Genomic prediction of hybrid performance in maize with models incorporating dominance and population specific marker effects
- 1.7k Downloads
Identifying high performing hybrids is an essential part of every maize breeding program. Genomic prediction of maize hybrid performance allows to identify promising hybrids, when they themselves or other hybrids produced from their parents were not tested in field trials. Using simulations, we investigated the effects of marker density (10, 1, 0.3 marker per mega base pair, Mbp−1), convergent or divergent parental populations, number of parents tested in other combinations (2, 1, 0), genetic model (including population-specific and/or dominance marker effects or not), and estimation method (GBLUP or BayesB) on the prediction accuracy. We based our simulations on marker genotypes of Central European flint and dent inbred lines from an ongoing maize breeding program. To simulate convergent or divergent parent populations, we generated phenotypes by assigning QTL to markers with similar or very different allele frequencies in both pools, respectively. Prediction accuracies increased with marker density and number of parents tested and were higher under divergent compared with convergent parental populations. Modeling marker effects as population-specific slightly improved prediction accuracy under lower marker densities (1 and 0.3 Mbp−1). This indicated that modeling marker effects as population-specific will be most beneficial under low linkage disequilibrium. Incorporating dominance effects improved prediction accuracies considerably for convergent parent populations, where dominance results in major contributions of SCA effects to the genetic variance among inter-population hybrids. While the general trends regarding the effects of the aforementioned influence factors on prediction accuracy were similar for GBLUP and BayesB, the latter method produced significantly higher accuracies for models incorporating dominance.
KeywordsPrediction Accuracy Dominance Effect Marker Density Specific Combine Ability Dent Line
This research was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) within the AgroClustEr Synbreed—Synergistic plant and animal breeding (FKZ: 0315528d).
- Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B (2011) lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4, r package version 0.999375-39
- Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics. 4th edn. Longmans Green, HarlowGoogle Scholar
- Ganal MW, Durstewitz G, Polley A, Bérard A, Buckler ES, Charcosset A, Clarke JD, Graner EM, Hansen M, Joets J, Le Paslier MC, McMullen MD, Montalent P, Rose M, Schön CC, Sun Q, Walter H, Martin OC, Falque M (2011) A large maize (Zea mays L.) SNP genotyping array: development and germplasm genotyping, and genetic mapping to compare with the B73 reference genome. PLoS ONE 6:e28,334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gardner C (1963) Estimates of genetic parameters in cross-fertilizing plants and their implications in plant breeding. In: Statistical genetics and plant breeding. Comittee on Plant Breeding and Genetics of the Agricultural Board at the North Carolina State College Raleigh, NC, vol 982, pp 225–251Google Scholar
- Müller P (1991) A generic approach to posterior integration and Gibbs sampling. Technical report, Purdue University # 91-09Google Scholar
- Plummer M, Best N, Cowles K, Vines K (2010) coda: output analysis and diagnostics for MCMC. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=coda, r package version 0.14-2
- R Development Core Team (2011) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/, ISBN 3-900051-07-0
- Ramsey J, Ripley B (2010) pspline: penalized smoothing splines. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pspline, r package version 1.0-14
- Schaefer J, Opgen-Rhein R, Zuber V, Silva APD, Strimmer K (2012) corpcor: efficient estimation of covariance and (partial) correlation. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=corpcor, r package version 1.6.2