Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 111, Issue 5, pp 888–897 | Cite as

Two-generation marker-aided backcrossing for rapid conversion of normal maize lines to quality protein maize (QPM)

  • R. Babu
  • S. K. Nair
  • A. Kumar
  • S. Venkatesh
  • J. C. Sekhar
  • N. N. Singh
  • G. Srinivasan
  • H. S. Gupta
Original Paper

Abstract

The low nutritive value of maize endosperm protein is genetically corrected in quality protein maize (QPM), which contains the opaque2 gene along with numerous modifiers for kernel hardness. We report here a two generation marker-based backcross breeding program for incorporation of the opaque2 gene along with phenotypic selection for kernel modification in the background of an early maturing normal maize inbred line, V25. Using the flanking marker distances from opaque2 gene in the cross V25×CML176, optimum population size for the BC2 generation was computed in such a way that at least one double recombinant could be obtained. Whole genome background selection in the BC2 generation identified three plants with 93 to 96% recurrent parent genome content. The three BC2F2 families derived from marker identified BC2 individuals were subjected to foreground selection and phenotypic selection for kernel modification. The tryptophan concentration in endosperm protein was significantly enhanced in all the three classes of kernel modification viz., less than 25%, 25–50% and more than 50% opaqueness. BC2F3 lines developed from the hard endosperm kernels were evaluated for desirable agronomic and biochemical traits in replicated trials and the best line was chosen to represent the QPM version of V25, with tryptophan concentration of 0.85% in protein. The integrated breeding strategy reported here can be applied to reduce genetic drag as well as the time involved in a conventional line conversion program, and would prove valuable in rapid development of specialty corn germplasm.

