Fine mapping of the chromosome 5B region carrying closely linked rust resistance genes Yr47 and Lr52 in wheat
Fine mapping ofYr47andLr52in chromosome arm 5BS of wheat identified close linkage of the markersun180to both genes and its robustness for marker-assisted selection was demonstrated.
The widely effective and genetically linked rust resistance genes Yr47 and Lr52 have previously been mapped in the short arm of chromosome 5B in two F3 populations (Aus28183/Aus27229 and Aus28187/Aus27229). The Aus28183/Aus27229 F3 population was advanced to generate an F6 recombinant inbred line (RIL) population to identify markers closely linked with Yr47 and Lr52. Diverse genomic resources including flow-sorted chromosome survey sequence contigs representing the orthologous region in Brachypodium distachyon, the physical map of chromosome arm 5BS, expressed sequence tags (ESTs) located in the 5BS6-0.81-1.00 deletion bin and resistance gene analog contigs of chromosome arm 5BS were used to develop markers to saturate the target region. Selective genotyping was also performed using the iSelect 90 K Infinium wheat SNP assay. A set of SSR, STS, gene-based and SNP markers were developed and genotyped on the Aus28183/Aus27229 RIL population. Yr47 and Lr52 are genetically distinct genes that mapped 0.4 cM apart in the RIL population. The SSR marker sun180 co-segregated with Lr52 and mapped 0.4 cM distal to Yr47. In a high resolution mapping population of 600 F2 genotypes Yr47 and Lr52 mapped 0.2 cM apart and marker sun180 was placed 0.4 cM distal to Lr52. The amplification of a different sun180 amplicon (195 bp) than that linked with Yr47 and Lr52 (200 bp) in 204 diverse wheat genotypes demonstrated its robustness for marker-assisted selection of these genes.
Naeela Qureshi acknowledges the University of Sydney for the USYDIS award. We thank the Grains Research and Development Corporation (GRDC) Australia for financial support through the Australian Cereal Rust Control Program.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All authors have read the manuscript and declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Choudhary K, Choudhary O, Shekhawat N (2008) Marker assisted selection: a novel approach for crop improvement. Am-Eurasian J Agron 1:26–30Google Scholar
- Gustafson P, Raskina O, Ma X, Nevo E (2009) Wheat evolution, domestication, and improvement. Sci Trade, Wheat, pp 5–30Google Scholar
- Rosegrant MW, Msangi S, Ringler C, Sulser TB, Zhu T, Cline SA (2008) International model for policy analysis of agricultural commodities and trade (IMPACT): model description. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
- Singh RP, Huerta-Espino J, Rajaram S (2000) Achieving near immunity to leaf and stripe rusts in wheat by combining slow rusting resistance genes. Acta Phytopathol Entomol Hung 35:133–139Google Scholar
- Singh RP, Hodson DP, Jin Y, Huerta-Espino J, Kinyua MG, Wanyera R, Njau P, Ward RW (2006) Current status, likely migration and strategies to mitigate the threat to wheat production from race Ug99 (TTKS) of stem rust pathogen. CAB reviews: perspectives in agriculture, veterinary science, nutrition and natural resources 1:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wang S, Wong D, Forrest K, Allen A, Chao S, Huang BE, Maccaferri M, Salvi S, Milner SG, Cattivelli L, Mastrangelo AM, Whan A, Stephen S, Barker G, Wieseke R, Plieske J, International Wheat Genome Sequencing C, Lillemo M, Mather D, Appels R, Dolferus R, Brown-Guedira G, Korol A, Akhunova AR, Feuillet C, Salse J, Morgante M, Pozniak C, Luo MC, Dvorak J, Morell M, Dubcovsky J, Ganal M, Tuberosa R, Lawley C, Mikoulitch I, Cavanagh C, Edwards KJ, Hayden M, Akhunov E (2014) Characterization of polyploid wheat genomic diversity using a high-density 90,000 single nucleotide polymorphism array. Plant Biotech J 12:787–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar