Advertisement

Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 125, Issue 1, pp 33–45 | Cite as

Analysis of the barley bract suppression gene Trd1

  • Kelly Houston
  • Arnis Druka
  • Nicky Bonar
  • Malcolm Macaulay
  • Udda Lundqvist
  • Jerome Franckowiak
  • Michele Morgante
  • Nils Stein
  • Robbie WaughEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

A typical barley (Hordeum vulgare) floret consists of reproductive organs three stamens and a pistil, and non-reproductive organs—lodicules and two floral bracts, abaxial called ‘lemma’ and adaxial ‘palea’. The floret is subtended by two additional bracts called outer or empty glumes. Together these organs form the basic structural unit of the grass inflorescence, a spikelet. There are commonly three spikelets at each rachis (floral stem of the barley spike) node, one central and two lateral spikelets. Rare naturally occurring or induced phenotypic variants that contain a third bract subtending the central spikelets have been described in barley. The gene responsible for this phenotype was called the THIRD OUTER GLUME1 (Trd1). The Trd1 mutants fail to suppress bract growth and as a result produce leaf-like structures that subtend each rachis node in the basal portion of the spike. Also, floral development at the collar is not always suppressed. In rice and maize, recessive mutations in NECK LEAF1 (Nl1) and TASSEL SHEATH1 (Tsh1) genes, respectively, have been shown to be responsible for orthologous phenotypes. Fine mapping of the trd1 phenotype in an F3 recombinant population enabled us to position Trd1 on the long arm of chromosome 1H to a 10 cM region. We anchored this to a conserved syntenic region on rice chromosome Os05 and selected a set of candidate genes for validation by resequencing PCR amplicons from a series of independent mutant alleles. This analysis revealed that a GATA transcription factor, recently proposed to be Trd1, contained mutations in 10 out of 14 independent trd1 mutant alleles that would generate non-functional TRD1 proteins. Together with genetic linkage data, we confirm the identity of Trd1 as the GATA transcription factor ortholog of rice Nl1 and maize Tsh1 genes.

Keywords

Floral Meristem Brachypodium Gata Transcription Factor Oligo Pool Assay Rachis Node 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The work reported in this paper was funded through European Research Area Networks in plant genomics project number ERAPGFP/06.046A - Genomics-Assisted Dissection of Barley Morphology and Development awarded to RW, NS and MM via their respective funding agencies. We would like to thank Harold Bockelman at the National Small Grains Collection, Aberdeen ID USA, David Marshall who combined sequence information from Bowman and Morex NGS assemblies which allowed us to locate the promoter region of Trd1, Sean Chapman and Martin Kierans for help with SEM work, and David Harrap for generating BW069 x Barke F2 seeds.

Supplementary material

122_2012_1814_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (39 kb)
Online Resource 1. This includes all mutant lines that had previously been described as Trd1. Details of donor line cultivar, backcross stage and mutagen used to generate the line are provided. (PDF 38 kb)
122_2012_1814_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (136 kb)
Online Resource 2. Details of the SNPs used in the 384-SNP Illumina GoldenGate oligo pool assay. The name refers to the SNP id in Close et al. (2009). (PDF 135 kb)
122_2012_1814_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (131 kb)
Online Resource 3. Dendrogram based on bead express analysis of 384 SNPs in all lines included in this study. Where appropriate new nomenclature for the lines has been used, otherwise previous names are given. (PDF 130 kb)

References

  1. Anastasio AE, Platt A, Horton M, Grotewold E, Scholl R, Borevitz JO, Nordborg M, Bergelson J (2011) Source verification of misidentified Arabidopsis thaliana accessions. Plant J. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04606.x PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bossinger G, Rohde W, Lundqvist U, Salamini F (1992) Genetics of barley development: mutant phenotypes and molecular aspects. In: Shewry PR (ed) Barley: genetics, biochemistry, molecular biology and biotechnology. C. A. B. International, Wallingford, pp 231–263Google Scholar
  3. Bossolini E, Wicker T, Knobel PA, Keller B (2007) Comparison of orthologous loci from small grass genomes Brachypodium and rice: implications for wheat genomics and grass genome annotation. Plant J 49(4):704–717PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Briggs S (1992) A suppressor of floral leaf development. Maize Genet Coop News Lett 66:50–51Google Scholar
  5. Chuck G, Whipple C, Jackson D, Hake S (2010) The maize SBP-box transcription factor encoded by tasselsheath4 regulates bract development and the establishment of meristem boundaries. Development 137(8):1243–1250PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Close T, Bhat P, Lonardi S, Wu Y, Rostoks N, Ramsay L, Druka A, Stein N, Svensson J, Wanamaker S, Bozdag S, Roose M, Moscou M, Chao S, Varshney R, Szucs P, Sato K, Hayes P, Matthews D, Kleinhofs A, Muehlbauer G, DeYoung J, Marshall D, Madishetty K, Fenton R, Condamine P, Graner A, Waugh R (2009) Development and implementation of high-throughput SNP genotyping in barley. BMC Genomics 10(1):582PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coen E, Nugent JA (1994) Evolution of flowers and inflorescences. Development (Suppl):107–116Google Scholar
  8. Corley SB, Carpenter R, Copsey L, Coen E (2005) Floral asymmetry involves an interplay between TCP and MYB transcription factors in Antirrhinum. Proc Natl Acad Sci 102(14):5068–5073PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Costa JM, Corey A, Hayes PM, Jobet C, Kleinhofs A et al (2001) Molecular mapping of the Oregon Wolfe Barleys: a phenotypically polymorphic doubled-haploid population. Theor Appl Genet 103:415–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Druka A, Franckowiak J, Lundqvist U, Bonar N, Alexander J, Houston K, Radovic S, Shahinnia F, Vendramin V, Morgante M, Stein N, Waugh R (2011) Genetic dissection of barley morphology and development. Plant Physiol 155:617–627PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Drummond AJ, Ashton B, Buxton S, Cheung M, Cooper A, Duran C, Field M, Heled J, Kearse M, Markowitz S, Moir R, Stones-Havas S, Sturrock S, Thierer T, Wilson A (2011) Geneious v5.0, Available from http://www.geneious.com
  12. Franckowiak JD, Lundqvist U (1997) BGS 202; third outer glume, trd. Barley Genet Newslett 26:207–208Google Scholar
  13. Franckowiak JD, Lundqvist U (2002) New and revised barley genetic stock descriptions. Barley Genet Newslett 32:120Google Scholar
  14. Franckowiak JD, Lundqvist U (2010a) Descriptions of barley genetic stocks for 2010. Barley Genet Newslett 40:45–177Google Scholar
  15. Franckowiak JD, Lundqvist U (2010b) BGS 586; third outer glume. Barley Genet Newslett 40:139–140Google Scholar
  16. Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4(1):9Google Scholar
  17. Ivanova KV (1937) A new character in barley, “third outer glume”: its inheritance and linkage with the colour of the flowering glumes. Bull Appl Bot Genet Plant Breed (Russia) Series II: 339–353Google Scholar
  18. Iwata H, Ninomiya S (2006) AntMap: constructing genetic linkage maps using an ant colony optimization algorithm. Breed Sci 56:371–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Khush GS (1987) List of gene markers maintained in the Rice Genetic Stock Center, IRRI. Rice Genetics Newsletter pp 56–61Google Scholar
  20. Kirby EJM, Appleyard M (1987) Cereal development guide. Stoneleigh, Kenilworth, UK, NAC Cereal Unit, p 85Google Scholar
  21. Kleinhofs A, Kilian A, Saghai Maroof MA, Biyashev RM, Hayes PM et al (1993) A molecular, isozyme and morphological map of the barley (Hordeum vulgare) genome. Theor Appl Genet 86:705–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Komatsuda T, Pourkheirandish M, He C, Azhaguvel P, Kanamori H, Perovic D, Stein N, Graner A, Wicker T, Tagiri A, Lundqvist U, Fujimura T, Matsuoka M, Matsumoto T, Yano M (2007) Six-rowed barley originated from a mutation in a homeodomain-leucine zipper I-class homeobox gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:1424–1429PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Konzak C (1953) The third outer glume character in barley. J Hered 44(3):103–104Google Scholar
  24. Li H, Xue D, Gao Z, Yan M, Xu W, Xing Z, Huang D, Qian Q, Xue Y (2009) A putative lipase gene EXTRA GLUME1 regulates both empty-glume fate and spikelet development in rice. Plant J 57(4):593–605PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liu L, White MJ, MacRae TH (1999) Transcription factors and their genes in higher plants. Eur J Biochem 262(2):247–257PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lundqvist U, Franckowiak JD (2002) BGS 619; third outer glume. Barley Genet Newslett 32:120Google Scholar
  27. Lundqvist U, Franckowiak JD, Konishi T (1997) New and revised descriptions of barley genes. Barley Genet Newslett 26:22–43Google Scholar
  28. Lundqvist U, Franckowiak JD (2007) BGS 586, Bracteatum-d, bra-d revised. Barley Genet Newslett 37:284Google Scholar
  29. Mayer KFX, Martis M, Hedley PE, Šimková H, Liu H, Morris JA, Steuernagel B et al (2011) Unlocking the barley genome by chromosomal and comparative genomics. Plant Cell 23:1249–1263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McSteen P, Hake S (2001) Barren inflorescence2 regulates axillary meristem development in the maize inflorescence. Development 128:2881–2891PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Moragues M, Comadran J, Waugh R, Milne I, Flavell AJ, Russell JR (2010) Effects of ascertainment bias and marker number on estimations of barley diversity from high-throughput SNP genotype data. Theor Appl Genet 120:1525–1534PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Müller KJ, Romano N, Gerstner O, Garcia-Marotot F, Pozzi C, Salamini F, Rohde W (1995) The barley Hooded mutation caused by a duplication in a homeobox gene intron. Nature 374:727–730PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nagao S, Takahashi M, Kinoshita T (1963) Present status of rice linkage studies and some intriguing associated problems: genetical studies on rice plant. J Fac Agr Hokkaido Univ 54:29–41Google Scholar
  34. Omichinski JG, Clore GM, Schaad O, Felsenfeld G, Trainor C, Appella E, Stahl SJ, Gronenborn AM (1993) NMR structure of a specific DNA complex of Zn-containing DNA binding domain of GATA-1. Science 261(5120):438–446PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pozzi C, di Pietro D, Halas G, Roig C, Salamini F (2003) Integration of a barley (Hordeum vulgare) molecular linkage map with the position of genetic loci hosting 29 developmental mutants. Heredity 90:390–396PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Reyes JC, Muro-Pastor MI, Florencio FJ (2004) The GATA family of transcription factors in Arabidopsis and rice. Plant Physiol 134(4):1718–1732PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rogozin IB, Pavlov YI (2003) Theoretical analysis of mutation hotspots and their DNA sequence context specificity. Mutat Res 544(1):65–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schmidt RJ, Ambrose BA (1998) The blooming of grass flower development. Curr Opin Plant Biol 1(1):60–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schultz EA, Haughn GW (1991) LEAFY, a homeotic gene that regulates inflorescence development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 3:771–781PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Takahashi R, Yasuda S (1971) Genetics of earliness and growth habit in barley. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Barley Genetics Symposium. State University Press, Washington, pp 388–408Google Scholar
  41. Tsuchiya (1974) Further results of allelism testing in barley. Barley Genet Newslett 4:82–85Google Scholar
  42. Waddington SR, Cartwright PM, Wall PC (1983) A quantitative scale of spike initial and pistal development in barley and wheat. Ann Bot 51:119–130Google Scholar
  43. Wang LP, Yin HF, Qian Q, Yang J, Huang CF, Hu XH, Luo D (2009) NECK LEAF 1, a GATA type transcription factor, modulates organogenesis by regulating the expression of multiple regulatory genes during reproductive development in rice. Cell Res 19(5):598–611PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Whipple CJ, Hall DH, DeBlasio S, Taguchi-Shiobara F, Schmidt RJ, Jackson DP (2010) A conserved mechanism of bract suppression in the grass family. Plant Cell 22(3):565–578PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhao J, Bacolla A, Wang G, Vasquez KM (2010) Non-B DNA structure-induced genetic instability and evolution. Cell Mol Life Sci 67(1):43–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kelly Houston
    • 1
  • Arnis Druka
    • 1
  • Nicky Bonar
    • 1
  • Malcolm Macaulay
    • 1
  • Udda Lundqvist
    • 2
  • Jerome Franckowiak
    • 3
  • Michele Morgante
    • 4
  • Nils Stein
    • 5
  • Robbie Waugh
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.The James Hutton InstituteDundeeScotland, UK
  2. 2.Nordic Genetic Resource CenterAlnarpSweden
  3. 3.Agri-Science Queensland, Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation, Hermitage Research FacilityWarwickAustralia
  4. 4.University of UdineUdineItaly
  5. 5.Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK)GaterslebenGermany

Personalised recommendations