Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 115, Issue 1, pp 87–100 | Cite as

Application of identified QTL-marker associations in rice quality improvement through a design-breeding approach

  • Jiankang Wang
  • Xiangyuan Wan
  • Huihui Li
  • Wolfgang H. Pfeiffer
  • Jonathan Crouch
  • Jianmin Wan
Original Paper


A permanent mapping population of rice consisting of 65 non-idealized chromosome segment substitution lines (denoted as CSSL1 to CSSL65) and 82 donor parent chromosome segments (denoted as M1 to M82) was used to identify QTL with additive effects for two rice quality traits, area of chalky endosperm (ACE) and amylose content (AC), by a likelihood ratio test based on stepwise regression. Subsequently, the genetics and breeding simulation tool QuLine was employed to demonstrate the application of the identified QTL in rice quality improvement. When a LOD threshold of 2.0 was used, a total of 16 chromosome segments were associated with QTL for ACE, and a total of 15 segments with QTL for AC in at least one environment. Four target genotypes denoted as DG1 to DG4 were designed based on the identified QTL, and according to low ACE and high AC breeding objectives. Target genotypes DG1 and DG2 can be achieved via a topcross (TC) among the three lines CSSL4, CSSL28, and CSSL49. Results revealed that TC2: (CSSL4  ×  CSSL49)  ×  CSSL28 and TC3: (CSSL28  ×  CSSL49)  ×  CSSL4 resulted in higher DG1 frequency in their doubled haploid populations, whereas TC1: (CSSL4  ×  CSSL28)  ×  CSSL49 resulted in the highest DG2 frequency. Target genotypes DG3 and DG4 can be developed by a double cross among the four lines CSSL4, CSSL28, CSSL49, and CSSL52. In a double cross, the order of parents affects the frequency of target genotype to be selected. Results suggested that the double cross between the two single crosses (CSSL4  ×  CSSL28) and (CSSL49  ×  CSSL52) resulted in the highest frequency for DG3 and DG4 genotypes in its derived doubled haploid derivatives. Using an enhancement selection methodology, alternative ways were investigated to increase the target genotype frequency without significantly increasing the total cost of breeding operations.


