Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 118, Issue 6, pp 1065–1081 | Cite as

Leaf-level water use efficiency determined by carbon isotope discrimination in rice seedlings: genetic variation associated with population structure and QTL mapping

  • Yunbi Xu
  • Dominique This
  • Roman C. Pausch
  • Wendy M. Vonhof
  • Jason R. Coburn
  • Jonathan P. Comstock
  • Susan R. McCouch
Original Paper

Abstract

Increasing the water use efficiency (WUE) of our major crop species is an important target of agricultural research. Rice is a major water consumer in agriculture and it is also an attractive genetic model. We evaluated leaf-level WUE in young rice seedlings using carbon isotope discrimination (∆13C) as an indicator of the trait. A survey of ∆13C was undertaken in 116 diverse germplasm accessions representing O. sativa, O. glaberrima and four wild Oryza species. O. sativa cultivars were classified into sub-populations based on SSR markers, and significant differences in ∆13C were observed among the five genetically defined groups. While individual accessions explained a greater proportion of the variation than did sub-population, indica rice varieties had the lowest ∆13C values overall, indicating superior WUE, while temperatejaponica had the highest ∆13C. O sativa accessions had a similar or greater range of ∆13C values than wild Oryza species, while domesticated O. glaberrima had a narrower range. Correlation analysis identified leaf morphological and physiological traits that were significantly associated with ∆13C, including longer leaves, more drooping leaves, higher tillering ability, and lower leaf nitrogen content. These trait associations were investigated by quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping using backcross inbred lines derived from a cross between Nipponbare (temperatejaponica) and Kasalath (aus). Seven QTL for ∆13C were identified using composite interval analysis, located in five chromosomal regions. The QTL with the largest additive effect came from Kasalath and co-localized with QTL for leaf length, tiller number and nitrogen content.

