Genetic control of macro-and micro-environmental sensitivities in Populus

  • R. L. Wu
Article

Abstract

Understanding the genetic mechanisms for the phenotypic plasticity and developmental instability of a quantitative trait has important implications for breeding and evolution. Two clonally replicated plantations of two 3-generation inbred pedigrees derived from the highly divergent species Populus trichocarpa and P. deltoides were used to examine the genetic control of macro- and micro-environmental sensitivities and their genetic relationships with the trait mean across two contrasting environments. For all stem-growth traits studied, the trait mean had a higher broad-sense heritability (H2) level than macroenvironmental sensitivity, both with much higher H2 values than microenvironmental sensitivity. Genetic correlation analyses indicated that the trait mean was more or less independent of macro- or micro-environmental sensitivity in stem height. Thus, for this trait, the genetic difference in response to the two environments might be mainly due to epistasis between some regulatory loci for plasticity and loci for trait mean. However, for basal area and volume index, pleiotropic loci might be more important for their genetic differences between the two environments. No evidence was found to support Lerner’s (1954) homeostasis theory in which macro- or microenvironmental sensitivity is the inverse function of heterozygosity.

Key words

Developmental instability Growth Phenotypic plasticity Poplar (PopulusQuantitative genetics 

References

  1. Allard RW, Bradshaw AD (1964) Implications of genotype-environmental interaction in applied plant breeding. Crop Sci 4:503–508Google Scholar
  2. Bazzaz FA, Jasienski M, Thomas SC, Wayne P (1995) Microevolutionary responses in experimental populations of plants to CO2-enriched environments: Parallel results from two model systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:8161–8165PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradshaw AD (1965) Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Adv Genet 13:115–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bradshaw HD Jr, Stettier RF (1995) Molecular genetics of growth and development in Populus. IV. Mapping QTLs with large effects on growth, form, and phenology traits in a forest tree. Genetics 139:963–973PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bradshaw HD Jr, Villar M, Watson BD, Otto KG, Stewart S, Stettler RF (1994) Molecular genetics of growth and development in Populus. III. A genetic linkage map of a hybrid poplar composed of RFLP, STS, and RAPD markers. Theor Appl Genet 89:551–558Google Scholar
  6. Bull JJ (1987) Evolution of phenotypic variance. Evolution 41:303–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clarke GM (1993) The genetic basis of developmental stability. I. Reletionships between stability, heterozygosity and genomic coadaptation. Genetica 89:15–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Comstock RE, Moll RH (1963) Genotype-by-environment interactions. In: Hanson WD, Robinson HF (eds) Statistical genetics and plant breeding. Proc Natl Acad Sci-Natl Res Coun Publ 982:164–196Google Scholar
  9. Cockerham CC (1963) Estimation of genetic variances. In: Hanson WD, Robinson HF (eds) Statistical genetics and plant breeding. Proc Natl Acad-Natl Res Coun Publ 982:53–94Google Scholar
  10. Dixon RA, Harrison NJ (1990) Activation, structure, and organization of genes involved in microbial defense in plants. Adv Genet 28:165–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dobzhansky Th, Levene H (1955) The genetics of natural populations. XXIV. Developmental homeostasis in natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 40:747–808Google Scholar
  12. Dobzhansky Th, Pavlovsky O, Spassky B, Spassky N (1955) The genetics of natural populations. XXIII. Biological role of deterious recessives in populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 40:781–796PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Dutilleul P, Potvin C (1995) Among-environment heteroscedasticity and genetic autocorrelation: implications for the study of phenotypic plasticity. Genetics 139:1815–1829PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Eberhart SA, Russell WA (1966) Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci 6:36–40Google Scholar
  15. Efron B (1982) The jackknife, the bootstrap and other resampling plans. SIAM (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics) Monograph 38Google Scholar
  16. Falconer DS (1989) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 3rd edn. Longman Scientific and Technical, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Ford NB, Seigel RA (1989) Phenotypic plasticity in reproductive traits: evidence from a viviparous snake. Ecology 70:1768–1774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gavrilets S, Hastings A (1994) A quantitative-genetic model for selection on developmental noise. Evolution 48:1478–1486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gillespie JH, Turelli M (1989) Genotype-environment interaction and the maintenance of polygenic variation. Genetics 121:129–138PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Gimelfarb A (1994) Additive-multiplicative approximation of genotype-environment interaction. Genetics 138:1339–1349PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Gomuliewicz R, Kirkpatrick M (1992) Quantitative genetics and the evolution of reaction norms. Evolution 46:390–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goransson M, Forsman K, Uhlin BE (1989) Regulatory genes in the thermoregulation of Escherichia coli pili gene transcription. Genes Dev 3:123–130PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gupta AP, Lewontin RC (1982) A study of reaction norms in natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Evolution 36:934–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lande R (1981) The minimum number of genes contributing to quantitative variation between and within populations. Genetics 99:541–553PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lerner IM (1954) Genetic homeostasis. Oliver and Boyd, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Jinks JL, Pooni HS (1988) The genetic basis of environmental sensitivity. In Weir BS, Eisen EJ, Goodman MM, Namkoong G (eds) Proc 2nd Intl Conf Quantitative Genetics. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachuseus, pp 505–522Google Scholar
  27. Liu Z, Ambros V (1991) Alternative temporal control system for hypodermal cell differentiation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 350:162–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mather K, Jinks L (1982) Biometrical genetics, 3rd edn. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. Mitton JB, Grant MC (1984) Association among protein heterozygosity for enzyme loci and variation of morphological characters in natural populations. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 15:479–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Namkoong G, Jonsson A, Eriksson G (1992) Genetic variation in nutrient response functions. Theor Appl Genet 85:165–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Palmer AR, Strobeck C (1986) Fluctuating asymmetry: measurements, analysis, pattern. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 17:392–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Paterson AH, Damon S, Hewitt JD, Zamir D, Rabinowitch HD, Lincoln SE, Lander ES, Tanksley SD (1991) Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits in tomato: comparison across species, generations, and environments. Genetics 127:181–197PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Perkins JM, Jinks JL (1973) The assessment and specificity of environmental and genotype-environmental components of variability. Heredity 30:111–126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pigliucci M, Schlichting C (1995) Ontogenetic reaction norms in Lobelia siphilitica (Lobeliaceae): response to shading. Ecology 76:2134–2144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Santiago E, Dominguez A, Albornoz J, Pineiro R, Izquierdo JI (1989) Environmental sensivity and heterosis for egg laying in Drosophila melanogaster. Theor Appl Genet 78:243–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Scheiner SM (1993) Genetics and evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 24:35–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Scheiner SM, Goodnight CJ (1984) The comparison of phenotypic plasticity and genetic variation in populations of the grass Danthonia spicata. Evolution 38:845–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Scheiner SM, Lyman RF (1991) The genetics of phenotypic plasticity. II. Response to selection. J Evol Biol 3:23–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Scheiner SM, Gaplan RL, Lyman R (1991) The genetics of phenotypic plasticity. II. Genetic correlations and fluctuating asymmetries. J Evol Biol 4:51–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schlichting CD (1986) The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 17:667–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schlichting CD (1989) Phenotypic integration and environmental change. Bioscience 39:460–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schlichting CD, Pigliucci M (1993) Control of phenotypic plasticity via regulatory genes. Am Nat 142:366–370CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Schmalhausen II (1994) Factors of evolution. Blakiston, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  44. Song O, Dolan JW, Yuan YO, Fields F (1991) Pheromone-dependent phosphorylation of the yeast STE12 protein correlates with transcription activation. Genes Dev 5:741–750PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stuber CW, Lincoln SE, Wolff DW, Helentjaris T, Lander ES (1992) Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from two elite maize inbred lines using molecular markers. Genetics 132:823–839PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Sultan SE, Bazzaz FA (1993) Phenotypic plasticity in Polygonum persicaria. I. Diversity and uniformity in genotypic norms of reaction to light. Evolution 47:1009–1031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Thoday JM (1955) Balance, heterozygosity and development stability. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 20:318–326PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Via S (1993) Adaptive phenotypic plasticity: target or by-product of selection in a variable environment? Am Nat 142:352–365CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Via S, Lande R (1985) Genotype-environment interaction and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Evolution 39:509–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Via S, Lande R (1987) Evolution of genetic variability in a spatially variable environment: effects of genotype-environment interaction. Genet Res 49:147–156PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Via S, Gomulkiewicz R, De Jong G, Scheiner SM, Schlichting CD, Van Tienderen PH (1995) Adaptive phenotypic plasticity: consensus and controversy. Trends Ecol Evol 10:212–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Waddington CH (1960) Experiments on canalizing selection. Genet Res 1:140–150Google Scholar
  53. Waddington CH, Robertson E (1966) Selection for developmental canalization. Genet Res 7:303–312PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wescott B (1986) Some methods of analysing genotype-environment interaction. Heredity 56:243–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zeng Z-B, Houle D, Cockerham CC (1990) How informative is Wright’s estimator of the number of genes affecting a quantitative character? Genetics 126:235–247PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhivotovsky L, Gavrilets S (1992) Quantitative variability and multilocus polymorphism under epistatic selection. Theor Pop Biol 42:254–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. L. Wu
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Ecosystem Science and Conservation, College of Forest ResourcesUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations