Optimizing the allocation of resources for genomic selection in one breeding cycle
We developed a universally applicable planning tool for optimizing the allocation of resources for one cycle of genomic selection in a biparental population. The framework combines selection theory with constraint numerical optimization and considers genotype × environment interactions.
Genomic selection (GS) is increasingly implemented in plant breeding programs to increase selection gain but little is known how to optimally allocate the resources under a given budget. We investigated this problem with model calculations by combining quantitative genetic selection theory with constraint numerical optimization. We assumed one selection cycle where both the training and prediction sets comprised double haploid (DH) lines from the same biparental population. Grain yield for testcrosses of maize DH lines was used as a model trait but all parameters can be adjusted in a freely available software implementation. An extension of the expected selection accuracy given by Daetwyler et al. (2008) was developed to correctly balance between the number of environments for phenotyping the training set and its population size in the presence of genotype × environment interactions. Under small budget, genotyping costs mainly determine whether GS is superior over phenotypic selection. With increasing budget, flexibility in resource allocation increases greatly but selection gain leveled off quickly requiring balancing the number of populations with the budget spent for each population. The use of an index combining phenotypic and GS predicted values in the training set was especially beneficial under limited resources and large genotype × environment interactions. Once a sufficiently high selection accuracy is achieved in the prediction set, further selection gain can be achieved most efficiently by massively expanding its size. Thus, with increasing budget, reducing the costs for producing a DH line becomes increasingly crucial for successfully exploiting the benefits of GS.
This publication is dedicated to Professor Chris-Carolin Schön, TU München, to acknowledge her outstanding role in initiating and coordinating the “Synbreed” project and promoting genomic selection in plant breeding. Funding for this research came from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) within the AgroClustEr “Synbreed—Synergistic Plant and Animal Breeding” (grant 0315528D) as well as from DuPont Pioneer under a Ph.D. fellowship for C.R.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
The authors declare that all experiments comply with the current laws in Germany.
- Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics. Pearson, EssexGoogle Scholar
- Heslot N, Yang H-P, Sorrells ME, Jannink JL (2012) Genomic selection in plant breeding: a comparison of models. Crop Sci 52:146–160Google Scholar
- Lorenz AJ (2013) Resource allocation for maximizing prediction accuracy and genetic gain of genomic selection in plant breeding: a simulation experiment. G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics 3:481–491Google Scholar
- Massman JM, Jung HJG, Bernardo R (2012) Genomewide selection versus marker-assisted recurrent selection to improve grain yield and stover-quality traits for cellulosic ethanol in maize. Crop Sci 53:58–66Google Scholar
- Prigge V, Schipprack W, Mahuku G, Atlin GN, Melchinger AE (2012) Development of in vivo haploid inducers for tropical maize breeding programs. Euphytica 185:482–490Google Scholar
- Tomerius AM (2001) Optimizing the development of seed-parent lines in hybrid rye breeding, Dissertation, University of HohenheimGoogle Scholar
- Utz HF (1969) Mehrstufenselektion in der Pflanzenzüchtung. Dissertation, University of HohenheimGoogle Scholar
- Yabe S, Ohsawa R, Iwata H (2013) Potential of genomic selection for mass selection breeding in annual allogamous crops. Crop Sci 53:95–105Google Scholar