Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 124, Issue 8, pp 1539–1547 | Cite as

The common bean growth habit gene PvTFL1y is a functional homolog of Arabidopsis TFL1

Original Paper

Abstract

In a common bean plant exhibiting determinate growth, the terminal shoot meristem switches from a vegetative to reproductive state, resulting in a terminal inflorescence. Contrary to this, indeterminate growth habit results in a terminal meristem that remains vegetative where it further regulates the production of lateral vegetative and reproductive growth. In the last century, breeders have selected determinate growth habit, in combination with photoperiod insensitivity, to obtain varieties with a shorter flowering period, earlier maturation and ease of mechanized harvest. Previous work has identified TFL1 as a gene controlling determinate growth habit in Arabidopsis thaliana. In this work, we have validated that the Phaseolus vulgaris candidate gene, PvTFL1y, is the functional homolog of TFL1 using three independent lines of evidence. First, in a population of ~1,500 plants, PvTFL1y was found to co-segregate with the phenotypic locus for determinate growth habit (fin) on chromosome 01. Second, using quantitative PCR, we found that two unique haplotypes associated with determinacy at the PvTFL1y locus, a 4.1-kb retrotransposon and a splice-site mutation, cause mRNA abundance to decrease 20–133 fold, consistent with the recessive nature of fin. Finally, using a functional complementation approach, through Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of determinate Arabidopsis, we rescued tfl1-1 mutants with the wild-type PvTFL1y gene. Together, these three lines of evidence lead to the conclusion that PvTFL1y is the functional homolog of the Arabidopsis gene, TFL1, and is the gene responsible for naturally occurring variation for determinacy in common bean. Further work exploring the different haplotypes at the PvTFL1y locus may lead to improved plant architecture and phenology of common bean cultivars.

References

  1. Abe M, Kobayashi Y, Yamamoto S, Daimon Y, Yamaguchi A, Ikeda Y et al (2005) FD, a bZIP protein mediating signals from the floral pathway integrator FT at the shoot apex. Science 309:1052–1056PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahn JH, Miller D, Winter VJ, Banfield MJ, Lee JH, Yoo SY, Henz SR, Brady RL, Weigel D (2006) A divergent external loop confers antagonistic activity on floral regulators FT and TFL1. EMBO 25:605–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alvarez J, Guli CL, Yu X-H, Smyth DR (1992) Terminal flower: a gene affecting inflorescence development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 2:103–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonfim K, Faria JC, Nogueira E, Mendes EA, Aragao FJL (2007) RNAi-mediated resistance to bean golden mosaic virus in genetically engineered common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Mol Plant–Micr Inter 20:717–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boss PK, Bastow RM, Mylne JS, Dean C (2004) Multiple pathways in the decision to flower: enabling, promoting, and resetting. Plant Cell 16:S18–S31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boyes DC, Zayed AM, Ascenzi R, McCaskill AJ, Hoffman NE, Davis KR, Görlach J (2001) Growth stage-based phenotypic analysis of Arabidopsis: a model for high throughput functional genomics in plants. Plant Cell 13:1499–1510PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradley D, Ratcliffe O, Vincent C, Carpenter R, Coen R (1997) Inflorescence commitment and architecture in Arabidopsis. Science 275:80–83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen DH, Ronald PC (1999) A rapid DNA minipreparation method suitable for AFLP and other PCR applications. Plant Mol Biol Rep 17:53–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cober ER, Tanner JW (1995) Performance of related indeterminate and tall determinate soybean lines in short-season areas. Crop Sci 35:361–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Foucher F, Morin J, Courtiade J, Cadioux S, Ellis N et al (2003) DETERMINATE and LATE FLOWERING are two TERMINAL FLOWER1/CENTRORADIALIS homologs that control two distinct phases of flowering initiation and development in pea. Plant Cell 15:2742–2754PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Freyre R et al (1998) Towards an integrated linkage map of common bean. 4. Development of a core linkage map and alignment of RFLP maps. Theor Appl Genet 97:847–856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gepts P (1987) Characterizing plant phenology. In: Wisiol K, Hesketh J (eds) Plant growth modeling for resource management. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 3–24Google Scholar
  13. Gepts P et al (2008) Genomics of Phaseolus beans, a major source of dietary protein and micronutrients in the tropics. In: Moore P, Ming R (eds) Genomics of tropical crop plants. Springer, New York, pp 113–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Guo XZ, Zhao Z, Chen JH, Hu XH, Lou D (2006) A putative CENTRORADIALIS/TERMINAL FLOWER 1-like gene, Ljcen1, plays a role in phase transition in Lotus japonicus. J Plant Physiol 163:436–444PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hanzawa Y, Money T, Bradley D (2005) A single amino acid converts a repressor to an activator of flowering. PNAS 102:7748–7753PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huyghe C (1998) Genetics and genetic modifications of plant architecture in grain legumes: a review. Agronomie 18:383–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kelly JD (2001) Remaking bean plant architecture for efficient production. Adv Agron 71:109–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Koinange EMS, Singh SP, Gepts P (1996) Genetic control of the domestication syndrome in common-bean. Crop Sci 36:1037–1045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kolkman JM, Kelly JD (2003) QTL conferring resistance and avoidance to white mold in common bean. Crop Sci 43:539–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kwak M (2008) Population structure and evolution of the determinacy gene (fin) during domestication in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Dissertation, University of California, DavisGoogle Scholar
  21. Kwak M, Velasco DM, Gepts P (2008) Mapping homologous sequences for determinacy and photoperiod sensitivity in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). J Hered 99:283–291PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2_DDCT method. Methods 25:402–408PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ma H (1998) To be, or not to be, a flower: a control of floral meristem identity. Trends Genet 14:26–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nilsson O, Lee I, Blazquez MA, Weigel D (1998) Flowering-time genes modulate the response to LEAFY activity. Genetics 150:403–410PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Nocarova E, Fischer L (2009) Cloning of transgenic tobacco BY-2 cells; an efficient method to analyse and reduce high natural heterogeneity of transgene expression. BMC Plant Biol 9:44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Norton JB (1915) Inheritance of habit in the common bean. Am Nat 49:547–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ohshima S, Murata M, Sakamoto W, Ogura Y, Motoyoshi F (1997) Cloning and molecular analysis of the Arabidopsis gene Terminal Flower 1. Mol Gen Genet 254:186–194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ojehomon OO, Morgan DG (1969) A quantitative study of inflorescence development in Phaseolus vulgaris. Ann Bot 33:325–332Google Scholar
  29. Pidkowich MS, Klenz JE, Haughn GW (1999) The making of a flower: control of floral meristem identity in Arabidopsis. Trends Plant Sci 4:64–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Poncet V, Robert T, Sarr A, Gepts P (2004) Quantitative trait loci analyses of the domestication syndrome and domestication process. In: Goodman R (ed) Encyclopedia of plant and crop science. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 1069–1073Google Scholar
  31. Pröls F, Meyer P (1992) The methylation patterns of chromosomal integration regions influence gene activity of transferred DNA in Petunia hybrid. Plant J 2:465–475PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Shannon S, Meeks-Wagner DR (1991) A mutation in the Arabidopsis TFL1 gene affects inflorescence meristem development. Plant Cell 3:877–892PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Smartt J (1976) Comparative evolution of pulse crops. Euphytica 25:139–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tian Z, Wang X, Lee R, Li Y, Specht JE, Nelson RL, McClean PE, Qiu L, Ma J (2010) Artificial selection for determinate growth habit in soybean. PNAS 19:8563–8568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. van Rheenen HA, Pundir RPS, Miranda JH (1994) Induction and inheritance of determinate growth habit in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Euphytica 78:137–141Google Scholar
  36. van Schoonhoven A, Pastor-Corrales MA (1987) Standard system for the evaluation of bean germplasm. CIAT, CaliGoogle Scholar
  37. Waldia RS, Singh VP (1987) Inheritance of stem termination in Pigeon Pea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Mill sp.). Euphytica 36:525–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Weigel D (1995) The genetics of flower development: from floral induction to ovule morphogenesis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 29:19–39Google Scholar
  39. Wigge PA, Kim MC, Jaeger KE, Busch W, Schmid M, Lohmann JU et al (2005) Integration of spatial and temporal information during floral induction in Arabidopsis. Science 309:1056–1059PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yanofsky MF (1995) Floral meristems to floral organs: genes controlling early events in Arabidopsis flower development. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 46:167–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zambre M, Goossens A, Cardona C, Van Montagu M, Terryn N, Angenon G (2005) A reproducible genetic transformation system for cultivated Phaseolus acutifolius (tepary bean) and its use to assess the role of arcelins in resistance to the Mexican bean weevil. Theor Appl Genet 110:914–924PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhang X, Henriques R, Lin SS, Niu QW, Chua NH (2006) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana using the floral dip method. Nat Protoc 1(2):641–646PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Plant Sciences/MS1University of CaliforniaDavisUSA
  2. 2.National Institute of Biological ResourcesEnvironmental Research ComplexIncheonKorea

Personalised recommendations