Genome-based prediction of testcross values in maize
- 1.5k Downloads
This is the first large-scale experimental study on genome-based prediction of testcross values in an advanced cycle breeding population of maize. The study comprised testcross progenies of 1,380 doubled haploid lines of maize derived from 36 crosses and phenotyped for grain yield and grain dry matter content in seven locations. The lines were genotyped with 1,152 single nucleotide polymorphism markers. Pedigree data were available for three generations. We used best linear unbiased prediction and stratified cross-validation to evaluate the performance of prediction models differing in the modeling of relatedness between inbred lines and in the calculation of genome-based coefficients of similarity. The choice of similarity coefficient did not affect prediction accuracies. Models including genomic information yielded significantly higher prediction accuracies than the model based on pedigree information alone. Average prediction accuracies based on genomic data were high even for a complex trait like grain yield (0.72–0.74) when the cross-validation scheme allowed for a high degree of relatedness between the estimation and the test set. When predictions were performed across distantly related families, prediction accuracies decreased significantly (0.47–0.48). Prediction accuracies decreased with decreasing sample size but were still high when the population size was halved (0.67–0.69). The results from this study are encouraging with respect to genome-based prediction of the genetic value of untested lines in advanced cycle breeding populations and the implementation of genomic selection in the breeding process.
This research was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) within the AgroClustEr “Synbreed—Synergistic plant and animal breeding” (FKZ: 0315528A).
- Bernardo R (2002) Breeding for quantitative traits in plants. Stemma Press, Woodbury, MNGoogle Scholar
- Crossa J, de los Campos G, Pérez P, Gianola D, Burgueño J, Araus JL, Makumbi D, Singh RP, Dreisigacker S, Yan J, Arief V, Banzinger M, Braun HJ (2010) Prediction of genetic values of quantitative traits in plant breeding using pedigree and molecular markers. Genetics 186:713–724PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ, Cullis BR, Thompson R (2009) ASReml user guide release 3.0. VSN International Ltd. Hemel HempsteadGoogle Scholar
- Hayes BJ, Daetwyler HD, Bowman P, Moser G, Tier B, Crump R, Khatkar M, Raadsma HW, Goddard ME (2009a) Accuracy of genomic selection: comparing theory and results. Proc Assoc Adv Anim Breed Genet 18:34–37Google Scholar
- Henderson CR (1984) Applications of linear models in animal breeding. University of Guelph, GuelphGoogle Scholar
- Malécot G (1948) Les mathématiques de l’hérédité. Masson et Cie, ParisGoogle Scholar
- Röber F, Gordillo G, Geiger HH (2005) In vivo haploid induction in maize—performance of new inducers and significance of doubled haploid lines in hybrid breeding. Maydica 50:275–283Google Scholar
- Rogers JS (1972) Measures of genetic similarity and genetic distance. In: Studies in genetics VII. University of Texas, Austin, pp 145–153Google Scholar
- Sneath PH, Sokal RR (1973) Numerical taxonomy: the principles and practice of numerical classification. Freeman, San Francisco, CAGoogle Scholar