Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 118, Issue 7, pp 1279–1293 | Cite as

A COSII genetic map of the pepper genome provides a detailed picture of synteny with tomato and new insights into recent chromosome evolution in the genus Capsicum

  • Feinan Wu
  • Nancy T. Eannetta
  • Yimin Xu
  • Richard Durrett
  • Michael Mazourek
  • Molly M. Jahn
  • Steven D. Tanksley
Original Paper

Abstract

We report herein the development of a pepper genetic linkage map which comprises 299 orthologous markers between the pepper and tomato genomes (including 263 conserved ortholog set II or COSII markers). The expected position of additional 288 COSII markers was inferred in the pepper map via pepper–tomato synteny, bringing the total orthologous markers in the pepper genome to 587. While pepper maps have been previously reported, this is the first complete map in the sense that all markers could be placed in 12 linkage groups corresponding to the 12 chromosomes. The map presented herein is relevant to the genomes of cultivated C. annuum and wild C. annuum (as well as related Capsicum species) which differ by a reciprocal chromosome translocation. This map is also unique in that it is largely based on COSII markers, which permits the inference of a detailed syntenic relationship between the pepper and tomato genomes—shedding new light on chromosome evolution in the Solanaceae. Since divergence from their last common ancestor is approximately 20 million years ago, the two genomes have become differentiated by a minimum number of 19 inversions and 6 chromosome translocations, as well as numerous putative single gene transpositions. Nevertheless, the two genomes share 35 conserved syntenic segments (CSSs) within which gene/marker order is well preserved. The high resolution COSII synteny map described herein provides a platform for cross-reference of genetic and genomic information (including the tomato genome sequence) between pepper and tomato and therefore will facilitate both applied and basic research in pepper.

Supplementary material

122_2009_980_MOESM1_ESM.cpp.
Supplementary material 1 (CPP 5 kb)
122_2009_980_MOESM2_ESM.ppt (1.5 mb)
Supplementary material 2 (PPT 1,579 kb)
122_2009_980_MOESM3_ESM.xls (170 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (XLS 170 kb)

References

  1. Ben-Chaim A, Borovsky Y, Falise M, Mazourek M, Kang BC, Paran I, Jahn M (2006) QTL analysis for capsaicinoid content in Capsicum. Theor Appl Genet 113:1481–1490PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennetzen JL (2005) Transposable elements, gene creation and genome rearrangement in flowering plants. Curr Opin Genet Dev 15:621–627PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bennetzen JL (2007) Patterns in grass genome evolution. Curr Opin Plant Biol 10:176–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burnham CR (1962) “Discussions in cytogenetics”. Burgess, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  5. Caranta C, Lefebvre V, Palloix A (1997a) Polygenic resistance of pepper to potyviruses consists of a combination of isolate-specific and broad-spectrum quantitative trait loci. Mol Plant–Microbe Interact 10:872–878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caranta C, Palloix A, Lefebvre V, Daubeze AM (1997b) QTLs for a component of partial resistance to cucumber mosaic virus in pepper: restriction of virus installation in host-cells. Theor Appl Genet 94:431–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Doganlar S, Frary A, Daunay MC, Lester RN, Tanksley SD (2002) A comparative genetic linkage map of eggplant (Solanum melongena) and its implications for genome evolution in the Solanaceae. Genetics 161:1697–1711PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Frary A, Xu YM, Liu JP, Mitchell S, Tedeschi E, Tanksley S (2005) Development of a set of PCR-based anchor markers encompassing the tomato genome and evaluation of their usefulness for genetics and breeding experiments. Theor Appl Genet 111:291–312PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fulton TM, Van der Hoeven R, Eannetta NT, Tanksley SD (2002) Identification, analysis, and utilization of conserved ortholog set markers for comparative genomics in higher plants. Plant Cell 14:1457–1467PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grandillo S, Tanksley SD (1996) Genetic analysis of RFLPs, GATA microsatellites and RAPDs in a cross between l-esculentum and l-pimpinellifolium. Theor Appl Genet 92:957–965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kang BC, Nahm SH, Huh JH, Yoo HS, Yu JW, Lee MH, Kim BD (2001) An interspecific (Capsicum annuum × C chinese) F2 linkage map in pepper using RFLP and AFLP markers. Theor Appl Genet 102:531–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Konieczny A, Ausubel FM (1993) A procedure for mapping Arabidopsis mutations using co-dominant ecotype-specific PCR-based markers. Plant J 4:403–410PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Koompai P (1976) Some barriers to interspecific crossing and gene exchange in five species of Capsicum. M. Phil. Thesis. Reading University libraryGoogle Scholar
  14. Kosambi DD (1944) The estimation of map distances from recombination values. Ann Eugen 12:172–175Google Scholar
  15. Lander ES, Green P, Abrahamson J, Barlow A, Daly MJ, Lincoln SE, Newburg L (1987) MAPMAKER: an interactive computer package for constructing primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations. Genomics 1:174–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lanteri S, Pickersgill B (1993) Chromosomal structural-changes in Capsicum annuum L. and C Chinense Jacq. Euphytica 67:155–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lee JM, Nahm SH, Kim YM, Kim BD (2004) Characterization and molecular genetic mapping of microsatellite loci in pepper. Theor Appl Genet 108:619–627PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lefebvre V, Palloix A (1996) Both epistatic and additive effects of QTLs are involved in polygenic induced resistance to disease: a case study, the interaction pepper—Phytophthora capsici Leonian. Theor Appl Genet 93:503–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lefebvre V, Palloix A, Caranta C, Pochard E (1995) Construction of an intraspecific integrated linkage map of pepper using molecular markers and doubled-haploid progenies. Genome 38:112–121PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lefebvre V, Pflieger S, Thabuis A, Caranta C, Blattes A, Chauvet JC, Daubeze AM, Palloix A (2002) Towards the saturation of the pepper linkage map by alignment of three intraspecific maps including known-function genes. Genome 45:839–854PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Livingstone KD, Lackney VK, Blauth JR, van Wijk R, Jahn MK (1999) Genome mapping in Capsicum and the evolution of genome structure in the Solanaceae. Genetics 152:1183–1202PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Minamiyama Y, Tsuro M, Hirai M (2006) An SSR-based linkage map of Capsicum annuum. Mol Breed 18:157–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Morgante M, De Paoli E, Radovic S (2007) Transposable elements and the plant pan-genomes. Curr Opin Plant Biol 10:149–155PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nadeau JH, Taylor BA (1984) Lengths of chromosomal segments conserved since divergence of man and mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81:814–818PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Neff MM, Neff JD, Chory J, Pepper AE (1998) dCAPS, a simple technique for the genetic analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms: experimental applications in Arabidopsis thaliana genetics. Plant J 14:387–392PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Neff MM, Turk E, Kalishman M (2002) Web-based primer design for single nucleotide polymorphism analysis. Trends Genet 18:613–615PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Paran I, van der Voort JR, Lefebvre V, Jahn M, Landry L, van Schriek M, Tanyolac B, Caranta C, Ben Chaim A, Livingstone K, Palloix A, Peleman J (2004) An integrated genetic linkage map of pepper (Capsicum spp.). Mol Breed 13:251–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pickersgill B (1971) Relationships between weedy and cultivated forms in some species of chili peppers (genus Capsicum). Evolution 25:683–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pickersgill B, Heiser CB, McNeil J (1979) Numerical taxonomic studies on variatin and domestication in some species of Capsicum. In: Hawkes JG, Lester RN, Skelding AD (eds) The biology and taxonomy of the Solanaceae. Academic Press, London, pp 679–700Google Scholar
  30. Pochard E (1970) Description of trisomic individuals of Capsicum annuum L. obtained in progeny of a haploid plant. Ann Amel Plantes 20:233–256Google Scholar
  31. Prince JP, Pochard E, Tanksley SD (1993) Construction of a molecular linkage map of pepper and a comparison of synteny with tomato. Genome 36:404–417PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tang X, Szinay D, Lang C, Ramanna MS, van der Vossen EAG, Datema E, Lankhorst RK, de Boer J, Peters SA, Bachem C, Stiekema W, Visser RGF, de Jong H, Bai Y (2008) Cross-species bacterial artificial chromosome-fluorescence in situ hybridization painting of the tomato and potato chromosome 6 reveals undescribed chromosomal rearrangements. Genetics 180:1319–1328PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tanksley SD (1984) Linkage relationships and chromosomal locations of enzyme-coding genes in pepper, Capsicum annuum. Chromosoma 89:352–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tanksley SD, Bernatzky R, Lapitan NL, Prince JP (1988) Conservation of gene repertoire but not gene order in pepper and tomato. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:6419–6423PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tanksley SD, Ganal MW, Prince JP, Devicente MC, Bonierbale MW, Broun P, Fulton TM, Giovannoni JJ, Grandillo S, Martin GB, Messeguer R, Miller JC, Miller L, Paterson AH, Pineda O, Roder MS, Wing RA, Wu W, Young ND (1992) High-density molecular linkage maps of the tomato and potato genomes. Genetics 132:1141–1160PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang Y, Tang XM, Cheng ZK, Mucller L, Giovannoni J, Tanksley SD (2006) Euchromatin and pericentromeric heterochromatin: comparative composition in the tomato genome. Genetics 172:2529–2540PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wu FN, Mueller LA, Crouzillat D, Petiard V, Tanksley SD (2006) Combining bioinformatics and phylogenetics to identify large sets of single-copy orthologous genes (COSII) for comparative, evolutionary and systematic studies: a test case in the euasterid plant clade. Genetics 174:1407–1420PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wu F, Eannetta NT, Xu Y, Tanksley SD (2009) A detailed synteny map of the eggplant genome based on conserved ortholog set II (COSII) markers. Theor Appl Genet. doi:10.1007/s00122-008-0590-9

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Feinan Wu
    • 1
  • Nancy T. Eannetta
    • 1
  • Yimin Xu
    • 1
  • Richard Durrett
    • 2
  • Michael Mazourek
    • 1
  • Molly M. Jahn
    • 1
    • 3
  • Steven D. Tanksley
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Plant Breeding and GeneticsCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  3. 3.College of Agriculture and Life SciencesUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA
  4. 4.Department of Plant BiologyCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations