Advertisement

Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 126, Issue 9, pp 2381–2390 | Cite as

PCR and sequence analysis of barley chromosome 2H subjected to the gametocidal action of chromosome 2C

  • Giri Prasad Joshi
  • Takashi R. Endo
  • Shuhei Nasuda
Original Paper

Abstract

Gametocidal (Gc) chromosomes induce various types of chromosomal mutations during gametogenesis in the chromosomes of common wheat and alien chromosomes added to common wheat. However, it is not yet known whether the Gc chromosome causes aberrations at the nucleotide level because mutations caused by Gc chromosomes have been studied only by cytological screening. In order to know whether the Gc chromosome induces point mutations, we conducted PCR analysis and sequencing with the progeny of a common wheat line that is disomic for barley chromosome 2H and monosomic for Gc chromosome 2C. We analyzed 18 2H-specific EST sequences using 81 progeny plants carrying a cytologically normal-appearing 2H chromosome and found no nucleotide changes in the analyzed 1,419 sequences (in total 647,075 bp). During this analysis, we found six plants for which some ESTs could not be PCR amplified, suggesting the presence of chromosomal mutations in these plants. The cytological and PCR analyses of the progeny of the six plants confirmed the occurrence of chromosomal mutations in the parental plants. These results suggested that the Gc chromosome mostly induced chromosomal aberrations, not nucleotide changes, and that the Gc-induced chromosomal mutations in the six plants occurred after fertilization.

Keywords

Common Wheat Chinese Spring Fraction Length Barley Chromosome Alien Chromosome 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Abbreviations

Gc

Gametocidal

PCR

Polymerase chain reaction

EST

Expressed sequence tag

FISH

Fluorescence in situ hybridization

GISH

Genomic in situ hybridization

Notes

Acknowledgments

The aberrant 2H lines developed in this study will be deposited with the National BioResource Project-Wheat. This work was partially supported by the National BioResource Project, MEXT Japan. Contribution number 609 from the Laboratory of Plant Genetics, Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University.

