Advertisement

Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 119, Issue 5, pp 931–937 | Cite as

The potato R locus codes for dihydroflavonol 4-reductase

  • Yongfei Zhang
  • Shuping Cheng
  • Darlene De Jong
  • Helen Griffiths
  • Rayko Halitschke
  • Walter De Jong
Open Access
Original Paper

Abstract

The potato R locus is required for the production of red pelargonidin-based anthocyanin pigments in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Red color also requires tissue-specific regulatory genes, such as D (for expression in tuber skin) and F (expression in flowers). A related locus, P, is required for production of blue/purple anthocyanins; P is epistatic to R. We have previously reported that the dihydroflavonol 4-reductase gene (dfr) co-segregates with R. To test directly whether R corresponds to dfr, we placed the allele of dfr associated with red color under the control of the CaMV 35S promoter and introduced it into the potato cultivar Prince Hairy (genotype dddd rrrr P-), which has white tubers and pale blue flowers. Transgenic Prince Hairy tubers remained white, but flower color changed to purple. Three independent transgenic lines, as well as a vector-transformed line, were then crossed with the red-skinned variety Chieftain (genotype D-R-pppp), to establish populations that segregated for D, R, P, and the dfr transgene or empty vector. Markers were used to genotype progeny at D and R. Progeny carrying the empty vector in the genetic background D-rrrr produced white or purple tubers, while progeny with the same genotype and the dfr transgene produced red or purple tubers. HPLC and LC–MS/MS analyses of anthocyanins present in Chieftain and in a red-skinned progeny clone with the dfr transgene in a D-rrrr background revealed no qualitative differences. Thus, dfr can fully complement R, both in terms of tuber color and anthocyanin composition.

Keywords

Empty Vector Pelargonidin Peonidin Blue Flower Tuber Skin 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Introduction

The potato R locus, first described by Salaman (1910), is required for the production of red anthocyanin pigments in any tissue of a potato plant. The related P locus (Salaman 1910) is required for production of purple anthocyanins. P has been shown to code for the anthocyanin biosynthetic enzyme flavonoid 3′,5′-hydroxylase (Jung et al. 2005). R and P are, nevertheless, not sufficient for red and purple color, respectively; both require the activity of additional tissue-specific regulatory genes such as developer (D) (Salaman 1910) for anthocyanin production in tuber periderm or F for anthocyanin synthesis in flowers (Dodds and Long 1956). D is also known as the I locus in diploid potato (Dodds and Long 1955, 1956). P is known to be epistatic to R (Dodds and Long 1955).

We have previously reported that a specific allele of dihydroflavonol 4-reductase (dfr), another anthocyanin biosynthetic gene, was present in every red-skinned or red-flowered potato clone examined (De Jong et al. 2003a), and absent in many, but not all, white potato clones. This result provided strong circumstantial evidence, but did not prove, that R codes for dfr.

DFR catalyzes an essential reaction in each of the three primary branches of anthocyanin synthesis, reducing dihydrokaempferol (DHK), dihydroquercitin (DHQ), and dihydromyricetin (DHM) en route to the production of red pelargonidin, pink cyanidin, and purple delphinidin-based anthocyanins, respectively (Holton and Cornish 1995). In some genera, like Gerbera, DFR is able to efficiently reduce all three substrates (Johnson et al. 2001), while in other genera, like Petunia (Forkmann and Ruhnau 1987) and Cymbidium (Johnson et al. 1999), DFR can efficiently reduce DHQ and DHM, but not DHK. The precedent of differences in substrate specificity between species provides a possible explanation for how variation between alleles of potato dfr might lead to differences in potato color; it suggests that the ‘red allele’ of potato DFR is capable of reducing DHK, while other potato DFR alleles cannot (De Jong et al. 2003a). Simple RFLP banding patterns suggest that dfr is a single copy gene in both potato and tomato (De Jong et al. 2003a; Bongue-Bartelsman et al. 1994).

To test the relationship between R and dfr more thoroughly, we report here on the construction and evaluation of transgenic potato lines that express the ‘red allele’ of dfr, and show that this allele is able, in a genetic background that includes D, to direct synthesis of red pelargonidin-based anthocyanin pigments in tuber skin.

Materials and methods

Plant materials

Diploid potato clone 320-02 (kindly provided by H. De Jong, AAFC, Fredericton, NB) and tetraploid potato cultivars Prince Hairy (also known as NYL235-4) (Plaisted et al. 1992) and Chieftain (Weigle et al. 1968) were propagated as sterile plantlets in vitro, as well as via tubers in both the greenhouse and field. Transformed plants were maintained in the greenhouse under 14 h photoperiod and at temperatures of 24–28°C during the day and 16–18°C at night. Tubers were harvested after the vines had naturally senesced.

Transformation construct

The open reading frame of the potato dfr allele that co-segregates with red color (De Jong et al. 2003a) was amplified from diploid W5281.2, which is homozygous RR, with primers DFRadaptorF (5′ GCG CCA TGG CAA GTG AAG TTC AT) and DFRadaptorR (5′ CGC GGT ACC CTA GAT TTC ACC ATT GGT). The fourth through ninth nucleotides of primer DFRadaptorF create an NcoI restriction site, while the last 18 nucleotides correspond to the first 18 nucleotides of the dfr open reading frame. The fourth through ninth nucleotides of primer DFRadaptorR create a KpnI site, while the last 18 nucleotides anneal to the final 18 nucleotides of the dfr open reading frame. The resulting PCR product was digested with NcoI and KpnI, and then cloned into the NcoI and KpnI sites of intermediate vector pIBT210.1 (Haq et al. 1995). The dfr open reading frame was then transferred, as an XhoI–KpnI fragment, into the XhoI and KpnI sites of binary vector pPS1 (Huang and Mason 2004). This vector drives expression with a doubled CaMV 35S promoter and carries a tobacco etch virus translational enhancer to further increase transgene expression. Sequencing the transgene construct revealed a single, translationally silent nucleotide change in the open reading frame: the 256th codon of the dfr construct is CAT, while the same codon of native dfr is CAC; both code for the amino acid histidine. The construct was introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain LBA4404, and then transformed into potato cultivar Prince Hairy as described earlier (Jung et al. 2005).

Crossing

Four transgenic Prince Hairy lines—three transformed with the dfr construct, and one transformed with an empty pPS1 vector—were crossed, as females, to Chieftain. Seeds from the four crosses were harvested and planted in the greenhouse the following year. Approximately, 200 seeds from each of the three plants transformed with dfr and the line transformed with an empty vector were sown.

Genotyping

Genomic DNA was isolated from 353 F1 progeny of the three crosses to dfr-transformed lines and 87 F1 progeny from the cross to the empty vector-transformed line using a quick extraction method (Edwards et al. 1991). PCR assays were used to genotype progeny at the D and R loci, and for the presence/absence of the transgene or empty vector. To test for the presence of the native allele of dfr associated with red color, DNA was amplified with primers potDFR1 and potDFR2, and digested with BamHI (De Jong et al. 2003a). The same assay was used to test for the presence of the dfr transgene; because the transgene lacks introns, amplification with the same primers yields smaller products. To test for the presence of D, DNA was amplified with primers 21BAClaI-F2 (5′ GTG ATT ATG TCA TCC AAA AGT TTA TAG) and 21BAClaI-R1 (5′ GAA TTT CTG AGG TTG AGG TCT TA), and digested with Cla I; these primers amplify part of an R2R3MYB gene tightly linked to D (Jung and De Jong, unpublished). To test for the presence of the empty vector, DNA was amplified with primers pPS13162F (5′ CGA ATC TCA AGC AAT CAA GCA) and pPS13443R (5′ CGT AGG TAC GTG GAG TGT CTT); these flank the cloning sites of pPS1 and amplify a 282-bp product from an empty vector. PCR products were visualized on a 2% agarose gel. A total of 293 plants from all four crosses were selected based on genotype data generated by these markers. These were grown to maturity, when tuber color was recorded.

Anthocyanin extraction

One-tenth of a gram of tuber periderm tissue was frozen in liquid nitrogen and ground to a fine powder. Anthocyanins were extracted using 1 ml of 1% (v/v) HCl in methanol for 5 min. The homogenate was centrifuged for 10 min at 12,000g. The supernatant was filtered through a 0.45-μm regenerated cellulose syringe filter (Grace, Deerfield, IL) prior to HPLC analysis.

HPLC analysis

Anthocyanin compounds were analyzed using a HP1100 Liquid Chromatograph equipped with a diode array detector (DAD) (Agilent Technology, Palo Alto, CA, USA). An Inertsil ODS-3 column (5.0 μm particle size, 4.6 mm × 250 mm, GL Sciences Inc., Tokyo, Japan) was used in the separation preceded by an Inertsil ODS-3 Guard Column (5.0 μm, 4.0 mm × 10 mm). Five microliter of filtered supernatant was injected for HPLC. A binary gradient of a mixture of water–acetonitrile–formic acid was used. Solvent A was 10% (v/v) formic acid in water and solvent B was 10% (v/v) formic acid in acetonitrile. The gradient for HPLC analysis was linearly changed as follows (total 75 min): 95% A (0 min), 85% A (25 min), 78% A (42 min), 64% A (60 min), 95% A (65 min). Post run-time was 10 min. Flow rate was 1.0 ml/min at 30°C. Anthocyanins of each sample were compared by their UV–vis spectra and retention times. A DAD chromatogram was generated using 520 nm as the detection wavelength.

LC/MS analysis

HPLC–MS/MS analyses on a Quantum Access triple quadrupole system (Thermo Finnigan LLC, San Jose, CA) was used to confirm anthocyanin identity. Anthocyanin extracts were separated on a ThermoFisher Accela HPLC equipped with a Gemini C18 reversed phase column (3 μm, 150 × 4.6 mm, Phenomenex, Torrance, CA) using a solvent gradient (solvent A: 0.1% formic acid in water, solvent B: 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile): 0–4 min 5% B, 24 min 60% B; 34 min 95% B, 40 min 95% B at a flow rate of 0.7 mL min−1. The MS detector was equipped with an electrospray ionization (ESI) probe operated under the following conditions: spray voltage 4.5 kV, capillary temperature 300°C, sheath gas (N2) pressure 30 arbitrary units, auxiliary gas (N2) pressure 55 arbitrary units. Mass spectra were recorded in positive mode between m/z 100 and m/z 1200 to determine molecular ions [M + H]+. Aglycone and glycosylation pattern were analyzed by collision-induced dissociation (CID energy 30 V, CID gas (Ar) pressure 1.5 mTorr) of selected molecular ions and compared with reported anthocyanin fragmentation data (Eichhorn and Winterhalter 2005).

Results

To test if the allele of dfr associated with red color corresponds to R, we introduced it, under the control of a doubled CaMV 35S promoter and tobacco etch virus translational enhancer, into the potato cultivar Prince Hairy. Wild type Prince Hairy produces white tubers and pale blue flowers (Fig. 1). The blue flower color indicates that Prince Hairy must have a functional allele at the P locus (genotype P-). In addition, because Prince Hairy tubers are white, this cultivar must lack a functional allele at D (genotype dddd). It has previously been shown that Prince Hairy lacks the allele of dfr associated with red color (De Jong et al. 2003a). We would have preferred to introduce the red allele of dfr directly into a white potato with genotype D-rrrr pppp, to test if the transformation would change skin color from white to red, but did not have such a genotype available. Thus an indirect approach, one that required subsequent crossing, was used in this study instead.
Fig. 1

Tubers and flowers of the cultivar Prince Hairy, before and after transformation with the ‘red allele’ of potato dihydroflavonol 4-reductase

If dfr corresponds to R, we anticipated that flower color would change in transgenic Prince Hairy, from light blue to purple, as the flowers would produce a mixture of blue and red pigments. Indeed, of the 12 independent transgenic Prince Hairy lines generated, 10 exhibited purple flowers (Fig. 1). Flower color in the remaining two transgenic lines was unchanged, presumably because dfr was not expressed, or was expressed rather weakly. None of the seven independent Prince Hairy lines transformed with an empty vector developed purple flowers; all their flowers remained pale blue. Tubers of all transgenic Prince Hairy lines, whether transformed with dfr or an empty vector, were invariably white (Fig. 1).

To determine how the red allele of dfr would interact with D, three independent transgenic Prince Hairy lines, all with purple flowers, were crossed (as females) with the red-skinned cultivar Chieftain, which is known to be simplex at R (genotype D-Rrrr pppp) (De Jong et al. 2003b). We anticipated that the progeny of these crosses would segregate for native R as well as the dfr transgene, and would likely segregate for D and P as well. The progeny of most interest would be those that carried the transgene in a genetic background of D-rrrr pppp, as their phenotype would allow us to determine if dfr could substitute for R. As a control, a Prince Hairy line transformed with an empty vector was also crossed with Chieftain.

Progeny of these three crosses were genotyped with PCR assays to assess the presence of R, the presence of the transgene or empty vector, and the presence of an R2R3 MYB gene tightly linked to D (see “Methods”). All eight possible combinations of these loci were observed. The phenotype(s) observed for each genotypic class are summarized in Fig. 2. Because the three crosses with lines carrying the dfr transgene yielded similar results (not shown), data from these three crosses were pooled in Fig. 2c. Note that the P locus was not genotyped in this study.
Fig. 2

Predicted and observed tuber color, sorted by genotype, in F1 progeny of crosses between transgenic Prince Hairy and Chieftain. a, b The PCR assays used to genotype at R/dfr and D, respectively. c, d Predicted and observed tuber color for each genotype where the transgene is the ‘red allele’ of dfr in (c), and an empty vector in (d). Representative tubers for each genotype are shown on the right side of panels (c) and (d)

As expected, all progeny lacking the marker tightly linked to D produced white tubers, reflecting the requirement of D for red or purple tuber skin. Progeny with this marker were red, purple, or white, presumably reflecting offspring that contained R but not P, P with or without R, and neither R nor P, respectively (Fig. 2). The genotype of most interest was that which contained D and the transgene, but lacked R. If dfr corresponds to R, segregants with this genotype should be red or purple, but never white. Of 62 clones with this genotype, 28 red- and 34 purple-skinned clones were observed, and no clone produced white tubers (Fig. 2c). Of the six progeny that carried D and the empty vector, but lacked native R, four produced purple tubers, and two produced white tubers; none produced red tubers (Fig. 2d). Thus, the allele of dfr that co-segregates with R, but not an empty vector, can complement R.

Since D appeared to segregate in a 5:1 ratio when the data from all four crosses were considered together (239 colored:54 white, χ2 = 0.66, P = 0.42), Chieftain appears to be duplex for D (i.e., genotype DDdd). Similarly, since the skin color of all progeny combined with D and native R segregated in an apparent 1:1 ratio (54 red:69 purple, χ2 = 1.83, P = 0.18), Prince Hairy appears to be simplex at the P locus.

To determine if the anthocyanins produced in red untransformed tubers with genotype D-R- were comparable in composition to those produced in red tubers expressing the dfr transgene, pigment profiles were compared by HPLC. As shown, the red-skinned variety Chieftain and a transgenic progeny clone with genetic background D-rrrr (i.e., lacking native R) produced indistinguishable pigment profiles (Fig. 3). Both were clearly distinct from the white-skinned variety Prince Hairy and a white-skinned progeny clone transformed with an empty vector, neither of which produced detectable anthocyanin (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3

HPLC analysis of pigments in the varieties Chieftain, Prince Hairy, and progeny of a cross between Chieftain and transgenic Prince Hairy, where the transgene is either the ‘red allele’ of dfr or an empty vector control

Additional characterization of tuber skin pigments by LC–MS/MS also revealed no substantial differences between Chieftain and dfr-transgenic (D-rrrr) tubers (Table 1). In both cases, based on the pattern of molecular mass and fragment ions, and comparison to previous potato analyses (Eichhorn and Winterhalter 2005, Naito et al. 1998, Rodriguez-Saona et al. 1998), the primary pigments were pelargonidin-3-coumaryl-rutinoside-5-glucoside, pelargonidin-3-feruloyl-rutinoside-5-glucoside, and pelargonidin-3-rutinoside-5-glucoside (Table 1). Lesser quantities of three additional anthocyanins, where peonidin took the place of pelargonidin, were also observed (Table 1). The identity of the individual anthocyanins in the two extracts was verified by comparing the [M + H]+ and fragmentation patterns. Prince Hairy and empty vector-transformed Prince Hairy produced no anthocyanins detectable by our LC–MS/MS analysis (Table 1).
Table 1

Anthocyanins detected in tubers by LC–MS/MS

#

R t (min)

Inferred compound

[M + H]+ (m/z)

Fragment ions (m/z)

Relative amount (% peak area)

Chieftain

Prince Hairy

dfr-transgenic clone

Empty vector

1

9.8

pel-3-rut-5-glc

741

579, 433, 271

11

NDa

16

ND

2

10.0

peo-3-rut-5-glc

771

609, 463, 301

2

ND

2

ND

3

14.0

pel-3-coum-rut-5-glc

887

725, 433, 271

59

ND

53

ND

4

14.1

peo-3-coum-rut-5-glc

917

755, 463, 301

6

ND

4

ND

5

14.2

pel-3-ferul-rut-5-glc

917

755, 433, 271

17

ND

19

ND

6

14.4

peo-3-ferul-rut-5-glc

947

785, 463, 301

5

ND

6

ND

ND not detectable

Discussion

We have provided direct evidence that the potato R locus codes for dihydroflavonol 4-reductase, as the allele of dfr previously shown to co-segregate with the dominant allele at the R locus (De Jong et al. 2003a) can transgenically complement R with respect to both tuber color and anthocyanin composition.

More than one anthocyanin was observed in both Chieftain and dfr-transformed potato skin (Fig. 3; Table 1), consistent with previous studies that have also reported more than one anthocyanin present in red-skinned or red-fleshed tubers (Lewis et al. 1998; Naito et al. 1998; Eichhorn and Winterhalter 2005). DFR is required for the production of red, pink, and purple anthocyanins in plants (Holton and Cornish 1995; Fig. 4). It is worth noting that while only one allele of potato dfr appears capable of directing the synthesis of red anthocyanins, both this and other allele(s) of potato dfr appear capable of supporting the production of purple anthocyanins. As shown in Fig. 2, many potato genotypes without R or the dfr transgene produced purple-skinned tubers. Similarly, potatoes that are homozygous at R, like purple-skinned diploid W5281.2 (De Jong and Burns 1993), can produce purple anthocyanins in the presence of P. Thus, the key difference between ‘red’ and ‘not-red’ alleles of dfr does not appear to be an issue of enzyme functionality per se, as both types of alleles code for catalytically-active enzymes.
Fig. 4

Generalized anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway (adapted from Holton and Cornish 1995), illustrating the various chemical reactions that DFR can, in principle, catalyze en route to producing red (pelargonidin-based), pink (cyanidin-based), and purple (delphinidin-based) anthocyanin pigments. Enzyme abbreviations: CHS chalcone synthase, CHI chalcone isomerase, F3H flavanone 3-hydroxylase, F3′H flavonoid 3′-hydroxylase, F3′5′H flavonoid 3′,5′-hydroxylase, DFR dihydroflavonol 4-reductase, ANS anthocyanidin synthase, GT UDP-glucose anthocyanidin 3-O-glucosyltransferase, RT UDP-rhamnose anthocyanidin-3-glucoside rhamnosyltransferase

In order to produce red pelargonidin-based anthocyanins, DFR must be able to reduce DHK, while reduction of DHM is required to produce purple delphinidin or petunidin-derived compounds (Fig. 4). Thus, the enzyme encoded by the red allele of potato dfr appears capable of reducing both DHK and DHM, while enzymes coded by other potato allele(s) appear capable of reducing DHM, but not DHK. The peonidin derivatives observed in Chieftain and red-skinned transgenic progeny clones (Table 1) suggest that the enzyme coded by the ‘red allele’ of dfr can also utilize DHQ as a substrate, since peonidin is simply methylated cyanidin.

Transgenic expression of dfr to alter color of economically important plant tissue was first reported in Petunia (Meyer et al. 1987), and has since been reported in other floral crops such as Torenia fournieri (Aida et al. 2000), rose (Katsumoto et al. 2007) and Osteospermum hybrida (Seitz et al. 2007). In a suitable genetic background, i.e., one that contains a functional allele at D and lacks a functional allele at P, it should be possible to convert a white-skinned potato into a red-skinned one. Of relevance to applied breeding, the red allele of dfr did not appear to be silenced after sexual hybridization, as all progeny carrying D and the transgene were red or purple, and never white (Fig. 2).

It should be possible through reciprocal exchange of fragments between ‘red’ and ‘non red’ alleles of potato dfr to precisely delineate the amino acids that permit the ‘red allele’ to utilize DHK as a substrate. Comparable experiments, exchanging portions of dfr between Gerbera and Petunia, and subsequent site-directed mutagenesis (Johnson et al. 2001), have implicated a single amino acid, corresponding to potato amino acid position 145, in the ability to utilize DHK. Potato amino acid 145 does not differ between ‘red’ and ‘non red’ alleles, although potato positions 143 and 154 are polymorphic (De Jong et al. 2003a). The crystal structure of grape DFR has recently been described (Petit et al. 2007). Thus, if the potato amino acids that influence substrate specificity can be identified, their role in influencing DFR activity could be interpreted at high resolution.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Hatch funds provided to WD. We thank Drs. Lailiang Cheng and Pengmin Li for help with HPLC.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. Aida R, Kishimoto S, Tanaka Y, Shibata M (2000) Modification of flower color in torenia (Torenia fournieri Lind.) by genetic transformation. Plant Sci 153:33–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bongue-Bartelsman M, O’Neill SD, Tong Y, Yoder JI (1994) Characterization of the gene encoding dihydroflavonol 4-reductase in tomato. Gene 138:153–157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. De Jong H, Burns VJ (1993) Inheritance of tuber shape in cultivated diploid potatoes. Am Pot J 70:267–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. De Jong WS, De Jong DM, De Jong H, Kalazich J, Bodis M (2003a) An allele of dihydroflavonol 4-reductase associated with the ability to produce red anthocyanin pigments in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Theor Appl Genet 107:1375–1383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De Jong WS, De Jong DM, Bodis M (2003b) A fluorogenic 5′ nuclease (TaqMan) assay to assess dosage of a marker tightly linked to red skin color in autotetraploid potato. Theor Appl Genet 107:1384–1390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dodds KS, Long DH (1955) The inheritance of colour in diploid potatoes: types of anthocyanidins and their genetic loci. J Genet 53:136–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dodds KS, Long DH (1956) The inheritance of colour in diploid potatoes: II. A three-factor linkage group. J Genet 54:27–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Edwards K, Johnstone C, Thompson C (1991) A simple and rapid method for the preparation of plant genomic DNA for PCR analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 19:1349PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eichhorn S, Winterhalter P (2005) Anthocyanins from pigmented potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) varieties. Food Res Int 38:943–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Forkmann G, Ruhnau B (1987) Distinct substrate specificity of dihydroflavonol 4-reductase from flowers of Petunia hybrida. Z Naturforsch 42c:1146–1148Google Scholar
  11. Haq TA, Mason HS, Clements JD, Arntzen CJ (1995) Oral immunization with a recombinant bacterial antigen produced in transgenic plants. Science 268:714–716PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Holton TA, Cornish EC (1995) Genetics and biochemistry of anthocyanin biosynthesis. Plant Cell 7:1071–1083PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huang Z, Mason HS (2004) Conformational analysis of hepatitis B surface antigen fusions in an Agrobacterium-mediated transient expression system. Plant Biotechnol J 2:241–249PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Johnson ET, Yi H, Shin B, Oh B-J, Cheong H, Choi G (1999) Cymbidium hybrida dihydroflavonol 4-reductase does not efficiently reduce dihydrokaempferol to produce orange pelargonidin-type anthocyanins. Plant J 19:81–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Johnson ET, Ryu S, Yi H, Shin B, Cheong H, Choi G (2001) Alteration of a single amino-acid changes the substrate specificity of dihydroflavonol 4-reductase. Plant J 25:325–333PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jung CS, Griffiths HM, De Jong DM, Cheng S, Bodis M, De Jong WS (2005) The potato P locus codes for flavonoid 3′,5′-hydroxylase. Theor Appl Genet 110:269–275PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Katsumoto Y, Fukuchi-Mizutani M, Fukui Y, Brugliera F, Holton TA, Karan M, Nakamura N, Yonekura-Sakakibara K, Togami J, Pigeaire A, Tao G-Q, Nehra NS, Lu C-Y, Dyson BK, Tsuda S, Ashikari T, Kusumi T, Mason JG, Tanaka Y (2007) Engineering of the rose flavonoid biosynthetic pathway successfully generated blue-hued flowers accumulating delphinidin. Plant Cell Physiol 48:1589–1600PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lewis CE, Walker JRL, Lancaster JE, Sutton KH (1998) Determination of anthocyanins, flavonoids and phenolic acids in potatoes. I: coloured cultivars of Solanum tuberosum L. J Sci Food Agr 77:45–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Meyer P, Heidmann I, Forkmann G, Saedler H (1987) A new petunia flower colour generated by transformation of a mutant with a maize gene. Nature 30:677–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Naito K, Umemura Y, Mori M, Sumida T, Okada T, Takamatsu N, Okawa Y, Hayashi K, Saito N, Honda T (1998) Acylated pelargonidin glycosides from a red potato. Phytochemistry 47:109–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Petit P, Granier T, d’ Estaintot BL, Manigand C, Bathany K, Schmitter JM, Lauvergeat V, Hamdi S, Gallois B (2007) Crystal structure of grape dihydroflavonol 4-reductase, a key enzyme in flavonoid biosynthesis. J Mol Biol 368:1345–1357PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Plaisted RL, Tingey WM, Steffens JC (1992) The germplasm release of NYL 235–4, a clone with resistance to the Colorado potato beetle. Am Pot J 69:843–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rodriguez-Saona LE, Giusti MM, Wrolstad RE (1998) Anthocyanin pigment composition of red-fleshed potatoes. J Food Sci 63:458–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Salaman RN (1910) The inheritance of colour and other characters in the potato. J Genet 1:7–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Seitz C, Vitten M, Steinbach P, Hartl S, Hirsche J, Rathje W, Treutter D, Forkmann G (2007) Redirection of anthocyanin synthesis in Osteospermum hybrida by a two-enzyme manipulation strategy. Phytochemistry 68:824–833PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Weigle JL, Kehr AE, Akeley RV, Horton JC (1968) Chieftain: a red-skinned potato with attractive appearance and broad adaptability. Am Pot J 45:293–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yongfei Zhang
    • 1
  • Shuping Cheng
    • 1
  • Darlene De Jong
    • 1
  • Helen Griffiths
    • 1
  • Rayko Halitschke
    • 2
  • Walter De Jong
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant Breeding and GeneticsCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations