Advertisement

Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 118, Issue 4, pp 801–809 | Cite as

Genetic analysis of nuclear-cytoplasmic incompatibility in pea associated with cytoplasm of an accession of wild subspecies Pisum sativum subsp. elatius (Bieb.) Schmahl.

  • Vera S. Bogdanova
  • Elvira R. Galieva
  • Oleg E. KosterinEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

The genetic basis of nuclear-cytoplasmic incompatibility was examined using the wild pea (Pisum sativum subsp. elatius) accession VIR320. When this accession is used as the female parent in crosses with domesticated peas (Pisum sativum subsp. sativum) the F1 is highly sterile and displays chlorophyll deficiency, chlorophyll variegation, reduction of leaflets and stipulae while the reciprocal cross produces hybrids that appear normal. A mapping recombinant inbred line (RIL) population was established based on a cross in a compatible direction of a tester line WL1238 with VIR320. The ability to cause nuclear-cytoplasmic conflict was analysed by crossing individual RIL plants as pollen parents with VIR320 as donor of cytoplasm and scoring each F1 for major signs of the conflict. It is concluded that two unlinked nuclear genes are involved in the genetic control of the observed incompatibility. One of the genes, denoted as Scs1, is closely linked to the PhlC gene on linkage group III and the other, denoted as Scs2, is closely linked to the gp gene on linkage group V. Alleles of both genes in WL1238 are dominant and appear to be lethal in the homozygous condition in the VIR320 cytoplasm background.

Keywords

Recombinant Inbred Line Recombinant Inbred Line Population Cleave Amplify Polymorphic Sequence Alloplasmic Line Wild Parent 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Dr. N·F.Weeden for helpful comments on the manuscript and revising English language, to the anonymous referees for valuable suggestions and to Mrs. L.P. Romkina for excellent technical assistance. Sequencing reactions were performed at DNA Sequencing Center (ICG-ICBFM SD RAS). This work was supported by Russian Foundation for Fundamental Research, grant number 07-04-00111-a.

Supplementary material

122_2008_940_MOESM1_ESM.doc (36 kb)
Supplementary Table s1. (DOC 35 kb)

References

  1. Aksyonova E, Sinyavskaya M, Danilenko N, Pershina L, Nakamura C, Davydenko O (2005) Heteroplasmy and paternally oriented shift of the organellar DNA composition in barley-wheat hybrids during backcrosses with wheat parents. Genome 48:761–769PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen JO (2005) Effect of teosinte cytoplasmic genomes on maize phenotype. Genetics 169:863–880PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson JA, Maan SS (1995) Interspecific nuclear-cytoplasmic compatibility controlled by genes on group 1 chromosomes in durum wheat. Genome 38:803–808PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Asakura N, Nakamura C, Ohtsuka I (1997a) A nuclear compatibility gene, Ncc-tmp, of Triticum timopheevi for the cytoplasm of Aegilops squarrosa. Genes Genet Syst 72:71–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Asakura N, Nakamura C, Ohtsuka I (1997b) RAPD markers linked to the nuclear gene from Triticum timopheevii that confers compatibility with Aegoilops squarrosa cytoplasm on alloplasmic durum wheat. Genome 40:201–210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Asakura N, Nakamura C, Ohtsuka I (2000) Homoeoallelic gene Ncc-tmp of Triticum timopheevii conferring compatibility with the cytoplasm of Aegilops squarrosa in the tetraploid wheat nuclear background. Genome 43:503–511PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bogdanova VS (2007) Inheritance of organelle DNA markers in a pea cross associated with nuclear-cytoplasmic incompatibility. Theor Appl Genet 114:333–339PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bogdanova VS, Berdnikov VA (2001) Observation of a phenomenon resembling hybrid dysgenesis, in a wild pea subspecies Pisum sativum ssp elatius. Pisum Genet 33:5–8Google Scholar
  9. Bogdanova VS, Kosterin OE (2006) A case of anomalous chloroplast inheritance in crosses of garden pea involving an accession of wild subspecies. Dokl Biol Sci 406:44–46 RussianPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Choi HK, Mun JH, Kim DJ, Zhu H, Baek JM, Mudge J, Roe B, Ellis N, Doyle J, Kiss GB, Young ND, Cook DR (2004) Estimating genome conservation between crop and model legume species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:15289–15294PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gehlhar SB, Simons KJ, Maan SS, Kianian SF (2005) Genetic analysis of the species cytoplasm specific gene (scs d) derived from durum wheat. J Hered 96:404–409PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Glick R, Sears BB (1994) Genetically-programmed chloroplast dedifferentiation as a consequence of plastome-genome incompatibility in Oenothera. Plant Physiol 106:367–373PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Goloenko IM, Lukhanina NV, Shimkevich AM, Aksyonova EA, Danilenko NG, Davydenko OG (2002) The productivity characteristics of substituted barley lines with marked chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes. Cell Mol Biol Lett 7:483–491PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Haldane JBS, Waddington CH (1931) Inbreeding and linkage. Genetics 16:357–374PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hanson MR (1991) Plant mitochondrial mutations and male sterility. Annu Rev Genet 25:461–486PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hossain KG, Riera-Lizarazu O, Kalavacharla V, Vales MI, Maan SS, Kianian SF (2004) Radiation Hybrid mapping of the species cytoplasm-specific (scs ae) gene in wheat. Genetics 168:415–423PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kalo P, Seres A, Taylor SA, Jakab J, Kevei Z, Kereszt A, Endre G, Ellis TH, Kiss GB (2004) Comparative mapping between Medicago sativa and Pisum sativum. Mol Genet Genomics 272:235–346PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Konieczny A, Ausubel FM (1993) A procedure for mapping Arabidopsis mutations using co-dominant ecotype-specific PCR-based markers. Plant J 4:403–410PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Konovalov F, Toshchakova E, Gostimsky S (2005) A CAPS marker set for mapping in linkage group III of pea (Pisum sativum L). Cell Mol Biol Lett 10:163–171PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lander ES, Green P, Abrahamson J, Barlow A, Daly MJ, Lincoln SE, Newburg L (1987) MAPMAKER: an interactive computer package for constructing primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations. Genomics 1:174–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lilienfeld FA (1962) Plastid behavior in reciprocally different crosses between two races of Medicago truncatula Gaertn. Seiken Ziho 13:3–38Google Scholar
  22. Lilienfeld FA (1965) A case of malfunctioning plastids in Medicago truncatula Gaertn. Jan J Genet 40:261–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Maan S (1992a) Transfer of a species cytoplasm specific (scs) gene of Triticum timopheevii Zhuk to T. turgidum. Genome 35:238–243Google Scholar
  24. Maan S (1992b) The scs and Vi genes correct a syndrome of cytoplasmic effects in alloplasmic durum wheat. Genome 35:780–787Google Scholar
  25. Maroof MA, Zhang Q, Neale DB, Allard RW (1992) Associations between nuclear loci and chloroplast DNA genotypes in wild barley. Genetics 131:225–231PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Medicago Genome Sequence Consortium (2007) Medicago truncatula genome sequence: release 1.0 at http://www.medicago.org
  27. Mukai Y, Tsunewaki K (1976) Genetic diversity of the cytoplasm in Triticum and Aegilops IV distribution of the cytoplasm inducing variegation in common wheat. Theor Appl Genet 4S:9–16Google Scholar
  28. Mun J-H, Kim D-J, Choi H-K, Gish J, Debellé F, Mudge J, Denny R, Endré G, Saurat O, Dudez A-M, Kiss GB, Roe BA, Young ND, Cook DR (2006) Distribution of microsatellites in the genome of Medicago truncatula: a resource of genetic markers that integrate genetic and physical maps. Genetics 172:2541–2555PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Neff MM, Neff JD, Chory J, Pepper AE (1998) dCAPS, a simple technique for the genetic analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms: experimental applications in Arabidopsis thaliana genetics. Plant J 14:387–392PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ohtsuka I (1991) Genetic differentiation in wheat genomes in relation to compatibility with Aegilops squarrosa cytoplasm and application to phylogeny of polyploid wheats. J Fac Agric Hokkaido Univ 65(part 2):127–198Google Scholar
  31. Schmitz-Linneweber C, Kushnir S, Babiychuk E, Poltnigg P, Herrmann RG, Maier RM (2005) Pigment deficiency in nightshade/tobacco cybrids is caused by the failure to edit the plastid ATPase a-subunit mRNA. Plant Cell 17:1815–1828PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Simons KJ, Gehlhar SB, Maan SS, Kianian SF (2003) Detailed mapping of the species cytoplasm-specific (scs) gene in durum wheat. Genetics 165:2129–2136PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Stubbe W (1964) The role of the plastome in evolution of the genus Oenothera. Genetica 35:28–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stubbe W, Steiner E (1999) Inactivation of pollen and other effects of genome-plastome incompatibility in Oenothera. Plant Syst Evol 217:259–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tsunewaki K (1993) Genome-plasmon interactions in wheat. Jpn J Genet 68:1–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tsunewaki K, Wang G-Z, Matsuoka Y (1996) Plasmon analysis of Triticum (wheat) and Aegilops. 1. Production of alloplasmic common wheats and their fertilities. Genes Genet Syst 71:293–311PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tsunewaki K, Wang GZ, Matsuoka Y (2002) Plasmon analysis of Triticum (wheat) and Aegilops. 2. Characterization and classification of 47 plasmons based on their effects on common wheat phenotype. Genes Genet Syst 77:409–427PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Weeden NF, Ellis THN, Timmerman-Vaughan GM, Swiecicki WK, Rozov SM, Berdnikov VA (1998) A consensus linkage map for Pisum sativum. Pisum Genet 30:1–4Google Scholar
  39. Weeden NF, Moffett MD (2007) List of genes postulated to be on pea LGIII between Fed1 and just distal to Egl1. Pisum Genet 39:45–63Google Scholar
  40. Zubko MK, Zubko EI, Ruban AV, Adler K, Mock H-P, Misera S, Gleba YY, Grimm B (2001) Extensive developmental and metabolic alterations in cybrids Nicotiana tabacum (+Hyoscyamus niger) are caused by complex nucleo-cytoplasmic incompatibility. Plant J 25:627–639PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vera S. Bogdanova
    • 1
  • Elvira R. Galieva
    • 1
  • Oleg E. Kosterin
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Institute of Cytology and GeneticsSiberian Department of Russian Academy of SciencesNovosibirskRussia

Personalised recommendations