References

  1. Annual Report (2004–05) Ministry of Agriculture, Department of Agriculture & Cooperation, Govt of IndiaGoogle Scholar
  2. AOAC (1965) Official methods of analysis of the association of official agricultural chemists. 10th ed, pp 744–745Google Scholar
  3. Babu R, Nair SK, Prasanna BM, Gupta HS (2004) Integrating marker assisted selection in crop breeding-prospects and challenges. Curr Sci 87:607–619Google Scholar
  4. Bass HW, Webster C, O’Brien GR, Roberts JKM, Boston RS (1992) A maize ribosome inactivating protein is controlled by the transcriptional activator opaque2. Plant Cell 4:225–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Frisch M, Bohn M, Melchinger AE (1999a) Comparison of selection strategies for marker assisted backcrossing of a gene. Crop Sci 39:1295–1301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Frisch M, Bohn M, Melchinger AE (1999b) Comparison of selection strategies for marker assisted backcrossing of a gene. Crop Sci 39:967–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Frisch M, Melchinger AE (2001) Marker assisted backcrossing for introgression of a recessive gene. Crop Sci 41:1485–1494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Glover DV, Mertz ET (1987) Corn. In: Olson RA, Frey KJ (eds) Nutritional security of cereal grains: genetic and agronomic improvement. Agron Monogr 28 ASA CSSA and SSSA Madison, WLGoogle Scholar
  9. Habben JE, Moro GL, Hunter BG, Hamaker R, Larkins BA (1995) Characterization of the proteins that define the nutritional quality of maize endosperm. In: Larkins BA, Mertz ET (eds) Quality protein maize: 1964–1994. Proc. International Symposium on Quality Protein Maize, EMBRAPA/CNPMS, Sete Lagaos, MG, Brazil, Dec 1–3, 1994Google Scholar
  10. Hernandez HH, Bates LS (1969) A modified method for rapid tryptophan analysis of maize. CIMMYT Research Bull 13 CIMMYT, MexicoGoogle Scholar
  11. Hospital F, Chevalet C, Mulsant P (1992) Using markers in gene introgression programs. Genetics 132:1199–1210PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hospital F, Decoux G (2002) Popmin: a program for the numerical optimization of population sizes in marker assisted backcross programs. J Hered 93:383–384PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lee M (1995) DNA markers and plant breeding programs. Adv Agron 55:265–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lincoln S, Daly M, Lander E (1992) Constructing genetic maps with MAPMAKER/EXP 3.0. Whitehead Institute Tech Rep, 3rd edGoogle Scholar
  15. Lohmer S, Maddaloni M, Motto M, Difonzo N, Hartings H, Salamini F, Thomson RD (1991) The maize regulatory locus opaque2 encodes a DNA binding protein which activates the transcription of the B-32 gene. Embo J 10:617–624PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lopes MA, Larkins BA (1995) Genetic analysis of opaque2 modifier gene activity in maize endosperm. Theor Appl Genet 119:274–281Google Scholar
  17. Lopes MA, Takasaki K, Bostwick DE, Helentjaris T, Larkins B (1995) Identification of two opaque2 modifier loci in QPM. Mol Gen Genet 247:603–613CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Melchinger AE (1990) Use of molecular markers in plant breeding. Plant Breed 104:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mertz ET (1992) Discovery of high lysine, high Tryptophan cereals. In: Mertz ET (ed) Quality protein maize. American Society of Cereal Chemistry, St Paul, MN, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  20. Mertz ET, Bates LS, Nelson OE (1964) Mutant that changes protein composition and increases lysine content of maize endosperm. Science 145:279–280PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pixley KV, Bjarnasan MS (1993) Combining ability for yield and protein quality among modified endosperm opaque2 tropical maize inbreds. Crop Sci 33:1229–1234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ribaut JM, Hoisington DA (1998) Marker assisted selection: new tools and strategies. Trends in Pl Sci 3:236–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ribaut JM, Jiang C, Hoisington DA (2002) Simulation experiments on efficiencies of gene introgression by backcrossing. Crop Sci 42:557–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Salvi S, Tuberosa R, Phillips RL (2001) Development of PCR based assays for allelic discrimination in maize by using the 5′ nuclease procedure. Mol Breed 8:169–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schmidt RJ, Burr FA, Aukerman MJ, Burr B (1990) Maize regulatory gene opaque2 encodes protein with a “leucine zipper” motif that binds to zein DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci 87:46–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Senior MC, Murphy JP, Goodman MM, Stuber CW (1998) Utility of SSRs for determining genetic similarities and relationships in maize using an agarose gel system. Crop Sci 38:1088–1098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tanksley SD (1983) Molecular markers in plant breeding. Plant Mol Bio Rep 1:3–8Google Scholar
  28. Tyagi s, Bratu DP, Kramer FR (1998) Multicolor molecular beacons for allele discrimination . Nature Biotech 16:49–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. VanBerloo R (1999) GGT: software for display of graphical genotypes. J Hered 90:328–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vasal SK, Srinivasan G, Pandy S, Gonzalez CF, Crossa J, Beck DL (1993a) Heterosis and combining ability of CIMMYT’s quality protein maize germplasm I: lowland tropical. Crop Sci 33:46–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Vasal SK, Srinivasan G, Pandy S, Gonzalez CF, Crossa J, Beck DL (1993b) Heterosis and combining ability of CIMMYT’s quality protein maize germplasm II: sub tropical. Crop Sci 33:51–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Villegas E (1975) An integral system for chemical screening of quality protein maize In: High qulity protein maize. Proc CIMMYT-Purdue Int Symp on protein quality in maize, El Batan, MexicoGoogle Scholar
  33. Villegas E, Ortega E, Bauer R (1984) Chemical methods used at CIMMYT for determining protein quality in corn. CIMMYT, MexicoGoogle Scholar
  34. Visscher PM, Haley CS, Thompson R (1996) Marker assisted introgression in backcross breeding programs. Genetics 144:1923–1932PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Young ND, Tanksley SD (1989) RFLP analysis of the size of chromosomal segments retained around Tm-2 locus of tomato during backcross breeding. Theor Appl Genet 77:353–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Babu
    • 1
  • S. K. Nair
    • 1
  • A. Kumar
    • 1
  • S. Venkatesh
    • 2
  • J. C. Sekhar
    • 2
  • N. N. Singh
    • 3
  • G. Srinivasan
    • 4
  • H. S. Gupta
    • 1
  1. 1.Vivekananda Institute of Hill Agriculture (ICAR)UttaranchalIndia
  2. 2.Directorate of Maize ResearchHyderabadIndia
  3. 3.Directorate of Maize ResearchNew DelhiIndia
  4. 4.International Center for Wheat and Maize Research (CIMMYT)Mexico DFMexico

Personalised recommendations