Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 126, Issue 5, pp 1377–1395 | Cite as

Supermodels: sorghum and maize provide mutual insight into the genetics of flowering time

  • E. S. Mace
  • C. H. Hunt
  • D. R. Jordan
Original Paper


Nested association mapping (NAM) offers power to dissect complex, quantitative traits. This study made use of a recently developed sorghum backcross (BC)-NAM population to dissect the genetic architecture of flowering time in sorghum; to compare the QTL identified with other genomic regions identified in previous sorghum and maize flowering time studies and to highlight the implications of our findings for plant breeding. A subset of the sorghum BC-NAM population consisting of over 1,300 individuals from 24 families was evaluated for flowering time across multiple environments. Two QTL analysis methodologies were used to identify 40 QTLs with predominately small, additive effects on flowering time; 24 of these co-located with previously identified QTL for flowering time in sorghum and 16 were novel in sorghum. Significant synteny was also detected with the QTL for flowering time detected in a comparable NAM resource recently developed for maize (Zea mays) by Buckler et al. (Science 325:714–718, 2009). The use of the sorghum BC-NAM population allowed us to catalogue allelic variants at a maximal number of QTL and understand their contribution to the flowering time phenotype and distribution across diverse germplasm. The successful demonstration of the power of the sorghum BC-NAM population is exemplified not only by correspondence of QTL previously identified in sorghum, but also by correspondence of QTL in different taxa, specifically maize in this case. The unification across taxa of the candidate genes influencing complex traits, such as flowering time can further facilitate the detailed dissection of the genetic control and causal genes.


Sorghum Flowering Time Association Mapping DArT Marker Allele Effect 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The authors would like to thank Erik van Oosterum, Ian Godwin and Chris Lambrides for their critical review of the manuscript and to acknowledge the Queensland Government and the Grains Research and Development Corporation (GRDC) for providing funding for this research.

Supplementary material

122_2013_2059_MOESM1_ESM.ppt (1.1 mb)
Figure S1. Allele effect graphs for all 40 DTF QTL detected in BC-NAM population (PPT 1117 kb)
122_2013_2059_MOESM2_ESM.ppt (416 kb)
Figure S2. Consensus genetic linkage map of sorghum showing location of previously identified sorghum flowering time QTL in relation to QTL identified in current study (PPT 415 kb)
122_2013_2059_MOESM3_ESM.ppt (252 kb)
Figure S3. Genetic linkage maps of sorghum location of NAM flowering time QTL in maize vs sorghum (PPT 252 kb)
122_2013_2059_MOESM4_ESM.ppt (104 kb)
Figure S4. QTL allele effect size comparison between ABC population and S. arundinaceum BC-NAM population (PPT 104 kb)
122_2013_2059_MOESM5_ESM.doc (43 kb)
File S1. Details of the statistical methods used to analyse the phenotypic data, the single marker analysis and the mpQTL process (DOC 43 kb)
122_2013_2059_MOESM6_ESM.doc (44 kb)
Table S1. The occurrence of the 24 BC-NAM populations across years (DOC 43 kb)
122_2013_2059_MOESM7_ESM.doc (33 kb)
Table S2. Number of markers within each BC-NAM family after excluding monomorphic markers and those with frequency greater than 95% and less than 5% (DOC 33 kb)
122_2013_2059_MOESM8_ESM.xlsx (18 kb)
Table S3. Details of co-locating QTL from previous sorghum and maize flowering time studies. Identifiers of QTL are those detailed in Buckler et al 2009 (for maize) and in Mace and Jordan (2011) for sorghum (XLSX 18 kb)
122_2013_2059_MOESM9_ESM.xlsx (24 kb)
Table S4. Details of candidate genes for flowering time identified in the sorghum genome (XLSX 23 kb)


  1. Akhunov ED, Goodyear AW, Geng S, Qi LL, Echalier B, Gill BS, Miftahudin Gustafson JP, Lazo G, Chao SM, Anderson OD, Linkiewicz AM, Dubcovsky J, La Rota M, Sorrells ME, Zhang DS, Nguyen HT, Kalavacharla V, Hossain K, Kianian SF, Peng JH, Lapitan NLV, Gonzalez-Hernandeiz JL, Anderson JA, Choi DW, Close TJ, Dilbirligi M, Gill KS, Walker-Simmons MK, Steber C, McGuire PE, Qualset CO, Dvorak J (2003) The organization and rate of evolution of wheat genomes are correlated with recombination rates along chromosome arms. Genome Res 13:753–763PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altschul S, Gish W, Miller WP, Myers E, Lipman D (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Amasino RM, Michaels SD (2010) The timing of flowering. Plant Physiol 154:516–520PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beavis WD (1994) The power and deceit of QTL experiments: lessons from comparative QTL studies. In: Proceedings of 49th annual corn sorghum and research conference. American Seed Trade Association, Washington, DC, pp 250–266Google Scholar
  5. Brown PJ, Klein PE, Bortiri E, Acharya CB, Rooney WL, Kresovich S (2006) Inheritance of inflorescence architecture in sorghum. Theor Appl Genet 113:931–942PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buckler ES et al (2009) The genetic architecture of maize flowering time. Science 325:714–718PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Butler DG, Cullis BR, Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ (2009) ASReml-R reference manual release 3. Technical report, QLD Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, Brisbane, QLDGoogle Scholar
  8. Chantereau J, Trouche G, Rami JF, Deu M, Barro C, Grivet L (2001) RFLP mapping of QTLs for photoperiod response in tropical sorghum. Euphytica 120:183–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cockram J, Jones H, Leigh FJ, O’Sullivan D, Powell W, Laurie DA, Greenland AJ (2007) Control of flowering time in temperate cereals: genes, domestication and sustainable productivity. J Exp Bot 58:1231–1244PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Colasanti J, Coneva V (2009) Mechanisms of floral induction in grasses: something borrowed, something new. Plant Physiol 149:56–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cook JP, McMullem MD, Holland JB, Tian F, Bradbury P, Ross-Ibarra J, Buckler ES, Flint-Garcia SA (2012) Genetic architecture of maize kernel composition in the nested association mapping and inbred association panels. Plant Physiol 158:824–834PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crasta OR, Xu WW, Nguyen HT, Rosenow DT, Mullet J (1999) Mapping of post flowering drought resistance traits in grain sorghum: association between QTLs influencing premature senescence and maturity. Mol Gen Genet 262:579–588PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Craufurd PQ, Wheeler TR (2009) Climate change and the flowering time of annual crops. J Exp Bot 60:2529–2539PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cullis BR, Smith AR, Coombes NE (2006) On the design of early generation variety trials with correlated data. J Agric Biol Envirn Stat 11:381–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Feltus FA, Hart GE, Schertz KF, Casa AM, Kresovich S, Abraham S, Klein PE, Brown PJ, Paterson AH (2006) Alignment of genetic maps and QTLs between inter- and intraspecific sorghum populations. Theor Appl Genet 112:1295–1305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fisher RA (1932) Statistical methods for research workers, 4th edn. Oliver and Boyd, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  17. Flowers JM, Hanzawa Y, Hall MC, Moore RC, Purugganan MD (2009) Population genomics of the Arabidopsis thaliana flowering time gene network. Mol Biol Evol 26:2475–2486PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Greenup A, Peacock WJ, Dennis ES, Trevaskis B (2009) The molecular biology of seasonal flowering-responses in Arabidopsis and the cereals. Ann Bot 103:1165–1172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hammer GL, Sinclair TR, Chapman SC, van Oosterom EJ (2004) On systems thinking, systems biology and in the in silico plant. Plant Physiol 134:909–911PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hammer GL, van Oosterom E, McLean G, Chapman SC, Broad I, Harland P, Muchow RC (2010) Adapting APSIM to model the physiology and genetics of complex adaptive traits in field crops. J Exp Bot 61:2185–2202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hart GE, Schertz KF, Peng Y, Syed NH (2001) Genetic mapping of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench QTLs that control variation in tillering and other morphological characters. Theor Appl Genet 103:1232–1242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Higgins JA, Bailey PC, Laurie DA (2010) Comparative genomics of flowering time pathways using Brachypodium distachyon as a model for the temperate grasses. PLoS ONE 5:e10065PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Imaizumi T (2010) Arabidopsis circadian clock and photoperiodism: time to think about location. Curr Opin Plant Biol 13:83–89PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jordan DR, Mace ES, Cruickshank AW, Hunt CH, Henzell RG (2011) Exploring and exploiting genetic variation from unadapted sorghum germplasm in a breeding program. Crop Sci 51:1444–1457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jung C, Muller AE (2009) Flowering time control and applications in plant breeding. Trends Plant Sci 14:563–573PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kebede H, Subadhi PK, Rosenow DT, Nguyen HT (2001) Quantitative trait loci influencing drought tolerance in grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench). Theor Appl Genet 103:266–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kim J (2003) Genomic analysis of sorghum by fluorescence in situ hybridization. PhD thesis. Texas A&M University, TexasGoogle Scholar
  28. Kirby JS, Atkins RE (1968) Heterotic response for vegetative and mature plant characters in grain sorghum, Sorghum bicolour (L.) Moench. Crop Sci 8:335–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kump KL, Bradbury PJ, Wisser RJ, Buckler ES, Belcher AR, Oropeza-Rosas MA, Zwonitzer JC, Kresovich S, McMullen MD, Ware D, Balint-Kurti PJ, Holland JB (2011) Genome-wide association study of quantitative resistance to southern leaf blight in the maize nested association mapping population. Nat Genet 43:163–168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lagercrantz U (2009) At the end of the day: a common molecular mechanism for photoperiod response in plants? J Exp Bot 60:2501–2515PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liang GHL, Walter TL (1968) Heritability estimates and gene effects for agronomic traits in grain sorghum, Sorghum vulgare Pers. Crop Sci 8:77–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lin Y-R, Schertz KF, Paterson AH (1995) Comparative analysis of QTLs affecting plant height and maturity across the Poaceae, in reference to an interspecific sorghum population. Genetics 141:391–411PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Mace ES, Jordan DR (2011) Integrating sorghum whole genome sequence information with a compendium of sorghum QTL studies reveals non-random distribution of QTL and of gene rich regions with significant implications for crop improvement. Theor Appl Genet 123:169–191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mace ES, Xia L, Jordan DR, Halloran K, Parh DK, Huttner E, Wenzl P, Kilian A (2008) DArT markers: diversity analyses and mapping in Sorghum bicolor. BMC Genomics 9:26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mace ES, Rami JF, Bouchet S, Klein PE, Klein RR, Kilian A, Wenzl P, Xia L, Halloran K, Jordan DR (2009a) A consensus genetic map of sorghum that integrates multiple component maps and high-throughput diversity array technology (DArT) markers. BMC Plant Biol 9:13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mace ES, Hunt C, Rodgers D, Jordan DR (2009b) Multi-population QTL analysis in sorghum. SABRAO J Breed Genet (41), special supplement. A paper presented at the 14th Australasian plant breeding conference, 10–14 Aug 2009, Cairns, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  37. Mannai YE, Shehzad T, Okuno K (2011) variation in flowering time in sorghum core collection and mapping of QTLs controlling flowering time by association analysis. Genet Resour Crop Evol 58:983–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McMullen MD et al (2009) Genetic properties of the maize nested association mapping population. Science 325:737–740PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Messing J (2009) The polyploidy origin of maize. Handbook of maize, pp 221–238. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-77863-1_11
  40. Mouradov A, Cremer F, Coupland G (2002) Control of flowering time: interacting pathways as a basis for diversity. Plant Cell 14(supplement):S111–S130PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Murphy RL, Klein RR, Morishge DT, Brady JA, Rooney WL, Miller FR, Dugas DV, Klein PE, Mullet JE (2011) Coincident light and clock regulation of pseudoresponse regulator protein 37 (PRR37) controls photoperiodic flowering in sorghum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:16469–16474PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Murray SC, Rooney WL, Mitchell SE, Sharma A, Klein PE, Mullet JE, Kresovich S (2008) Genetic improvement of sorghum as a biofuel feedstock: II. QTL for stem and leaf structural carbohydrates. Crop Sci 48:2180–2193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Parh D (2005) DNA-based markers for ergot resistance in sorghum. PhD thesis. University of Queensland, BrisbaneGoogle Scholar
  44. Poland JA, Bradbury PJ, Buckler ES, Nelson RJ (2011) Genome-wide nested association mapping of quantitative resistance to northern leaf blight in maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:6893–6898PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Putterill J, Laurie R, Macknight R (2004) It’s time to flower: the genetic control of flowering time. BioEssays 26:363–373PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Quinby JR (1967) The maturity genes of sorghum. In: Ag Norman (ed) Advances in Agronomy, vol 19. Academic Press, New York, pp 267–305Google Scholar
  47. R Development Core Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. ISBN 3-900051-07-0Google Scholar
  48. Ritter KB, Jordan DR, Chapman SC, Godwin ID, Mace ES, McIntyre CL (2008) Identification of QTL for sugar-related traits in a sweet x grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) recombinant inbred population. Mol Breed 22:367–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rooney WL, Aydin S (1999) Genetic control of a photoperiod-sensitive response in Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. Crop Sci 39:397–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schuler GD (1998) Electronic PCR: bridging the gap between genome mapping and genome sequencing. Trends Biotechnol 16:456–459PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shiringani AL, Frisch M, Friedt W (2010) Genetic mapping of QTLs for sugar-related traits in a RIL population of Sorghum bicolor L. Moench. Theor Appl Genet 121:323–336PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Simpson GG (2004) The autonomous pathway: epigenetic and post-transcriptional gene regulation in the control of Arabidopsis flowering time. Curr Opinion Pl Biol 7:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Smith A, Cullis B, Thompson R (2001) Analyzing variety by environment data using multiplicative mixed models and adjustments for spatial field trend. Biometrics 57:1138–1147PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Srinivas G, Satish K, Madhusudhana R, Nagaraja Reddy R, Murali Mohan S, Seetharama N (2009) Identification of quantitative trait loci for agronomically important traits and their association with genic-microsatellite markers in sorghum. Theor Appl Genet 118:1439–1454PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stephens JC, Miller FR, Rosenow DT (1967) Conversion of alien sorghums to early combine genotypes. Crop Sci 7:396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sun X, Peng T, Mumm RH (2011) The role and basics of computer simulation in support of critical decisions in plant breeding. Mol Breeding 28:421–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Taylor JS, Raes J (2004) Duplication and divergence: the evolution of new genes and old ideas. Ann Rev Genet 38:615–643PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tian F, Bradbury PJ, Brown PJ, Hung H, Sun Q, Flint-Garcia S, Rocheford TR, McMulle MD, Holland JB, Buckler ES (2011) Genome-wide association study of leaf architecture in the maize nested association mapping population. Nat Genet 43:159–162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Van Oosterom EJ, Hammer GL, Chapman SC, Doherty A, Mace ES, Jordan DR (2006) Predicting flowering time in sorghum using a simple gene network: functional physiology or fictional functionality? In: Proceedings of the 5th Australian sorghum conference. 30 Jan–2 Feb 2006, Gold Coast, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  60. VSN International (2011) GenStat for Windows. 14th edn. VSN International, Hemel Hempstead, UK.
  61. Wenzel WG (1988) Relationships between yield, base temperature and drought resistance in grain sorghum. S Afr J Pl Soil 5:150–154Google Scholar
  62. Woodhouse MR, Schnable JC, Pedersen BS, Lyons E, Lisch D, Subramanian S, Freeling M (2010) Following tetraploidy in maize, a short deletion mechanism removed genes preferentially from one of the two homologs. PLoS Biol 8:e1000409PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Australia 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AgricultureForestry and Fisheries, Hermitage Research StationWarwickAustralia
  2. 2.Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food InnovationThe University of QueenslandSt. LuciaAustralia

Personalised recommendations