Advertisement

Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 120, Issue 8, pp 1525–1534 | Cite as

Effects of ascertainment bias and marker number on estimations of barley diversity from high-throughput SNP genotype data

  • M. Moragues
  • J. Comadran
  • R. Waugh
  • I. Milne
  • A. J. Flavell
  • Joanne R. RussellEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

The capability of molecular markers to provide information of genetic structure is influenced by their number and the way they are chosen. This study evaluates the effects of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) number and selection strategy on estimates of germplasm diversity and population structure for different types of barley germplasm, namely cultivar and landrace. One hundred and sixty-nine barley landraces from Syria and Jordan and 171 European barley cultivars were genotyped with 1536 SNPs. Different subsets of 384 and 96 SNPs were selected from the 1536 set, based on their ability to detect diversity in landraces or cultivated barley in addition to corresponding randomly chosen subsets. All SNP sets except the landrace-optimised subsets underestimated the diversity present in the landrace germplasm, and all subsets of SNP gave similar estimates for cultivar germplasm. All marker subsets gave qualitatively similar estimates of the population structure in both germplasm sets, but the 96 SNP sets showed much lower data resolution values than the larger SNP sets. From these data we deduce that pre-selecting markers for their diversity in a germplasm set is very worthwhile in terms of the quality of data obtained. Second, we suggest that a properly chosen 384 SNP subset gives a good combination of power and economy for germplasm characterization, whereas the rather modest gain from using 1536 SNPs does not justify the increased cost and 96 markers give unacceptably low performance. Lastly, we propose a specific 384 SNP subset as a standard genotyping tool for middle-eastern landrace barley.

Keywords

Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Marker Ascertainment Bias Wild Barley Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Genotyping 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge Drs S. Grando, M. Baum and S. Ceccarelli at International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA) for providing the Syrian Jordanian landrace collection material. The above work was supported by BBSRC Grant BB/E024726/1 (EXBARDIV) under the ERA-PG Programme ‘Structuring Plant Genomic Research in Europe’. SCRI received Grant-in-Aid from the Scottish Government.

Supplementary material

122_2010_1273_MOESM1_ESM.doc (174 kb)
Supplementary Table 1 and Figure 1 (DOC 174 kb)

References

  1. Abasht B, Lamont SJ (2007) Genome-wide association analysis reveals cryptic alleles as an important factor in heterosis for fatness in chicken F2 population. Anim Genet 38:491–498CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Akey JM, Zhang K, Xiong M, Jin L (2003) The effect of single nucleotide polymorphism identification strategies on estimates of linkage disequilibrium. Mol Biol Evol 20:232–242CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown A, Munday J (1982) Population-genetic structure and optimal sampling of land races of barley from Iran. Genetica 58:85–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown A, Nevo E, Zohary D, Dagan O (1978) Genetic variations in natural populations of wild barley. Genetica 49:97–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caldwell KS, Russell J, Langridge P, Powell W (2006) Extreme population-dependent linkage disequilibrium detected in an inbreeding plant species, Hordeum vulgare. Genetics 172:557–567CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark AG, Hubisz MJ, Bustamante CD, Williamson SH, Nielsen R (2005) Ascertainment bias in studies of human genome-wide polymorphism. Genome Res 15:1496–1502CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Fan J, Chee MS, Gunderson KL (2006) Highly parallel genomic assays. Nat Rev Genet 7:632–644CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hayes P, Szucs P (2006) Disequilibrium and association in barley: thinking outside the glass. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:18385–18386CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Jana S, Pietrzak LN (1988) Comparative assessment of genetic diversity in wild and primitive cultivated barley in a center of diversity. Genetics 119:981–990PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kota R, Varshney RK, Prasad M, Zhang H, Stein N, Graner A (2007) EST-derived single nucleotide polymorphism markers for assembling genetic and physical maps of the barley genome. Funct Integr Genomics 8:223–233CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kuhner MK, Beerli P, Yamato J, Felsenstein J (2000) Usefulness of single nucleotide polymorphism data for estimating population parameters. Genetics 156:439–447PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Mardia KV, Kent JT, Bibby JM (1979) Multivariate Analysis. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Matus IA, Hayes PM (2002) Genetic diversity in three groups of barley germplasm assessed by simple sequence repeats. Genome 45:1095–1106CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Moragues M, Moralejo M, Sorrells M, Royo C (2007) Dispersal of durum wheat [Triticum turgidum ssp. turgidum convar. durum (Desf.) MK] landraces across the Mediterranean basin assessed by AFLPs and microsatellites. Genet Resour Crop Evol 54:1133–1144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nevo E, Zohary D, Beiles D, Kaplan D, Storch N (1986) Genetic diversity and environmental associations of wild barley, Hordeum spontaneum, in Turkey. Genetica 68:203–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nielsen R (2000) Estimation of population parameters and recombination rates from single nucleotide polymorphisms. Genetics 154(2):931–942PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Nielsen R, Hubisz MJ, Clark AG (2004) Reconstituting the frequency spectrum of ascertained single-nucleotide polymorphism data. Genetics 168:2373–2382CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Rafalski A (2002) Applications of single nucleotide polymorphisms in crop genetics. Curr Opin Plant Biol 5(2):94–100CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Romero IG, Manica A, Goudet J, Handley LL, Balloux F (2009) How accurate is the current picture of human genetic variation? Heredity 102:120–126CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Rosenblum EB, Novembre J (2007) Ascertainment bias in spatially structured populations: a case study in the eastern fence lizard. J Hered 98:331–336CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Rostoks N, Mudie S, Cardle L, Russell J, Ramsay L, Booth A, Svensson J, Wanamaker S, Walia H, Rodriguez E, Hedley P, Liu H, Morris J, Close T, Marshall D, Waugh R (2005) Genome-wide SNP discovery and linkage analysis in barley based on genes responsive to abiotic stress. Mol Genet Gen 274:515–527Google Scholar
  22. Rostoks N, Ramsay L, MacKenzie K, Cardle L, Bhat PR, Roose ML, Svensson JT, Stein N, Varshney RK, Marshall DF, Graner A, Close TJ, Waugh R (2006) Recent history of artificial outcrossing facilitates whole-genome association mapping in elite inbred crop varieties. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:18656–18661CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Russell JR, Booth A, Fuller JD, Baum M, Ceccarelli S, Grando S, Powell W (2003) Patterns of polymorphism detected in the chloroplast and nuclear genomes of barley landraces sampled from Syria and Jordan. Theor Appl Genet 107:413–421CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Saxena R, Voight BF, Lyssenko V, Burtt NP, de Bakker PIW, Chen H, Roix JJ, Kathiresan S, Hirschhorn JN, Daly MJ, Hughes TE, Groop L, Altshuler D, Almgren P, Florez JC, Meyer J, Ardlie K, Bengtsson Boström K, Isomaa B, Lettre G, Lindblad U, Lyon HN, Melander O, Newton-Cheh C, Nilsson P, Orho-Melander M, Råstam L, Speliotes EK, Taskinen M, Tuomi T, Guiducci C, Berglund A, Carlson J, Gianniny L, Hackett R, Hall L, Holmkvist J, Laurila E, Sjögren M, Sterner M, Surti A, Svensson M, Svensson M, Tewhey R, Blumenstiel B, Parkin M, Defelice M, Barry R, Brodeur W, Camarata J, Chia N, Fava M, Gibbons J, Handsaker B, Healy C, Nguyen K, Gates C, Sougnez C, Gage D, Nizzari M, Gabriel SB, Chirn G, Ma Q, Parikh H, Richardson D, Ricke D, Purcell S (2007) Genome-wide association analysis identifies loci for type 2 diabetes and triglyceride levels. Science 316:1331–1336CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Schlotterer C, Harr B (2002) Single nucleotide polymorphisms derived from ancestral populations show no evidence for biased diversity estimates in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Ecol 11:947–950CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Storz JF, Kelly JK (2008) Effects of spatially varying selection on nucleotide diversity and linkage disequilibrium: insights from deer mouse globin genes. Genetics 180:367–379CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. van Hintum TJL (2007) Data resolution: a jackknife procedure for determining the consistency of molecular marker datasets. Theor Appl Genet 115:343–349CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Wakeley J, Nielsen R, Liu-Cordero SN, Ardlie K (2001) The discovery of single nucleotide polymorphisms and inferences about human demographic history. Am J Hum Genet 69:1332–1347CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Waugh R, Jannink J-L, Muehlbauer GJ, Ramsay L (2009) The emergence of whole genome association scans in barley. Curr Opin Plant Biol 12(2):218–222CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Weir B (1996) Genetic data analysis II: methods for discrete population genetic data. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MAGoogle Scholar
  31. Zeggini E, Weedon MN, Lindgren CM, Frayling TM, Elliott KS, Lango H, Timpson NJ, Perry JRB, Rayner NW, Freathy RM, Barrett JC, Shields B, Morris AP, Ellard S, Groves CJ, Harries LW, Marchini JL, Owen KR, Knight B, Cardon LR, Walker M, Hitman GA, Morris AD, Doney ASF, McCarthy MI, Hattersley AT (2007) Replication of genome-wide association signals in UK samples reveals risk loci for type 2 diabetes. Science 316:1336–1341CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Moragues
    • 1
  • J. Comadran
    • 2
  • R. Waugh
    • 2
  • I. Milne
    • 2
  • A. J. Flavell
    • 1
  • Joanne R. Russell
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Division of Plant SciencesUniversity of Dundee at SCRIDundeeUK
  2. 2.Genetics Programme, Scottish Crop Research InstituteDundeeScotland, UK

Personalised recommendations