Advertisement

Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 130, Issue 2, pp 319–330 | Cite as

A GBS-SNP-based linkage map and quantitative trait loci (QTL) associated with resistance to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum race 2 identified in Citrullus lanatus var. citroides

  • Sandra E. Branham
  • Amnon Levi
  • Mark W. Farnham
  • W. Patrick WechterEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Key message

A major QTL for resistance to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum race 2 was mapped to a narrow 1.2 Mb interval using a high-density GBS-SNP linkage map, the first map of Citrullus lanatus var. citroides.

Abstract

Fusarium wilt, a fungal disease caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum (Fon), devastates watermelon crop production worldwide. Several races, which are differentiated by host range, of the pathogen exist. Resistance to Fon race 2, a particularly virulent strain prevalent in the United States, does not exist in edible cultivars of the sweet cultivated watermelon Citrullus lanatus var. lanatus (Cll) and has been well described in a few plant introductions of the wild subspecies of watermelon, C. lanatus var. citroides (Clc). Clc provides a vital source of genetic diversity, as well as resistance to numerous diseases. Unfortunately, both genetic diversity and disease resistance are lacking in Cll due to the narrow genetic base. Despite the importance of Clc to continued watermelon improvement, intra-variety genetic studies are lacking. Here, we present the first Clc genetic linkage map, generated with 2495 single nucleotide polymorphisms developed through genotyping-by-sequencing, and use it to identify quantitative trait loci associated with Fon race 2 resistance. Multiple QTL mapping in a Clc F2:3 population (N = 173) identified one major and four minor QTL. The major QTL explained 43% of the variation in Fon race 2 resistance and was delimited to a 1.2-Mb interval on chromosome 9, a region spanning 44 genes.

Keywords

Quantitative Trait Locus Fusarium Wilt Plant Introduction Resistance Allele Major Quantitative Trait Locus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the United States Department of Agriculture, project no. 6080-22000-025-00 and the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, project no. 6080-21000-018-08. We would like to acknowledge and thank Dr. Yong Xu and Honghe Sun of National Engineering Research Center for Vegetables, China and Dr. Zhangjun Fei of USDA-ARS, Boyce Thompson Institute, Cornell University, USA for providing the genome information for Citrullus lanatus var citroides PI 296341.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standards

The experiment conducted complies with the laws of the United States.

Supplementary material

122_2016_2813_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (15 kb)
Online Resource 1 Percentage of surviving (surv) F3 individuals for each F2:3 family (line) and the parents in two blocks (XLSX 15 kb)
122_2016_2813_MOESM2_ESM.sam (456.6 mb)
Online Resource 2 Tag sequence and position information in SAM format (SAM 4,67,592 kb)
122_2016_2813_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx (1.5 mb)
Online Resource 3 Imputed genotypes for 173 F2 individuals at 2,495 SNPs in “csvr” format for import into Rqtl. The first row is the F2:3 family ID (line). The second row has the best linear unbiased predictor value (blup) of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum race 2 resistance for each F2:3 family. The first column contains the SNP ID is in the format of “S”+chromosome number+”_” + physical position (bp). The second and third columns list the linkage group and genetic position (cM), respectively. The remaining information is the imputed genotypes with “A” indicating homozygous for the resistant parent alleles, “B” homozygous for the susceptible parent alleles, and “H” heterozygous (XLSX 1488 kb)
122_2016_2813_MOESM4_ESM.xlsx (60 kb)
Online Resource 4 Chromosome, start and stop positions, and functional information for the 832 genes that collocated with Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. niveum race 2 resistance QTL (XLSX 60 kb)

References

  1. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B 57:289–300Google Scholar
  2. Berrocal-Lobo M, Molina A (2004) Ethylene response factor 1 mediates arabidopsis resistance to the soilborne fungus fusarium oxysporum. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 17:763–770. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.2004.17.7.763 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Boyhan GE, Langston DB, Granberry DM, Lewis PM, Linton DO (2003) Resistance to Fusarium wilt and root-knot nematode in watermelon germplasm. Cucurbit Genet Co-op Rep 26:18–25Google Scholar
  4. Bradbury PJ, Zhang Z, Kroon DE, Casstevens TM, Ramdoss Y, Buckler ES (2007) TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics 23:2633–2635CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Broman KW, Sen S (2009) A guide to QTL mapping with R/qtl, vol 46. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Broman KW, Speed T (2002) A model selection approach for the identification of quantitative trait loci in experimental crosses (with discussion). J Roy Stat Soc B 64:641–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Broman KW, Wu H, Sen S, Churchill GA (2003) R/qtl: QTL mapping in experimental crosses. Bioinformatics 19:889–890CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Brotman Y, Normantovich M, Goldenberg Z, Zvirin Z, Kovalski I, Stovbun N et al (2013) Dual resistance of melon to Fusarium oxysporum races 0 and 2 and to Papaya ring-spot virus is controlled by a pair of head-to-head-oriented NB-LRR genes of unusual architecture. Mol Plant 6:235–238CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Catanzariti A-M, Lim GTT, Jones DA (2015) The tomato I-3 gene: a novel gene for resistance to Fusarium wilt disease. New Phytol 207:106–118. doi: 10.1111/nph.13348 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Chomicki G, Renner S (2014) Watermelon origin solved with molecular phylogenetics including Linnaean material: another example of museomics. New Phytol 205:526–532CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cole SJ, Diener AC (2013) Diversity in receptor-like kinase genes is a major determinant of quantitative resistance to Fusarium oxysporum f.sp matthioli. New Phytol 200:172–184. doi: 10.1111/nph.12368 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Core Team R (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  13. Elshire RJ, Glaubitz JC, Sun Q, Poland JA, Kawamoto A, Buckler ES, Mitchell SE (2011) A robust, simple Genotyping-by-Sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity species. PLoS One 6(5):e19379. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019379 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ, Cullis BR, Thompson R (2009) ASReml User Guide Release 3.0. VSN International Ltd, Hemel Hempstead, UKGoogle Scholar
  15. Glaubitz JC, Casstevens TM, Lu F et al (2014) TASSEL-GBS: a High Capacity Genotyping by Sequencing Analysis Pipeline. PLoS One 9:e90346. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090346 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Guner N (2004) Papaya ringspot virus watermelon strain and Zucchini yellow mosaic virus resistance in watermelon. Ph.D Diss., Department of Horticultural Sciences, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NCGoogle Scholar
  17. Guner N, Wehner TC (2008) Overview of potyvirus resistance in watermelon. In: Proc. IXth EUCARPIA Meeting Cucurbitaceae (Avignon, France), l’institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Avignon, France, pp 445–451, 21–24 May 2008Google Scholar
  18. Gusmini G, Song R, Wehner TC (2005) New sources of resistance to gummy stem blight in watermelon. Crop Sci 45:582–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Haley CS, Knott SA (1992) A simple regression method for mapping quantitative trait loci in line crosses using flanking markers. Heredity 69:315–324CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Jeffrey C (2001) Cucurbitaceae. In: Hanelt P (ed) Mansfeld’s Encyclopedia of Agricultural and Horticultural Crops. Springer, Berlin, Germany, pp 1510–1557Google Scholar
  21. Joobeur T, King JJ, Nolin SJ, Thomas CE, Dean RA (2004) The fusarium wilt resistance locus Fom-2 of melon contains a single resistance gene with complex features. Plant J 39:283–297CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kosambi DD (1943) The estimation of map distances from recombination values. Ann Eugen 12:172–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kruglyak L, Lander ES (1995) A nonparametric approach for mapping quantitative trait loci. Genetics 139:1421–1428PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Kruskal WH, Wallis WA (1952) Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. J Am Stat Assoc 47:583–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lander ES, Green P (1987) Construction of multilocus genetic linkage maps in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:2363–2367CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Levi A, Thomas CE, Wehner TC, Zhang X (2001a) Low genetic diversity indicates the need to broaden the genetic base of cultivated watermelon. Hort Sci 36:1096–1101Google Scholar
  27. Levi A, Thomas CE, Zhang X, Joobeur T, Dean R, Wehner TC, Carle BR (2001b) A genetic linkage map for watermelon based on randomly amplified polymorphic dna markers. J Am Soc Hort Sci 126:730–737Google Scholar
  28. Levi A, Thomas CE, Joobeur T, Zhang X, Davis A (2002) A genetic linkage map for watermelon derived from a testcross population: (Citrullus lanatus var. citroides × C.lanatus var. lanatus) × C. colocynthis. Theor Appl Genet 105:555–563CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Levi A, Thomas CE, Trebitsh T, Salman A, King J, Karalius J, Newman M, Reddy OUK, Xu Y, Zhang X (2006) An extended linkage map for watermelon based on SRAP, AFLP, SSR, ISSR and RAPD markers. J Am Soc Hort Sci 131:393–402Google Scholar
  30. Levi A, Wechter WP, Massey LM, Carter L, Hopkins D (2011) Genetic linkage map of Citrullus lanatus var. citroides chromosomal segments introgressed into the watermelon cultivar Crimson Sweet (Citrullus lanatus var. lanatus) genome. Am J Plant Sci 2:93–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Levi A, Thies JA, Wechter WP, Harrison HF, Simmons AM, Reddy UK, Nimmakayala P, Fei Z (2013) High frequency oligonucleotides: targeting active gene (HFO-TAG) markers revealed wide genetic diversity among Citrullus spp. accessions useful for enhancing disease or pest resistance in watermelon cultivars. Genet Resour Crop Evol 60:427–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Manichaikul A, Moon JY, Sen Ś, Yandell BS, Broman KW (2009) A model selection approach for the identification of quantitative trait loci in experimental crosses, allowing epistasis. Genetics 181:1077–1086CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Martyn RD (1985) An aggressive race of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum new to the United States. Plant Dis 69:1007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Martyn RD (1987) Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum race 2: a highly aggressive race new to the United States. Plant Dis 71:233–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Martyn RD, Bruton BD (1989) An initial survey of the United States for races of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum. Hort Science 24:696–698Google Scholar
  36. Martyn RD, Netzer D (1991) Resistance to races 0, 1, and 2 of Fusarium wilt of watermelon in Citrullus sp. PI-296341-FR. Hort Science 26:429–432Google Scholar
  37. Nazarian A, Gezan SA (2016) Geno matrix: a software package for pedigree-based and genomic prediction analyses on complex traits. J Hered 107:372–379. doi: 10.1093/jhered/esw020 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Netzer D (1976) Physiological races of soil population levels of Fusarium wilt of watermelon. Phytoparasitica 4:131–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Netzer D, Martyn RD (1989) PI 296341, a source of resistance in watermelon to race 2 of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum. Plant Dis 73:518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Reddy UK, Nimmakayala P, Levi A et al (2014) High-resolution genetic map for understanding the effect of genome-wide recombination rate on nucleotide diversity in watermelon. G3 (Bethesda, Md)(4):2219–2230. doi: 10.1534/g3.114.012815 Google Scholar
  41. Ren Y, Zhao H, Kou Q, Jiang J, Guo S, Zhang H et al (2012) A high resolution genetic map anchoring scaffolds of the sequenced watermelon genome. PLoS One 7(1):e29453. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029453 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Ren Y, McGregor C, Zhang Y, Gong G, Zhang H, Guo S, Sun H, Cai W, Zhang J, Xu Y (2014) An integrated genetic map based on four mapping populations and quantitative trait loci associated with economically important traits in watermelon (Citrullus lanatus). BMC Plant Biol 14:33 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2229/14/33
  43. Ren Y, Jiao Di, Gong G et al (2015) Genetic analysis and chromosome mapping of resistance to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum (FON) race 1 and race 2 in watermelon (Citrullus lanatus L.). Mol Breed 35:1–9. doi: 10.1007/s11032-015-0375-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sandlin K, Prothro J, Heesacker A et al (2012) Comparative mapping in watermelon [Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. et Nakai]. Theor Appl Genet 125:1603–1618. doi: 10.1007/s00122-012-1938-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Sekhwal M, Li P, Lam I et al (2015) Disease resistance gene analogs (RGAs) in plants. Int J Mol Sci 16:19248–19290. doi: 10.3390/ijms160819248 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Shang J, Li N, Li N, Xu Y, Ma S, Wang J (2016) Construction of a high-density genetic map for watermelon (Citrullus lanatus L.) based on large-scale SNP discovery by specific length amplified fragment sequencing (SLAF-seq). Sci Hortic 203:38–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shimizu M, Fujimoto R, Ying H, Pu ZJ, Ebe Y, Kawanabe T et al (2014) Identification of candidate genes for fusarium yellows resistance in Chinese cabbage by differential expression analysis. Plant Mol Biol 85:247–257CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Simons G, Groenendijk J, Wijbrandi J, Reijans M, Groenen J, Diergaarde P et al (1998) Dissection of the Fusarium I2 gene cluster in tomato reveals six homologs and one active gene copy. Plant Cell 10:1055–1068CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Swarts K, Li H, Romero Navarro JA, An D, Romay MC, Hearne S et al (2014) Novel methods to optimize genotypic imputation for low-coverage, next-generation sequence data in crop plants. Plant Genome 7:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Thies JA, Levi A (2003) Resistance of watermelon germplasm to the peanut root–knotnematode. Hort Sci 38:1417–1421Google Scholar
  51. Thies J, Levi A (2007) Characterization of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus var. citroides) germplasm for resistance to root-knot nematodes. Hort Sci 42:1530–1533Google Scholar
  52. Wechter WP, Kousik CS, McMillan ML, Levi A (2012) Identification of resistance to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum race 2 in Citrullus lanatus var. citroides plant introductions. Hort Sci 47:334–338Google Scholar
  53. Wechter WP, McMillan ML, Farnham MW, Levi A (2016) Watermelon germplasm lines USVL246-FR2 and USVL252-FR2 tolerant to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum race 2. Hort Sci 51:1065–1067Google Scholar
  54. Whitaker TW, Bemis WP (1976) Cucurbits. Cucumis, Citrullus, Cucurbita, Lagenaria. In: Simmonds NW (ed) Evolution of crop plants. Longman, London, pp 64–69Google Scholar
  55. Yang J, Benyamin B, McEvoy BP, Gordon S, Henders AK, Nyholt DR et al (2010) Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height. Nat Genet 42:565–569CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Zeng ZB, Kao CH, Basten CJ (1999) Estimating the genetic architecture of quantitative traits. Genet Res 74:279–289CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhang R, Xu Y, Yi K et al (2004) A genetic linkage map for watermelon derived from recombinant inbred lines. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 129:237–243Google Scholar
  58. Zhou XG, Everts KL, Bruton BD (2010) Race 3, a new and highly virulent race of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum causing Fusarium wilt in watermelon. Plant Dis 94:92–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg (outside the USA) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sandra E. Branham
    • 1
  • Amnon Levi
    • 1
  • Mark W. Farnham
    • 1
  • W. Patrick Wechter
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.USDA, ARS, US Vegetable LaboratoryCharlestonUSA

Personalised recommendations