References

  1. Araus JL, Villegas D, Aparicio N, Garcia del Moral LF, El Hani S, Rharrabti Y, Ferrio JP, Royo C (2003) Environmental factors determining carbon isotope discrimination and yield in durum wheat under Mediterranean conditions. Crop Sci 43:170–180Google Scholar
  2. Barker R, Dawe D, Tuong TP, Bhuiyan SI, Guerra LC (1999) The outlook for water resources in the year 2020: challenges for research on water management in rice production. 19th session of the International Rice Commission. Food and Agriculture Organization, Cairo, pp 99–109Google Scholar
  3. Brendel O, Pot D, Plomion C, Rosenberg P, Guehl JM (2002) Genetic parameters and QTL analysis of delta C-13 and ring width in maritime pine. Plant Cell Environ 25:1248–1257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cabuslay GS, Ito O, Alejar AA (2002) Physiological evaluation of responses of rice (Oryza sativa L.) to water deficit. Pl Sci 163:815–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Casasoli M, Pot D, Plomion C, Monteverdi MC, Barreneche T, Lauteri M, Villani F (2004) Identification of QTLs affecting adaptive traits in Castanea sativa Mill. Plant Cell Environ 27:1088–1101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Comstock JP, McCouch SR, Martin BC, Tauer CG, Vision TJ, Xu Y, Pausch R (2005) The effects of resource availability and environmental conditions on genetic rankings for carbon isotope discrimination during growth in tomato and rice. Funct Plant Biol 32:1089–1105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Condon AG, Richards RA, Farquhar GD (1987) Carbon isotope discrimination is positively correlated with grain yield and dry matter production in field-grown wheat. Crop Sci 27:996–1001Google Scholar
  8. Condon AG, Farquhar GD, Richards RA (1990) Genotypic variation in carbon isotope discrimination and transpiration efficiency in wheat leaf gas exchange and whole plant studies. Aust J Plant Physiol 17:9–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Condon AG, Richards RA, Rebetzke GJ, Farquhar GD (2002) Improving intrinsic water-use efficiency and crop yield. Crop Sci 42:122–131PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Condon AG, Richards RA, Rebetzke GJ, Farquhar GD (2004) Breeding for high water-use efficiency. J Exp Bot 55:2447–2460PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cregg B, Zhang J (2000) Carbon isotope discrimination as a tool to screen for improved drought tolerance. In: 11th METRIA conference, Gresham, OregonGoogle Scholar
  12. Diab AA, Teulat-Merah B, This D, Ozturk NZ, Benscher D, Sorrells ME (2004) Identification of drought-inducible genes and differentially expressed sequence tags in barley. Theor Appl Genet 109:1417–1425PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dingkuhn M, Farquhar GD, De Datta SK, O’Toole JC (1991) Discrimination of 13C among upland rices having different water use efficiencies. Australian J Ag Res 42:1123–1131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ellis RP, Forster BP, Gordon DC, Handley LL, Keith RP, Lawrence P, Meyer R, Powell W, Robinson D, Scrimgeour CM, Young G, Thomas WT (2002) Phenotype/genotype associations for yield and salt tolerance in a barley mapping population segregating for two dwarfing genes. J Exp Bot 53:1163–1176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2003) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164:1567–1587PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Farquhar GD, Richards RA (1984) Isotopic composition of plant carbon correlates with water use efficiency of wheat genotypes. Aust J Ag Res 11:539–552Google Scholar
  17. Farquhar GD, Ehleringer JR, Hubick KT (1989) Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis. In: Briggs WR (ed) Annual review of plant physiology and plant molecular biology, vol 40. Annual Reviews Inc., Palo Alto, pp 503–538Google Scholar
  18. Franks PJ, Farquhar GD (1999) A relationship between humidity response, growth form and photosynthetic operating point in C3 plants. Plant Cell Environ 22:1337–1349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Franks PJ, Farquhar GD (2001) The effect of exogenous abscisic acid on stomatal development, stomatal mechanics, and leaf gas exchange in Tradescantia virginiana. Plant Physiol 125:935–942PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Garris AJ, Tai TH, Coburn JR, Kresovich S, McCouch S (2005) Genetic structure and diversity in Oryza sativa L. Genetics 169:1631–1638PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Geber MA, Dawson TE (1997) Genetic variation in stomatal and biochemical limitations to photosynthesis in the annual plant, Polygonum arenastrum. Oecologia 109:535–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Glaszmann JC (1987) Isozymes and classification of asian rice varieties. Theor Appl Genet 74:21–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gleick PH (2003) Water use. Annu Rev Environ Resour 28:275–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Handley LL, Nevo E, Raven JA, MartInez-Carrasco R, Scrimgeour CM, Pakniyat H, Forster BP (1994) Chromosome 4 controls potential water use efficiency (delta13C) in barley. J Exp Bot 45:1661–1663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hausmann NJ, Juenger TE, Sen S, Stowe KA, Dawson TE, Simms EL (2005) Quantitative trait loci affecting delta13C and response to differential water availability in Arabidopsis thaliana. Evolution Int J Org Evol 59:81–96Google Scholar
