Advertisement

Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 120, Issue 4, pp 753–763 | Cite as

Cloning and characterization of a putative GS3 ortholog involved in maize kernel development

  • Qing Li
  • Xiaohong Yang
  • Guanghong Bai
  • Marilyn L. Warburton
  • George Mahuku
  • Michael Gore
  • Jingrui Dai
  • Jiansheng Li
  • Jianbing Yan
Original Paper

Abstract

The GS3 gene was the first identified gene controlling the grain size in rice. It has been proven to be involved in the evolution of grain size during domestication. We isolated the maize ortholog, ZmGS3 and investigated its role in the evolution of maize grain size. ZmGS3 has five exons encoding a protein with 198 amino acids, and has domains in common with the rice GS3 protein. Compared with teosinte, maize has reduced nucleotide diversity at ZmGS3, and the reduction is comparable to that found in neutrally evolving maize genes. No positive selection was detected along the length of the gene using either the Hudson–Kreitman–Aguadé or Tajima’s D tests. Phylogenetic analysis reveals a distribution of maize sequences among two different clades, with one clade including related teosinte sequences. The nucleotide polymorphism analysis, selection test and phylogenetic analysis reveal that ZmGS3 has not been subjected to selection, and appears to be a neutrally evolving gene. In maize, ZmGS3 is primarily expressed in immature ears and kernels, implying a role in maize kernel development. Association mapping analysis revealed one polymorphism in the fifth exon that is significantly associated with kernel length in two environments. Also one polymorphism in the promoter region was found to affect hundred kernel weight in both environments. Collectively, these results imply that ZmGS3 is involved in maize kernel development but with different functional polymorphisms and thus, possibly different mechanisms from that of the rice GS3 gene.

Keywords

Maize Quantitative Trait Locus Quantitative Trait Locus Region Maize Line Quantitative Trait Locus Cluster 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Dr. Qifa Zhang for kindly providing the rice GS3 information before the results’ publication. This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30500322) and National Hi-Tech Research and Development Program of China.

Supplementary material

122_2009_1196_MOESM1_ESM.doc (81 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 81 kb)
122_2009_1196_MOESM2_ESM.tif (895 kb)
Supplementary Fig. S1 Genetic and physical location of yield-related QTL. Genetic coordinates are based on IBM2 2008 Neighbors. The physical locations are from www.maizegdb.org. The two markers that have location discrepancy in genetic and physical map are underlined. ZmGS3 cloned in this study is in italics and in open box. For detailed QTL information, see Supplementary Table S1. (TIFF 894 kb)
122_2009_1196_MOESM3_ESM.tif (290 kb)
Supplementary Fig. S2 a PCR amplification product of the gap1 primer pair using B73 genomic DNA. b Tertiary product of TAIL-PCR using primers listed in Supplementary Table S2. c PCR amplification product of the CDS2 primer pair (Supplementary Table S2) using cDNA isolated from immature ears (TIFF 290 kb)
122_2009_1196_MOESM4_ESM.tif (632 kb)
Supplementary Fig. S3 Schematics of the domain structure of ZmGS3 and OsGS3 protein. Because of two (one) amino acids change, the tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR)/nerve growth factor receptor (NGFR) domain in rice (the von Willebrand factor type C (VWFC) domain in maize) can not be identified by InterProScan (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/InterProScan/), they were identified manually. The phosphatidylethanolamine-binding protein (PEBP)-like domain can not be identified by InterProScan either, thus the rice domain was presented according to the results of Fan et al. (2006) and the corresponding maize domain was identified by the Blast program, MUSCLE (Edgar 2004). Only three amino acid substitutions were observed between OsGS3 and ZmGS3 in the PEBP-like domain. The amino acid change in the rice protein that leads to altered grain characteristics is marked by an asterisk (TIFF 631 kb)
122_2009_1196_MOESM5_ESM.tif (390 kb)
Supplementary Fig. S4 Plots comparing identity of GS3 protein sequences from higher plants, including maize (this study), sorghum (assembly of BI098398 and BI098087), rice (CT835094), tomato (assembly of BI210240 and AW217519), potato (BQ116994), populus (DT488475), Arabidopsis (AK221695), and Brassica (DY004631 and AC189411). The similarity was averaged over every 5 aligned amino acids. Relative position of amino acids is given based on the aligned maize protein sequence, which is indicated by five open boxes at the bottom (TIFF 390 kb)
122_2009_1196_MOESM6_ESM.tif (2.4 mb)
Supplementary Fig. S5 Multiple sequence alignment (a) and phylogenetic analysis (b) of GS3 and DEP1 protein sequences in maize and rice. a Identical residues are indicated by dark black boxes, and similar residues by light gray boxes. Asterisk means the amino acids are completely conserved in the five protein sequences. The sequences were aligned using MUSCLE (Edgar 2004). b The phylogeny was generated using MEGA, version 3.1 (Kumar et al. 2004). Numbers at the branches are percentages based on 1,000 bootstrap repetitions, bootstrap values >50% are given. The scale bar indicates the number of amino acid substitutions per position. GenBank accession numbers are as follows: OsGS3, DQ355996. ZmGS3, FJ797616. OsDEP1, FJ039905. ZmDEP1-7, AC187408. ZmDEP1-2, AC190873 (TIFF 2490 kb)

References

  1. Alexandrov NN, Brover VV, Freidin S, Troukhan ME, Tatarinova TV, Zhang HY, Swaller TJ, Lu YP, Bouck J, Flavell RB, Feldmann KA (2009) Insights into corn genes derived from large-scale cDNA sequencing. Plant Mol Biol 69:179–194CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Arumuganathan K, Earle ED (1991) Nuclear DNA content of some important plant species. Plant Mol Biol Rep 9:208–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bedell JA, Budiman MA, Nunberg A, Citek RW, Robbins D, Jones J, Flick E, Rohlfing T et al (2005) Sorghum genome sequencing by methylation filtration. PLoS Biol 3(1):e13CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bradbury PJ, Zhang ZW, Kroon DE, Casstevens TM, Ramdoss Y, Buckler ES (2007) TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics 23(19):2633–2635CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Buckler ES, Holland JB, Bradbury PJ, Acharya CB, Brown PJ, Browne C, Ersoz E, Flint-Garcia S et al (2009) The genetic architecture of maize flowering time. Science 325:714–718CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark RM, Linton E, Messing J, Doebley JF (2004) Pattern of diversity in the genomic region near the maize domestication gene tb1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(3):700–707CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Devos KM (2005) Updating the ‘crop circle’. Curr Opin Plant Biol 8:155–162CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Doebley J, Bacigalupo A, Stec A (1994) Inheritance of kernel weight in two maize-teosinte hybrid populations: implications for crop evolution. J Hered 85:191–195Google Scholar
  9. Doebley JF, Gaut BS, Smith BD (2006) The molecular genetics of crop domestication. Cell 127(7):1309–1321CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Edgar RC (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucl Acid Res 32(5):1792–1797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fan CC, Xing YZ, Mao HL, Lu TT, Han B, Xu CG, Li XH, Zhang QF (2006) GS3, a major QTL for grain length and weight and minor QTL for grain width and thickness in rice, encodes a putative transmembrane protein. Theor Appl Genet 112:1164–1171CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Fan CC, Yu SB, Wang CR, Xing YZ (2009) A causal C–A mutation in the second exon of GS3 highly associated with rice grain length and validated as a functional marker. Theor Appl Genet 118:465–472CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Fukunaga K, Hill J, Vigouroux Y, Matsuoka Y, Sanchez GJ, Liu K, Buckler ES, Doebley J (2005) Genetic diversity and population structure of teosinte. Genetics 169:2241–2254CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gale MD, Devos KM (1998) Comparative genetics in the grasses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95(5):1971–1974CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Goff SA, Ricke D, Lan TH, Presting G, Wang RL, Dunn M, Glazebrook J, Sessions A et al (2002) A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp. japonica). Science 296(5565):92–100CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Huang X, Qian Q, Liu Z, Sun H, He S, Luo D, Xia G, Chu C, Li J, Fu X (2009) Natural variation at the DEP1 locus enhances grain yield in rice. Nat Genet 41(4):494–497CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hudson RR, Kreitman M, Aguadé M (1987) A test of neutral molecular evolution based on nucleotide data. Genetics 116:153–159PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kellogg EA (1998) Relationships of cereal crops and other grasses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95(5):2005–2010CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kojima S, Takahashi Y, Kobayashi Y, Monna L, Sasaki T, Araki T, Yano M (2002) Hd3a, a rice ortholog of the Arabidopsis FT gene, promotes transition to flowering downstream of Hd1 under short-day conditions. Plant Cell Physiol 43(10):1096–1105CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Konishi S, Izawa T, Lin SY, Ebana K, Fukuta Y, Sasaki T, Yano M (2006) An SNP caused loss of seed shattering during rice domestication. Science 312(5778):1392–1396CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M (2004) MEGA3: integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetics analysis and sequence alignment. Brief Bioinf 