References

  1. Ashida T, Nasuda S, Sato K, Endo TR (2007) Dissection of barley chromosome 5H in common wheat. Genes Genet Syst 82:123–133PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Belostotsky DA, Ananiev EV (1990) Characterization of relic DNA from barley genome. Theor Appl Genet 80:374–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cowan RK, Hoen DR, Schoen DJ, Bureau TE (2005) Mustang is a novel family of domesticated transposase genes found in diverse angiosperms. Mol Biol Evol 22:2084–2089PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dolezel J, Greilhuber J, Lucretti S, Meister A, Lysak MA, Nardi L, Obermayer R (1998) Plant genome size estimation by flow cytometry: inter-laboratory comparison. Ann Bot 82:17–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Endo TR (1988) Induction of chromosomal structural changes by a chromosome of Aegilops cylindrica L. in common wheat. J Hered 79:366–370Google Scholar
  6. Endo TR (1990) Gametocidal chromosomes and their induction of chromosome mutations in wheat. Jpn J Genet 65:135–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Endo TR (2007) The gametocidal chromosome as a tool for chromosome manipulation in wheat. Chromosom Res 15:67–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Endo TR, Gill BS (1996) The deletion stocks of common wheat. J Hered 87:295–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Friebe B, Kynast RG, Gill BS (2000) Gametocidal factor-induced structural rearrangements in rye chromosomes added to common wheat. Chromosom Res 8:501–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Havecker ER, Gao X, Voytas DF (2004) The diversity of LTR retrotransposons. Genome Biol 5:225PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hirochika H, Sugimoto K, Otsuki Y, Tsugawa H, Kanda M (1996) Retrotransposons of rice involved in mutations induced by tissue culture. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:7783–7788PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Islam AKMR, Shepherd KW, Sparrow DHB (1981) Isolation and characterization of euplasmic wheat–barley chromosome addition lines. Heredity 46:161–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Joshi GP, Nasuda S, Endo TR (2011) Dissection and cytological mapping of barley chromosome 2H in the genetic background of common wheat. Genes Genet Syst 86:231–248PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. King IP, Laurie DA (1993) Chromosome damage in early embryo and endosperm development in crosses involving the preferentially transmitted 4Sl chromosome of Aegilops sharonensis. Heredity 70:52–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kumar A, Bennetzen JL (1999) Plant retrotransposons. Annu Rev Genet 33:479–532PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Maluszynksi M (2001) Officially released mutant varieties-the FAO/IAEA database. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 65:175–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nasuda S, Friebe B, Gill BS (1998) Gametocidal genes induce chromosome breakage in the interphase prior to the first mitotic cell division of the male gametophyte in wheat. Genetics 149:1115–1124PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Nasuda S, Kikkawa Y, Ashida T, Islam AKMR, Sato K, Endo TR (2005) Chromosomal assignment and deletion mapping of barley EST markers. Genes Genet Syst 80:357–366PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Poland JA, Brown PJ, Sorrells ME, Jannink JL (2012) Development of high-density genetic maps for barley and wheat using a novel two-enzyme genotyping-by-sequencing approach. PLoS One. 7:e32253PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sakai K, Nasuda S, Sato K, Endo TR (2009) Dissection of barley chromosome 3H in common wheat and a comparison of 3H physical and genetic maps. Genes Genet Syst 84:25–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sakata M, Nasuda S, Endo TR (2010) Dissection of barley chromosome 4H in common wheat by the gametocidal system and cytological mapping of chromosome 4H with EST markers. Genes Genet Syst 85:19–29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sato K, Nankaku N, Takeda K (2009) A high density transcript linkage map of barley derived from a single population. Heredity 103:110–117PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shi F, Endo TR (1997) Production of wheat–barley disomic addition lines possessing an Aegilops cylindrica gametocidal chromosome. Genes Genet Syst 72:243–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shi F, Endo TR (1999) Genetic induction of structural changes in barley chromosomes added to common wheat by a gametocidal chromosome derived from Aegilops cylindrica. Genes Genet Syst 74:49–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shi F, Endo TR (2000) Genetic induction of chromosomal rearrangements in barley chromosome 7H added to common wheat. Chromosoma 109:358–363PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Slade AJ, Fuerstenberg SI, Loeffler D, Steine MN, Facciotti D (2005) A reverse genetic, nontransgenic approach to wheat crop improvement by TILLING. Nat Biotechnol 23:75–81PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stadler LJ (1928) Mutations in barley induced by X-rays and radium. Science 68:186–187PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Suchánková P, Kubaláková M, Kovářová P, Bartoš J, Číhalíková J, Molnár-Láng M, Endo TR, Doležel J (2006) Dissection of the nuclear genome of barley by chromosome flow sorting. Theor Appl Genet 113:651–659PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Suzuki T, Eiguchi M, Kumamaru T, Satoh H, Matsusaka H, Moriguchi K, Nagato Y, Kurata N (2008) MNU-induced mutant pools and high performance TILLING enable finding of any gene mutation in rice. Mol Genet Genomics 279:213–223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Talamè V, Bovina R, Sanguineti MC, Tuberosa R, Lundqvist U, Salvi S (2008) TILLMore, a resource for the discovery of chemically induced mutants in barley. Plant Biotechnol J 6:477–485PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28:2731–2739PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice”. Nucl Acids Res 22:4673–4680PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Thuillet A, Bru D, David J, Toumet P, Santoni S, Sourdille P, Bataillon T (2002) Direct estimation of mutation rate for 10 microsatellite loci in durum wheat, Triticum turgidum (L.) Thell. ssp durum desf. Mol Biol Evol 19:122–125PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Till BJ, Reynolds SH, Weil C et al (2004) Discovery of induced point mutations in maize genes by TILLING. BMC Plant Biol 4:12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tsujimoto H, Noda K (1990) Mutation of five marker genes in wheat by gametocidal gene of Ae. speltoides, Gc1a. Wheat Inf Serv 71:6–9Google Scholar
  36. Tsujimoto H, Yamada T, Hasegawa K, Usami N, Kojima T, Endo TR, Ogihara Y, Sasakuma T (2001) Large scale selection of lines with deletions in chromosome 1B in wheat and applications for fine deletion mapping. Genome 44:501–508PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Uauy C, Paraiso F, Colasuonno P, Tran RK, Tsai H, Berardi S, Comai L, Dubcovsky J (2009) A modified TILLING approach to detect induced mutations in tetraploid and hexaploid wheat. BMC Plant Biol 9:115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Xin ZG, Wang ML, Barkley NA, Burow G, Franks C, Pederson G, Burke J (2008) Applying genotyping (TILLING) and phenotyping analyses to elucidate gene function in a chemically induced sorghum mutant population. BMC Plant Biol 8:103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giri Prasad Joshi
    • 1
  • Takashi R. Endo
    • 1
  • Shuhei Nasuda
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Plant Genetics, Graduate School of AgricultureKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations