Estimation of genealogical coancestry in plant species using a pedigree reconstruction algorithm and application to an oil palm breeding population
Explicit pedigree reconstruction by simulated annealing gave reliable estimates of genealogical coancestry in plant species, especially when selfing rate was lower than 0.6, using a realistic number of markers.
Genealogical coancestry information is crucial in plant breeding to estimate genetic parameters and breeding values. The approach of Fernández and Toro (Mol Ecol 15:1657–1667, 2006) to estimate genealogical coancestries from molecular data through pedigree reconstruction was limited to species with separate sexes. In this study it was extended to plants, allowing hermaphroditism and monoecy, with possible selfing. Moreover, some improvements were made to take previous knowledge on the population demographic history into account. The new method was validated using simulated and real datasets. Simulations showed that accuracy of estimates was high with 30 microsatellites, with the best results obtained for selfing rates below 0.6. In these conditions, the root mean square error (RMSE) between the true and estimated genealogical coancestry was small (<0.07), although the number of ancestors was overestimated and the selfing rate could be biased. Simulations also showed that linkage disequilibrium between markers and departure from the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium in the founder population did not affect the efficiency of the method. Real oil palm data confirmed the simulation results, with a high correlation between the true and estimated genealogical coancestry (>0.9) and a low RMSE (<0.08) using 38 markers. The method was applied to the Deli oil palm population for which pedigree data were scarce. The estimated genealogical coancestries were highly correlated (>0.9) with the molecular coancestries using 100 markers. Reconstructed pedigrees were used to estimate effective population sizes. In conclusion, this method gave reliable genealogical coancestry estimates. The strategy was implemented in the software MOLCOANC 3.0.
- Adams W, Neale D, Loopstra C (1988) Verifying controlled crosses in conifer tree-improvement programs. Silvae genetica 37:147–152Google Scholar
- Cochard B (2008) Etude de la diversité génétique et du déséquilibre de liaison au sein de populations améliorées de palmier à huile (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.). Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, p 175Google Scholar
- Corley RHV (2005) Illegitimacy in oil palm breeding—a review. J Oil Palm Res 17:64–69Google Scholar
- Ericsson T (1999) The effect of pedigree error by misidentification of individual trees on genetic evaluation of a full-sib experiment. Silvae genetica 48:239–242Google Scholar
- Garbe JR, Da Y (2008) Pedigraph user manual Version 2.4. Department of Animal Science, University of MinnesotaGoogle Scholar
- Voorrips RE (2007) Pedimap: software for visualization of genetic and phenotypic data in pedigrees. Plant Research International, WageningenGoogle Scholar
- Zhao J (2007) gap: genetic analysis package. J Stat Softw 23:1–18Google Scholar