5(2):150–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Li JM, Thomson M, McCouch SR (2004) Fine mapping of a grain-weight quantitative trait locus in the pericentromeric region of rice chromosome 3. Genetics 168:2187–2195CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Li CB, Zhou AL, Sang T (2006) Rice domestication by reducing shattering. Science 311(5769):1936–1939CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Lin ZW, Griffith ME, Li XR, Zhu ZF, Tan LB, Fu YC, Zhang WX, Wang XK, Xie DX, Sun CQ (2007) Origin of seed shattering in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Planta 226(1):11–20CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lincoln S, Daly M, Lander E (1992) Constructing genetic maps with MAPMAKER/EXP3.0. Whitehead Institute, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  26. Liu YG, Mitsukawa N, Oosumi T, Whittier RF (1995) Efficient isolation and mapping of Arabidopsis thaliana T-DNA insert junctions by thermal asymmetric interlaced PCR. Plant J 8(3):457–463CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 25:402–408CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ma XQ, Tang JH, Teng WT, Yan JB, Meng YJ, Li JS (2007) Epistatic interaction is an important genetic basis of grain yield and its components in maize. Mol Breed 20(1):41–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Martin A, Lee J, Kichey T, Gerentes D, Zivy M, Tatout C, Dubois F, Balliau T et al (2006) Two cytosolic glutamine synthetase isoforms of maize are specifically involved in the control of grain production. Plant Cell 18:3252–3274CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Myles S, Peiffer J, Brown PJ, Ersoz ES, Zhang Z, Costich DE, Buckler ES (2009) Association mapping: critical considerations shift from genotyping to experimental design. Plant Cell. doi: 10.1105/tpc.109.068437
  31. Palmer LE, Rabinowicz PD, O’Shaughnessy AL, Balija VS, Nascimento LU, Dike S, Bastide M, Martienssen RA, McCombie WR (2003) Maize genome sequencing by methylation filtration. Science 302(5653):2115–2117CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Paterson AH, Lin YR, Li ZK, Schertz KF, Doebley JF, Pinson SRM, Liu SC, Stansel JW, Irvine JE (1995) Convergent domestication of cereal crops by independent mutations at corresponding genetic loci. Science 269(5231):1714–1718CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Paterson AH, Bowers JE, Bruggmann R, Dubchak I, Grimwood J, Gundlach H, Haberer G, Hellsten U et al (2009) The Sorghum bicolor genome and the diversification of grasses. Nature 457:551–556CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Rozas J, Rozas R (1999) DnaSP version 3: an integrated program for molecular population genetics and molecular evolution analysis. Bioinformatics 15(2):174–175CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Salse J, Piégu B, Cooke R, Delseny M (2004) New in silico insight into the synteny between rice (Oryza sativa L.) and maize (Zea mays L.) highlights reshuffling and identifies new duplications in the rice genome. Plant J 38:396–409CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. SanMiguel P, Bennetzen JL (1998) Evidence that a recent increase in maize genome size was caused by the massive amplification of intergene retrotransposons. Ann Bot 82:37–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shomura A, Izawa T, Ebana K, Ebitani T, Kanegae H, Konishi S, Yano M (2008) Deletion in a gene associated with grain size increased yields during rice domestication. Nat Genet 40(8):1023–1028CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Song XJ, Huang W, Shi M, Zhu MZ, Lin HX (2007) A QTL for rice grain width and weight encodes a previously unknown RING-type E3 ubiquitin ligase. Nat Genet 39(5):623–630CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Tajima F (1989) Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123:585–595PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Takano-Kai N, Jiang H, Kubo T, Sweeney M, Matsumoto T, Kanamori H, Padhukasahasram B, Bustamante C, Yoshimura A, Doi K, McCouch S (2009) Evolutionary history of GS3, a gene conferring grain length in rice. Genetics (published articles ahead of print).doi: 10.1534/genetics.109.103002
  41. Tenaillon MI, U’Ren J, Tenaillon O, Gaut BS (2004) Selection versus demography: a multilocus investigation of the domestication process in maize. Mol Biol Evol 21(7):1214–1225CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Teng WT, Cao JS, Chen YH, Liu XH, Jing XQ, Zhang FJ, Li JS (2004) Analysis of maize heterotic groups and patterns during past decade in China. Sci Agric Sin 37(12):1804–1811Google Scholar
  43. Wan XY, Weng JF, Zhai HQ, Wang JK, Lei CL, Liu XL, Guo T, Jiang L, Su N, Wan JM (2008) Quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis for rice grain width and fine mapping of an identified QTL allele gw-5 in a recombination hotspot region on chromosome 5. Genetics 179:2239–2252CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang H, Nussbaum-Wagler T, Li BL, Zhao Q, Vigouroux Y, Faller M, Bomblies K, Lukens L, Doebley JF (2005) The origin of the naked grains of maize. Nature 436:714–719CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Weng JF, Gu SH, Wan XY, Gao H, Guo T, Su N, Lei CL, Zhang X, Cheng ZJ, Guo XP, Wang JL, Jiang L, Zhai HQ, Wan JM (2008) Isolation and initial characterization of GW5, a major QTL associated with rice grain width and weight. Cell Res 18:1199–1209CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. White SE, Doebley JF (1999) The molecular evolution of terminal ear1, a regulatory gene in the genus Zea. Genetics 153:1455–1462PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Whitelaw CA, Barbazuk WB, Pertea G, Chan AP, Cheung F, Lee Y, Zheng L, Heeringen S et al (2003) Enrichment of gene-coding sequences in maize by genome filtration. Science 302(5653):2118–2120CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Wilson R (2008) Sequence and assembly of the maize B73 genome. Abstract of 50th annual maize genetics conference, 27 February–1 March 2008, Washington, DC, p 18Google Scholar
  49. Wright SI, Bi IV, Schroeder SG, Yamasaki M, Doebley JF, McMullen MD, Gaut BS (2005) The effects of artificial selection on the maize genome. Science 308:1310–1314CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Yamasaki M, Tenaillon MI, Bi IV, Schroeder SG, Sanchez-Villeda H, Doebley JF, Gaut BS, McMullen MD (2005) A large-scale screen for artificial selection in maize identifies candidate agronomic loci for domestication and crop improvement. Plant Cell 17:2859–2872CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Yan JB, Tang H, Huang YQ, Zheng YL, Li JS (2004) Comparative analyses of QTL for important agronomic traits between maize and rice. Acta Genet Sin 31(12):1401–1407PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Yan JB, Tang H, Huang YQ, Li JS, Zheng YL (2006) Quantitative trait loci mapping and epistatic analysis for grain yield and yield components using molecular markers with an elite maize hybrid. Euphytica 149:121–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Yano M, Katayose Y, Ashikari M, Yamanouchi U, Monna L, Fuse T, Baba T, Yamamoto K, Umehara Y, Nagamura Y, Sasaki T (2000) Hd1, a major photoperiod sensitivity quantitative trait locus in rice, is closely related to the Arabidopsis flowering time gene CONSTANS. Plant Cell 12:2473–2484CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Yu J, Hu SN, Wang J, Wong G, Li SG, Liu B, Deng YJ et al (2002) A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp. indica). Science 296(5565):79–92CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Yu J, Pressoir G, Briggs WH, Bi IV, Yamasaki M, Doebley JF, McMullen MD, Gaut BS, Nielsen DM, Holland JB, Kresovich S, Buckler ES (2006) A unified mixed-model method for association mapping that accounts for multiple levels of relatedness. Nat Genet 38(2):203–208CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Qing Li
    • 1
  • Xiaohong Yang
    • 1
  • Guanghong Bai
    • 1
    • 2
  • Marilyn L. Warburton
    • 3
  • George Mahuku
    • 4
  • Michael Gore
    • 5
  • Jingrui Dai
    • 1
  • Jiansheng Li
    • 1
  • Jianbing Yan
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.National Maize Improvement Center of China, Key Laboratory of Crop Genomics and Genetic Improvement (Ministry of Agriculture)China Agricultural UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.College of AgricultureXinjiang Agricultural UniversityUrumqiChina
  3. 3.USDA-ARS, Corn Host Plant Resistance Research UnitMississippi StateUSA
  4. 4.International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT)Mexico D.F.Mexico
  5. 5.Department of Plant Breeding and GeneticsCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations