Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 122, Issue 8, pp 1451–1460 | Cite as

Expression level of a gibberellin 20-oxidase gene is associated with multiple agronomic and quality traits in barley

  • Qiaojun Jia
  • Xiao-Qi Zhang
  • Sharon Westcott
  • Sue Broughton
  • Mehmet Cakir
  • Jianming Yang
  • Reg Lance
  • Chengdao Li
Original Paper


The use of dwarfing genes has resulted in the most significant improvements in yield and adaptation in cereal crops. The allelic dwarfing gene sdw1/denso has been used throughout the world to develop commercial barley varieties. The sdw1 gene has never been used successfully for malting barley, but only for a large number of feed varieties. One of the gibberellin 20-oxidase genes (Hv20ox 2 ) was identified as the candidate gene for sdw1/denso. Semi-quantitative real-time RT-PCR revealed that Hv20ox 2 was expressed at different levels in various organs of barley. Transcriptional levels were reduced in leaf blade, sheath, stem and rachis tissue in the barley variety Baudin with the denso gene. Subsequently, the relative expression levels of Hv20ox 2 were determined by quantitative real-time RT-PCR in a doubled haploid population and mapped as a quantitative trait. A single expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) was identified and mapped to its structural gene region on chromosome 3H. The eQTL was co-located with QTLs for yield, height, development score, hectolitre weight and grain plumpness. The expression level of Hv20ox 2 was reduced fourfold in the denso mutant, but around 60-fold in the sdw1 mutant, compared to the control variety. The reduced expression level of Hv20ox 2 enhanced grain yield by increasing the number of effective tillers, but had negative effects on grain and malting quality. The sdw1 gene can be used only in feed barley due to its severe reduction of Hv20ox 2 expression. The gene expression marker for Hv20ox 2 can be used to distinguish different alleles of sdw1/denso.


Quantitative Trait Locus Doubled Haploid Agronomic Trait Doubled Haploid Line Barley Variety 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This project is supported by the Grain Research & Development Corporation of Australia, earmarked fund for Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System of China, Major International Scientific and Technological Joint Research Program of Zhejiang (2008C14072), National Natural Science Foundation of China (30828023 & 30800686) and Zhejiang Natural Science Foundation (Y308495).


  1. Ashikari M, Sasaki A, Ueguchi-Tanaka M, Itoh H, Nishimura A et al (2002) Loss-of-function of a rice gibberellin biosynthetic gene, GA20 oxidase (GA20ox-2), led to the rice ‘green revolution’. Breed Sci 52:143–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernardo AN, Bradbury PJ, Ma H, Hu S, Bowden RL et al (2009) Discovery and mapping of single feature polymorphisms in wheat using Affymetrix arrays. BMC Genomics 10:251PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bezant J, Laurie D, Pratchett N, Chojecki J, Kearsey M (1997) Mapping QTLs controlling yield and yield components in a spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cross using marker regression. Mol Breed 3:29–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brem RB, Yvert G, Clinton R, Kruglyak L (2002) Genetic dissection of transcriptional regulation in budding yeast. Science 296:752–755PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cakir M, Gupta S, Li C, Eckermann P, Hayden M et al (2011) Genetic map construction and QTL analysis of the disease traits in the barley population Baudin × AC Metcalfe. Crop Pasture Sci (in press)Google Scholar
  6. Coventry SJ, Barr AR, Eglinton JK, McDonald GK (2003) The determinants and genome locations influencing grain weight and size in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Aust J Agric Res 54:1103–1115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cuesta-Marcos A, Casas AM, Hayesn PM, Gracia MP, Lasa JM et al (2009) Yield QTL affected by heading date in Mediterranean grown barley. Plant Breed 128:46–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Doerge RW (2002) Mapping and analysis of quantitative trait loci in experimental populations. Nat Rev Genet 3:43–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Doerge RW, Churchill GA (1996) Permutation tests for multiple loci affecting a quantitative character. Genetics 142:285–294PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Dos S, Schadt EE, Drake TA, Lusis AJ (2005) Cis-acting expression quantitative trait loci in mice. Genome Res 15:681–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Druka A, Potokina E, Luo Z, Bonar N, Druka I et al (2008) Exploiting regulatory variation to identify genes underlying quantitative resistance to the wheat stem rust pathogen Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici in barley. Theor Appl Genet 117:261–272PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ellis RP, Forster BP, Gordon DC, Handley LL, Keith RP et al (2002) Phenotype/genotype associations for yield and salt tolerance in a barley mapping population segregating for two dwarfing genes. J Exp. Bot 53:1163–1176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Evans DE, Li C, Harasymow S, Roumeliotis S, Eglinton JK (2009) Improved prediction of malt fermentability by the measurement of the diastatic power enzymes, β-amylase, α-amylase and limit dextrinase: II. Impact of barley genetics, growing environment and gibberellin on levels of α-amylase and limit dextrinase in malts. J Am Chem Soc Brew Chem 67:14–22Google Scholar
  14. Fettell NA, Moody DB, Long N, Flood RG (1999) Determinants of grain size in malting barley. In: Proceedings of the 9th Australian barley technical symposium, September 1999, Melbourne, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  15. Franckowiak JD, Pecio A (1992) Coordinator’s report: a listing of genetic stocks. Barley Genet Newsl 21:116–126Google Scholar
  16. Gallagher LW, Jackson LF, Schaller CW, Puri YP, Vogt HE (1996) Registration of ‘UC 828’ barley. Crop Sci 36:466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gibson G, Weir B (2005) The quantitative genetics of transcription. Trends Genet 21:616–623PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Groat I, Briggs DE (1969) Gibberellins and α-amylase formation in germinating barley. Phytochemistry 8:1615–1627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hellewell KB, Rasmusson DC, Gallo-Meagher M (2000) Enhancing yield of semidwarf barley. Crop Sci 40:352–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ivandic V, Malyshev S, Korzum V, Gramer A, Börner A (1999) Comparative mapping of a gibberellic acid-insensitive dwarfing gene (Dwf2) on chromosome 4HS in barley. Theor Appl Genet 98:728–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jacobsen JV, Scandalios JG, Varner JE (1970) Multiple forms of amylase induced by gibberellic acid in isolated barley aleurone layers. Plant Physiol 45:367–371PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jansen RC, Nap JP (2001) Genetical genomics: the added value from segregation. Trends Genet 17:338–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jia QJ, Zhang JJ, Westcott S, Zhang XQ, Bellgard M et al (2009) GA-20 oxidase as a candidate for the semidwarf gene sdw1/denso in barley. Funct Integr Genomics 9:255–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jordan MC, Somers DJ, Banks TW (2007) Identifying regions of the wheat genome controlling seed development by mapping expression quantitative trait loci. Plant Biotech J 5:442–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kirst M, Myburg AA, De León JPG, Kirst ME, Scott J et al (2004) Coordinated genetic regulation of growth and lignin revealed by quantitative trait locus analysis of cDNA microarray data in and interspecific backcross of Eucalyptus. Plant Physiol 135:2368–2378PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lapitan NL, Hess A, Cooper B, Botha AM, Badillo D et al (2009) Differentially expressed genes during malting and correlation with malting quality phenotypes in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Theor Appl Genet 118:937–952PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Li JZ, Huang XQ, Heinrichs F, Ganal MW, Röder MS (2006) Analysis of QTLs for yield components, agronomic traits, and disease resistance in an advanced backcross population of spring barley. Genome 49:454–466PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mickelson HR, Rasmusson DC (1994) Genes for short stature in barley. Crop Sci 34:1180–1183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Monna L, Kitazawa N, Yoshino R, Suzuki J, Masuda H, Maehara Y et al (2002) Positional cloning of rice semidwarfing gene, sd-1: rice “green revolution gene” encodes a mutant enzyme involved in gibberellin synthesis. DNA Res 9:11–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Potokina E, Caspers M, Wang M, Prasad M, Kota R et al (2004) Functional association between malting quality trait components and cDNA array based expression patterns in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Mol Breed 14:153–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Potokina E, Prasad M, Malysheva L, Röder MS, Graner A (2006) Expression genetics and haplotype analysis reveal cis regulation of serine carboxypeptidase I (Cxp1), a candidate gene for malting quality in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Funct Integr Genomics 6:25–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Potokina E, Druka A, Luo Z, Moscou M, Wise R et al (2008a) Tissue-dependent limited pleiotropy affects gene expression in barley. Plant J 56(2):287–296PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Potokina E, Druka A, Luo Z, Wise R, Waugh R et al (2008b) Gene expression quantitative trait locus analysis of 16 000 barley genes reveals a complex pattern of genome-wide transcriptional regulation. Plant J 53:90–101PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Powell W, Caligari PDS, Thomas WTB, Jinks TL (1985) The effects of major genes on quantitatively varying characters in barley. 2. The denso and daylength response loci. Heredity 54:349–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Powell W, Thomas WTB, Baird E, Lawrence P, Booth A et al (1997) Analysis of quantitative traits in barley by the use of amplified fragment length polymorphisms. Heredity 79:48–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rasmusson DC (1991) A plant breeder’s experience with ideotype breeding. Field Crops Res 26:191–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Read BJ, Macdonald AF (1991) Hordeum vulgare (barley) cv. Yerong. Aust J Exp Agric 31:866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rifkin SA, Kim J, White KP (2003) Evolution of gene expression in the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup. Nat Genet 33:138–144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sakamoto T, Miura K, Itoh H, Tatsumi T, Ueguchi-Tanaka M et al (2004) An overview of gibberellin metabolism enzyme genes and their related mutants in rice. Plant Physiol 134:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sasaki A, Ashikari M, Ueguchi-Tanaka M, Itoh H, Nishimura A et al (2002) A mutant gibberellin-synthesis gene in rice. Nature 416:701–702PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schadt EE, Monks SA, Drake TA, Lusis AJ, Che N et al (2003) Genetics of gene expression surveyed in maize, mouse and man. Nature 422:297–302PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shi C, Uzarowska A, Ouzunova M, Landbeck M, Wenzel G et al (2007) Identification of candidate genes associated with cell wall digestibility and eQTL (expression quantitative trait loci) analysis in a Flint × Flint maize recombinant inbred line population. BMC Genomics 8:22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Spielmeyer W, Ellis MH, Chandler PM (2002) Semidwarf (sd-1), green revolution rice, contains a defective gibberellin 20-oxidase gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:9043–9048PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Spielmeyer W, Ellis M, Robertson M, Ali S, Lenton JR et al (2004) Isolation of gibberellin metabolic pathway genes from barley and comparative mapping in barley, wheat and rice. Theor Appl Genet 109:847–855PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Suprunova T, Krugman T, Distelfeld A, Fahima T, Nevo E et al (2007) Identification of a novel gene (Hsdr4) involved in water-stress tolerance in wild barley. Plant Mol Biol 64:17–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Thomas WTB, Powell W, Swanston JS (1991) The effects of major genes on quantitatively varying characters in barley. 4. The GPert and denso loci and quality characters. Heredity 66:381–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Thomas WTB, Powell W, Waugh R, Forster BP, Chalmers KJ et al (1995) Quantitative trait loci in a North West European spring barley cross, Blenheim × E224/3. Barley Genet Newsl 24:41–45Google Scholar
  48. Von Korff M, Wang H, Léon J, Pillen K (2006) AB-QTL analysis in spring barley: II. Detection of favourable exotic alleles for agronomic traits introgressed from wild barley (H. vulgare ssp. spontaneum). Theor Appl Genet 112:1221–1231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yadav SK, Luthra YP, Sood DR, Aggarwal NK (2000) Gibberellic acid (GA3) induced changes in proanthocyanidins and malt quality of two and six-row husked barleys. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 55:87–96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yang J, Hu CC, Ye XZ, Zhu J (2005) Qtlnetwork 2.0. Institute of Bioinformatics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou.
  51. Yin X, Stam P, Johan DC, Kropff MJ (1999) AFLP mapping of quantitative trait loci for yield-determining physiological characters in spring barley. Theor Appl Genet 99:244–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zadoks JC, Chang TT, Konzak CF (1974) A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res 14:415–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhang J, Zhen L, Zhang CH (2006) Analysis on the dwarfing genes in Zhepi 1 and Aizao 3: two dwarfing gene donors in barley breeding in China. Agric Sci China 5:643–647Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Qiaojun Jia
    • 1
    • 2
  • Xiao-Qi Zhang
    • 3
  • Sharon Westcott
    • 2
  • Sue Broughton
    • 2
  • Mehmet Cakir
    • 3
  • Jianming Yang
    • 1
  • Reg Lance
    • 2
  • Chengdao Li
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Crop and Nuclear Technology UtilizationZhejiang Academy of Agricultural SciencesHangzhouChina
  2. 2.Department of Agriculture and FoodGovernment of Western AustraliaSouth PerthAustralia
  3. 3.Western Australian Agricultural Biotechnology CentreMurdoch UniversityPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations