Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 115, Issue 7, pp 945–957 | Cite as

Generation and characterization of two novel low phytate mutations in soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.)

  • Feng-Jie Yuan
  • Hai-Jun Zhao
  • Xue-Liang Ren
  • Shen-Long Zhu
  • Xu-Jun Fu
  • Qing-Yao Shu
Original Paper

Abstract

Phytic acid (PA, myo-inositol 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 hexakisphosphate) is important to the nutritional quality of soybean meal. Organic phosphorus (P) in PA is indigestible in humans and non-ruminant animals, which affects nutrition and causes P pollution of ground water from animal wastes. Two novel soybean [(Glycine max L. (Merr.)] low phytic acid (lpa) mutations were isolated and characterized. Gm-lpa-TW-1 had a phytic acid P (PA-P) reduction of 66.6% and a sixfold increase in inorganic P (Pi), and Gm-lpa-ZC-2 had a PA-P reduction of 46.3% and a 1.4-fold increase in Pi, compared with their respective non-mutant progenitor lines. The reduction of PA-P and increase of Pi in Gm-lpa-TW-1 were molar equivalent; the decrease of PA-P in Gm-lpa-ZC-2, however, was accompanied by the increase of both Pi and lower inositol phosphates. In both mutant lines, the total P content remained similar to their wild type parents. The two lpa mutations were both inherited in a single recessive gene model but were non-allelic. Sequence data and progeny analysis indicate that Gm-lpa-TW-1 lpa mutation resulted from a 2 bp deletion in the soybean d-myo-inositol 3-phosphate synthase (MIPS1 EC 5.5.1.4) gene 1 (MIPS1). The lpa mutation in Gm-lpa-ZC-2 was mapped on LG B2, closely linked with microsatellite loci Satt416 and Satt168, at genetic distances of ∼4.63 and ∼9.25 cM, respectively. Thus this mutation probably represents a novel soybean lpa locus. The seed emergence rate of Gm-lpa-ZC-2 was similar to its progenitor line and was not affected by seed source and its lpa mutation. However, Gm-lpa-TW-1 had a significantly reduced field emergence when seeds were produced in a subtropic environment. Field tests of the mutants and their progenies further demonstrated that the lpa mutation in Gm-lpa-ZC-2 does not negatively affect plant yield traits. These results will advance understanding of the genetic, biochemical and molecular control of PA synthesis in soybean. The novel lpa mutation in Gm-lpa-ZC-2, together with linked simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers, will be of value for breeding productive lpa soybeans, with meal high in digestible Pi eventually to improve animal nutrition and lessen environmental pollution.

References

  1. Bregitzer P, Raboy V (2006) Effects of four independent low-phytate mutations on barley agronomic performance. Crop Sci 46:1318–1322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chappell AS, Scaboo AM, Wu X, Pantalone VR, Bilyeu KD (2006) Characterization of the MIPS gene family in Glycine max. Plant Breed 125:493–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen PS, Toribara TY, Warner H (1956) Microdetermination of phosphorus. Anal Chem 28:1756–1758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chiera JM, Finer JJ, Grabau EA (2005) Ectopic expression of a soybean phytase in developing seeds of Glycine max to improve phosphorus availability. Plant Mol Biol 56:895–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Denbow DM, Grabau EA, Lacy GH, Kornegay ET, Russell DR, Umbeck PF (1998) Soybeans transformed with a fungal phytase gene improve phosphorus availability for broilers. Poult Sci 77:878–881PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Dorsch JA, Cook A, Young KA, Anderson JM, Bauman AT, Volkmann CJ, Murthy PPN, Raboy V (2003) Seed phosphorus and inositol phosphate phenotype of barley low phytic acid genotypes. Phytochemistry 62:691–706PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Erdman JW (1979) Oilseed phytates: nutrition implications. J Am Oil Chem Soc 56:736–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fehr WR, Caviness CE (1977) Stages of soybean development. Spec. Rep. 80. Iowa Agric Home Econ Exp Stn AmesGoogle Scholar
  9. Hegeman GE, Good LL, Grabau EA (2001) Expression of D-myo-inositol-3-phosphate synthase in soybean. Implication for phytic acid biosynthesis. Plant Physiol 125:1941–1948PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hitz WD, Carlson TJ, Kerr PS, Sebastian SA (2002) Biochemical and molecular characterization of a mutation that confers a decreased raffinosaccharide and phytic acid phenotype on soybean seeds. Plant Physiol 128:650–660PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hulke BS, Fehr WR, Welke GA (2004) Agronomic and seed characteristics of soybean with reduced phytate and palmitate. Crop Sci 44:2027–2031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Keim P, Olson TC, Shoemaker RC (1988) A rapid protocol for isolating soybean DNA. Soybean Genet Newslett 15:150–152Google Scholar
  13. Li ZL, Jakkula RS, Hussey JP, Boerma HR (2001) SSR mapping and confirmation of the QTL from PI96354 conditioning soybean resistance to southern root-knot nematode. Theor Appl Genet 103:1167–1173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Liu QL, Xu XH, Ren XL, Fu HW, Wu DX, Shu QY (2007) Generation and characterization of low phytic acid germplasm in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor Appl Genet 114:803–814PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Meis SJ, Fehr WR, Schnebly SR (2003) Seed source effect on field emergence of soybean lines with reduced phytate and raffinose saccharides. Crop Sci 43:1336–1339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nunes ACS, Vianna GR, Cuneo F, Amaya-Farfán J, de Capdeville G, Rech EL, Aragão FJL (2006) RNAi-mediated silencing of the myo-inositol-1-phosphate synthase gene (GmMIPS1) in transgenic soybean inhibited seed development and reduced phytate content. Planta 224(1):125–132PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Oltmans SE, Fehr WR, Welke GA (2004) Inheritance of low-phytate phosphours in soybean. Crop Sci 44:433–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Oltmans SE, Fehr WR, Welke GA, Raboy V (2005) Agronomic and seed traits of soybean lines with low-phytate phosphorus. Crop Sci 45:593–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Primomo VS, Falk DE, Ablett GR, Tanner JW, Rajcan I (2002) Inheritance and interaction of low palmitic and low linolenic soybean. Crop Sci 42:31–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Raboy V, Dickinson DB, Below FE (1984) Variation in seed total P, phytic acid, zinc, calcium, magnesium, and protein among lines of Glycine max and G. sojae. Crop Sci 24:431–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Raboy V, Gerbasi PF, Young KA, Stoneberg SD, Pickett SG, Bauman AT, Murthy PPN, Sheridan WF, Ertl DS (2000) Origin and seed phenotype of maize low phytic acid 1-1 and low phytic acid 2-1. Plant Physiol 124:355–368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Raboy V, Young KA, Dorsch JA, Cook A (2001) Genetics and breeding of seed phosphorus and phytic acid. J Plant Physiol 158:489–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Raboy V (2002) Progress in breeding low phytate crops. J Nutr 132:503S–505SPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Sebastian SA, Kerr PS, Pearlstein RW, Hitz WD (2000) Soybean germplasm with novel genes for improved digestibility. In: Drackley JK (ed) Soy in animal nutrition. Federation of Animal Science Societies, Savoy, IL, pp 56–74Google Scholar
  25. Shi JR, Wang HY, Wu YS, Meeley RB, Ertl DS (2003) The maize low-phytic acid mutant lpa2 is caused by mutation in an inositol phosphate kinase gene. Plant Physiol 131:507–515PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shi JR, Wang HY, Hazebroek J, Ertl DS, Harp T (2005) The maize low-phytic acid 3 encodes a myo-insitol kinase that plays a role in phytic acid biosynthesis in developing seeds. Plant J 42:708–719PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shi JR, Ertl DS, Wang HY, Li BL, Faller M, Schellin K (2006) Maize multidrug resistance-associated protein polynucleotides and methods of use. US Patent Application 20060143728Google Scholar
  28. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22:4673–4680PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. van Harten AM (1998) Mutation breeding—theory and practical application. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  30. Walker DR, Scaboo AM, Wilcox JR (2006) Genetic mapping of loci associated with seed phytic acid content in CX1834-1-2 soybean. Crop Sci 46:390–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wang LZ, Wang JL (1992) Soybean genetics and breeding. Science Press ISBN 7-03-003014-1/Q.400Google Scholar
  32. Wilcox JR, Premachandra GS, Young KA, Raboy V (2000) Isolation of high seed inorganic P, low-phytate soybean mutants. Crop Sci 40:1601–1605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhang JJ, Zhu Y (2005) Anion-exchange chromatography with post-column derivatization for the analysis of phytic acid in rice flour. J Zhejiang Univ (Science edition) 32(2):201–203Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Feng-Jie Yuan
    • 1
    • 2
  • Hai-Jun Zhao
    • 1
  • Xue-Liang Ren
    • 1
  • Shen-Long Zhu
    • 2
  • Xu-Jun Fu
    • 2
  • Qing-Yao Shu
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.IAEA-Zhejiang University Collaborating Center, Institute of Nuclear Agricultural SciencesZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina
  2. 2.Institute of Crop Science and Nuclear Technology UtilizationZhejiang Academy of Agricultural SciencesHangzhouChina
  3. 3.Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and AgricultureInternational Atomic Energy AgencyViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations