Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 114, Issue 3, pp 421–428 | Cite as

Genetic distance sampling: a novel sampling method for obtaining core collections using genetic distances with an application to cultivated lettuce

Original Paper


This paper introduces a novel sampling method for obtaining core collections, entitled genetic distance sampling. The method incorporates information about distances between individual accessions into a random sampling procedure. A basic feature of the method is that automatically larger samples are obtained if accessions are further apart and smaller samples if accessions are closer together. Genetic distance sampling can be used in conjunction with predefined stratifications of the accessions. Sample sizes are determined automatically; they depend on the distances between accessions within strata. The method is applied to the collection of cultivated lettuce of the Centre for Genetic Resources, the Netherlands. In this paper, genetic distances between accessions are obtained using AFLP marker data. However, genetic distance sampling can be applied using any measure of genetic distance between accessions. Some properties of genetic distance sampling are discussed.


  1. Bretting PK, Widrlechner MP (1995) Genetic markers and plant genetic resource management. Plant Breed Rev 31:11–86Google Scholar
  2. Brown AHD (1989) Core collections: a practical approach to genetic resources management. Genome 31:818–823Google Scholar
  3. Brown AHD (1995) The core collection at the crossroads. In: Hodgkin T, Brown AHD, van Hintum ThJL, Morales EAV (eds) Core collections of plant genetic resources. Wiley, Chichester, pp 3–19Google Scholar
  4. Brown AHD, Schoen DJ (1994) Optimal strategies for core collections of plant genetic resources. In: Loeschcke V, Tomiuk J, Jain SK (eds) Conservation genetics. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 357–370Google Scholar
  5. Charmet G, Balfourier F (1995) The use of geostatistics for sampling a core collection of perennial ryegrass populations. Genet Resour Crop Evol 42:303–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Franco J, Crossa J, Taba S, Shands H (2005) A sampling strategy for conserving genetic diversity when forming core subsets. Crop Sci 45:1035–1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Frankel OH (1984) Genetic perspectives of germplasm conservation. In: Arber W, Llimensee K, Peacock WJ, Starlinger P (eds) Genetic manipulation: impact on man and society. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 161–170Google Scholar
  8. Genstat Committee (2005) Genstat® Release 8. Reference manual. VSN International, Hemel HempsteadGoogle Scholar
  9. Gouesnard B, Bataillon TM, Decoux G, Rozale C, Schoen DJ, David JL (2001) MSTRAT: an algorithm for building germplasm core collections by maximizing allelic or phenotypic richness. J Hered 92:93–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gower JC (1971) A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics 27:857–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. van Hintum ThJL (2003) Molecular characterisation of a lettuce germplasm collection. In: Eucarpia leafy vegetables 2003, Proceedings of the Eucarpia meeting on leafy vegetables genetics and breeding, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands, 19–21 March 2003. Centre for Genetic Resources, Wageningen, pp 99–104Google Scholar
  12. van Hintum ThJL van Treuren R (2002) Molecular markers: tools to improve genebank efficiency. Cell Mol Biol Lett 7:737–744Google Scholar
  13. van Hintum ThJL, Brown AHD, Spillane C, Hodgkin T (2000) Core collections of plant genetic resources. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, RomeGoogle Scholar
  14. Jansen J, Verbakel H, Peleman J, van Hintum ThJL (2006) A note on the measurement of genetic diversity within genebank accessions of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) using AFLP markers. Theor Appl Genet (in press)Google Scholar
  15. Marita JM, Rodriguez JM, Nienhuis J (2000) Development of an algorithm identifying maximally diverse core collections. Genet Resour Crop Evol 47:515–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Schoen DJ, Brown AHD (1993) Conservation of allelic richness in wild crop relatives is aided by assessment of genetic markers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:10623–10627PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schoen DJ, Brown AHD (1995) Maximising genetic diversity in core collections of wild relatives of crop species. In: Hodgkin T, Brown AHD, van Hintum ThJL, Morales EAV (eds) Core collections of plant genetic resources. Wiley, Chichester, pp 55–76Google Scholar
  18. Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, van de Lee T, Hornes M, Frijters A, Pot J, Peleman J, Kuiper M, Zabeau M (1995) AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res 23:4407–4414PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.BiometrisWageningen University and Research CentreWageningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Centre for Genetic Resources, the Netherlands (CGN)Wageningen University and Research CentreWageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations