Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 113, Issue 5, pp 831–845 | Cite as

Genome-wide transcript analysis of maize hybrids: allelic additive gene expression and yield heterosis

  • Mei GuoEmail author
  • Mary A. Rupe
  • Xiaofeng Yang
  • Oswald Crasta
  • Christopher Zinselmeier
  • Oscar S. Smith
  • Ben Bowen
Original Paper


Heterosis, or hybrid vigor, has been widely exploited in plant breeding for many decades, but the molecular mechanisms underlying the phenomenon remain unknown. In this study, we applied genome-wide transcript profiling to gain a global picture of the ways in which a large proportion of genes are expressed in the immature ear tissues of a series of 16 maize hybrids that vary in their degree of heterosis. Key observations include: (1) the proportion of allelic additively expressed genes is positively associated with hybrid yield and heterosis; (2) the proportion of genes that exhibit a bias towards the expression level of the paternal parent is negatively correlated with hybrid yield and heterosis; and (3) there is no correlation between the over- or under-expression of specific genes in maize hybrids with either yield or heterosis. The relationship of the expression patterns with hybrid performance is substantiated by analysis of a genetically improved modern hybrid (Pioneer® hybrid 3394) versus a less improved older hybrid (Pioneer® hybrid 3306) grown at different levels of plant density stress. The proportion of allelic additively expressed genes is positively associated with the modern high yielding hybrid, heterosis and high yielding environments, whereas the converse is true for the paternally biased gene expression. The dynamic changes of gene expression in hybrids responding to genotype and environment may result from differential regulation of the two parental alleles. Our findings suggest that differential allele regulation may play an important role in hybrid yield or heterosis, and provide a new insight to the molecular understanding of the underlying mechanisms of heterosis.


Maize Hybrid Allelic Expression Paternal Parent Inbred Parent Heterotic Pool 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



We thank S. Zhao, W. Bruce, and B. Zeka for tissue sampling and RNA preparation; R. Luedtke, D. Ritland, and L. Heetland for field experiment support; O. Folkerts, T. Jarvie, P. Pochart, G. Vijayadamodar, and D. Marks for their support in the GeneCalling technology and database development from the CuraGen Corporation. We specially thank D. Duvick and J. Birchler for critical reading of the manuscript.

Supplementary material

122_2006_335_MOESM1_ESM.ppt (70 kb)
Supplementary material
122_2006_335_MOESM2_ESM.ppt (40 kb)
Supplementary material
122_2006_335_MOESM3_ESM.ppt (98 kb)
Supplementary material


  1. Auger DL, Gray AD, Ream TS, Kato A, Coe EH Jr, Birchler JA (2005) Nonadditive gene expression in diploid and triploid hybrids of maize. Genetics 169:389–9397PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bao J, Le S, Chen C, Zhang X, Zhang Y, Liu S, Clark T, Wang J, Cao M, Yang H, Wang S, Yu J (2005) Serial analysis of gene expression study of a hybrid rice strain (LYP9) and its parental cultivars. Plant Physiol 138:1216–1231PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhattramakki D, Dolan M, Hanafey M, Wineland R, Vaske D, Register JC III, Tingey S, Rafalski A (2002) Insertion-deletion polymorphisms in 3′ regions of maize genes occur frequently and can be used as highly informative genetic markers. Plant Mol Biol 48:539–547PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Birchler JA, Auger DL, Riddle NC (2003) In search of the molecular basis of heterosis. The Plant Cell 15:2236–2239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Birchler JA, Riddle NC, Auger DL, Veitia RA (2005) Dosage balance in gene regulation: biological implications. Trends Genet 21:219–226PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brunner S, Fengler K, Morgante M, Tingey S, Rafalski A (2005) Evolution of DNA sequence nonhomologies among maize inbreds. The Plant Cell 17:343–360PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bruce W, Desbons P, Crasta O, Folkerts O (2001) Gene expression profiling of two related maize inbred lines with contrasting root-lodging traits. J Exp Bot 52:459–468PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bruce W, Folkerts O, Garnaat C, Crasta O, Roth B, Bowen B (2000) Expression profiling of the maize flavonoid pathway genes controlled by estradiol-inducible transcription factors CRC and P. The Plant Cell 12:65–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ching A, Caldwell KS, Jung M, Dolan M, Smith OS, Tingey S, Morgante M, Raflaski AJ (2002) SNP frequency, haplotype structure and linkage disequilibrium in elite maize lines. BMC Genet 3:19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Comstock RE, Robinson HF (1952) Estimation of average dominance of genes. In: Gowen JW (ed) Heterosis. Iowa State College Press, Ames, Iowa, pp. 494–516Google Scholar
  11. Cong B, Liu J, Tanksley SD (2002) Natural alleles at a tomato fruit size quantitative trait locus differ by heterochronic regulatory mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99:13606–13611PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cowles CR, Hirschhorn JN, Altshuler D, Lander ES (2002) Detection of regulatory variation in mouse genes. Nat Genet 32:432–437PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crasta OR, Folkerts O (2003) Open architecture expression profiling of plant transcriptomes and gene discovery using GeneCalling® technology. In: Grotewold E (ed) Plant functional genomics: methods and protocols. Humana, Totawa, NJ, pp 381–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Doebley J (2004) The genetics of maize evolution. Ann Rev Genet 38:37–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Doss S, Schadt EE, Drake TA, Lusis AJ (2005) cis-acting expression quantitative trait loci in mice. Genome Res 15:681–691PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Duvick DN (2001) Biotechnology in the 1930s: the development of hybrid maize. Nat Genet Rev 2:69–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Duvick DN (2005) The contribution of breeding to yield advances in maize (Zea mays L.). In: Sparks DN (ed) Adv Agron, Vol. 86. Academic, San Diego, pp 83–145Google Scholar
  18. Duvick DN, Smith JSC, Cooper M (2004) Long-term selection in a commercial hybrid maize breeding program. In: Janick J (ed) Plant breeding reviews, Vol. 24, part 2. Long term selection: crops, animals, and bacteria. Wiley, New York, pp 109–151Google Scholar
  19. Enard W, Khaitovich P, Klose J, Zollner S, Heissig F, Giavalisco P, Nieselt-Struwe K, Muchmore E, Varki A, Ravid R, Doxiadis G, Bontrop R, Pääbo S (2002) Intra- and interspecific variation in primate gene expression patterns. Science 296:340–343PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fu H, Dooner HK (2002) Intraspecific violation of genetic colinearity and its implications in maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99:9573–9578PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Gall T, Darlu LP, Escobar-Páramo P, Picard B, Denamur E (2005) Selection-driven transcriptome polymorphism in Escherichia coli/Shigella species. Genome Res 15:260–268PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gardner CO, Harvey PH, Comstock RE, Robinson HF (1953) Dominance of genes controlling quantitative characters in maize. Agron J 45:186–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gibson G, Weir B (2005) The quantitative genetics of transcription. Trends Genet 21:616–623PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gibson G, Riley-Berger R, Harshman L, Kopp A, Vacha S, Nuzhdin S, Wayne M (2004) Extensive sex-specific non-additivity of gene expression in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 167:1791–1799PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Guo M, Birchler JA (1994) Trans-acting dosage effects on the expression of model gene systems in maize aneuploids. Science 266:1999–2002PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Guo M, Rupe MA, Danilevskaya ON, Yang X, Hu Z (2003) Genome-wide mRNA profiling reveals heterochronic allelic variation and a new imprinted gene in hybrid maize endosperm. The Plant J 36:30–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Guo M, Rupe MA, Zinselmeier C, Habben J, Bowen BA, Smith OS (2004) Allelic variation of gene expression in maize hybrids. The Plant Cell 16:1707–1716PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Horton P (2000) Prospects for crop improvement through the genetic manipulation of photosynthesis: morphological and biochemical aspects of light capture. J Exp Bot 51:475–485PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Janick J (1999) Exploitation of heterosis: uniformity and stability. In: Coors JG, Pandey S (eds) The genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crops (American Society of Agronomy, Inc. Crop Science Society of America, Inc.) Madison, pp 319–333Google Scholar
  30. Knight JC (2004) Allele-specific gene expression uncovered. Trends Genet 20:113–116PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kollipara KP, Saab IN, Wych RD, Lauer MJ, Singletary GW (2002) Expression profiling of reciprocal maize hybrids divergent for cold germination and desiccation tolerance. Plant Physiol 129:974–992PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Labate JA, Lamkey KR, Lee M, Woodman WW (1997) Molecular genetic diversity after reciprocal recurrent selection in BSSS and BCCB1 maize populations. Crop Sci 37:416–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Leonardi A, Damerval C, Herbert Y, Gallais A, de Vienne D (1991) Association of protein amount polymorphism (PAP) among maize lines with performances of their hybrids. Theor Appl Genet 82:552–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ogura A, Ikeo K, Gojobori T (2004) Comparative analysis of gene expression for convergent evolution of camera eye between octopus and human. Genome Res 14:1555–1561PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Papp B, Pal C, Hurst LD (2003) Dosage sensitivity and the evolution of gene families in yeast. Nature 424:194–197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ranz JM, Castillo-Davis CI, Meiklejohn CD, Hartl DL (2003) Sex-dependent gene expression and evolution of the Drosophila transcriptome. Science 300:1742–1745PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Romagnoli S, Maddaloni M, Livini C, Motto M (1990) Relationship between gene expression and hybrid vigor in primary root tips of young maize (Zea mays L) plantlets. Theor Appl Genet 80:767–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schadt EE, Monks SA, Drake TA, Lusis AJ, Che N, Colinayo V, Ruff TG, Milligan SB, Cavet G, Linsley PS, Mao M, Stoughton RB, Friend SH (2003) Genetics of gene expression surveyed in maize, mouse and man. Nature 422:297–302PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shimkets RA, Lowe DG, Tai JT, Sehl P, Jin H, Yang R, Predki PF, Rothberg BEG, Murtha MT, Roth ME, Shenoy SG, Windemuth A, Simpson JW, Simons JF, Daley MP, Gold SA, McKenna MP, Hillan K, Went GT, Rothberg JM (1999) Gene expression analysis by transcript profiling coupled to a gene database query. Nat Biotech 17:798–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shull GH (1908) The composition of a field of maize. Am Breed Assoc Rep 4:296–301Google Scholar
  41. Smith OS, Smith JSC (1992) Measurement of genetic diversity among maize hybrids; a comparison of isozymic, RFLP, pedigree, and heterosis data. Maydica 37:53–60Google Scholar
  42. Smith OS, Smith JSC, Bowen SL, Tenborg RA, Wall SJ (1990) Similarities among a group of elite maize inbreds as measured by pedigree, F1 grain yield, heterosis, and RFLPs. Theor Appl Genet 80:833–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Song RT, Messing J (2003) Gene expression of a gene family in maize based on non-collinear haplotypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100:9055–9060PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Swanson-Wagner RA, Jia Y, DeCook R, Borsuk LA, Nettleton D, Schnable PS (2006) All possible modes of gene action are observed in a global comparison of gene expression in a maize F1 hybrid and its inbred parents. PNAS 103:6805–6810PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Szalma SJ, Buckler ES IV, Snook ME, McMullen MD (2005) Association analysis of candidate genes for maysin and chlorogenic acid accumulation in maize silks. Theor Appl Genet 110:1324–1333PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tsaftaris AS (1995) Molecular aspects of heterosis in plants. Physiol Plant 94:362–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tsaftaris AS, Kafka M, Polidoros A, Tani E (1999) Epigenetic changes in Maize DNA and Heterosis. In: Coors JG, Pandey S (eds) The genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crops. (American Society of Agronomy, Inc. Crop Science Society of America, Inc.) Madison, pp 195–203Google Scholar
  48. Vuylsteke M, van Eeuwijk F, van Hummelen P, Kuiper M, Zabeau M (2005) Genetic analysis of variation in gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 171:1267–1275PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wittkopp P, Belinda J, Haerum K, Andrew GC (2004) Evolutionary changes in cis and trans gene regulation. Nature 430:85–88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yan H, Yuan W, Velculescu VE, Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW (2002) Allelic variation in human gene expression. Science 297:1143PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yvert G, Brem RB, Whittle J, Akey JM, Foss E, Smith FN, Mackelprang R, Kruglyak L (2003) Trans-acting regulatory variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the role of transcription factors. Nat Genet 35:57–64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mei Guo
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mary A. Rupe
    • 1
  • Xiaofeng Yang
    • 1
  • Oswald Crasta
    • 2
    • 3
  • Christopher Zinselmeier
    • 1
  • Oscar S. Smith
    • 1
  • Ben Bowen
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc.JohnstonUSA
  2. 2.CuraGen Corp.New HavenUSA
  3. 3.Virginia Bioinformatics InstituteVirginiaUSA
  4. 4.Gene-fx, Inc.BerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations