Effects of missing marker and segregation distortion on QTL mapping in F2 populations
- 1.1k Downloads
Missing marker and segregation distortion are commonly encountered in actual quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping populations. Our objective in this study was to investigate the impact of the two factors on QTL mapping through computer simulations. Results indicate that detection power decreases with increasing levels of missing markers, and the false discovery rate increases. Missing markers have greater effects on smaller effect QTL and smaller size populations. The effect of missing markers can be quantified by a population with a reduced size similar to the marker missing rate. As for segregation distortion, if the distorted marker is not closely linked with any QTL, it will not have significant impact on QTL mapping; otherwise, the impact of the distortion will depend on the degree of dominance of QTL, frequencies of the three marker types, the linkage distance between the distorted marker and QTL, and the mapping population size. Sometimes, the distortion can result in a higher genetic variance than that of non-distortion, and therefore benefits the detection of linked QTL. A formula of the ratio of genetic variance explained by QTL under distortion and non-distortion was given in this study, so as to easily determine whether the segregation distortion marker (SDM) increases or decreases the QTL detection power. The effect of SDM decreases rapidly as its linkage relationship with QTL becomes looser. In general, distorted markers will not have a great effect on the position and effect estimations of QTL, and their effects can be ignored in large-size mapping populations.
KeywordsQuantitative Trait Locus Quantitative Trait Locus Mapping Segregation Distortion Dominance Effect Detection Power
This work was supported by the National 973 Projects of China (no. 2006CB101700) and Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 30771351).
- Garcia-Dorado A, Gallego A (1992) On the use of the classical tests for detecting linkage. Heredity 83(2):143–146Google Scholar
- Lorieux M, Goffinet B, Perrier X, González de León D, Lanaud C (1995a) Maximum likelihood models for mapping genetic markers showing segregation distortion. 1. Backcross population. Theor Appl Genet 90:73–80Google Scholar
- Lorieux M, Perrier X, Goffinet B, Lanaud C, González de León D (1995b) Maximum likelihood models for mapping genetic markers showing segregation distortion. 2. F2 population. Theor Appl Genet 90:81–89Google Scholar
- Lynch M, Walsh B (1998) Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer Associates, Inc, Sunderland, MAGoogle Scholar
- Ye S, Zhang Q, Li J, Zhao B, Li P (2005) QTL mapping for yield component traits using (Pei’ai 64s/Nipponbare) F2 population. Acta Agronom Sinica 31:1620–1627 (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
- Ye S, Zhang Q, Li J, Zhao B, Yin D, Li P (2007) Mapping of quantitative trait loci for six agronomic traits of rice in Pei’ai 64s/Nipponbare F2 population. Chin J Rice Sci 21(1):39–43 (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar