Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 124, Issue 3, pp 533–542 | Cite as

Fine mapping and analysis of a candidate gene in tomato accession PI128216 conferring hypersensitive resistance to bacterial spot race T3

  • Chengcheng Pei
  • Hui Wang
  • Jieyun Zhang
  • Yuanyuan Wang
  • David M. Francis
  • Wencai Yang
Original Paper

Abstract

Bacterial spot caused by Xanthomonas euvesicatoria, X. vesicatoria, X. perforans and X. gardneri is one of the most destructive diseases in tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum L.) growing in tropical and subtropical regions. Exploring resistance genes from diverse germplasm and incorporating them into cultivated varieties are critical for controlling this disease. The S. pimpinellifolium accession PI128216 was reported to carry the Rx4 gene on chromosome 11 conferring hypersensitivity and field resistance to race T3. To facilitate the use of marker-assisted selection in breeding and map-based cloning of the gene, an F2 population derived from a cross between the susceptible variety OH88119 and the resistant accession PI128216 was created for fine mapping of the Rx4 gene. Using 18 markers developed through various approaches, we mapped the gene to a 45.1-kb region between two markers pcc17 and pcc14 on chromosome 11. A NBS-LRR class of resistance gene was identified as the candidate for the Rx4 gene based on annotation results from the International Tomato Annotation Group. Comparison of the genomic DNA sequences of the Rx4 alleles in PI128216 and OH88119 revealed a 6-bp insertion/deletion (InDel) and eight SNPs. The InDel marker was successfully used to distinguish resistance and susceptibility in 12 tomato lines. These results will facilitate cloning the Rx4 gene and provide a useful tool for marker-assisted selection of this gene in tomato breeding programs.

