Prediction of malting quality traits in barley based on genome-wide marker data to assess the potential of genomic selection
- 1.1k Downloads
Genomic prediction of malting quality traits in barley shows the potential of applying genomic selection to improve selection for malting quality and speed up the breeding process.
Genomic selection has been applied to various plant species, mostly for yield or yield-related traits such as grain dry matter yield or thousand kernel weight, and improvement of resistances against diseases. Quality traits have not been the main scope of analysis for genomic selection, but have rather been addressed by marker-assisted selection. In this study, the potential to apply genomic selection to twelve malting quality traits in two commercial breeding programs of spring and winter barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) was assessed. Phenotypic means were calculated combining multilocational field trial data from 3 or 4 years, depending on the trait investigated. Three to five locations were available in each of these years. Heritabilities for malting traits ranged between 0.50 and 0.98. Predictive abilities (PA), as derived from cross validation, ranged between 0.14 to 0.58 for spring barley and 0.40–0.80 for winter barley. Small training sets were shown to be sufficient to obtain useful PAs, possibly due to the narrow genetic base in this breeding material. Deployment of genomic selection in malting barley breeding clearly has the potential to reduce cost intensive phenotyping for quality traits, increase selection intensity and to shorten breeding cycles.
KeywordsQuantitative Trait Locus Genomic Selection Spring Barley Winter Barley Training Population
The authors greatly thank Professor Mark E. Sorrells (Cornell University, USA) and Dr. Edward Henry Byrne (KWS UK Ltd., UK) for careful reading and providing useful comments for this manuscript. This research was supported by Grant (FKZ 0315960) from the Bundesministerium Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) within the framework of the PLANT 2030 program.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
- Butler D (2009) ASReml R package version 3.0. https://www.vsni.co.uk/de/software/asreml/
- Close TJ, Bhat PR, Lonardi S, Wu Y, Rostoks N, Ramsay L, Druka A, Stein N, Svensson JT, Wanamaker S, Bozdag S, Roose ML, Moscou MJ, Chao S, Varshney RK, Szucs P, Sato K, Hayes PM, Matthews DE, Kleinhofs A, Muehlbauer GJ, DeYoung J, Marshall DF, Madishetty K, Fenton RD, Condamine P, Graner A, Waugh R (2009) Development and implementation of high-throughput SNP genotyping in barley. BMC Genomics 10:852Google Scholar
- Comadran J, Kilian B, Russell J, Ramsay L, Stein N, Ganal M, Shaw P, Bayer M, Thomas W, Marshall D, Hedley P, Tondelli A, Pecchioni N, Francia E, Korzun V, Walther A, Waugh R (2012) Natural variation in a homolog of Antirrhinum CENTRORADIALIS contributed to spring growth habit and environmental adaptation in cultivated barley. Nat Genet 44:1388–1392PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Frisch M (2015) SelectionTools. http://www.fb09-pg-s207agraruni-giessende/~frisch-m/. R-Library 15.1.1
- Hickey JM, Dreisigacker S, Crossa J, Hearne S, Babu R, Prasanna BM, Grondona M, Zambelli A, Windhausen VS, Mathews K, Gorjanc G (2014) Evaluation of genomic selection training population designs and genotyping strategies in plant breeding programs using simulation. Crop Sci 54:1476–1488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hofmann K, Silvar C, Casas AM, Herz M, Buttner B, Gracia MP, Contreras-Moreira B, Wallwork H, Igartua E, Schweizer G (2013) Fine mapping of the Rrs1 resistance locus against scald in two large populations derived from Spanish barley landraces. Theor Appl Genet 126:3091–3102Google Scholar
- Islamovic E, Obert D, Budde A, Schmitt M, Brunick R II, Kilian A, Chao S, Lazo G, Marshall J, Jellen E, Maughan P, Hu G, Klos K, Brown R, Jackson E (2014) Quantitative trait loci of barley malting quality trait components in the Stellar/01Ab8219 mapping population. Mol Breed 34:59–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’ Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Henry M, Stevens H, Wagner H (2014) Vegan: community ecology package. http://www.CRANR-projectorg/package=vegan. R package version 2.2-1
- Rincent R, Laloë D, Nicolas S, Altmann T, Brunel D, Revilla P, Rodríguez VM, Moreno-Gonzalez J, Melchinger A, Bauer E, Schoen CC, Meyer N, Giauffret C, Bauland C, Jamin P, Laborde J, Monod H, Flament P, Charcosset A, Moreau L (2012) Maximizing the reliability of genomic selection by optimizing the calibration set of reference individuals: comparison of methods in two diverse groups of maize inbreds (Zea mays L.). Genetics 192:715–728PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rostoks N, Ramsay L, MacKenzie K, Cardle L, Bhat PR, Roose ML, Svensson JT, Stein N, Varshney RK, Marshall DF, Graner A, Close TJ, Waugh R (2006) Recent history of artificial outcrossing facilitates whole-genome association mapping in elite inbred crop varieties. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103:18656–18661PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schmid KJ, Thorwarth P (2014) Genomic Selection in Barley Breeding. In: Kumlehn J, Stein N (eds) Biotechnological approaches to barley improvement. Springer, Berlin, pp 367–378Google Scholar
- Shewry PR, Ullrich SE (2014) Barley: Chemistry and Technology, 2nd edn. AACC InternationalGoogle Scholar
- Spindel J, Begum H, Akdemir D, Virk P, Collard B, Redoña E, Atlin G, Jannink JL, McCouch SR (2015) Genomic selection and association mapping in rice Oryza sativa: effect of trait genetic architecture, training population composition, marker number and statistical model on accuracy of rice genomic selection in elite, tropical rice breeding lines. PLoS Genet 11:e1004982PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Utz HF (2011) PLABSTAT - Ein Computerprogramm zur statistischen Analyse von pflanzenzüchterischen Experimenten. Saatgutforschungund Populationsgenetik, Universität Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Institut für PflanzenzüchtungGoogle Scholar
- Wang Y, Mette MF, Miedaner T, Gottwald M, Wilde P, Reif JC, Zhao Y (2014) The accuracy of prediction of genomic selection in elite hybrid rye populations surpasses the accuracy of marker-assisted selection and is equally augmented by multiple field evaluation locations and test years. BMC Genom 15:556CrossRefGoogle Scholar