  1. Belknap JK (2003) Chromosome substitution strains: some quantitative considerations for genome scans and fine mapping. Mamm Genome 14:723–732PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernardo R, Charcosset A (2006) Usefulness of gene information in marker-assisted recurrent selection: a simulation appraisal. Crop Sci 46:614–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Churchill GA, Doerge RW (1994) Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics 138:963–971PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cooper M, Podlich DW, Smith OS (2005) Gene-to-phenotype and complex trait genetics. Aust J Agric Sci 56:895–918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cowley AW Jr, Roman RJ, Jacob HJ (2003) Application of chromosome substitution techniques in gene-function discovery. J Physiol 554:46–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dekkers JCM, Hospital F (2002) The use of molecular genetics in the improvement of agricultural populations. Nat Rev Genet 3:22–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. van Eeuwijk FA, Crossa J, Vargas M, Ribaut JM (2002) Analysing QTL-environment interaction by factorial regression, with an application to the CIMMYT drought and low-nitrogen stress programme in maize. In: Kang MS (ed) Quantitative genetics, genomics and plant breeding. CABI Publishing, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Eshed Y, Zamir D (1995) An introgression line population of Lycopersicon pennellii in the cultivated tomato enables the identification and fine mapping of yield-associated QTL. Genetics 141:1147–1162PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Harushima Y, Yano M, Shomura A, Sato M, Shimano T, Kuboki Y, Yamamoto T, Lin SY, Antonio BA, Parco A, Kajiya H, Huang N, Yamamoto K, Nagamura Y, Kurata N, Khush GS, Sasaki T (1998) A high-density rice genetic linkage map with 2275 markers using a single F2 Population. Genetics 148:479–494PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. He P, Li SG, Qian Q, Ma YQ, Li JZ, Wang WM, Chen Y, Zhu LH (1999) Genetic analysis of rice grain quality. Theor Appl Genet 98:502–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Huang FS, Sun ZX, Hu PS, Tang SQ (1998) Present situations and prospects for the research on rice grain quality forming. Chin J Rice Sci 12(3):172–176Google Scholar
  12. Kubo T, Aida Y, Nakamura K, Tsunematsu H, Doi K, Yoshimura A (2002) Reciprocal chromosome segment substitution series derived from Japonica and Indica cross of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Breed Sci 52:319–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lander ES, Botstein D (1989) Mapping Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics 121:185–199PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Li H, Ye G, Wang J (2007) A modified algorithm for the improvement of composite interval mapping. Genetics 175:361–374PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mackill DJ, Ni JJ (2001) Molecular mapping and marker-assisted selection for major-gene traits in rice. In: Rice genetics, vol IV. Science Publishers, New Delhi, pp 137–151Google Scholar
  16. McCouch SR, Teytelman L, Xu Y, Maghirang R, Li Z, Xing Y, Zhang Q, Kono I, Yano M, Fjellstrom R, DeClerck G, Schneider D, Cartinhour S, Ware D Stein L (2002) Development and mapping of 2240 new SSR markers for rice (Oryza sativa L.). DNA Res 9:199–207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Myers RH (1990) Classical and modern regression with applications, 2nd edn. Duxbury Thomson Learning, Pacific GroveGoogle Scholar
  18. Nadeau JH, Singer JB, Martin A, Lander ES (2000) Analysis complex genetics traits with chromosome substitution strains. Nat Genet 24:221–225PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Peleman JD, Voort JR (2003) Breeding by design. Trends Plant Sci 8:330–334PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Piepho HP (2000) A mixed-model approach to mapping quantitative trait loci in barley on the basis of multiple environment data. Genetics 156:2043–2050PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Podlich DW, Cooper M (1998) QU-GENE: a platform for quantitative analysis of genetic models. Bioinformatics 14:632–653PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tanksley SD, Nelson JC (1996) Advanced backcross QTL analysis: a method for the simultaneous discovery and transfer of valuable QTL from unadpated germplasm into elite breeding lines. Theor Appl Genet 92:191–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tsunematsu H, Yoshimura A, Harushima Y, Nagamura Y, Kurata N, Yano M, Sadaki T, Iwata N (1996) RFLP framework map using recombination inbred lines in rice. Breed Sci 46:279–284Google Scholar
  24. Wan X-Y, Wan J-M, Su C-C, Wang C-M, Shen W-B, Li J-M, Wang H-L, Jiang L, Liu S-J, Chen L-M, Yasui H, Yoshimura A (2004) QTL detection for eating quality of cooked rice in a population of chromosome segment substitution lines. Theor Appl Genet 110:71–79PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wan X-Y, Wan J-M, Weng J-F, Jiang L, Bi J-C, Wang C-M, Zhai H-Q (2005) Stability of QTLs for rice grain dimension and endosperm chalkiness characteristics across eight environments. Theor Appl Genet 110:1334–1346PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang J, van Ginkel M, Podlich D, Ye G, Trethowan R, Pfeiffer W, DeLacy IH, Cooper M, Rajaram S (2003) Comparison of two breeding strategies by computer simulation. Crop Sci 43:1764–1773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang J, van Ginkel M, Trethowan R, Ye G, DeLacy I, Podlich D, Cooper M (2004) Simulating the effects of dominance and epistasis on selection response in the CIMMYT Wheat Breeding Program using QuCim. Crop Sci 44:2006–2018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang J, Eagles HA, Trethowan R, van Ginkel M (2005) Using computer simulation of the selection process and known gene information to assist in parental selection in wheat quality breeding. Aust J Agric Sci 56:465–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wang J, Wan X, Crossa J, Crouch J, Weng J, Zhai H, Wan J (2006) QTL mapping of grain length in rice (Oryza sativa L.) using chromosome segment substitution lines. Genet Res 88:93–104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wang J, Chapman SC, Bonnett DB, Rebetzke GJ, Crouch J (2007) Application of population genetic theory and simulation models to efficiently pyramid multiple genes via marker-assisted selection. Crop Sci 47:580–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Young ND (1999) A cautiously optimistic vision for marker-assited selection. Mol Breed 5:505–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zeng Z-B (1994) Precision mapping of quantitative trait loci. Genetics 136:1457–1468PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jiankang Wang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Xiangyuan Wan
    • 1
  • Huihui Li
    • 1
    • 2
  • Wolfgang H. Pfeiffer
    • 3
  • Jonathan Crouch
    • 2
  • Jianmin Wan
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Crop Science and The National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic ImprovementChinese Academy of Agricultural SciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.Crop Research Informatics Laboratory (CRIL) and Genetic Resources Enhancement Unit (GREU)International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT)Mexico DFMexico
  3. 3.HarvetPlus and International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT-HarvestPlus)CaliColombia

Personalised recommendations