  26. Ishimaru K, Shirota K, Higa M, Kawamitsu Y (2001a) Identification of quantitative trait loci for adaxial and abaxial stomatal frequencies in Oryza sativa. Plant Physiol Biochem 39:173–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ishimaru K, Yano M, Aoki N, Ono K, Hirose T, Lin SY, Monna L, Sasaki T, Ohsugi R (2001b) Toward the mapping of physiological and agronomic characters on a rice function map: QTL analysis and comparison between QTLs and expressed sequence tags. Theor Appl Genet 102:793–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Johnson RC (1993) Carbon isotope discrimination, water relations, and photosynthesis in Tall Fescues. Crop Sci 33:169–174Google Scholar
  29. Juenger TE, McKay JK, Hausmann N, Keurentjes J, Sen S, Stowe KA, Dawson TE, Simms EL, Richards JH (2005) Identification and characterization of QTL underlying whole-plant physiology in Arabidopsis thaliana: delta C-13, stomatal conductance and transpiration efficiency. Plant Cell Environ 28:697–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Keeling CD (1958) The concentration and isotopic abundances of atmospheric carbon dioxide in rural areas. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 13:322–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Knight JD, Livingston NJ, van-Kessel C (1994) Carbon isotope discrimination and water-use efficiency of six crops grown under wet and dryland conditions. Plant Cell Environ 17:173–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kondo M, Pablico PP, Aragones DV, Agbisit R (2004) Genotypic variations in carbon isotope discrimination, transpiration efficiency, and biomass production in rice as affected by soil water conditions and N. Pl Soil 267:165–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lambrides CJ, Chapman SC, Shorter R (2004) Genetic variation for carbon isotope discrimination in sunflower: association with transpiration efficiency and evidence for cytoplasmic inheritance. Crop Sci 44:1642–1653Google Scholar
  34. Larcher W (1995) Physiological plant ecology: ecophysiology and stress physiology of functional groups, 3rd edn. p xvi + 506pGoogle Scholar
  35. Laza MR, Kondo M, Ideta O, Barlaan E, Imbe T (2006) Identification of quantitative trait loci from d13C and productivity in irrigated lowland rice. Crop Sci 46:763–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lin SY, Sasaki T, Yano M (1998) Mapping quantitative trait loci controlling seed dormancy and heading date in rice, Oryza sativa L, using backcross inbred lines. Theor Appl Genet 96:997–1003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lu H, Redus MA, Coburn JR, Rutger JN, McCouch SR, Tai TH (2005) Population structure and breeding patterns of 145 US rice cultivars based on SSR marker analysis. Crop Sci 45:66–76Google Scholar
  38. Mae T (1997) Physiological nitrogen efficiency in rice: nitrogen utilization, photosynthesis, and yield potential. Pl Soil 196:201–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Makino A (2003) Rubisco and nitrogen relationships in rice: leaf photosynthesis and plant growth. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 49:319–327Google Scholar
  40. Martin B, Nienhuis J, King G, Schaefer A (1989) Restriction fragment length polymorphisms associated with water use efficiency in tomato. Science (Wash DC) 243:1725–1728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Masle J, Gilmore SR, Farquhar GD (2005) The ERECTA gene regulates plant transpiration efficiency in Arabidopsis. Nature 436:866–870PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McKay JK, Richards JH, Mitchell-Olds T (2003) Genetics of drought adaptation in Arabidopsis thaliana: I. Pleiotropy contributes to genetic correlations among ecological traits. Mol Ecol 12:1137–1151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Minhas JS, Khurana SMP, Sheshshayee MS, Kumar MU (2003) Potato varieties show genetic variability in water use efficiency based on carbon isotope discrimination. J Ind Potato Assoc 30:193–194Google Scholar
  44. Monneveux P, Reynolds MP, Trethowan R, Gonzalez-Santoyo H, Pena RJ, Zapata F (2005) Relationship between grain yield and carbon isotope discrimination in bread wheat under four water regimes. Europ J Agron 22:231–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Passioura JB (1977) Grain yield, harvest index, and water use of wheat. J Aust Inst Agric Sci 42:117–120Google Scholar
  46. Peng S, Laza RC, Khush GS, Sanico AL, Visperas RM, Garcia FV (1998) Transpiration efficiencies of indica and improved tropical japonica rice grown under irrigated conditions. Euphytica 103:103–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Price AH, Cairns JE, Horton P, Jones HG, Griffiths H (2002) Linking drought-resistance mechanisms to drought avoidance in upland rice using a QTL approach: progress and new opportunities to integrate stomatal and mesophyll responses. J Exp Bot 53:989–1004PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Rosegrant MW (1998) Water and irrigation policy: prospects for the future and implications for rice production. In: Pingali P, Hossain M (eds) Impact of Rice Research Thailand Development Research Institute and International Rice Research Institute. Bangkok, Thailand, pp 83–112Google Scholar
  50. Saranga Y, Flash I, Paterson AH, Yakir D (1999) Carbon isotope ratio in cotton varies with growth stage and plant organ. Pl Sci 142:47–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Saranga Y, Jiang CX, Wright RJ, Yakir D, Paterson AH (2004) Genetic dissection of cotton physiological responses to arid conditions and their inter-relationships with productivity. Plant Cell Environ 27:263–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Semon M, Nielsen R, Jones M, McCouch S (2005) The population structure of African cultivated rice Oryza glaberrima (Steud.): evidence for elevated levels of LD caused by admixture with O. sativa and ecological adaptation. Genetics 169:1639–1647PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sparks JP, Ehleringer JR (1997) Leaf carbon isotope discrimination and nitrogen content for riparian trees along elevational transects. Oecologia (Berlin) 109:362–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Specht JE, Chase K, Macrander M, Graef GL, Chung J, Markwell JP, Germann M, Orf JH, Lark KG (2001) Soybean response to water: a QTL analysis of drought tolerance. Crop Sci 41:493–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stiller WN, Read JJ, Constable GA, Reid PE (2005) Selection for water use efficiency traits in a cotton breeding program: cultivar differences. Crop Sci 45:1107–1113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tai TH, Tanksley SD (1990) A rapid and inexpensive method for isolation of total DNA from dehydrated tissue. Plant Mol Biol Rep 8:297–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Takai T, Fukuta Y, Sugimoto A, Shiraiwa T, Horie T (2006) Mapping of QTLs controlling carbon isotope discrimination in the photosynthetic system using recombinant inbred lines derived from a cross between two different rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars. Plant Prod Sci 9:271–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Teulat B, Merah O, Sirault X, Borries C, Waugh R, This D (2002) QTLs for grain carbon isotope discrimination in field-grown barley. Theor Appl Genet 106:118–126PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Thumma BR, Naidu BP, Chandra A, Cameron DF, Bahnisch LM, Liu CN (2001) Identification of causal relationships among traits related to drought resistance in Stylosanthes scabra using QTL analysis. J Exp Bot 52:203–214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Turner NC (1993) Water use efficiency of crop plants: potential for improvement. In: Buxton DR, Shibles R, Forsberg RA, Blad BL, Asay H, Paulsen GM, Wilson RG (eds) International crop science. Crop Science Society of America, Madison, pp 75–82Google Scholar
  61. Wang S, Basten CJ, Zeng Z-B (2006) Windows QTL Cartographer 2.5, 2.5 edn. Dept. of Statistics. North Carolina State University, RaleighGoogle Scholar
  62. Wong SC, Cowan IR, Farquhar GD (1979) Stomatal conductance correlates with photosynthetic capacity. Nature (London) 282:424–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wright GC, Hubick KT, Farquhar GD, Nageswara RC (1993) Genetic and environmental variation in transpiration efficiency and its correlation with carbon isotope discrimination and specific leaf area in peanut. In: Ehleringer JR, Hall AE, Farquhar GD (eds) Stable isotopes and plant carbon-water relations. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 247–267Google Scholar
  64. Yan J, Zhu J, He C, Benmoussa M, Wu P (1999) Molecular marker-assisted dissection of genotype × environment interaction for plant type traits in rice (Oryza sativa L). Crop Sci 39:538–544Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yunbi Xu
    • 1
    • 3
  • Dominique This
    • 1
    • 4
  • Roman C. Pausch
    • 2
  • Wendy M. Vonhof
    • 2
  • Jason R. Coburn
    • 1
  • Jonathan P. Comstock
    • 1
    • 2
  • Susan R. McCouch
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant Breeding and GeneticsCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  2. 2.Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research at Cornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  3. 3.CIMMYTMexicoMexico
  4. 4.UMR DAP, Montpellier-SupAgro-CIRADMontpellier Cedex 5France

Personalised recommendations