Advertisement

Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 132, Issue 2, pp 419–429 | Cite as

Enhancing grain size in durum wheat using RNAi to knockdown GW2 genes

  • Francesco Sestili
  • Riccardo Pagliarello
  • Alessandra Zega
  • Rosaria Saletti
  • Anna Pucci
  • Ermelinda Botticella
  • Stefania Masci
  • Silvio Tundo
  • Ilaria Moscetti
  • Salvatore Foti
  • Domenico LafiandraEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Key message

Knocking down GW2 enhances grain size by regulating genes encoding the synthesis of cytokinin, gibberellin, starch and cell wall.

Abstract

Raising crop yield is a priority task in the light of the continuing growth of the world's population and the inexorable loss of arable land to urbanization. Here, the RNAi approach was taken to reduce the abundance of Grain Weight 2 (GW2) transcript in the durum wheat cultivar Svevo. The effect of the knockdown was to increase the grains' starch content by 10–40%, their width by 4–13% and their surface area by 3–5%. Transcriptomic profiling, based on a quantitative real-time PCR platform, revealed that the transcript abundance of genes encoding both cytokinin dehydrogenase 1 and the large subunit of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase was markedly increased in the transgenic lines, whereas that of the genes encoding cytokinin dehydrogenase 2 and gibberellin 3-oxidase was reduced. A proteomic analysis of the non-storage fraction extracted from mature grains detected that eleven proteins were differentially represented in the transgenic compared to wild-type grain: some of these were involved, or at least potentially involved, in cell wall development, suggesting a role of GW2 in the regulation of cell division in the wheat grain.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research was financially supported by Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (MIUR): project PRIN 2010Z77XAX_001 “Identification and characterization of yield- and sustainability-related genes in durum wheat” and in the frame of the MIUR initiative “Departments of excellence”, Law 232/2016. The Bionanotech Research and Innovation Tower (BRIT, University of Catania) is gratefully acknowledged for making available the Orbitrap Fusion mass spectrometer.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

122_2018_3229_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.3 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 1328 kb)

References

  1. Bednarek J, Boulaflous A, Girousse C, Ravel C, Tassy C, Barret P, Bouzidi MF, Mouzeyar S (2012) Down-regulation of the TaGW2 gene by RNA interference results in decreased grain size and weight in wheat. J Exp Bot 63:5945–5955.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ers249 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Camerlengo F, Sestili F, Silvestri M, Colaprico G, Margiotta B, Ruggeri R, Lupi R, Masci S, Lafiandra D (2017) Production and molecular characterization of bread wheat lines with reduced amount of α-type gliadins. BMC Plant Biol 17:248.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-017-1211-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Christensen AH, Quail PF (1996) Ubiquitin promoter-based vectors for high level expression of selectable and/or screenable marker genes in monocotyledonous plants. Trans Res 5:213–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cunsolo V, Foti S, Saletti R (2004) Mass spectrometry in the characterisation of cereal seed proteins. Eur J Mass Spectrom 10:359–370.  https://doi.org/10.1255/ejms.609 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cunsolo V, Muccilli V, Saletti R, Foti S (2012) Mass spectrometry in the proteome analysis of mature cereal kernels. Mass Spectrom Rev 31:448–465. 10.1002/mas.20347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dornez E, Croes E, Gebruers K, De Coninck B, Cammue BP, Delcour JA, Courtin CM (2010) Accumulated evidence substantiates a role for three classes of wheat xylanase inhibitors in plant defense. Critic Rev Plant Sci 29:244–264.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2010.487780 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Du D, Gao X, Geng J, Li Q, Li L, Lv Q, Li X (2016) Identification of key proteins and networks related to grain development in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) by comparative transcription and proteomic analysis of allelic variants in TaGW2-6A. Front Plant Sci 7:922.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00922 Google Scholar
  8. Elliott G, Durand A, Hughes RK, D'Ovidio R, Juge N (2009) Isolation and characterisation of a xylanase inhibitor Xip-II gene from durum wheat. J Cereal Sci 50:324–331.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2009.06.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gebruers K, Courtin CM, Goesaert H, Campenhout SV, Delcour JA (2002) Endoxylanase inhibition activity in different European wheat cultivars and milling fractions. Cereal Chem 79:613–616.  https://doi.org/10.1094/CCHEM.2002.79.5.613 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Geng J, Li L, Lv Q, Zhao Y, Liu Y, Zhang L, Li X (2017) TaGW2-6A allelic variation contributes to grain size possibly by regulating the expression of cytokinins and starch-related genes in wheat. Planta 246:1153–1163.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-017-2759-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Glass M, Barkwill S, Unda F, Mansfield SD (2015) Endo-β-1, 4-glucanases impact plant cell wall development by influencing cellulose crystallization. J Integr Plant Biol 57:396–410.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.12353 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hong Y, Chen L, Du L-p SuZ, Wang J, Ye X, Qi L, Zhang Z (2014) Transcript suppression of TaGW2 increased grain width and weight in bread wheat. Funct Integr Gen 14:341–349.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10142-014-0380-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huttly AK, Phillips AL (1995) Gibberellin-regulated plant genes. Physiol Plant 95:310–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jaiswal V, Gahlaut V, Mathur S, Agarwal P, Khandelwal MK, Khurana JP, Tyagi AK, Balyan HS, Gupta PK (2015) Identification of novel SNP in promoter sequence of TaGW2-6A associated with grain weight and other agronomic traits in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). PLoS ONE 10:e0129400.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129400 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jeon JS, Ryoo N, Hahn TR, Walia H, Nakamura Y (2010) Starch biosynthesis in cereal endosperm. Plant Physiol Biochem 48:383–392.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.03.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kadkol G, Sissons M (2016) Durum wheat: overview. In: Wrigley C, Corke H, Seetharaman K, Faubion J (eds) Encyclopedia of food grains, 2nd edn. Academic Press Inc., San Diego, pp 117–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li Q, Li L, Yang X, Warburton M, Bai G, Dai J, Li J, Yan J (2010) Relationship, evolutionary fate and function of two maize co-orthologs of rice GW2 associated with kernel size and weight. BMC Plant Biol 10:143.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-10-143 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Li Q, Li L, Liu Y, Lv Q, Zhang H, Zhu J, Li X (2017) Influence of TaGW2-6A on seed development in wheat by negatively regulating gibberellin synthesis. Plant Sci 263:226–235.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2017.07.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 25:402–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Locascio A, Roig-Villanova I, Bernardi J, Varotto S (2014) Current perspectives on the hormonal control of seed development in Arabidopsis and maize: a focus on auxin. Front Plant Sci 5:412.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00412 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lopez-Casado G, Urbanowicz BR, Damasceno CMB, Rose JKC (2008) Plant glycosyl hydrolases and biofuels: a natural marriage. Curr Opin Plant Biol 11:329–333.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2008.02.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nieuwland J, Feron R, Huisman BA, Fasolino A, Hilbers CW, Derksen J, Mariani C (2005) Lipid transfer proteins enhance cell wall extension in tobacco. Plant Cell 17:2009–2019.  https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.105.032094 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Qin L, Zhao J, Li T, Hou J, Zhang X, Hao C (2017) TaGW2, a good reflection of wheat polyploidization and evolution. Front Plant Sci 8:318.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00318 Google Scholar
  25. Sestili F, Janni M, Doherty A, Botticella E, D'Ovidio R, Masci S, Jones H, Lafiandra D (2010) Increasing the amylose content of durum wheat through silencing of the SBEIIa genes. BMC Plant Biol 10:144.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-10-144 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sestili F, Palombieri S, Botticella E, Mantovani P, Bovina R, Lafiandra D (2015) TILLING mutants of durum wheat result in a high amylose phenotype and provide information on alternative splicing mechanisms. Plant Sci 233:127–133.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.01.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Simmonds J, Scott P, Brinton J, Mestre TC, Bush M, Del Blanco A, Dubcovsky J, Uauy C (2016) A splice acceptor site mutation in TaGW2-A1 increases thousand grain weight in tetraploid and hexaploid wheat through wider and longer grains. Theor Appl Genet 129:1099–1112.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-016-2686-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Song X-J, Huang W, Shi M, Zhu M-Z, Lin H-X (2007) A QTL for rice grain width and weight encodes a previously unknown RING-type E3 ubiquitin ligase. Nat Genet 39:623–630.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ng2014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sreenivasulu N, Schnurbusch T (2012) A genetic playground for enhancing grain number in cereals. Trends Plant Sci 17:91–101.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2011.11.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Su Z, Hao C, Wang L, Dong Y, Zhang X (2011) Identification and development of a functional marker of TaGW2 associated with grain weight in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet 122:211–223.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-010-1437-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tanabata T, Shibaya T, Hori K, Ebana K, Yano M (2012) SmartGrain: high-throughput phenotyping software for measuring seed shape through image analysis. Plant Physiol 160:1871–1880.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.112.205120 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tosi P, D'Ovidio R, Napier JA, Bekes F, Shewry PR (2004) Expression of epitope-tagged LMW glutenin subunits in the starchy endosperm of transgenic wheat and their incorporation into glutenin polymers. Theor Appl Genet 108:468–476.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-003-1459-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wang NJ, Lee CC, Cheng CS, Lo WC, Yang YF, Chen MN, Lyu PC (2012) Construction and analysis of a plant non-specific lipid transfer protein database (nsLTPDB). BMC Genom 13:S9.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-13-S1-S9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Xing Y, Zhang Q (2010) Genetic and molecular bases of rice yield. Annu Rev Plant Biol 61:421–442.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112209 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yang Z, Bai Z, Li X, Wang P, Wu Q, Yang L, Li L, Li X (2012) SNP identification and allelic-specific PCR markers development for TaGW2, a gene linked to wheat kernel weight. Theor Appl Genet 125:1057–1068.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-012-1895-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhai H, Feng Z, Du X, Song Y, Liu X, Qi Z, Song L, Li J, Li L, Peng H, Hu Z, Yao Y, Xin M, Xiao S, Sun Q, Ni Z (2018) A novel allele of TaGW2-A1 is located in a finely mapped QTL that increases grain weight but decreases grain number in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet 131:539–553.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-017-3017-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhang X, Chen J, Shi C, Chen J, Zheng F, Tian J (2013) Function of TaGW2-6A and its effect on grain weight in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Euphytica 192:347–357.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-012-0858-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhang Y, Li D, Zhang D, Zhao X, Cao X, Dong L, Liu J, Chen K, Zhang H, Gao C, Wang D (2018) Analysis of the functions of TaGW2 homeologs in wheat grain weight and protein content traits. Plant J 94:857–866.  https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.13903 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zürcher E, Müller B (2016) Cytokinin synthesis, signaling, and function-advances and new insights. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol 324:1–38.  https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.ircmb.2016.01.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Agriculture and Forest SciencesUniversity of TusciaViterboItaly
  2. 2.Department of Chemical SciencesUniversity of CataniaCataniaItaly

Personalised recommendations