incubated in 0.05% 3,3-diamonbenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAB) in Tris buffer for 10 min. Hydrogen peroxide was added to the incubation medium to a final concentration of 0.01%. Following 5 min the reaction was stopped by rinsing in Tris buffer. Sections were then washed and coverslipped.
Immunofluorescent sections were examined and imaged with a Zeiss Axioplan 2 microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany), fitted with a Bio-Rad 1024 confocal illuminating system (Bio-Rad, Sydney, Australia), using ×40, ×63 and ×100 objectives. The appropriate fluorescence filters were used (Alexa TM 594/CY3, excitation −568, emission filter 605/32; Alexa TM 488/FITC, excitation −488, emission filter 522/32) with a krypton/argon laser for differential visualisation of the fluorophores. Red and green fluorescence was scanned and imaged separately and later merged with Adobe Photoshop 7.0 (Adobe Systems, USA). Retinal flatmounts that had been prepared using the ABC method were viewed on a Zeiss Axioplan II microscope with a ×40 oil objective.
Expression of GLAST and EAAT4
In order to examine changes in mRNA expression of GLAST and EAAT4, the eyes from control and diabetic rats were removed, the anterior contents discarded and the retina dissected free from the posterior eyecup. The retinae were then snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −70°C until use.
RNA isolation and RT-PCR
Total RNA was isolated from individual rat retinae (10–30 mg) using the RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA, USA). To eliminate potential genomic DNA contamination, a DNase I treatment was included in the isolation protocol. The purified RNA was quantified at 260 nm on a spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer Corp., Norwalk, CT, USA) and 0.5 μg RNA was reverse transcribed (Omniscript RT kit; Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA, USA) using 0.5 μmol/l oligo-d(T) primers. Specific rat GLAST (5′-ctctgggcatcctcttcttg-3′ and 5′-caaatctggtgatgcgtttg-3′) and EAAT4 (5′-tatggcatccttggacaaca-3′ and 5′-accaggtccatgaaagcatc-3′) primers were designed and used (0.5 μmol/l) with commercial PCR reaction mix (HotstarTaq; Qiagen). A touchdown protocol [95°C, 15 min; (94°C, 10 s; 70°C, 30 s; decreasing 1°C/cycle, 72°C, 30 s)×15; (94°C, 10 s; 55°C, 30 s; 72°C, 30 s)×20; 72°C, 10 min] was run on a thermal cycler (Hybaid, Ashford, UK) and the identities Fcts were confirmed by automated DNA sequencing of both strands.
The relative expression levels of GLAST and EAAT4 were determined for rat retinae using real-time PCR (LightCycler; Roche, Mannheim, Germany). Total RNA was isolated and reverse transcribed as above. An aliquot of cDNA (0.025 μg) added to a commercial reaction mix (FastStart DNA Master SYBR Green I; Roche) containing 3 mmol/l MgCl2 and 0.5 μmol/l of the respective primers. After an initial denaturation (95°C, 10 min), a 40-cycle protocol was used (95°C, 0 s; 60°C, 10 s; 72°C, 12 s) with the fluorescent signal detected after the extension step. Hypoxanthine phosphorylribosyl transferase (HPRT) was used as the housekeeping gene. For the HPRT reactions, human primers (5′-ggaggccatcacattgtagc-3′ and 5′-ccacaatcaagacattctttcc-3′) were included and the final MgCl2 concentration was 4 mmol/l. The amplification protocol was similar to that described for GLAST and EAAT4, however, a 15-s extension time was used and the fluorescence signal detected at 82°C for 2 s. While the human primers had one base pair mismatch in both oligonucleotides when compared to the rat sequence, a single product of the correct size was amplified. Sequencing of the product showed it to be rat HPRT. All amplifications were performed in triplicate and tissue GLAST and EAAT4 expression levels were corrected for HPRT content.
In vitro d-aspartate uptake assay
d-Aspartate is a non-metabolisable glutamate transporter analogue. By measuring the degree of d-aspartate uptake into Müller cells, we were able to examine the function of the glutamate transporter GLAST in Müller cells. In order to be able to examine the changes in uptake in control and diabetic retinae, it was first necessary to establish the concentration of d-aspartate that saturates the transporter. The eyes from six adult male Sprague–Dawley rats were removed, the anterior portion of the globe separated and the retinae dissected free from the posterior eyecup. Each retina was cut in half and incubated at 37°C in oxygenated Ames–Nesbett solution supplemented with d-aspartate at the following concentrations for 10 min: 0, 0.01, 0.03, 0.1, 0.3 and 1 mmol/l. Following 10 min, the retinae were immediately removed and placed into chilled fixative and processed for post-embedding immunocytochemistry (as described below).
d-Aspartate uptake in control and diabetic retinae
Following 1, 4 and 12 weeks, control and diabetic rats were prepared for d-aspartate assaying. The cornea of each rat was anaesthetised with 0.5% proxymetacaine (Ophthetic; Allergan, Frenchs Forest, NSW, Australia). Under deep anaesthesia (xylazine/ketamine; 60:5 mg/kg, Therapon Pty Ltd, Burwood, Victoria, Australia), the right eyes were slowly injected intravitreally with either 2 μl of 0.67 mmol/l  or 2 μl of 2.5 mmol/l d-aspartate, a non-endogenous ligand of glutamate transporters that can be detected by immunocytochemistry . Based on these injection concentrations and volumes, the final vitreal concentration was approximately 0.1 and 0.37 mmol/l respectively (assuming a rat vitreal volume of 13.36 μl).
Following 30 min rats were killed by intracardial injection of pentobarbital and their eyes removed. The eyes were then placed in a chilled fixative solution containing 1% paraformaldehyde, 2.5% glutaraldehyde, 3% sucrose, 0.01% calcium chloride in 0.1 mol/l phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). The tissue remained in the fixative for 24 h, and was then rinsed with phosphate buffer and dissected. The anterior portion of the globe was removed and the retina was dissected into superior nasal and temporal, and inferior nasal and temporal sections through the optic nerve. The tissue was processed through a graded series of methanol washes (75, 85, 95 and 100%) and embedded in an epoxy resin (ProSciTech, Queensland, Australia). In order to minimise the effect of eccentricity, only pieces of retinae adjacent to the optic nerve were embedded. The samples were sectioned at 500 nm on an ultramicrotome (Reichert-Jung Ultracut S) and placed on Teflon-coated 18-well slides (Cel-line, Newfield, NJ, USA) and subsequently processed for serial-section post-embedding immunocytochemistry.
The post-embedding immunocytochemical procedure used was that described by Kalloniatis and Fletcher . The tissue sections were etched in 1:5 solution of sodium ethoxide/ethanol rinsed in a graded series of methanol washes and placed in phosphate buffer (0.1 mol/l PB). The slides were then placed in 1% sodium borohydride in 0.1 mol/l phosphate buffer for 30 min, washed, dried and blocked with a solution containing 5% goat serum, 0.8% bovine serum albumin, in phosphate buffered saline (pH 7.4) for 1 h. Sections were then incubated overnight in rabbit anti-d-aspartate (kindly donated by Prof. R.E. Marc, University of Utah) diluted 1:100 in 1% goat serum in phosphate buffered saline (GSPBS). Following the incubation with the primary antibody, the slides were rinsed in 1% GSPBS for 30 min. The secondary antibody, goat anti-rabbit IgGs conjugated with 1-nm gold and diluted 1:100 in 1% GSPBS, was applied for 4 h (gold conjugates purchased from British BioCell International, UK). The slides were then rinsed several times in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and fixed in 1% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 mol/l phosphate buffer for 10 min. The immunogold was visualised by silver intensification [32, 33].
Quantification of d-aspartate immunoreactivity
For quantification purposes, all experiments were performed under identical conditions. That is, retinal sections from each animal were placed on the same 18-well slide and processed at the same time using identical solutions and antibody aliquots. In all experiments, the level of immunoreactivity was measured in each of 30 Müller cell somata from each retinal piece. Images were captured using a Kodak Megaplus high-resolution camera mounted on a Zeiss Axioplan II microscope with a ×40 oil objective and ×10 eye piece. The histogram option of NIH Image 1.49 (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA) was used to determine the average pixel value over each of 30 Müller cell somata with 8-bit precision (i.e. pixel values range from 0 to 255 or 2.408 log units). Consequently, each pixel value is equivalent to 0.0094 log units of change in immunoreactivity. The level of immunoreactivity (pixel value) determined using these methods is proportional to the logarithm of the concentration of antigen in the tissue [34, 35, 36].
A dose–response curve was generated for tissue that had been incubated in varying concentrations of d-aspartate. The data was fitted to a Michaelis–Menten equation. The lowest control in vitro value, determined from the incubation of retinae in 0 mmol/l d-aspartate was used to fix the lowest point of the curve. The mean pixel values obtained from the in vivo intravitreal injection experiment were fitted to the curve to determine the relative change in EC50 between controls and diabetic. The mean pixel value for each of the controls at 1, 4 and 12 weeks was floated to the modelled in vitro curve (i.e. the curve generated from the control in vitro experiment) of the in vitro data. If one assumes that the only change between the two treatment groups is a change in K m value, it is possible to make an estimation of the change in EC50 during diabetes. To do this the mean pixel values generated from the STZ animals were plotted on the modelled curve using the formula (Y=bottom+(Top−Bottom)/(1+10^((logEC50−X))). By doing this we were able to quantify the relative change in EC50 for d-aspartate uptake in control and diabetic retinae.
Statistical analysis was performed using an ANOVA (Statview) and a p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Glutamate transporter expression in Müller cells and astrocytes during diabetes
EAAT4 has been previously associated with glutamate uptake into Purkinje cells of the cerebellum. We have recently shown that EAAT4 is expressed by astrocytes in the retina . Figure 1c and d shows EAAT4 labelling in whole-mounted control and diabetic rat retinae 12 weeks post-diabetogenesis. The labelling pattern looks very similar to the control, and we were unable to detect any differences in the level of EAAT4 in control compared with STZ animals.
Diabetic Müller cells have enhanced d-aspartate uptake
In order to verify the significance of this increase in d-aspartate uptake we floated the mean d-aspartate values generated from the intravitreal experiment onto our dose–response curve generated in Fig. 3b (Fig. 5b). By doing this, we were able to approximate the change in EC50 value in d-aspartate uptake in control and diabetic retinae. There was a difference of 0.304 log units between the EC50 value for the controls and diabetics (Fig. 5b; Control, log EC50=−1.309; STZ, log EC50=−1.613). Based on this approximation, d-aspartate transport in diabetic retinal Müller cells is twice as efficient as transport by Müller cells in age-matched controls.
Abnormalities in glutamate recycling are known to have deleterious effects on the function of retinal neurons in a number of retinal diseases. In this study we examined the expression of two glutamate transporters and evaluated the function of GLAST, the major glutamate transporter in the retina. We found that expression of GLAST and EAAT4 was unchanged following 12 weeks of diabetes but that, functionally, glutamate uptake was enhanced, even after a short period of diabetes.
There are two major classes of macroglial cells within the retina; Müller cells are the predominant glial cell type and express the glutamate transporter GLAST [8, 13, 21]. It is well known that GLAST provides the bulk of glutamate uptake within the retina [23, 24, 38]. Indeed, loss of function of GLAST results in a major loss of retinal structure and function. To our surprise we observed an increase d-aspartate uptake even at an early stage of diabetes. This finding is at odds with those demonstrated by Li and Puro , who showed that the 1-trans-pyrrolidine-2,4-dicarboxylate-induced current in isolated Müller cells was less in diabetic Müller cells than controls. Although it is not clear why our results differ, it should be emphasised that we used an in vivo measurement to assess uptake, rather than examination of this aspect in isolated cells. Experimentation on isolated cells may not always reflect function in vivo because the external environment is artificially controlled. This may be particularly significant in studying the changes in cellular function during diabetes because the external milieu can be altered by breakdown of the blood-retinal barrier .
There are several possible explanations for the observed increase in glutamate uptake during diabetes. The function of GLAST is not directly dependent on the protein expression within a tissue. Like other amino acid transporters, function is dependent on translocation of the protein between the plasma membrane and intracellular storage compartments. Alterations in cell-surface expression can up- or down-regulate membrane proteins within minutes, far more rapidly than is possible by protein synthesis (for review see Danbolt ). Examples of such mechanisms can be observed for glucose transporters; GLUT4 moves to the plasma membrane in response to insulin. Similarly, membrane expression of transporters for GABA, glycine and serotonin use similar mechanisms. In terms of glutamate transporters, EAAC1 has been shown to translocate to the cell surface of C6 glioma cells in response to activation by protein kinase C . Although little information is available on the intracellular concentrations of GLAST in brain or retinal glia, two studies highlight the importance of this mechanism for rapid changes in GLAST function in the glia. Duan et al.  demonstrated rapid changes in surface expression of GLAST in murine astrocytes in response to exogenous glutamate. Payet et al.  recently showed that hypoxia caused an dramatic increase in GLAST function in isolated retinal cells, an effect that was blocked by treatment with cytochalasin B, an inhibitor of actin polymerisation. We propose that GLAST function increases during diabetes, in the absence of a change in mRNA expression, because of a mobilisation of protein to the cell surface of Müller cells. Further work is necessary to definitively understand the mechanisms involved in this form of transporter regulation.
There are several factors that can regulate GLAST function and possible cell surface expression. Glutamate is known to trigger a rapid increase in surface expression of GLAST and EAAT4 . Other factors that may play a role include activation of glutamate receptors on glia , modulation of GLAST expression by growth factors such as insulin growth factor-1, oxidative stress , arachidonic acid , or protein kinase C . Other factors such as plasma that leak from the break down of the blood–retinal barrier can also alter ion channel conductance within Müller cells . Clearly, GLAST function could be altered by any of the myriad of biochemical changes that are known to occur during diabetic retinopathy.
It is well known that a fully functional glutamate turnover system is required for normal neuronal function. Indeed, many conditions such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Alzheimer’s disease, and neuronal death following ischaemia, have been linked with abnormalities in glutamate transport, and in particular a decrease in glial glutamate transport . Indeed, Lieth et al.  suggest that a decrease in glutamate transporter function could explain the neuronal dysfunction and possibly neuronal apoptosis that occurs during diabetes [5, 47, 48]. Essentially, an elevation of extracellular glutamate concentrations is known to lead to excitotoxic stimulation and subsequent death of neurons.
We observed a doubling of glutamate uptake capacity in diabetic Müller cells compared to controls. It is interesting to note that this is not the first retinal or CNS disease associated with an increase in glutamate transporter function. Indeed, following hypoxia, glutamate uptake is enhanced in isolated retinal cells . Moreover glutamate transporter expression is enhanced in the thalamus of patients with schizophrenia . In schizophrenia, the hyperfunction of GLAST is thought to play a significant role in the disease process. In particular, Smith et al.  suggest that the hyperfunction of GLAST may be linked with a decrease in NMDA receptor expression in schizophrenia . An increase in glutamate uptake capacity would lower the concentrations of glutamate within synapses to levels below that normally found. This could have downstream effects such a reduction in glutamate receptor expression and function. There are no reports of changes in glutamate receptor expression in the retina during diabetes. However, it is well known that there are a myriad of neuronal changes [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]. It is possible that some of the neuronal dysfunction reported to occur during diabetes could arise because of an abnormality of glutamate transport and concomitant glutamate receptor expression changes. Further work is necessary to address this issue.
Several reports have suggested that there is neuronal death within the retina during diabetes [16, 46, 47]. Our results demonstrating an increase in glutamate uptake suggest that glutamate neurotoxicity is unlikely to play a major role in causing neuronal apoptosis. The reported increases in glutamate concentrations in the vitreous could arise from the breakdown in the blood-retinal barrier  and blood-aqueous barrier. However, the extracellular concentration of glutamate within the retina would be maintained at “safe” levels.
In summary, our results indicate that although there is no change in expression of GLAST or EAAT4 there is an increase in glutamate uptake by Müller cells as early as one week following the induction of diabetes. These results suggest that although Müller cells undergo gliosis at an early stage of diabetes, one of the most important functions for maintaining normal retinal function is preserved. Further work is necessary to determine whether the observed elevation in glutamate transporter function is linked with neuronal dysfunction.
The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Ms Riki Gibson. This work was supported by a grant from the National Health and Medical Research Council to ELF (#208950) and supported in part by a professorship provided by the Robert G. Leitl estate (M.K.). No authors have any conflicts of interest.
- 2.Terasaki H, Hirose H, Miyake Y (1996) S-cone pathway sensitivity in diabetes measured with threshold versus intensity curves on flashed backgrounds. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 37:680–684Google Scholar
- 3.Kurtenbach A, Schiefer U, Neu A, Zrenner E (1999) Preretinopic changes in the colour vision of juvenile diabetics. Br J Ophthalmol 83:43–46Google Scholar
- 4.Holopigian K, Greenstein VC, Seiple W, Hood DC, Carr RE (1997) Evidence for photoreceptor changes in patients with diabetic retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 38:2355–2365Google Scholar
- 6.Fortune B, Schneck ME, Adams AJ (1999) Multifocal electroretinogram delays reveal local retinal dysfunction in early diabetic retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40:2638–2651Google Scholar
- 8.Ripps H, Witkovsky P (1985) Neuron–glia interaction in the brain and retina. In: Osborne NN, Chader GJ (eds) Progress in retinal research Vol 4. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 181–219Google Scholar
- 15.Ambati J, Chalam KV, Chawla DK et al. (1997) Elevated gamma-aminobutyric acid, glutamate, and vascular endothelial growth factor levels in the vitreous of patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol 115:1161–1166Google Scholar
- 16.Lieth E, Barber AJ, Xu B et al. (1998) Glial reactivity and impaired glutamate metabolism in short-term experimental diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes 47:815–820Google Scholar
- 17.Massey SC (1990) Cell types using glutamate as a neurotransmitter in the vertebrate retina. In: Osborne NN, Chader CJ (eds) Progress in retinal research vol 8. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 399–425Google Scholar
- 18.Danbolt NC, Chaudhry FA, Dehnes Y et al. (1998) Properties and localization of glutamate transporters. Prog Brain Res 116:23–43Google Scholar
- 26.Lo TC, Klunder L, Fletcher EL (2001) Increased Müller cell density during diabetes is ameliorated by aminoguanidine and ramipril. Clin Exp Optom 84:276–281Google Scholar
- 27.Li Q, Puro DG (2002) Diabetes-induced dysfunction of the glutamate transporter in retinal Müller cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43:3109–3116Google Scholar
- 33.Marc RE, Liu WL, Kalloniatis M, Raiguel SF, van Haesendonck E (1990) Patterns of glutamate immunoreactivity in the goldfish retina. J Neurosci 10:4006–4034Google Scholar
- 34.Marc RE, Murry RF, Basinger SF (1995) Pattern recognition of amino acid signatures in retinal neurons. J Neurosci 15:5106–5129Google Scholar
- 35.Kalloniatis M, Marc RE, Murry R (1996) Amino acid signatures in the primate retina. J Neurosci 16:6807–6902Google Scholar
- 37.Fletcher EL, Kalloniatis M (1996) Neurochemical architecture of the normal and degenerating rat retina. J Comp Neurol 376:343–360Google Scholar
- 38.Barnett NL, Pow DV (2000) Antisense knockdown of GLAST, a glial glutamate transporter, compromises retinal function. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:585–591Google Scholar
- 40.Dowd LA, Robinson MB (1996) Rapid stimulation of EAAC1-mediated Na+-dependent l-glutamate transport activity in C6 glioma cells by phorbol ester. J Neurochem 67:508–516Google Scholar
- 41.Duan S, Anderson CM, Stein BA, Swanson RA (1999) Glutamate induces rapid upregulation of astrocyte glutamate transport and cell-surface expression of GLAST. J Neurosci 19:10193–10200Google Scholar
- 43.Gegelashvili G, Civenni G, Racagni G, Danbolt NC, Schousboe I, Schousboe A (1996) Glutamate receptor agonists up-regulate glutamate transporter GLAST astrocytes. NeuroReport 8:261–265Google Scholar
- 44.Agostinho P, Duarte CB, Oliveira CR (1997) Impairment of excitatory amino acid transporter activity by oxidative stress conditions in retina cells: effect of antioxidants. FASEB J 11:154–163Google Scholar
- 45.Volterra A, Trotti D, Racagni G (1994) Glutamate uptake is inhibited by arachidonic acid and oxygen radicals via tow distinct and additive mechanisms. Mol Pharmacol 46:986–992Google Scholar