Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 125, Issue 2, pp 247–254 | Cite as

The distal portion of the short arm of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) chromosome 5D controls endosperm vitreosity and grain hardness

Original Paper


Kernel vitreosity is an important trait of wheat grain, but its developmental control is not completely known. We developed back-cross seven (BC7) near-isogenic lines in the soft white spring wheat cultivar Alpowa that lack the distal portion of chromosome 5D short arm. From the final back-cross, 46 BC7F2 plants were isolated. These plants exhibited a complete and perfect association between kernel vitreosity (i.e. vitreous, non-vitreous or mixed) and Single Kernel Characterization System (SKCS) hardness. Observed segregation of 10:28:7 fit a 1:2:1 Chi-square. BC7F2 plants classified as heterozygous for both SKCS hardness and kernel vitreosity (n = 29) were selected and a single vitreous and non-vitreous kernel were selected, and grown to maturity and subjected to SKCS analysis. The resultant phenotypic ratios were, from non-vitreous kernels, 23:6:0, and from vitreous kernels, 0:1:28, soft:heterozygous:hard, respectively. Three of these BC7F2 heterozygous plants were selected and 40 kernels each drawn at random, grown to maturity and subjected to SKCS analysis. Phenotypic segregation ratios were 7:27:6, 11:20:9, and 3:28:9, soft:heterozygous:hard. Chi-square analysis supported a 1:2:1 segregation for one plant but not the other two, in which cases the two homozygous classes were under-represented. Twenty-two paired BC7F2:F3 full sibs were compared for kernel hardness, weight, size, density and protein content. SKCS hardness index differed markedly, 29.4 for the lines with a complete 5DS, and 88.6 for the lines possessing the deletion. The soft non-vitreous kernels were on average significantly heavier, by nearly 20%, and were slightly larger. Density and protein contents were similar, however. The results provide strong genetic evidence that gene(s) on distal 5DS control not only kernel hardness but also the manner in which the endosperm develops, viz. whether it is vitreous or non-vitreous.


  1. AACC International (2011) Approved methods of analysis, method 46-30. 11th edn. AACC International, St. Paul, MNGoogle Scholar
  2. Anjum FM, Walker CE (1991) Review on the significance of starch and protein to wheat kernel hardness. J Sci Food Agric 56:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beecher B, Bettge A, Smidansky E, Giroux MJ (2002) Expression of wild-type pinB sequence in transgenic wheat complements a hard phenotype. Theor Appl Genet 105:870–877PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhave M, Morris CF (2008a) Molecular genetics of puroindolines and related genes: allelic diversity in wheat and other grasses. Plant Mol Biol 66:205–219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhave M, Morris CF (2008b) Molecular genetics of puroindolines and related genes: regulation of expression, membrane binding properties and applications. Plant Mol Biol 66:221–231PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chantret N, Salse J, Sabot F, Rahman S, Bellec A, Laubin B, Dubois I, Dossat C, Sourdille P, Joudrier P, Gautier M-F, Cattolico L, Beckert M, Aubourg S, Weissenbach J, Caboche M, Bernard M, Leroy P, Chalhoub B (2005) Molecular basis of evolutionary events that shaped the Hardness locus in diploid and polyploid wheat species (Triticum and Aegilops). Plant Cell 17:1033–1045PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dhaliwal HS, Sharma SK, Multani DS, Randhawa AS (1986) Genetics of yellow berry in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Theor Appl Genet 72:548–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Endo TR, Gill BS (1996) The deletion stocks of common wheat. J Heredity 87:295–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Feiz L, Martin JM, Giroux MJ (2009) Creation and functional analysis of new Puroindoline alleles in Triticum aestivum. Theor Appl Genet 118:247–257PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gill KS, Gill BS, Endo TR, Boyko EV (1996) Identification and high-density mapping of gene-rich regions in chromosome group 5 of wheat. Genetics 143:1001–1012PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Greenaway WT (1969) A wheat hardness index. Cereal Sci Today 14:4–7Google Scholar
  12. Law CN, Worland AJ, Giorgi B (1976) The genetic control of ear-emergence time by chromosomes 5A and 5D of wheat. Heredity 36:49–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Law CN, Young CF, Brown JWS, Snape JW, Worland JW (1978) The study of grain protein control in wheat using whole chromosome substitution lines. In: Seed protein improvement by nuclear techniques. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, pp 483–502Google Scholar
  14. Martin JM, Meyer FD, Smidansky ED, Wanjugi H, Blechl AE, Giroux MJ (2006) Complementation of the pina (null) allele with the wild type Pina sequence restores a soft phenotype in transgenic wheat. Theor Appl Genet 113:1563–1570PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Morris CF (2002) Puroindolines: the molecular genetic basis of wheat grain hardness. Plant Mol Biol 48:347–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Morris CF (2010) Yellow berry. In: Bockus W, Bowden RL, Hunger RM, Morrill WL, Murray TD, Smiley RW (eds) Compendium of wheat diseases and pests. The American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, p 158Google Scholar
  17. Morris CF, King GE (2008) Registration of hard kernel puroindoline allele near-isogenic line hexaploid wheat genetic stocks. J Plant Regist 2:67–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Morris CF, Simeone MC, King GE, Lafiandra D (2011) Transfer of soft kernel texture from Triticum aestivum to durum wheat, Triticum turgidum ssp. durum. Crop Sci 51:114–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nelson JC, Sorrells ME, Van Deynze AE, Lu AH, Atkinson M, Bernard M, Leroy P, Faris JD, Anderson JA (1995) Molecular mapping of wheat: major genes and rearrangements in homoeologous groups 4, 5, and 7. Genetics 141:721–731PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Riede CR, Anderson JA (1996) Linkage of RFLP markers to an aluminum tolerance gene in wheat. Crop Sci 36:905–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tranquilli G, Heaton J, Chicaiza O, Dubcovsky J (2002) Substitutions and deletions of genes related to grain hardness in wheat and their effect on grain texture. Crop Sci 42:1812–1817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Weightman RM, Millar S, Alava J, Foulkes MJ, Fish L, Snape JW (2008) Effects of drought and the presence of the 1BL/1RS translocation on grain vitreosity, hardness and protein content in winter wheat. J Cereal Sci 47:457–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag (outside the USA) 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Agricultural Research Service, Western Wheat Quality Laboratory, US Department of AgricultureWashington State UniversityPullmanUSA

Personalised recommendations