References

  1. Astua-Monge G, Minsavage GV, Stall RE, Davis MJ, Bonas U, Jones JB (2000a) Resistance of tomato and pepper to T3 strains of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria is specified by a plant-inducible avirulence gene. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 13:911–921PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Astua-Monge G, Minsavage GV, Stall RE, Vallejos CE, Davis MJ, Jones JB (2000b) Xv4-vrxv4: a new gene-for-gene interaction identified between Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria race T3 and the wild tomato relative Lycopersicon pennellii. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 13:1346–1355PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ballvora A, Pierre M, van den Ackerveken G, Schornack S, Rossier O, Ganal M, Lahaye T, Bonas U (2001) Genetic mapping and functional analysis of the tomato Bs4 locus governing recognition of the Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria AvrBs4 protein. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 14:629–638PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berry SZ, Aldrich TS, Wiese KL, Bash WD (1995) ‘Ohio OX38’ hybrid processing tomato. HortScience 30:159Google Scholar
  5. Cui YY, Yang H, Sun XJ, Liao JJ, Hao WL (2005) Studies on bacterial diseases of tomato in Xinjiang. Xinjiang Agric Sci 42(4):229–231Google Scholar
  6. Francis DM, Berry SZ, Aldrich TS, Scaife KL, Bash WD (2002) ‘Ohio OX 150’ processing tomato. Rpt Tomato Genet Coop 52:36–37Google Scholar
  7. Hutton SF (2008) Inheritance and mapping of resistance to bacterial spot race T4 (Xanthomonas perforans) in tomato, and its relationship to race T3 hypersensitivity, and inheritance of race T3 hypersensitivity from PI126932. PhD Dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville, USAGoogle Scholar
  8. Hutton SF, Scott JW, Yang WC, Sim SC, Francis DM, Jones JB (2010) Identification of QTL associated with resistance to bacterial spot race T4 in tomato. Theor Appl Genet 121:1275–1287PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jones JB, Scott JW (1986) Hypersensitive response in tomato to Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria. Plant Dis 70:337–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jones JB, Jones JP, Stall RE, Zitter TA (eds) (1991) Compendium of tomato diseases. APS Press, MinnesotaGoogle Scholar
  11. Jones JB, Bouzar H, Stall RE, Almira EC, Roberts PD, Bowen BW, Sudberry J, Strickler PM, Chun J (2000) Systematic analysis of xanthomonads (Xanthomonas spp.) associated with pepper and tomato lesions. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50:1211–1219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jones JB, Lacy GH, Bouzar H, Stall RE, Schaad NW (2004) Reclassification of the xanthomonads associated with bacterial spot disease of tomato and pepper. Syst Appl Microbiol 27:755–762PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jones JB, Lacy GH, Bouzar H, Minsavage GV, Stall RE, Schaad NW (2005) Bacterial spot-worldwide distribution, importance and review. Acta Hortic 695:27–33Google Scholar
  14. Kabelka E, Franchino B, Francis DM (2002) Two loci from Lycopersicon hirsutum LA407 confer resistance to strains of Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis. Phytopathology 92:504–510PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kavitha R, Umesha S (2008) Regulation of defense-related enzymes associated with bacterial spot resistance in tomato. Phytoparasitica 36(2):144–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lander ES, Green P, Abrahamson J, Barlow A, Daly MJ, Lincoln SE, Newburg L (1987) MAPMAKER: an interactive computer package for constructing primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations. Genomics 1:174–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lelliot RA, Stead DE (1987) Methods for the diagnosis of bacterial diseases of plants. Blackwell Scientific Publication Ltd., OxfordGoogle Scholar
  18. Minsavage GV, Jones JB, Stall RE (1996) Cloning and sequencing of an avirulence gene (avrRxv3) isolated from Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria tomato race 3. Phytopathology 86:S15Google Scholar
  19. Neff MM, Neff JD, Chory J, Pepper AE (1998) dCAPS, a simple technique for the genetic analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms: experimental applications in Arabidopsis thaliana genetics. Plant J 14:387–392PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Robbins MD, Darrigues A, Sim SC, Masud MAT, Francis DM (2009) Characterization of hypersensitive resistance to bacterial spot race T3 (Xanthomonas perforans) from tomato accession PI 128216. Phytopathology 99:1037–1044PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Scott JW, Jones JB (1986) Sources of resistance to bacterial spot in tomato. HortScience 21:304–306Google Scholar
  22. Scott JW, Jones JB, Somodi GC, Stall RE (1995) Screening tomato accessions for resistance to Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria, race T3. HortScience 30:579–581Google Scholar
  23. Scott JW, Stall RE, Jones JB, Somodi GC (1996) A single gene controls the hypersensitive response of Hawaii 7981 to race 3 (T3) of the bacterial spot pathogen. Rpt Tomato Genet Coop 46:23Google Scholar
  24. Scott JW, Miller SA, Stall RE, Jones JB, Somodi GC, Barbosa V, Francis DL, Sahin F (1997) Resistance to race T2 of the bacterial spot pathogen in tomato. HortScience 32:724–727Google Scholar
  25. Scott JW, Jones JB, Somodi GC (2001) Inheritance of resistance in tomato to race T3 of the bacterial spot pathogen. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 126:436–441Google Scholar
  26. Scott JW, Francis DM, Miller SA, Somodi GC, Jones JB (2003) Tomato bacterial spot resistance derived from PI 114490; inheritance to race T2 and relationship across three pathogen races. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 128:698–703Google Scholar
  27. Shen L, Shen HL, Chai M, Wang YL, Yang WC (2011) Genomic DNA polymorphisms in tomato varieties revealed by InDel and SSR markers. J. China Agric Univ 16(2):34–42Google Scholar
  28. Stall RE, Jones JB, Minsavage GV (2009) Durability of resistance in tomato and pepper to Xanthomonads causing bacterial spot. Annu Rev Phytopathol 47:265–284PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Staniaszek M, Kozik EU, Marczewski W (2007) A CAPS marker TAO1902 diagnostic for the I-2 gene conferring resistance to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici race 2 in tomato. Plant Breed 126:331–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sun FZ, Zhu H, Zheng JQ, Yi Q (1991) Occurrence of bacterial spot in Beijing and Datong areas. Plant Prot 17(4):50–51Google Scholar
  31. Sun FZ, Du ZQ, Jiao ZL, Zhao TC, Cheng BY (1999) Pathogen and race identification of bacterial spot of pepper and tomato. Acta Phytopathol Sin 29:265–269Google Scholar
  32. Van Ooijen JW, Voorrips RE (2001) Joinmap 3: Software for the Calculation of Genetic Linkage Maps. Plant Research International, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  33. Wang H, Hutton SF, Robbins MD, Sim SC, Scott JW, Yang WC, Jones JB, Francis DM (2011) Molecular mapping of hypersensitive resistance from tomato cv. Hawaii 7981 to Xanthomonas perforans race T3. Phytopathology 101:1217–1223Google Scholar
  34. Whalen MC, Wang JF, Carland FM, Heiskell ME, Dahlbeck D, Minsavage GV, Jones JB, Scott JW, Stall RE, Staskawicz BJ (1993) Avirulence gene avrRxv from Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria specifies resistance on tomato line Hawaii 7998. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 6:616–627PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yang WC, Francis DM (2005) Marker-assisted selection for combining resistance to bacterial spot and bacterial speck in tomato. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 130:716–721Google Scholar
  36. Yang WC, Francis DM (2007) Genetics and breeding for resistance to bacterial diseases in tomato: prospects for marker assisted selection. In: Razdan MK, Mattoo AK (eds) Genetic improvement of solanaceous crops. Tomato, vol 1. Science Publishers, USAGoogle Scholar
  37. Yang W, Bai X, Kabelka E, Eaton C, Kamoun S, van der Knaap E, Francis D (2004) Discovery of single nucleotide polymorphisms in Lycopersicon esculentum by computer aided analysis of expressed sequence tags. Mol Breed 14:21–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yang WC, Miller SA, Scott JW, Jones JB, Francis DM (2005a) Mining tomato genome sequence databases for molecular markers: application to bacterial resistance and marker assisted selection. Acta Hortic 695:241–250Google Scholar
  39. Yang WC, Sacks E, Ivey MLL, Miller SA, Francis DM (2005b) Resistance in Lycopersicon esculentum intraspecific crosses to race T1 strains of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria causing bacterial spot of tomato. Phytopathology 95:519–527PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yang WC, Chen J, Zhang XM, Francis DM (2007) Recent advances in classification of tomato bacterial spot pathogen, genetics of resistance, and marker-assisted selection. Sci Agric Sin 40(2):283–290Google Scholar
  41. Yu ZH, Wang JF, Stall RE, Vallejos CE (1995) Genomic localization of tomato genes that control a hypersensitive reaction to Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria (Doidge) dye. Genetics 141:675–682PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhang XM, Francis DM, Yang WC (2009) Evaluation of resistance to bacterial spot in varieties growing in China and marker-assisted selection. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica 24(4):183–187Google Scholar
  43. Zhao SF, Liao YX, Wang C, Li M, Peng S, Liu QW, Wei YH (2004) General occurrent situation of processing tomato diseases, pests and weeds and their integrated management techniques in Xinjiang. Xinjiang Agric Sci 41(5):274–276Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chengcheng Pei
    • 1
  • Hui Wang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jieyun Zhang
    • 1
  • Yuanyuan Wang
    • 1
  • David M. Francis
    • 2
  • Wencai Yang
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Vegetable Science, College of Agronomy and BiotechnologyChina Agricultural UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Department of Horticulture and Crop ScienceThe Ohio State University/OARDCWoosterUSA

Personalised recommendations